Peter Greene, always a font of common sense, explains
how we replaced “the soft bigotry of low expectations”
with the “hard tyranny of ridiculous expectations.” He writes: “We
have, for instance, substituted the expectation that every third
grader will read at grade level no matter what. In some states (I’m
looking at you, NY) we raised the standard for proficiency
arbitrarily. And we have just generally pushed the idea that all
students should be at grade level (as determined by anything from
data averages to a politician’s whim) all the time. “That seems
like a swell expectation. It’s not. It’s stupid. Let’s just apply
that reasoning some more. Let’s compute the average height for an
eight-year-old and declare that all third graders must be that
height. Let’s require all children to be walking by their tenth
month and potty trained by month thirteen. Let’s require all
seventeen-year-old males to be able to grow facial hair and all
fifteen-year-old females to fill a B cup. And let’s tell all young
men and women that they must be engaged by age twenty-two. “Let’s
take every single human developmental milestone and set a point by
which every human being must have achieved it. Because that is
totally how human beings develop and learn and grow– on exactly
the same path, at exactly the same speed, at exactly the same
time.” The bottom line: “The “promise of the common core” turns out
to be nothing more than threatening students “You’re going to pass
this high stakes test or we’re going to label you a failure, punish
your teachers, and keep you from graduating.” That’s not the soft
bigotry of low expectations, but the rather harsh bigotry of “Those
damn lazy kids just aren’t motivated enough. Threaten them.” They
don’t need help, support, resources, economic relief, or anything
else– just threats. “The cost of this bad threat is more than the
students should have to bear and certainly of no benefit to us as a
society. And the test results recall one more lesson from Basic
Teacher 101. If you have given a test to your class and a huge
percentage of the students have failed it, it’s a bad test.” What
Greene doesn’t understand is that there is a reason for these
wildly unrealistic expectations: They are supposed to make public
schools look bad so they can be closed and handed over to the
private sector.
Spot on! I’ve seen the Beta version of the PARCC tests for third graders. As a former field-test manager for a criterion-referenced reading program, I can tell you these items are written at a third-grader’s frustration level. Conceptually, they are wildly inappropriate. To make matters worse, they must be taken on a computer and the children are expected to type their responses. What third grader has touch typing skills? In short, if you wanted to place the maximum number of barriers in front of these third graders, these are the instruments you’d want to select. JUNK!!!
No typing tests until children are taught to type. This is just common sense. Doing otherwise shows the decision making of unbalanced thinking.
Best quote so far….”we replaced ‘the soft bigotry of low expectations’
with the ‘hard tyranny of ridiculous expectations’.”
Should be one of the nominations for quip of the year!
absolutely!
Made my morning.
Two enthusiastic thumbs up!
Tracy: “the soft bigotry of low expectations” always struck me as very peculiar. It is inextricably tied to high-stakes standardized testing. Once I understood how that particular hazing ritual is designed, produced, pre-tested, administered and scored, I couldn’t help thinking every time I heard or saw this catchy phrase:
“The hard bigotry of mandated failure.” [For just one recent example, think of NYS]
😎
B-cup? Talk about the “soft bigotry of low expectations”!!
Duane Swacker, your mother would wash your mouth out with soap. Keep it to the locker room. 🙂
That’s what I was thinking.
Or the nuns. Right Duane?
I figured ignoring Duane’s comment was the thing to do, but glad 2old said something.
Women learn to ignore comments like that. Otherwise we would never get anything done.
Been done! And it didn’t have the desired effect! I prefer the taste of. . . :
Joanna,
In eighth grade we were playing at recess after lunch, yes back in 67 even 8th graders still had recess, even in a Catholic school, when my glasses got knocked off my face (we had a tendency to “play” a little rough) and someone stepped on them cracking a lense and breaking the frame. I said something to the effect of GDFS (don’t want to cause any hearing loss for our readers here by burning their ears) and some goody two shoes girl went and told the principal. She called me off the playground and asked what I said and I told her GDFS because that was the third pair of glasses I had broken in a month or so and that my mom was going to kill me when I got home.
The nun listened, said okay and made me sit on the steps for the rest of the recess but no further punishment, not even writing “I will not curse ever again” 500 times on the blackboard after school which was the going punishment at the time. Shocked the hell out of me. And no soap either, although I did see a nun administer the “soap treatment” to a student in 1st or 2nd grade. I think that one put an end to that at school as it seemed to most to be a bit egregious (not that we were using that particular word back in 1st or 2nd grade).
This imposed system of “accountability –– what Peter Green calls the ‘hard tyranny of ridiculous expectations’ – is the core of corporate-style “reform.”
It’s also based on a myth that public education is “in crisis.” It’s based on the nonsense that if only teachers in public schools would do their jobs, then American “economic competitiveness” would be restored, and as Eric Hanushek writes, we would realize “trillions of dollars more in the gross domestic production.” None of this is true. But, as Lawrence Cremin pointed out decades ago, “It is a device that has been used repeatedly in the history of American education.”
It seems, increasingly, we live in a Bizarro world. Corporations and hedge-funder push policies that cause a near-fatal economic breakdown, they blame the schools, and they lobby for more of the same toxic policies. Supreme Court conservatives create a ludicrous constitutional argument they call “original intent,” use it to suppress liberties and rights based on democratic values and principles, and then turn their backs completely on strict constructionism whenever they see the opportunity to favor oligarchs over ‘the People’ (think Citizens United, or Heller, or the soon-to-be-decided Hobby Lobby case). Educational “leaders” say they believe in public education, but they (often) embrace practices and policies that undermine it.
The current path of change will not be – cannot be– altered unless people’s perceptions are, as Socrates says in the Allegory of the Cave, enlightened for the “intelligent conduct…of public business”.
And that’s exactly what the purpose of public education is supposed to be in a democratic society.
Soft or Hard, it is the same bigotry, isn’t it? Guess the technocrats just got smoother and invented a curriculum of assessments, benchmarks, data points, drills/kills, tests and life-long remediations that are more sanitized than outright lynching.
It’s just straight up tyranny. Authoritarianism at its worst. For a model of where this kind of policy ends up, take a look at Zamyatin’s old novel, We.
The Broad Foundation @BroadFoundation 12h
“Instead of passively using a tablet, they’ve made a computer do something.” Why students are coding around the world http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/world/europe/adding-coding-to-the-curriculum.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=1 …
Why are all ed reformers lock-step pushing coding this past coupla months? Why is it suddenly essential kids learn to code? It’s a nice skill, but why does everyone have to have it, and if it’s “essential” won’t it spread organically rather than being promoted by lobbying groups and the federal government?
Is there some “patient zero” type person for these ed reform fads? An individual where the fad virus begins and then spreads? If we could locate THAT PERSON we could limit the spread of the fad before it’s put into state or federal law! 🙂
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
Peter has a great way with a phrase!
Great line. Timely too.
Today, my local newspaper (Cincinnati Enquirer) has this front-page headline:
“Make or break time for third-graders ”
Secondary text:
“Schools looking at higher costs, confusion if reading tests hold kids back.”
Lead -n sentence:
“School districts around Ohio are bracing for the first real impact of Gov. John Kasich’s Third-Grade Reading Guarantee.”
The picture shows a girl sitting at a desk reading a book with fairly large print. The “over the shoulder” photo shows that she has dark brown skin. The out-of-focus background shows another child sitting at a desk.
Here is the visible text in the photo of the book.
“Hi,kid,” said Chet.
“What’s in the sack?”
“Lunch,” I said.” I had Mom fix us a feast!”
“Just in time,” said Chet. “I can not think when I last ate. I feel like a black hole.”
“Well, you are in luck,” I said.
Overall, the reporter, Cliff Radel, does an excellent job of showing the havoc that the Gov’s “guarantee” is creating, not least being the schedule for reporting results from the a student’s last try at passing the test. Results are available after assignments are made to fourth grade, which are then reversed for students who don’t pass. An those students will, in addition to regular reading for grade three, have 90 minutes more of reading in their second year of trying for the Governor’s Third-Grade Reading Guarantee.
You can bet that they won’t get to learn about sacks, feasts, and black holes, but they may remember when they last ate.
How about looking at yet another angle on bigotry.. “the bigotry of beyond ridiculous…just impossible” expectations. When curriculum forbids a pre k age child to have proper hands on play but TO UNDERSTAND AND REASON about concepts they have not experienced… is this not “BRAIN DEVELOPMENT BIGOTRY”????? And then to add insult to injury… children who are asked to do things they are JUST NOT ABLE TO DO BECAUSE OF BRAIN DEVELOPMENT of course they will act out. So the very curriculum … enhances behavioral problems. And then we get a NY Times opinion piece today addressing the punishment of young children as a Civil Rights Issue. Yes, young children expelled from school or suspended is inappropriate BUT what is THE ROOT CAUSE???? Poverty issues? Inappropriate top down policy??.. I mean how long can a young pre k child be expected to sit on a rug being forced to sit still and “READ” …….. just thinking here. This opinion piece certainly DOES NOT PAINT THE WHOLE PICTURE. Ask who is setting inappropriate top down policy for these young children. Then ask if the setting of inappropriate top down policy for these children violates these children’s Civil Rights. Then point the spotlight on YES “THE ED REFORMERS”!!! The WHY children act out is crucial… let us not ignore poverty.. let us not ignore those who are profitting off of our nation’s most vulnerable and neediest.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/27/opinion/giving-up-on-4-year-olds.html?hp&rref=opinion&_r=0
apologies.. in refering to “opinion” piece, I am addressing the link in today’s opinion piece in the NY Times. Peter Greene’s piece is SPOT ON!