Jeff Bryant here
describes the rise of an anti-democratic worldview that
threatens not only public education but democracy itself.
Under the fraudulent guise of “education reform,” extremists seek to
destroy public education and turn it over to private entrepreneurs.
They trust the marketplace, not the public. They are true believers
in the doctrines of free-market economist Milton Friedman, not
those of Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Horace Mann.
He quotes an Ohio legislator who says that public schools–which are a
cornerstone of our democracy–are “socialist.” If so, then we have
been a “socialist” nation for over 150 years. At least 90% of our
population was educated in those “socialist” schools and created
the greatest, most powerful nation in the world.
Then he quotes the founder of Netflix, Reed Hastings, who longs to see an end to
locally elected school boards, to be replaced by privately managed
charters. Democracy, Hastings seems to think, is too inefficient,
too messy. Are there enough billionaires like Hastings to run the
nation’s schools? Why do these people have such contempt for
democracy? Why do they like to replace democratic control with
mayoral control, governor control, anything but elected school
boards? Several districts in New Jersey have been under state
control for 20 years, with no results. Mayoral control has done
nothing for Cleveland or Chicago other than to increase
undemocratic decision making.
Bryant concludes: “The idea of democratic governance of schools as a principal means for ensuring
the quality of schools has never worked perfectly for sure. “It’s
true that too few people bother to vote in school board elections.
The electoral system is often prone to manipulation from powerful
individuals and self-interested groups. Elected boards are often
overly contentious to the point of dysfunction. And the country’s
history is replete with examples of local boards that perpetuated
widespread mistreatment of minorities to the point where outside
intervention was necessary. “But where else has democratic
governance achieved perfection? There are democratic solutions to
these problems: Do more to increase voter education and turnout,
limit the influence of money and factional interests, and ensure
checks and balances from outside authorities that are also
democratically elected. “If we want to give ordinary people more of
a voice in determining the education destinies of their children
and their communities, the solution is more democracy, not
less.”

Democracy was never intended to empower the people. It’s history dates back to the Greeks and it’s founding principles were to create elite and quite controlled social and political arrangements.
The understanding of the “State” as growing directly out of the “Police” and the army, and intended for no other purpose than to enforce property dates back much, much farther. The original organization of Athens is based on military districts which not only
yield a fixed quota of troops but also revenues to fund mounted archers who are slaves – the first police force. The rule of the demos, i.e. “democracy”, grows directly from this. The innovation here, is not the “fairness” of the Athenian democracy. In fact it is a
huge step backward from the Greek Tribes which were based on consensus and one vote for each adult. In place of that, the “Democracy” recognizes only one out of every 32 people as citizens. It’s key is not its incorporation of the people (except for those formally so defined), but in its organization of the state, and through it, the guarantee of personal property, most importantly in slaves.
This is yet another example of a thing we see through a thick fog,whereas those who came before us had a much clearer view.
Twenty five hundred years after inception of democracy, we still do not understand that we were ruled by Pentacosiomedimni, Solon’s aristocracy who could generate 500 bushels of goods annualy. Nothing has changed in the meantime, even the measure of wealth remains the same: bushels and barrels.
LikeLike
I think the answer is more republic; get rid of the department of education.
LikeLike
I am really going to have to cancel my Netflix account, aren’t I? Anyone have a competitor to recommend?
LikeLike
Thanks Diane!
LikeLike
I have lived 46 of my 56 years in places in America without elected school baords. (Today I live in New York City which doesn’t really have a school board at all.) Does the research show that elected school boards result in improved student achievement
LikeLike
I don’t know the research, but personally I like to be able to vote on who is in charge. We can see from the charter fiasco that accountability goes out the window when we trust businesses and politicians to make decisions for us.
LikeLike
The charter boards are nothing more than a rubber stamp for the CEO.
LikeLike
Well, whatever the student comparative achievement, if you or your child has an issue that needs to be remedied, you at least know where to go and who is responsible.
Try that in NYC today.
LikeLike
Today complete education system was spoiled.everything turned into business.You really well said Diane.Thanks for sharing this article.
LikeLike
Few, if any, “free-market” economists advocate using a free market to provide all products/services; they recognize that there are circumstances in which monopoly — particularly a govt-controlled monopoly — is so much more efficient than a free market that society is better off using the monopoly. Obvious examples are the military, police, fire departments, roads, water, and electricity. It would be theoretically possible for private firms to provide these services free of govt regulation with competing private firms selling their service/product to each consumer individually at whatever price the “market” determined. Society, of course, rarely chooses the free market approach to providing these services/products — in each case, society (including the free-market economists) recognize that, with regard to these products/services, the deficiencies in the free-market theoretical model would result in the provision of a product/service that was significantly inferior to the product/service that would be provided by the govt-run or govt-regulated monopoly.
This analysis applies to K-12 education. Many/most consumers (parents/children) can not/would not make rational/informed decisions regarding the relative quality of the education offered by competing providers — not enough information is available (re the particular product required by the particular consumer or re the product offered by a particular seller) and many/most consumers are not sufficiently expert to intelligently evaluate the information that is provided. Some consumers require a product that is much more expensive than that required by other consumers. Failing to provide consumers with an adequate product results in potentially huge external costs that are not born by the provider of the inadequate product (and that the consumer may not recognize as inadequate). The quality of a product provided by a particular seller is significantly impacted by the number/quality of the consumers who purchase the product. Having competing sellers providing a service that requires the frequent physical presence of the consumer at the seller’s facility necessarily imposes significant transportation inefficiencies if sellers are located far from consumers. I’m sure a real economist could identify many other deficiencies in the free-market model as applied to K-12 education; these are sufficient to refute the free-market argument.
LikeLike
“I’m sure a real economist could identify many other deficiencies in the free-market model as applied to K-12 education. . . ”
Have at it TE, have at it!
LikeLike
Seems uncle Miltie is on his way out in the business world. http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/07/05/the-overunder-on-when-the-worlds-dumbest-idea-will-die/
LikeLike
It is the “hidden agenda” of the Common Core that is most threatening to our democracy and leading to totalitarian government. That is the agenda this “corporate takeover” via Common Core from government enmeshed with corporate corruption.
Forcing young children to function in the Common Core Environment (CCE) should be considered “psychological rape”. It is an authoritarian punitive environment that does not allow young children freedom to develop their own identity or strong sense of self. It is an environment of chronic traumatic stress that is considered “invalidating” by mental health professionals and education specialists. In preWWII Germany it was called Schwarze Pädagogik,
The psychologist Alice Miller used the concept to describe child-raising approaches that, she believes, damage a child’s emotional development. Miller claims that this alleged emotional damage promotes adult behavior harmful to individuals.
This invalidating CCE for young children is a gradual process of psychological erosion that is robbing children of their true identify and natural potential. The CCE of chronic traumatic stress for children is high risk for causing personality disorders that will manifest in young adulthood: Narcissistic, Borderline, AntiSocial & Histronic (Ref: University of Washington Dr Marsha Linehan).
Common Core Environment needs to be declared a violation of children’s human rights.
A complaint to UNICEF needs to be a collaborative effort from the organized groups of parents and professional educators in the US who have first hand knowledge of this psychological damage to children, as well as mental health experts to support their charges. I nominate NPE, BATS, and National Opt Out as the three target groups to get this UN complaint organized.
LikeLike
My opinion is that the hidden agenda of Common Core is the greatest concern.
Implementing Common Core has allowed the corruption of government and corporate leaders full access to indoctrinate children as well as their parents, and therefore, our American society in general. Forcing young children to function in the Common Core Environment (CCE) should be considered “psychological rape”. It is an authoritarian punitive environment that does not allow children freedom to develop their own identity or individual sense of self. It is an environment of chronic traumatic stress that is considered “invalidating” by mental health professionals and educational specialists. In preWWII Germany it was called Schwarze Pädagogik. It is an environment that breaks the free will of a child.
The psychologist Alice Miller used the concept of Schwarze Pädagogik in her famous book “Drama of the Gifted Child” to describe child-management approaches that damage a child’s emotional development. Miller claims that this alleged emotional damage promotes adult behavior harmful to individuals.
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-drama-of-the-gifted-child-alice-miller/1002358392?ean=9780465016907
The Common Core Environment is a violation of children’s human rights and should be treated as such. The superficial concerns of standards and inappropriateness of Common Core are just a smoke screen to create chaos in order to hide the real tyranny underneath.
Organizations against Common Core, such as the BATS, NPE, National Opt Out, and others should collaborate to file a charge of “Violation of Children’s Human Rights” against Obama, Duncan, and Gates and present it to the UN. This is Tyranny.
It will take international media coverage to expose our self absorbed and callous leaders who are in denial about the psychological damage of Common Core. Do you agree?
LikeLike
Do more to increase voter turn out and education? We don’t even teach civics in the vast majority of our public schools. Teach individual rights? Never! The public schools have patently failed in their responsibility to educate future generations on the rights and responsibilty of living in a representative republic. They throw around the word democracy loosely without explaining why we don’t actually live in one. Perhaps our educators think we do?
LikeLike
Do you live on this planet? The state I live in requires Civics for graduation.
LikeLike
I live in Massachusetts were a civics course means a certain number of hours volunteering. They certainly don’t teach the Constitution. That is why the majority of you think you live in a democracy. On second thought maybe I do live on another planet.
LikeLike
A question…
Where do private schools (in general) stand on common core? I’m not talking about faux private/privatized/charter/pilot programs. I have not been hearing about or from the established schools that have long been the public education alternative.
LikeLike
A form of society that does not invest in what it takes to keep that form of society alive — that form of society will surely die.
We are veering near the phase boundary that marks the last gasp of the Democratic Enlightenment. Across that gap lies the regime of Total Corporate Feudalism.
There may be time to veer off — I don’t know. There is at least one precedent for the Most Enlightened doing most of the steering, but more often than not it is the Most Miserable who are forced to rise up and take the wheel. That doesn’t always turn out so well. The great majority of academics I know are very fine people but I have to be honest — most of them have their heads too far up their careers to see what’s coming.
LikeLike
Another right-wing kook with the looney toons version of history. I’m sure the campaign dollars will roll in from all the billionaire kooks supporting these people.
LikeLike
How telling that when somebody as conservative as Winston Churchill spilled the beans, the charterites/privatizers invoking free market fundamentalism suddenly develop a case of historical amnesia:
“It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others than have been tried.” [Winston Churchill]
$tudent $ucce$$ über alles—not just memory, but logic and facts as well.
😎
LikeLike
I think the roads around my house should be privately owned, and the police force should be a private paramilitary group, and lots of other things, too. Why? Because otherwise I would be a socialist! And of course, that would be bad!
LikeLike
When Diane said we are winning, none of us realized that there is another reason why this is true, coming straight from the heart of the business world. http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/06/26/the-origin-of-the-worlds-dumbest-idea-milton-friedman/ AND http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/07/05/the-overunder-on-when-the-worlds-dumbest-idea-will-die/
LikeLike