Civil rights lawyer Wendy Lecker writes that Arne Duncan has sold the American public a bill of goods, a false narrative. He and David Colemn think that national standards will fix all the problems of American education. She says they are wrong. Their bad ideas are the problem. They are wrong.
She writes:
“Before the Common Core, according to Duncan, high school success was a “lie” — it certainly did not mean that students were “college ready.”
“What a compelling, but false, narrative. A new peer-reviewed longitudinal nationwide study confirmed that the most reliable predictor of cumulative college GPA and college graduation is a student’s high school GPA.
“The study, co-authored by former Bates College Dean of Admissions William Hiss, examined more than 123,000 student records at public and private universities across the country, universities serving predominately minority students and art schools. It compared those who submitted SAT or ACT scores for admission to those who did not.
“The authors found students with strong high school records succeeded in college, despite lower standardized test scores. Strong testers with lower GPAs had lower college performance. Non-submitters tended to be women, first-generation college students, PELL grant recipients, students of color and students with learning disabilities. The authors found a broad geographic appeal to non-submissions.
“All of the students in this study attended school prior to the adoption of the Common Core State Standards. Many began school well before the No Child Left Behind Act. They graduated from a variety of schools across the country, learned different curricula in states with different standards. Their GPAs did not depend on standardized tests. Yet consistently, their high school GPAs were reliable predictors of college success. If these students succeeded in American high schools, no matter what the curricula, standards or assessments, they succeeded in American colleges, public or private, large or small.
“This fact undermines the claims that American students need national standards, standardized curricula and nationally standardized tests in order to be “college and career ready.” The high school teachers of students in this study accurately assessed their achievement, and taught them what they needed to know to do well in college — without common standards, scripted lessons or a nationalized test. In fact, the data show that the two national standardized tests, the SAT and ACT, were poor predictors of college success.”
Turns out that teachers’ grades are better predictors of college success than the SAT, the ACT, or other standardized tests.

Don’t confuse me with the facts. My mind has already been made up.
LikeLike
Success in life and in school is based on discipline, setting goals and following through with those goals to get the work and studying done. No matter how well a student scores on a bubble test, they will fail miserably and contribute to the high college drop out rate if they do not develop good study habits.
Most public school teachers base their grades on the work students do—-not endless bubble tests. Therefore, the overall GPA indicates a student who has good study habits and gets the work done. That’s how students learn. They study and do the work. They don’t just fill a seat and have a good time talking to their fellow students filling other seats.
Good students pay attention, ask questions, do the work, finish it and turn it in on time.
That’s where most overall GPA’s come from.
LikeLike
In addition, grade grubbing requires perseverance and shamelessness, two traits that appear to be very important to success in college and beyond.
LikeLike
And how many students practice shameless grade grubbing? I taught for thirty years and can’t remember one student begging me to give them a higher grade. Can you site any reputable studies that a significant number of students do this?
LikeLike
Reputable ones? No.
LikeLike
I’m sure this grubbing for grades happens just like kids cheat on tests and assignments but I don’t think it happens that much—the grubbing. From what I’ve read, a lot of cheating goes on in public school in just about every country.
LikeLike
I don’t recall anyone EVER promising, before the Obama administration, that squeaking by for a high school diploma meant a student was “college ready” in the first place. It was understood that they were separate issues.
LikeLike
This is an extremely important but overlooked point. One more example of the reform argument being unable to stand up to rational scrutiny. As long as 65% remains the standard for passing basic high school courses in algebra, biology, history, and english, there is no way the fabricted goal of college and career readines can be reconciled with reality. This is just a different twist on the NCLB requirement for 100% (all students) scoring proficient.
LikeLike
“As long as 65% remains the standard for passing basic high school courses. . . ”
And what does that 65% mean in each individual class? Should it be 50%, 90% or what? What is the number a percentage of?
LikeLike
NYS Teacher, I have tremendous respect for you, and what, at times, seems like”insider” knowledge. The “equivocating” language of the Regents is that “passing” will be a 75 on an “English”regents and 80 on an “algebra” regents for the class of 2022. Other exams may have other passing/aspirational scores. or should I say, Cuomoscores? The goalposts have been moved.
LikeLike
Nimbus
As you know only one of three things can happen here.
1) The BOR will continue to kick the 75/80 can down the road (2027? 2032?).
2) The “Mills Effect” will magically move them out of the corner from which they have painted themselves. The “Mills Effect” is the process by which any combination of dumbed down tests and/or manipulated cut scores will allow a majority of NY students to reach the 75/80 Cuomoscore minimum. The “Mills Effect” is best exemplified by the integrated algebra raw score conversion of 30/85 into 65% passing grade.
3) CCSS and the punitive reform movement suffer the parent beat down it so richly deserves.
Which would you bet on Nimbus?
LikeLike
Duane
In NY the integrated algebra Regents exam is one of five Regents tests required for HS graduation. Students achieve a passing score of 65% by scoring 30 points out of a possible 85 point maximum. (Kind of ironic considering this is actually a math test). This is but one example of the “Mills Effect” named after former NYSED commissioner Richard Mills who thought that the soft bigotry of low expectations should become the tough tyranny of impossibly high expectations when he required ALL students in NYS to pass five Regents exams for graduation. The “Mills Effect” has worked its magic in living environment (fka: biology) scores, ELA scores, US History scores, but is still struggling with our two year global history exam (48% passing rate statewide). This is probably because the “Mills Effect” was never intended to work on the ridiculous of testing June sophomores on TWO YEARS of world history content. The BOR is still figuring out how to unpaint itself out of this corner without Houdini-like creating cut scores.
LikeLike
Since the BOR just kicked the can down the road, I’m guessing we will begin to see the manipulation of cut scores with the new “Regents” exams. We may even see rising scores on grades 3-8 tests this year, an election year after all; politicians must show the standards are worthy and are working. After this election year, we will see the implementation of a more chilling data collection system than inBloom and the first round of teacher firings based on test scores.
LikeLike
Heard Coleman make his “pitch” many times. Lots of theater and little substance. Let him ply his schtick with real audiences–high school kids–for à year and let’s measure his performance against gains in classroom.
LikeLike
So how do we effectively fight this at the local and State levels to effect change. I am not an educator (I have a MBA and work in marketing). I am, however, the Mother of a first-grader who is very bright (I am not saying she’s a genius, but she is very intelligent). She always loved school and learning — has been reading since age 4. Now she cries at least once a week over her math homework and tells me she is stupid and can’t get anything right.
When she is doing her work she often puts her pencil down and scratches the top of one hand with the other so deeply that even though we cut her nails every night, she still makes marks.
Is this the kind of stress a six year old should have to deal with?
I have consistently read that the k-2 standards are developmentally inappropriate, but I’m looking for concrete resources that demonstrate this.
Anecdotally, I can use my daughter but then it just sounds like I’m upset because, in the words of Arne Duncan “My child isn’t as brilliant as I thought she was and my school isn’t as great as I thought it was.”
Her teacher told us “I’m not really teaching much differently under CC than I was before,” but her face and ears turned bright red when she said it and she could not look us in the eyes.
This is how I became aware of the Common Core. We live in one of the best school districts in Pa., and nobody is aware of what is happening. We have teamed up with TWO other families and have begun talking to the school board. They are receptive to listening but there is a long, long, long way to go.
I keep referring parents who say they don’t know anything about CC to look at news and reports coming out of NY, because they are a year ahead of us in implementation. Very few follow through. Even those who I know are active and involved parents don’t seem to believe it will “happen to them.” But we know it will.
Dr. Ravitch, I found this site because I read a speech you gave about the standards that I thought laid out the case perfectly. So perfectly, I shared the text with our school board.
If you can direct me to any resources or offer any perspective I would truly appreciate it.
I am searching for all the ammunition I can arm myself with to try and rally people to pay attention and to move our school board to act.
The hope is that if one board acts others will find the courage to do so. Then based on multiple actions at the district level, the goal is to kick the discussion back up to the State level. When I write it out like this it sounds nearly impossible (but I try not to think about that).
It is especially difficult when the CEO of EXXON Mobile sends open letters to our Governor with the (not so veiled threat) to move operations out of Pa if the CC is not adopted.
See link here: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/12/13/Exxon-Mobil-CEO-Strongly-Encourages-Pennsylvania-Governor-to-Implement-Common-Core
We welcome input and ideas and invite you to please reach out to us any time at nocrcore@gmail.com
Thank you.
LikeLike
Mir,
Google “Defending the Early Years”
LikeLike
Thank you.
LikeLike
http://lakewoodobserver.com/read/2014/01/08/common-core-part-1
This might help some parents understand the forces behind the Common Core.
LikeLike
@Mir Great to hear that you are getting involved. Talk to any parent and every parent you can about this. As a teacher, sadly, I see many teachers who do not like what is happening but are not educating themselves about what is going on that is supporting this negative change. As a teacher, I pass on as much information and links to information to teachers I work with. The younger teachers really need to understand the big picture. Parents are SUCH AN IMPORTANT part of the fight to restore sanity to public education again. As a teacher I can say that parents like you are ever-so-important to fighting the adverse effects of NCLB along withe the insidious “reform movement”. Please encourage parents you know to read up and not accept “the kool aid”.
LikeLike
Send Wendy on a national speaking tour aimed at parents with kids in public schools and at community media editors and writers. Mass media are in the pockets of the billionaires and will only tell corporate-friendly renditions of schooling.
LikeLike
I am in marketing and PR. If anyone knows her, I can secure interviews and manage the process and the press. My long reply, above, highlights my attempt at initiating a local fight against CC, but if I can use my talents to support something bigger…. please don’t hesitate to contact me. Miriam nocrcore@gmail.com
LikeLike
You may want to take a look at this article.
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/parents-join-forces-to-opt-kids-out-of-standardized-tests/article_88aff918-a643-11e3-aa64-0017a43b2370.html
LikeLike
Here’s another blog to stay informed:
http://keystonestateeducationcoalition.blogspot.com/
LikeLike
Always: Can we also opt our kids out of data collection? In addition to the formal testing they are doing a lot of “assessments” to benchmark success and “failure” (FOR BABIES)… I am unclear if we can opt out of that part.
LikeLike
Linda, can you make a connection between Mir and Wendy?
Wendy is among the top 5 tour-de-force parent advocates in the United States. . . . .
Wendy, if you are reading, would you have time and resources to go on tour?
LikeLike
Robert Rendo: Thank you for your reply! I appreciate the input. Wendy, I know you sent me an email, but it somehow got lost and I apologize. I would very much like to talk with you. If you message me again I will be sure to save your response so we can have direct contact! nocrcommoncore@gmail.com
Thank you .
LikeLike
Google pennsylvania against common core
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The study has perhaps been inadvertently buried, as it was first publicized by NPR, whose link was inoperable, as it the link at Lecker’s post.
Here’s a link to the organization that recommended the study be done, where you can download the study itself:
http://www.nacacnet.org/research/PublicationsResources/Marketplace/research/Pages/TestingCommissionReport.aspx
I’d like to see this on the front page of every major newspaper!
LikeLike
Wyatt, we know them and it’s a good start, but we really need people up in arms… the big differentiator is probably that NY has already had a year and a half of this (including a round of testing) and Pa is in year one…Still, hoping to try and avert as much pain as possible for these kids.
LikeLike
mir
Suggest reading Peter Greene’s blog ‘Curmudgucation’
He is an ELA teacher in PA and has a good handle on your developing situation in the Keystone state. Do not hesitate to contact him personally.
My suggestion is to pay close attention to the CCSS aligned tests your daughter will be taking. PA is part of the PARCC consortium; go to their website and read the gory details. PARCC testing will be computer based – yes, your future 8 year old will be typing her essay response on a keyboard in a timed test as well as her special ed counterpart in the small room down the hall.
I have administered MS math and ELA tests written by Pearson (who is writing the PARCC exams). Listen carefully to what I am about to say. This is ALL about the TESTS. They are the curriculum. They are the in-class modules and worksheets. They are the instruction. They are the reason the phrase ‘field trip’ is rarely uttered any more. The tests are the homework your daughter cries over. The tests are an educational horror show. The tests are the spear point of an invasion of the public schools.
The Pearson ELA and math assessments administered in NY last April were not valid TESTS, they were TRAPS designed and written to TRICK, CONFUSE and TIRE OUT young test takers into FAILURE. The bogus scores produced sent shock waves through suburban NY and beyond. Long Island parents and many others are up in arms. Parent outrage directed at state legislators has had some positive effects. The reform pendulum is losing some momentum but its still going to be a long up hill battle. Keep in mind we are up against both federal and state laws that must be changed in order for this nightmare to end.
This NOT an education discussion or debate.
It is a political battle against very powerful and ruthless forces.
If you shun the use of dirty tricks and propaganda you will be buried by the opposition. Show them no mercy for you will receive none in return. This is nothing less than an invasion by corporate profiteers of the US public school system. Stay fierce and fearless. Know that you are right and they are wrong. And trust that good usually triumphs over evil. And remember no standardized test should ever be used to intellectually define any one, much less an 8 year old. Good luck.
LikeLike
NY Teacher, thank you for pointing me in the direction of these resources. I am just a Mom and much of what many of you are discussing in this forum is new to me. I am learning a lot very quickly, however, and thank you all for sharing your perspectives.
Your last paragraph totally hits home. You are so right. this is not a political discussion, it is a battle for academic freedom in the United States cloaked as positive change. Right now, it feels very overwhelming as I read news of Bill Gates meeting with almost half of our Senators at one time, when people like me can’t get the time of day from those who are supposed to be representing me.
One Mother reported that she reached out to the head of the Pa education board to talk about getting CC on the legislative agenda and she was told “the legislature is not taking on comment about the Common Core at this time!” This makes my blood boil.
Pa, like many other States signed on to the CC BEFORE the standards were even complete! They sold our children for federal education dollars!!! Now, they want to make us out as “a few radicals” and “suburban soccer Moms” who just don’t want standards-based education. It’s insane!
So we are fighting big business, the Chambers of Commerce and Bill Gates and all his friends… I am interested in thoughts… who CAN we rally? How might we bring larger interests to our point of view? We need advertising. We need an organized Twitter campaign. We need to understand the attitudes of those in the higher education arena because if they thought students were ill-prepared before, what will they think in about five years when all of their applicants will come from the CC pool.
If we want to fight we have to take the battle to them. They ARE powerful and it IS all uphill, but they underestimate the will of parents and teachers, all of whom are dedicated to securing the futures of the very children they seek to turn into robots!!!
Thoughts, ideas, input…
LikeLike
Just appalling, the revolving door and conflicts and narrow little circle of people who sit on one anothers boards in this ed reform business:
“Ted Mitchell, nominated to oversee higher education at the Education Department, filed his financial disclosure statement — and his connections to charter schools and education technology run deep. The CEO of the NewSchools Venture Fund, Mitchell sits on at least a dozen boards of non-profit organizations and for-profit companies, including two ed-tech firms, a seed fund for blended learning schools, a charter network and Khan Academy. The 44-page financial disclosure form also lists Mitchell’s numerous — but generally small — investments in technology and education companies, including the publishing house McGraw-Hill, Apple, Google, Microsoft and the Apollo Group, the for-profit company that owns the University of Phoenix.
— Mitchell is also an adviser to Salmon River Capital, a venture capital firm that has invested heavily in online, for-profit Capella University. If confirmed as under secretary, Mitchell would focus on higher education. One contentious issue the department is facing includes the regulation of for-profit colleges. Department spokeswoman Dorie Turner Nolt said Mitchell is in the process of resigning from all boards on which he sits. “Under our ethics policies, Ted won’t be able to participate in any matter pertaining to an organization where he sat on the board for at least a year,” Nolt said.”
This is why people don’t bother to vote, it really is.
Do I really have to pay this guy to privatize and monetize public education? Why doesn’t he just stay on the Salmon River Capital payroll? He’ll be working for them anyway.
http://www.politico.com/morningeducation/0314/morningeducation13256.html
LikeLike
“Mitchell’s NewSchools Venture Fund has enjoyed considerable success in its dealings with the federal government, corporate America and philanthropy. In its 2010 tax filings, NewSchools stated it has “successfully received support from over 28 foundations, 47 individuals or corporations, and the U.S. Department of Education.”
The tax return shows that the organization generated $23.1 million in revenue and distributed $17.6 million in grants to a range of organizations that included charter schools, The KIPP Foundation, The New Teacher Project, and Teach for America.”
Thousands of smart people in this country who genuinely value public education as a public good instead of a “portfolio” and instead we got another well-connected privatizer who spouts the same stale “market-based” line as all the others.
They should wear corporate sponsorship patches like NASCAR drivers. At least then we’d all know who we’re dealing with.
LikeLike
“college-ready” is just a trick, an excuse jargon to do whatever they want to do to rid of quality public education.
LikeLike
A friend sent me an encouraging article that just maybe the tides are starting to turn. If the obsession with high stakes testing comes to a screeching halt, then maybe so too will the tightly linked (by “ed reform” design) developmentally inappropriate common core. It would be nice for teachers’ to return to classrooms without the nonsensical and anti education “reforms” posing as learning that are being top-down enforced right now. Teachers can teach and students can learn if we return joy and passion to the classroom and focus truly on the students before us “human to human” not “test to human”! Now if we can focus on poverty… because IT DOES MATTER. Kids who are moving around constantly, who come to school feeling ill without medical treatment, who are not eating properly have a much harder time focusing in the classroom. Our poverty rate is unconscionable in an age of a waning middle class and an increasing uber wealth at the top reaches of our society. Here is an article that a friend sent me in regards to stopping all the testing:
http://thejournal.com/articles/2014/03/11/reforming-reform-bill-aims-to-curb-high-stakes-testing-mandates.aspx?m=2#3fyyuHrtHG1zIxrh.99
LikeLike