Archives for the month of: February, 2014

Governor Cuomo created a panel to review the flawed rollout of the Common Core. His panel is stacked with supporters of Common Core. The governor invited the public to offer suggestions. Here is one from Jeff Nichols, a parent of children in the New York City public schools and a professor at Queens College and the GraduateCenter of the City of New Yrk:

Professor Nichols writes:

The Common Core Implementation Panel has invited suggestions from the public. Here’s mine, submitted to them this morning.

* * *

My suggestion is very simple:

Withdraw from the Common Core.

No recommendation this panel can come up with will salvage the CCSS, for a very simple reason. Ever growing numbers of parents like me reject the entire concept of federally mandated standards. And when standards are tied to funding, that is a form of mandate.

I consider myself a liberal Democrat. I voted twice for Barack Obama. But I am as offended by the design and implementation of CCSS as the tea party Republicans who oppose all federal interventions in their lives.

Why? The CCSS are expensive, mediocre, redundant and were adopted without due democratic process. They are, in short, a boondoggle perpetrated on the public by politicians who are either ignorant of real educational needs or under the sway of private interests that stand to profit enormously from this initiative.

As a taxpayer, I want the state’s education dollars dedicated to measures that actually improve student learning. The Common Core standards are completely unproven and, judging from early results, ineptly designed — too demanding in early grades, not demanding enough in later ones. Moreover, they come twinned with a new wave of useless and phenomenally expensive standardized tests. My wife and I will opt our children out of all state tests at least until all of New York State has implemented universal pre-K and high quality day care for low-income working families, until every child has the opportunity to learn a musical instrument and has access to the kinds of libraries, gyms and other vital faculties that children who live in affluent communities take for granted.

Our position is not going to change because NYSED acknowledges some errors in its implementation of CCSS. We demand the return of control over curriculum and teaching methods to educators, parents and local communities. The state can feel free to issue recommendations for curriculum, but not the kinds of mandates that have been flowing from CCSS.

All my wife and I want is for our children’s teachers to have the same intellectual freedom to practice their profession according to their best judgment as that enjoyed teachers in the exclusive private schools attended by the children of Barack Obama, Arne Duncan and John King.

That was the reality in my own childhood, growing up attending locally controlled rural public schools in Indiana. In that not-so-distant time and place, high-stakes standardized tests didn’t exist prior to the SAT — and that was optional. Teachers assessed children; principals, fellow teachers and parents assessed teachers. It worked a heck of a lot better than the test-based, wasteful and counterproductive accountability systems of the NCLB era.

The Common Core, like all assaults on democracy, is the product of fear — in this case, that our children will fall behind in the global economy. But what those of us who are actually raising the next generation of Americans understand is that the way to address that fear is not to cede control of our children’s schools to David Coleman and Arne Duncan.

Americans of all political persuasions know that the only thing we should fear and fight against is the erosion of our democracy. A pluralistic, locally governed and free public school system is the bedrock of that democracy, and it will be restored — not by state and federal bureaucrats, but by families like mine.

After a series of exposes on Eclectablog about poor conditions of teaching and learning in Governor Rick Snyder’s so-called Education Achievement Authority for failing schools, the Michigan State Department of Education terminated an exclusivity agreement with EAA.

This leaves open the possibility that the state education department might try some evidence-based practices–like smaller classes, experienced teachers, wraparound services–to support the state’s low performing schools instead of clustering them in a district with large classes and inexperienced teachers.

Stephen Danley, a professor at Rutgers University, here describes the game that Camden’ state-appointed superintendent is paying on residents.

He touted the virtues of the Urban Hope Act for new school construction, not the School Development Authority, because the former is funded. But the only schools it offers are charter schools! Neat trick!

Danley writes:

“I don’t know where that leaves Camden residents (or what they should choose given such frustrating choices). I do know that this type of false choice disenfranchises them. There can be all the public meetings in the world, but if the decisions are stacked by legislation (district schools and no repairs, or charters in new or refurbished buildings), do they really have choice? One would think the architects of policies expounding on the benefits of school choice would have a little more insight into the nature of choosing.

“And that is what is sad about this current plan. It had the potential to focus on things that the community could rally around; universal pre-K, school repairs, school dinners, safe corridors. Instead, those (positive) steps are being used to sweeten a bitter pill; the announcement of school takeovers that comes next week and will turn Camden into Newark into New Orleans.

“Parents are being given a devil of a choice: a status quo in which they are punished by state legislation, or money that is linked to the erasing of their history and community.

“Those who manufactured a crisis should not get credit for fixing it.”

Robert Reich posted this on his Facebook page:

Robert Reich

“I’ve been a teacher for most of my life, and few professions are more intrinsically rewarding. Yet I’m troubled by the direction we’re heading in, especially K-12 education. It makes sense for all kids to be brought up to a minimum level of proficiency in English and math, and standardized tests can help insure they are. But we’ve gone way overboard.

“We’re turning our schools into test-taking factories. We’re teaching children how to take standardized tests rather than how to think. The irony is we’re doing this at the very time when the economy is becoming less standardized than ever. Computers and software are taking over all routine, standardized tasks. The challenges of the future require the ability to solve and identify new problems, think creatively outside standard boxes, and work collaboratively with others. An obsessive focus on standardized tests can make our children less prepared for this future rather than better prepared.”

What do you think?

He has more than 5000 likes on this post, it has been shared 2177 times, and more than a thousand comments — in just an hour!!!

A report from “In the Public Interest,” an organization that tracks privatization.
The outlook for the profiteers is not so bright. That is good news. So is the news from Alaska and Maine.

“National: As U.S. revenues of for-profit education companies slump, they look overseas for greener pastures. “Outside the U.S., it’s a wide-open area to run in without as much scrutiny,” says Michael Moe, chief executive officer of GSV Capital Corp. There is speculation that as part of a reshuffle of the Washington Post’s parent company, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway may acquire Kaplan. Kaplan International teachers will be rallying this Thursday at Kaplan’s New York office to demand a fair contract. “A year-and-a-half after voting overwhelmingly for Guild representation, Teachers at Kaplans International Colleges are still fighting for a contract that provides basic benefits for the 90% of the workforce that is part-time. Management refuses to budge. Kaplan ESL instructors, backed by their students, say enough is enough.”

I was also happy to learn from this site that school voucher legislation is stalled in Alaska because two Republican senators are worried about how vouchers will affect public schools. I testified by telephone to the Slaska legislative committee, and I am pleased to see that the committee is thinking through the consequences of this reckless proposal. Many realize it has nothing to do with education.

In Maine, a state legislative committee voted 11-2 to impose a moratorium on virtual charter schools, which is a priority of Governor Paul LePage, a disciple of Jeb Bush. There is interest in a virtual charter controlled by the state, not by external for-profit corporations. Legislators may have been thinking of the 2012 award-winning news story about the political and financial interests–the profit motive–behind the push for virtual charters in Maine.

About once or twice a month, In the Public Interest sends out an email newsletter highlighting major issues and the latest news on privatization and responsible contracting. We keep you informed on new resources and efforts around the country to protect democratic control of public services and assets. *We never ask for donations.*

http://www.facebook.com/InThePublicInterest

State Senator Ronald Rice promised hearings into the Christie plan called “One Newark,” which would turn over 1/3 of the city’s umbilical schools to charter operators. Ironic name for Balkanization, no?

“Let me assure you I will be calling for an investigation into the operation of the Newark district,” Rice said at the close of a two-hour hearing in Newark City Hall about the so-called “One Newark” plan that would close, transfer to charters, redesign or otherwise “repurpose” more than a third of the schools in the state’s largest city. He predicted state education officials and Cami Anderson, the state-appointed superintendent, would probably not show up to answer questions. “If they continue to refuse to respond, then we will have to begin to demand they give us answers. We will ask for subpoena power.”

“Many of the complaints have been heard before but the hearing was significant because it brought out organizations that have been relatively silent on the growing concern about the privatization of public schools, especially through the vast expansion of charter schools.

“The New Jersey Education Association (NJEA), which has said little about the growing privatization movement, sent a vice president, Marie Blistan, to the hearing. She told the legislators, “It is clear that what the Christie Administration and the Departmentof Education are attempting to impose on Newark is just the beginning of an assault on the very principles of public education across the entire state of New Jersey.”

“Joyce McCree, the president of the NJEA’s small affiliate in Newark, used ever stronger words, contending the Christie administration was “engaged in a systematic campaign to undermine, demonize and ultimately privatize schools.”

A sage comment by a reader:

“The chief purpose of the Common Core standards –– one cited by the Common Core initiative, and repeatedly echoed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and Business Roundtable, and Arne Duncan and the like –– is that the standards are necessary to enable American students and the American nation “to compete successfully in the global economy.”

That’s demonstrably false.

American economic competitiveness is not tied to test scores; it is inextricably linked to stupid decisions made by politicians and corporate America.

When the U.S. dropped from 2nd to 4th in the 2010-11 World Economic Forum’s competitiveness rankings, four factors were cited by the WEF: (1) weak corporate auditing and reporting standards, (2) suspect corporate ethics, (3) big deficits (brought on by Wall Street’s financial implosion) and (4) unsustainable levels of debt.

More recently major factors cited by the WEF are a (1) lack of trust in politicians and the political process, with a lack of transparency in policy-making; (2) “a lack of macroeconomic stability” caused by decades of fiscal deficits and debt accrued as a result of boneheaded economic policies; (3) gross income inequities; and (4) political dysfunction.

The fact that the most ardent avid supporters of the Common Core are also
those most responsible for our nation’s economic problems is not very comforting.

When Ronald Reagan and Congress cut funding for PBS, the public system had to go begging to the 1%.

As this article in the LA Times shows, David Sirota was right when he exposed the funding behind the PBS series on “pension reform.” The money came from a billionaire who is a vocal critic if public pensions.

PBS returned the $3.5 million.

But read the story to learn how PBS quashed a show about the Koch brothers.

Mercedes Schneider recently wrote an open letter to Bill Gates. She is angry that he will be the keynote speaker for the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Let’s face it: Bill Gates has never taught and most of what he knows about education is wrong.

Schneider calls on him to explain how teachers can hold him accountable for having the nerve to tell them how to teach.

She writes:

“Your money is philanthropic cocaine to the organizations accepting your dollars.

“Your millions appear to foster a quick addiction in which organizations bend their agendas to suit the stream of your continued millions– to the detriment of their constituents.

“It is time for you to be accountable, Bill. Toward this end, the best I have is to call you out on my free blog.

“In your 2014 NBPTS speech, break new ground by offering a plan for your own accountability regarding your education reform spending.

“Feel free to share your plan with Eli Broad and the Waltons.

“Perhaps you might form a philanthropic support group to help each other withdraw from the bored-billionaire addiction to purchasing democracy.”

Earlier, she participated in a debate in Louisiana about the Common Core standards. Two panelists favored Them. One joined her in opposition. She was the only experienced teacher in the debate. Actually, the only teacher.

Reading the claims, you do get the sense that advocates see CCSS as the very thing that will prepare all students for college and great careers and will lift up the state’s economy too. How they know this to be true is not clear.

Schneider mopped the floor against the advocates.

My favorite lines.

“As for business leader Barry Erwin, the other CCSS supporter on the February 4th panel, CCSS is the solution for filling those 21st-century jobs with qualified Louisiana graduates.

“It certainly sounds good– except that the Louisiana Workforce Commission (LWC) projects that in 2016, the top three available jobs in Louisiana will be cashier, retail sales, and waiter/waitress.

“The first job on the list requiring a bachelors degree for entry level is ranked eleven: elementary school teacher. What irony.”

Anthony Cody is steamed that Bill Gates was invited to be a keynote speaker for the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. He knows that Gates will praise them and make them feel good.

But, beware, he says.

No one has done more to damage the profession of teaching than Bill Gates. Cody cites word-for-word the insulting and vacuous comments Gates has made in print and in lectures that undermine teacher professionalism.

No one has done more to foist an obsession with standardized testing on the nation’s children than Bill Gates.

As Cody observes,

“I know that the level of saturation that Gates and his money has achieved make his influence almost like the air that we breath. For that reason, it is all the more important to have a sober assessment of this reality. Scientist Carl Sagan wrote some years ago,

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.

“Bill Gates is a charlatan as far as education is concerned. He has discarded the expertise of educators as if it were trash, because it did not align with his concept of how learning ought to be measured and improved. In its place, he has fostered a worship of almighty data. He will come to the National Board singing the praises of accomplished teachers, because he wants to bring leading educators to his side, even as he devalues their expertise and autonomy.”

Now, if he agrees to subject his own children to the same data-driven regime he is imposing on the nation’s children, we might take him seriously. But we won’t hold our breath for that to happen.