Nashville is in the cross hairs of the “reform” (AKA privatization) movement.
Here is a good overview of the situation.
With a respected superintendent nearing the end of his contract, with a mayoral election in the offing, with the school board majority up for grabs in the next election, Nashville is looking like a tasty prize for the privatizers.
And there are so many of them! Start with State Commissioner of Education Kevin Huffman, who spent two years in TFA but otherwise has no experience as a principal or a superintendent. His major passion seems to be turning public dollars over to charter schools and passing laws to reduce the security and status of teachers. Then there is Governor Haslam, a reactionary who seems to despise public education and has the support of a compliant legislature. And don’t forget Karl Dean, the mayor of Nashville, who is eager to see private interests take control of public education in his city.
Nashville has been ripped asunder by the aggressive demands of the charter school crowd. The district has only 23 charters but those charters have “sucked up almost all the air” out of all public discussion of education, as if they and they alone held the key to success.
Although the district has chartered some 23 privately run schools to operate using district money, the role these charter schools play has sucked up almost all the air at Metro’s Central Office on Bransford Avenue over the past year-and-a-half.
The topic of charter schools — which have the autonomy to operate without the strings normally attached to traditional schools, including issues like how teachers are hired and fired or what class schedules look like — has polarized the district.
The division has created camps of pro-charter advocates, who argue that many of their schools are outperforming the district and MNPS should be more welcoming to the innovation. That has galvanized an equally entrenched anti-charter camp, which warns of the private investors and interests behind such schools and the taxpayer dollars the district must siphon from traditional public schools to fund these new ones. There has been little discussion trying to find a meeting ground in the middle.
The conflicts between the two are seemingly endless, starting in earnest with the district’s school board refusing a charter school targeted to open on the more affluent west side of town; the state fining MNPS $3 million for said rejection; battles with Gov. Bill Haslam, state education commissioner Kevin Huffman and House Speaker Beth Harwell over approval and costs of charter schools; a fight over leaked data showing charter schools kick out students weeks before state test time; embarrassing spats on Twitter and Facebook between board members and charter school advocates; the school board threatening to sue the state for its charter school law; a noisy protest by charter school advocates on the district’s front lawn; holding charter schools’ growth responsible for the district’s money problems; blaming under-capacity schools on the charter-school boom; and most recently, redirecting new charter schools to South Nashville or to convert select failing schools.
Four seats on the school board will be up for grabs in an election in seven months. The school board elections will attract some of the nation’s most notorious corporate reformers, including Stand for Children, Democrats for Education Reform, and Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst (Rhee is the ex-wife of State Commissioner Huffman). The charter school advocates will spend heavily to gain control of the school board, in hopes of expanding the charters and transferring public funds to their own operations.
Make no mistake. This is a well-funded raid on the public treasury, intended to take money away from the public system and hand it over to the friends of those providing the money for the election:
“Democrats for Education Reform is excited to support candidates who will increase the capacity of our public school system to better serve Nashville’s children, whether those candidates are running for school board or in the upcoming mayoral race,” says Alex Little, chair of the Nashville steering committee for the pro-charter-school group, which has been quietly combing the city for board candidates.
Charter school and reform groups are no strangers to investing in politics, dropping hundreds of thousands of dollars into local and state races here in recent years.
At the state level, education-reform lightning rod Michelle Rhee’s Students First organization poured more than $200,000 into legislative races and some local ones, without being shy about throwing massive checks to key candidates.
Last cycle, Metro’s school board races attracted an unprecedented $400,000 among five races and funders of all stripes. Gathering sums more suitable for a bid for state representative than the local school board, Ingram Industries’ Margaret Dolan amassed more than $115,000 for the MNPS board seat she lost to underdog Amy Frogge from Bellevue. In the same cycle, former Teach for America executive Elissa Kim raised some $85,000, largely from fellow TFA types, to beat out the school board’s then-chairwoman, Gracie Porter, in East Nashville.
The biggest players last cycle included the pro-charter crowd, with Mayor Karl Dean and the Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce bringing influence and some money, and locally organized Great Public Schools and StudentsFirst dishing out dollars. Democrats for Education Reform, working out of Nashville, plans on joining the effort this year. That group is led by Natasha Kamrani, wife of Tennessee Achievement School District head Chris Barbic, whose job duties include taking over or hiring charters to turn around the state’s weakest 5 percent of schools.

Charters have ““sucked up almost all the air” out of all public discussion of education in Nashville? Open minded folks might want to take a look at the local paper to see a variety of topics being discussed.
The Jan 10 Tennessean mentions the President Obama’s praise for some programs happening within the district’s comprehensive high schools:
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20140110/NEWS04/301100136/1970
LikeLike
Joe, did you bother to read the article? “Open minded people” would do that. “Public discussion” apparently means actual discussion, by the Nashville public, with their own Central Office. How does that relate to President Obama’s decision to praise specific programs he favors in their schools?
“As it attempts to improve public education, Metro has distinct challenges that are not shared by neighboring counties — which are largely surpassing MNPS, in some cases by leaps and bounds. More than 70 percent of students here are low-income. Some 12,000 are learning English as a second language, while almost 10,000 have a disability.”
“But the district’s educational challenges have been swamped by political ones. Although the district has chartered some 23 privately run schools to operate using district money, the role these charter schools play has sucked up almost all the air at Metro’s Central Office on Bransford Avenue over the past year-and-a-half.”
LikeLike
Sure did read it.
And the story I posted from yesterday’s Nashville paper shows how silly the assertion is.
The story notes that President Obama just praised a program happening in the city’s district high schools.
Clearly work has been done in the district to improve their own programs (please see the newspaper story). that’s good news and shows there’s lots going on besides the charter discussion.
LikeLike
Really, the big elephant in the room is a lack of science-based thinking by educators, politicians and parents. Honestly, I’m thinking most folks involved in public or private education dont understand genotype and phenotype. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genotype-phenotype_distinction And without that knowledge of basic evolutionary biology and http://criticalthinking.org we’ll flounder. Finally, educators must recognize and acknowledge that psychology, including ed. Psych is a huge fail…Freudian, gestault, co ditioning, etc. concepts aren’t science and should be quickly replaced by ethology done well. http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001109 Yes, that article addresses evo psych but the same is true for all of psych. – including ed. Psych!
We are way off-track…but I think we can find our way again if we take a look again at John Dewey and instead of using psych for guidance as he did, we employ ethology for it’s clarity and fairness and connection to all living things.
LikeLike
“Still, he says, anyone who ends up running in the elections will likely get pigeonholed as completely for charter schools or against them.
“It’s clear, for better or for worse, charters are going to be the defining issue in the next election,” he says.”
Great. The vast majority of kids who attend existing public schools get ignored, again.
This is de Blasio responding to Eric Cantor. Cantor neglected to mention public schools at all in his attack on de Blasio, which sadly is not at all remarkable among reformers.
“The Republican agenda in Washington doesn’t even scratch the surface of the inequities facing more than a million children in our public schools,” he said in an e-mailed statement. “It’s a dangerous philosophy that turns its back on public education — and it has failed many times before. What public school parents want — and I know because I’m one of them — are real investments that lift up all our kids. That will take big, bold, progressive ideas. And that’s exactly what the people of New York City just voted for.”
Turns its back on public education is exactly right, and it’s about time someone said it.
I have no earthly idea why the parent of a public school student would hire an ed reformer. You’re all but guaranteeing your kid’s school will be abandoned while we endlessly discuss charter schools and vouchers. It’s as if our schools and kids don’t exist. To read the statements from Democrats for Education Reform, they don’t.
LikeLike
This school board election has become high stakes as the charter movement selects and finances their candidates against those of the parents and/or teachers union. It will be interesting to watch the outcome which will determine the path of education in Nashville.
I’m sure many other cities are in a similar situation. In Buffalo, the school board race will determine whether the superintendent stays or is fired. Since the power brokers in the region have already offered her a half million dollar buy out (which she refused), I am sure they will finance the campaign of like minded candidates. This race, to be determined in May, will rival high stakes November elections of the region.
Never a dull moment on the education front.
LikeLike
Go, Tennessee Mama Bears and good luck!
LikeLike
Check out http://education.uschamber.com/node/1737 website.
Is ALEC behind this? Why didn’t they start with Civics in acknowledgement of the role of Democracy in the American Public School System.
LikeLike
As one of Amy Frogge’s constituents, I’ve been very happy with her job performance in standing up for public education over privatized interests. I will continue to vote for candidates with similar values; I am confident that my family will as well.
LikeLike
As someone who works in our public schools in Nashville, let’s be very clear that the goal of our local charters advocates and their funders is to profit off of our students (or as they like to call them – SEATS) and our public dollars. There are charter schools in Nashville with good results, run by well-intentioned educators, but the real agenda of groups like Stand for Children and by Democrats for Education Reform is by driven hedge fund managers and other investors who are looking to make a profit. Just take a close look at who sits on their national boards. I know from firsthand experience that our local charter schools drive students and their parents BACK TO MNPS schools once they realize the student needs specialized services, or poses the slightest discipline challenge. They literally load students in the car, pick up their parents on the way, and leave them at their MNPS school of zone. I have seen one of them do it to a kindergartener in East Nashville after they spent a HALF DAY of school.
MNPS schools do not have that luxury. We take all students and teach them. That is called a PUBLIC education. Take a good look at the scores of charters who take over local MNPS schools and compare them to schools that build a school from scratch. It’s a whole different ball game when you take all students in a zone, and are not culling and putting out kids once its apparent that they need an IEP or won’t sit and track a teacher for 10 hours a day. MNPS is maligned for speaking out about the attrition rates of charters, but we see our students return in large numbers at the semester – back to our schools after they were “counseled out” by their charter school. Amy Frogge’s election should hopefully warn our local “do-gooder hedge fund managers” and Chamber of Commerce that parents actually LIKE their neighborhood schools and want someone at the board is there to help us create the best urban district in the country – not sell it to the highest bidder.
LikeLike