On January 15, there will be a crucial vote to allow the expansion of charter schools in Morgan Hill, California. As the post below points out, Morgan Hill is a small town of 40,000 with only 8 elementary schools. Rocketship wants to open 2 new charters in this small community, which will effectively destroy public education. Please read this post and send an email to the Santa Clara Office of Education. I will. I hope you will too.
Rocketship Education is the poster child of corporate reform charter schools. Founded in a poor Silicon Valley Latino community, they hope to expand to nearly 40,000 students nationwide in the next 5 years. That’s despite the fact that they have registered falling test scores each year for the past 5 years; this year only half of their students met English language standards. They came to my community with big promises of accountability and local control. But when they failed to meet their performance goals they broke their promise to relinquish future charters. Only two years after promising local school autonomy, they quietly slipped in a new governance provision, moving all the power to their distant national offices. They use a 41:1 student to teacher ratio, with inexperienced TFA teachers, but tell the public their student to teacher ratio is 27:1, lest it would hurt their recruitment machine. Their aggressive recruitment, with information inconsistent with the facts, is destroying what was once the cohesive fabric of our Latino communities. Rocketship does have some clever ideas, like requiring teachers to visit every student’s home, but a lack of community and district collaboration outweigh those benefits.
Rocketship has greased the wheels with hundreds of thousands in campaign contributions to our County Board of Education, who have approved a state record setting 38 charters in a row. Now Rocketship Education, and their cousins Navigator Schools, are asking for 2 additional charters in Morgan Hill, CA. Morgan Hill is a small town of 40,000, the first farmland south of the San Francisco Bay Area urban sprawl. They have only 8 elementary schools. If these charters moved forward they would crush Morgan Hill Unified, an innovative and successful school district. It’s a plan that makes no sense; Rocketship has falling test scores, while Morgan Hill has successful and thriving math, arts, and STEAM focus academies. Sadly, the district is considering closing those academies if the charters move forward. How ironic that these focus academies that provide thriving students with broad opportunities in the sciences and arts would be replaced with a drill & kill charter that offers little more than intense test prep on computers in rooms packed with students.
You can learn more at: http://www.stoprocketship.com/?p=1151
We’d like to reach out to your readers and ask for help by sending a quick email to the Santa Clara County Office of Education against this plan,http://www.stoprocketship.com/take-action-now/
You can follow us on Twitter at @norocketship

I could make a political suggestion that is really very effective in smaller communities, and it doesn’t matter if the area is conservative, liberal or in-between.
They should focus on how the national charter chain pulls money from the local community and sends it elsewhere; out of neighborhood, out of district, out of county, out of state.
“Buy and spend local” is something everyone understands, and nearly everyone supports, in my experience. I think they’d get the attention of even people who don’t have children in the public schools who will be harmed with that.
This: money going to “distant national offices” would absolutely resonate here, and I think all smaller communities probably have that in common.
LikeLike
The Rocketship education plan is interesting:
“The redesigned school model projected $230K more net income per school”
So that’s exciting, huh?
Wait, there’s more!
Expenses
– Reduce to 1 Assistant Principal at each school
– Continued evaluation of the instructional model—may lead
to economic benefit (if doesn’t detract from instructional
value
– Online curriculum support and evolution
– Staff training may lead to a need for fewer adults in each
classroom
– Sharing of Operations Managers across schools
• Revenues
– Higher number of students at each school (back to 630-650
as before)
Click to access ExhE-BusinessCommittee2013-April30Final.pdf
It is truly transformational to cut staff to improve revenue, I must say. “Fewer adukts in each room”. No one ever came up with that idea before. No wonder that CEO makes the big bucks. Was probably trained at the Broad Academy of Management 🙂
LikeLike
Amen. We live in a sic country.
LikeLike
“$35M of cash need to open 5 schools per year over the next five years is offset by $13M of expected fundraising to $22M ($250K per school from Walton, $1M total from Debs)”
Wow. 250k per school from the Walton family. Do people in these communities know the country’s most notorious low wage, bottom-feeder employer is bankrolling this edu-enterprise?
Who is “Debs”? I can’t imagine. Another tennis player?
LikeLike
I for one just e mailed them. Hope you do too.
LikeLike
Excellent review of the whole charter-CCSS-privatization-nationalization game here.
LikeLike
Really sad state of affairs. How stupid were all of us for voting for OBama the crushing ball on US education as we knew it. He is seriously worse than Bush!!! It is unfortunate how he has ruined things for the black community and I am not sure they are even aware of the extent of it all.
LikeLike
Every shyster in America is taking advantage of Obama’s promoting of this garbage to minority communities. Pretty pathetic.
LikeLike
“They use a 41:1 student to teacher ratio, with inexperienced TFA teachers, but tell the public their student to teacher ratio is 27:1”
If that is true, well, need I say more?
LikeLike
It doesn’t appear to be true. The Ed-Data Website indicates that Rocketship schools have a 27 to a 31 student per teacher ratio. They seem to have less non-teaching staff than district schools though. Could that be what’s meant by fewer adults in the classroom? Generally they should only be 1 teacher in a classroom. Their schools have low income and Hispanic subgroup API scores in the upper 800’s so they must be doing something better than the Morgan Hill schools.
LikeLike
Actually, it is true.
The California Department of Education officially lists Rocketship’s student to teacher ratio at 41:1. See: http://ow.ly/smYqT or http://ow.ly/smYsC
They list their class size as 30:1. They apparently include aids in that number, which is certainly not what the public expects for student to teacher ratio. Since they cram more than 100 students in one room, they can get away with calling their class size 30:1. But it’s not student to teacher ratio, since it includes an aid (called an Independent Learning Specialist, ILS)
LikeLike
Or perhaps the ratio is that high because they have dramatically fewer SPED students which in turn generally will raise test score averages (if one considers that a true gauge of school effectiveness). 27-31 ratio is way too high anyway.
What is the Ed-Data Website?
LikeLike
Morgan Hill isn’t really a “small town,” it is more like a wealthy suburb of Silicon Valley. Parents and voters there tend to be well-educated and politically active. If Morgan Hill can’t defeat Rocketship, perhaps no one can. This is an important test case and all public school supporters should throw their support behind the Morgan Hill activists.
LikeLike
Why are reformers interested in successful school districts? Michelle Rhee funded two of our board candidates last year in Burbank. One of them won. Perhaps real estate has something to do with it?
LikeLike
We live in a time of MISINFORMATION disguised as the truth. OY!
LikeLike
I keep asking the same question. if the school is so bad, why do people choose to send their children to it. I keep seeing this.
LikeLike
A lot of propaganda. People want to believe the magic bullet theory of education
LikeLike
I wouldn’t call Morgan Hill Unified a successful school district. It’s 3111 Hispanic students have an API subgroup score of 723. That’s not very good. The 2549 socioeconomically disadvantaged students do even worse with an API score of 707. I think it is very misleading to call this district successful and to jump on Rocketship for coming in to try to serve this neglected subgroup.
LikeLike