Archives for the year of: 2013

Here is a summary of a recent mayoral forum in Minneapolis, sponsored by MinnCAN.

MinnCAN is a spinoff of ConnCAN and 50CAN, organizations that promote school choice and look askance at public education. To be fair, they are quite happy to take public dollars, but to run their schools with rules that are very different from those that govern public schools, which are not allowed to pick their students or exclude those with low scores.

The candidates who came before the group in Minneapolis were singing the same song:

It goes like this: Our public schools are broken, our experienced teachers are no good, what we need is what the far-right think tanks have been advocating for fifty years:

Pressurizing teachers, “school choice,” standardized testing, “accountability”, charter schools, and vouchers.

School choice is the answer! No evidence needed.

Innovative? No, this is the status quo. This is the agenda of the Bush-Obama era.

With enough of this ideology, Minneapolis can destroy its public schools, replace them with privately managed charter schools and vouchers. And in short order, Minneapolis will look like Milwaukee, which has a charter sector, a voucher sector, and a withering public sector. Note that the public schools of Milwaukee has more students with disabilities than the other two sectors. And on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, Milwaukee is one of the nation’s lowest performing urban districts.

Is this what is called a Race to the Bottom?

Ken K. Kumashiro’s Bad Teacher! How Blaming Teachers Distorts the Bigger Picture should be on your reading list. He has written a thoughtful critique of the current fad in which it is fashionable to blame teachers for the ills of society and for low test scores and student misbehavior. The current fad eliminates any accountability for those who make the laws, write the regulations, decide the policies and context in which teachers work.

Here is a good review of his book.

Accountable Talk, a popular education blogger, here reviews Reign of Error.

He or she writes:

The book is a thorough excoriation of the reform movement. Starting with who the major players are and how they stand to benefit financially from their “reforms”, Ms. Ravitch unravels, one by one, all the myths spun by the corporate raiders looking to cash in on public education dollars. She lays bare the truth about all the favorite tropes of the reform movement, such as test scores, the achievement gap, PISA, high school and college graduation rates,
merit pay, and many others….

Perhaps even more important than her expose of the reformers themselves, Ravitch points the way forward. She devotes 100 pages to proposed solutions to what ails public schools, all of which make perfect sense. From pre-natal care to wraparound services, Ms. Ravitch offers common sense solutions that move us away from the blame game so beloved by reformers. She clearly sees teachers as part of the solution, rather than the problem.

I love the fact that his book is coming out at the same time that Bill de Blasio seems poised to become mayor of NYC as the “anti-Bloomberg”. It may just be that the pendulum, which has so long swung towards the reformers, may at last be swinging its way back to teachers, students, parents, and other real stakeholders in the education system.

Adell Cothorne is the brave principal in Washington, D.C., who reported to her headquarters that she saw cheating going on. She was featured on a PBS Frontline special about the uncertain legacy of Michelle Rhee. What happened after she reported cheating by a group of staff? Nothing. Nothing except she became persona non grata for blowing the whistle.

For a long time, her lawyer told her to remain silent.

Now she speaks, and EduShyster offered her this column.

Adell is, pardon the expression, a hero. She spoke out when she saw wrongdoing. She risked her job and career because she could not remain silent.

She belongs on the honor roll of this blog. All schools deserve teachers and principals as courageous and kind and dedicated as Adell Cothorne.

Louisiana Educator is a blog written by one of that state’s finest educators, now retired, Mike Deshotels. He reviews Reign of Error here.

It is hard to pick a single excerpt from his review because every paragraph is compelling. (I tried but was not very successful.)

Deshotels writes:

In this, her latest meticulously researched book, Ravitch describes the myths upon which the current corporate reform of our education system is based. This expert historian of education carefully discredits the assumptions upon which the current education reform movement is based, and explains how extremely harmful much of the reform movement can be to our education system.

The first chapter of Reign of Error is titled: Our Schools Are at Risk. The author explains how major power brokers including some of the richest persons on the planet are proposing radical changes to our system of public education based on a manufactured crisis in student achievement. These influential power brokers propose to magically cure the ills of our education system with various forms of privatization. Ravitch explains chapter by chapter how the cure is much worse than the alleged illness. Many of these ill conceived proposals have already been adopted by Louisiana’s legislature and our state has become a leader in the corporate reform movement.

Dr Ravitch exposes the charlatans of the education reform movement for what they really are; non educators who have figured out how to make a buck on education by scaring the American public into believing that our present public education system is sub-standard in comparison to that of other industrialized countries. The so called “reformers” would have the American public believe that professional educators are really just a bunch of slackers protected by powerful unions who care little about preparing our children to be high achievers in the world education competition.

Their solution is to destroy the teacher unions, do away with teacher job protections and fire teachers who are not able or willing to raise student test scores in the very limited curriculum which they have chosen to emphasize in our schools. At the same time, the corporate reformers propose to transform education in our country into a system of autonomous schools often run by private groups or entrepreneurs who compete for students and taxpayer funding. Public school parents are to be given the right to select any school they feel best meet their child’s needs. Somehow this competitive environment with achievement results measured by expensive and oppressive government imposed testing in a few preferred skills will transform our entire educational system into one of the best in the world. Ravitch shows that none of this transformation is based on scientific principles of education practice. It is all based upon mostly dis-proven tactics such as merit pay, virtual Internet instruction, vouchers, and a depressingly restricted curriculum.

The danger to our education system Ravitch points out, is the opportunity and incentive for corruption, cheating, and extreme profiteering by large corporations as well as numerous small time “rainmakers”. Entrepreneurs will use our schools to pocket our tax dollars while transforming our schools into dreary test-prep factories treating all children like identical raw materials instead of the wonderfully complex individuals they are. Meanwhile the teaching profession will be demoralized, and replaced by low paid “test teachers” who will no longer stimulate the creativity in our young people, a trait that has made our country a world leader in innovation.

Here in Louisiana we have already seen a major demoralization of our teaching profession exemplified by increased early retirements of some our most respected teachers. The diversion of public funds to vouchers, charters and course choice and the exemption of the privatizers’ employees from the Louisiana retirement system is already causing serious damage to our public education system.

The latter part of the book proposes real solutions to closing the student achievement gap and for truly improving and enhancing our educational system based upon sound principals of economic, social and educational practice.

If this book had been written specifically to address the challenges educators now face in Louisiana it could not have been a more perfect guide. I strongly recommend this book to all my readers, educators and parents who want to be accurately informed about the real threats to our education system. It is definitely not too late to change the course of this education “deform” movement, but we must begin now to properly arm ourselves with the facts and join this battle for our schools and the teaching profession.

 

Here is a very interesting story in the HECHINGER Report about what went wrong in Los Angeles, after the district decided to send $1 billion on iPads.

Poor planning, poor implementation, a rush to get them in the hands of students without thinking about how to make it work or what might go wrong.

Reformers often say that they love “great” teachers. They
think that if they drive out all the “bad” teachers, then “the best
and brightest” will flock to teach in the schools. They think they
are restructuring the profession to make it attractive to the top
third of those who graduate from the very best universities.
  This comment from a teacher:   I feel
both embarrassed and horrified to be a teacher these days. What
keeps me going is being with the students and knowing I am helping
them. However, as a member of this ‘profession’ I am completely
disheartened and turned off by the politics and the bobble-headed
morons who make decisions that impact all of us. It’s like being on
a plane without a pilot….or a train without a conductor….or a
carriage without a horse…or….well, you get the picture. It’s
bad.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan blasted critics of Race to the Top and his “reforms” as “armchair pundits.”

Anthony Cody writes about his remarks here and reproduces part of his remarks (not the part where he boasts of his many “accomplishments” as Secretary of Education). I expect he made no reference to the high levels of demoralization among teachers and principals documented by the annual MetLife survey. But, hey, disruption is part of the plan, right? Pushing out the veterans is not counted a bad thing in Arne’s play book. He likes the nimble kids who stay two years, then leave.

Does Duncan think that teachers and principals are armchair pundits?

Does he think that researchers who have demonstrated the futility of value-added assessments like Linda Darling-Hammond (candidate Obama’s education advisor in 2008) are armchair pundits?

Does he think that researchers like David Berliner, who has studied the effects of poverty on academic achievement for decades, is an armchair pundit?

I guess he means me. I have studied the history and politics of American education for more than forty years. It is true that I believe what Duncan calls “reform” is a disaster that is demoralizing teachers and principals, harming communities, and doing incalculable damage to American education. I explain why I believe this in my new book, “Reign of Error.” I document everything I write.

I would like Secretary Duncan to explain why he thinks that more testing and more standardization and more charter schools is better than placing his bets on the research-based recommendations in my book.

I would like him to explain why the Obama administration’s education policies are so closely aligned–nearly identical–to the failed NCLB policies.

Looking for common ground.

Columnist Steve Lopez says that the L.A. officials rushed into the iPad deal without thinking through the problems.

Students broke the security codes to use them for fun.

Many went missing.

Biggest uncertainty: is the content any good?

Who will be held accountable, he asks.

Emma Brown of The Washington Post reports on an outrageous scandal at the city’s oldest charter school:

“Former senior managers and the board chairwoman of the Options Public Charter School for at-risk youths diverted millions of taxpayer dollars that were meant to fund programs for students, according to a lawsuit District authorities filed Tuesday.

“The lawsuit filed in D.C. Superior Court claims that three former managers, the school’s board chairwoman — Channel 9 news personality J.C. Hayward — and a senior official at the D.C. Public Charter School Board concocted an elaborate contracting scam that led to improper payments of more than $3 million since 2012. It alleges that the group of school leaders engaged in a “pattern of self-dealing” that included large payments to for-profit companies that the managers founded while running the school.”

And more from the story:

“The city’s charter board launched an investigation of Options on Aug. 19, days after The Washington Post submitted a Freedom of Information Act request seeking contracts between the school and two for-profit companies founded and controlled by its senior managers: Exceptional Education Management Corp. (EEMC) and Exceptional Education Services (EES).

“Those contracts and other payments to the companies — including a $2.8 million contract for management services during the 2013-2014 school year — are at the heart of the District’s case against Options.

“The senior managers who allegedly co-founded the two companies are the former executive director, Donna Montgomery, who was paid an annual salary of $254,679, according to the school’s 2011 tax return; former clinical director David Cranford, who made $202,443; and former general counsel Paul S. Dalton, who was paid $146,372.”

The school enrolled 400 students in middle- or high school, most of whom have disabilities.

The apparent misuse of public funds was a pattern.

“Jeremy L. Williams, who was the chief financial officer of the D.C. Public Charter School Board until August, also allegedly aided the scheme. He “regularly forwarded confidential, internal PCSB e-mails” to the three managers, including e-mails alerting them to a planned inspection of Options that was meant to be a surprise.

“Williams, who also served on Options’s board of trustees, also allegedly maneuvered to ensure that EEMC’s largest contract, for $2.8 million, would not be reviewed by PCSB staff. He is now the company’s chief financial officer.”

This is a sickening story.