Historian-teacher John Thompson analyzes a recent review of the Bloomberg administration’s education initiatives and explains how the private education funders wasted $2 billion.
The great mistake of the Bloomberg administration was its unalloyed faith in accountability, the threats of punishment and sanctions.
As the budget expanded, the number of reading specialists for the early grades plummeted–“from 1,158 in 2002 to 637 in 2013.”
By contrast, “de Blasio respects experts who estimate that ’75 percent of the city’s four year olds — that is, about 73,000 children — would attend full-day pre-kindergarten if it were available and readily accessible.’ Wouldn’t it be nice if Bloomberg had invested billions of dollars filling that real-world need and not his personal need to sort and punish?”
Thompson is very hopeful that de Blasio sees a better path for school improvement–through support, early childhood education, and coordinated social services–not A-F grades for schools.
He writes:
“Now, New York City has a mayor who respects social science and understands the need to strengthen the social and institutional infrastructure of poor communities. Now, NYC “can counter the social isolation common in these poor neighborhoods and temper the impact of poverty and low social capital on educational failure and lifelong poverty.” Soon, researchers may not need to be so circumspect in choosing their words about the need for:
A targeted, neighborhood-centered approach to poverty would weave together school improvement with coordinated human services, youth development, high-quality early education and child care, homelessness prevention, family supports and crisis interventions.”

I’m not holding out hope for de Blasio until I see who he picks for education. Word on the streets is that it’s between Kaya Henderson or Barbara Byrd-Bennett. Either one would tell us all we need to know about de Blasio.
LikeLike
While experience has taught me to be to be skeptical about liberal/progressive saviors, I’d be shocked if De Blasio actually appoints Henderson or Byrd-Bennett: it would be too much of an in-your-face betrayal.
My guess is that talk of those two is either DFER-ite disinformation and an attempt to jam De Blasio, or else De Blasio’s attempt to mollify the so-called reformers by floating the names of their preferred candidates, while having no intention of letting them near the NYC public schools.
The key question for me is what the new mayor intends to do vis-a-vis the Common Core, the new teacher evaluations and the parasitic Networks. If he takes a passive, “Well, it’s the law and we have to follow it,” then we’ll just have more of the same, minus the contempt and open viciousness of Bloomberg and his apparatchiks.
However, if De Blasio truly listens to the voices of parents, students and teachers (and not just the hopeless UFT/AFT leadership) and is sensitive to the intense demoralization and helplessness that has (intentionally) been imposed upon teachers, then he will hopefully work to minimize or truncate the damaging affects of RttT, Common Core and the Danielson evaluations, which are born of and implemented with the same venality and bad faith.
LikeLike
You may be right and I certainly hope you are. But I’m long past the point where I believe anything any alleged “progressive” says until I see what they do.
LikeLike
Barbara Byrd-Bennett’s work is done in Chicago. The slithery next steps involving more TFA and politically-connected charter schools can be accomplished by someone else.
LikeLike
I really don’t care if the number of “reading specialists” were reduced. This could be a plus with what these teachers are being taught about reading. Classroom teachers should be the “specialists” with authentic children’s literature and not the junk from the publishers. The literacy rate in the 13 colonies was 95% including indentured servants without “reading specialists”. I am seeing a book called “Wonder” forced onto all of the schools and students by the publishers, which is akin to a PT Barnum freak show by a “wonder” of an author who never write a book, but works for the publishers, who know that kind of books they want. Soon to be coming to a theatre near you. The Harry Potterization of books. this is no “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
LikeLike
The proof is in the pudding. Let’s wait and see what happens. (And don’t get your hopes up too high, just in case . . . )
LikeLike