Archives for the month of: September, 2013

As you may know, Michelle Rhee is holding three “teacher town halls” in which she and Steve Perry and George Parker talk to an audience who are allowed to submit questions.

George Parker was previously the head of the D.C. teachers union; he now works for Rhee.

Steve Perry, once a commentator for CNN, runs a magnet school in Hartford. Earlier this year in Minnesota, he spoke at a public forum and called unions “roaches” and accused teachers of being responsible for the “literal death” of children.

The first was held in Los Angeles, the second in Birmingham, and the third will be held in Philadelphia on September 16. (Ironically, I will be speaking in Philadelphia on the next night at the Free Library.)

G.F. Brandenburg, retired D.C. math teacher, explains here how the “teacher town halls” work.

Philadelphia is a great place to have a genuine conversation with teachers.

The governor cut the state education budget by $1 billion.

Thousands of teachers and other school staff were laid off last spring.

Many schools are opening without guidance counselors, social workers, teachers of the arts, basic supplies.

Teachers should try to attend Rhee’s “teacher town hall” and see what solutions the panel offers.

Sharon R. Higgins, an Oakland parent and blogger, questions
whether there is a STEM cris and offers documentation for her
views. She writes: The STEM alarm is definitely a manufactured
crisis. 1. “As the push to train more young people in STEM —
science, technology, engineering and math — careers gains steam, a
few prominent skeptics are warning that it may be misguided — and
that rhetoric about the USA losing its world pre-eminence in
science, math and technology may be a stretch.” (“Scientist
shortage? Maybe not.” USA Today, 7/9/2009,
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/2009-07-08-science-engineer-jobs_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip
2. “’There is no scientist shortage,’ says Harvard University
economist Richard Freeman, a leading expert on the academic labor
force.” (from “Does the U.S. Produce Too Many Scientists?”
Scientific American, 2/22/2010),
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=does-the-us-produce-too-m&sc=WR_20100224
3. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, of the top 20
fastest growing occupations, only one is STEM-related (biomedical
engineers). http://www.bls.gov/ooh/fastest-growing.htm 4. According
to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, of the top 20 occupations
w/highest projected numeric change in employment, ZERO are
STEM-related). http://www.bls.gov/ooh/most-new-jobs.htm 5. The STEM
push ignores the subtleties. According to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, some STEM occupations have job outlooks that are
“faster than average” but many fall into the “average” or “slower
than average” category. 6. The Gulen Movement has cleverly taken
advantage of the STEM push for its charter school expansion. ALL
their schools boast about having a STEM emphasis. Just one example
is with Harmony Public Schools, the Texas chain.
http://www.harmonytx.org/AboutUs/TSTEMatHarmony.aspx

This teacher blogger, Rene Dietrich, addresses an open letter to Apple about the iPads for all students in the district.

Such questions as whether they are configured to block inappropriate content; whether Apple will offer training and tech support to teachers; whether they can be used without access to the Internet; whether there is any way to disable them if stolen; and many more. These are the kinds of questions that school districts should get answers to before spending hundreds of millions of dollars on new technology.

Metro Nashville teachers passed a vote of no confidence in State Commissioner Kevin Huffman.

The article doesn’t say how many teachers voted or what percent oppose Huffman.

Presumably, these figures will emerge.

The vote by the teachers comes on the heels of a letter by nearly half the state’s superintendents criticizing Huffman’s top-down style.

A retired teacher is happy that parents are opting their children out of state testing

She writes:

“I am a former elementary art teacher and I am thrilled parents are taking matters into their own hands. The testing culture is madness. I had to sit in too many staff meetings, and watch as the administrators devote all professional development time to students passing the standardized tests. It did not matter that students did not take tests in art, the specialists still had to sit there and listen for hours about how to teach to the test. All resources were put toward classroom teachers teaching to the test. All professional development days were used for classroom teachers teaching to the test. The specialists were told to find something to do on those days. I thought to myself, we as educators need to just say no. I am glad someone finally is saying no!”

In the article in Sunday’s New York Times magazine about the introduction of Joel Klein/Rupert Murdoch’s Amplify tablet, Klein asserts that those who oppose his views on technology are ideological, not evidence-based.

Klein asserts that we can’t hope to compete with Korea and other nations with high test scores unless we put kids on his tablets.

But here is a contrary view, forwarded to me by Will Fitzhugh of The Concord Review.

It is an excerpt from Amanda Ripley’s new book, The Smartest Kids in the World:

 

...But the anecdotal evidence suggests that Americans waste an extraordinary 
amount of tax money on high-tech toys for teachers and students, most of which 
have no proven learning value whatsoever....“In most of the highest-performing 
systems, technology is remarkably absent from classrooms.”

ignore shiny objects 

Old-school can be good school. Eric’s high school in Busan, South Korea, had 
austere classrooms with bare-bones computer labs. Out front, kids played soccer 
on a dirt field. From certain angles, the place looked like an American school 
from the 1950s. Most of Kim’s classrooms in Finland looked the same way: rows of 
desks in front of a simple chalkboard or an old-fashioned white board, the kind 
that was not connected to anything but the wall. 

Tom’s school in Poland didn’t even have a cafeteria, let alone a 
state-of-the-art theater, like his public school back home in Pennsylvania. In 
his American school, every classroom had an interactive white board, the kind 
that had become ubiquitous in so many American schools. (In fact, when I visited 
Tom’s American high school in 2012, these boards were already being swapped for 
next-generation replacements.) None of the classrooms in his Polish school had 
interactive white boards. 

Little data exists to compare investments in technology across countries, 
unfortunately. But the anecdotal evidence suggests that Americans waste an 
extraordinary amount of tax money on high-tech toys for teachers and students, 
most of which have no proven learning value whatsoever. As in all other 
industries, computers are most helpful when they save time or money, by helping 
to sort out what kids know and who needs help. Conversely, giving kids 
expensive, individual wireless clickers so that they can vote in class would be 
unthinkable in most countries worldwide. (In most of the world, kids just raise 
their hands and that works out fine.) 

“In most of the highest-performing systems, technology is remarkably absent from 
classrooms,” Andreas Schleicher, the OECD international education guru, told me. 
“I have no explanation why that is the case, but it does seem that those systems 
place their efforts primarily on pedagogical practice rather than digital 
gadgets.” In the survey conducted for this book, seven out of ten international 
and American exchange students agreed that U.S. schools had more technology. Not 
one American student surveyed said there was significantly less technology in 
U.S. schools. The smartest countries prioritize teacher pay and equity 
(channeling more resources to the neediest students). When looking for a 
world-class education, remember that people always matter more than props.

Ripley, Amanda (2013-08-13). The Smartest Kids in the World: And How They Got 
That Way (pp. 214-215). Simon & Schuster. Kindle Edition.

The New York Times magazine has a long article by Carlo Rotella about the first trial of the Amplify tablet in the schools of Guilford County, North Carolina. Amplify is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation and run by Joel Klein, the former chancellor of the NewYork City public schools.

Klein is certain that public education in America is a disaster and the only things that can save it are disruptive technology and the Common Core. Those are the same recommendations made by the task force Klein co-chaired for the Council on Foreign Relations last year.

Happily for Murdoch, Klein, and other apostles of saving the schools by selling technology to them, they have a friend in Arne Duncan. He is quoted as follows:

“To keep doing the same thing we’ve been doing for the past hundred years — everybody working on the same thing at the same time, not based on competency. . . .” He sighed and let the thought trail off, then added his standard reminder that we must equip our students to compete with counterparts in India and China. He did acknowledge, though, that the fear of falling behind puts added pressure on school systems to do something, anything, which then makes them more vulnerable to rushed decisions and to peddlers of magic bullets. “There are a lot of hucksters out there,” he said.

“Duncan, whose longtime allies include Joel Klein, Bill Gates and other apostles of disruption, has a record of supporting reforms that increase the role of market forces — choice, competition, the profit motive — in education. He wants private enterprises vying to make money by providing innovative educational products and services, and sees his role as “taking to scale the best practices” that emerge from this contest.”

One of the trainers of teachers uses a phrase that we have now heard about a million times , meaning that we are experimenting on you and don’t know how things will turn out: “Another PLEF, Wenalyn Bell, told her group, “It’s like building a plane while it’s flying.”

Rotella retains a healthy skepticism. He knows that Los Angeles laid off teachers while it spent big bucks to buy iPads.

He ends with these observations from his last interview with Klein.

“Take Finland,” Klein continued, citing everyone’s favorite example of a country that puts its money on excellent teachers, not technology, and routinely finishes at the top in international assessments. “There’s a high barrier for entry into the teaching profession,” the kind that lets in the Robin Britts and keeps out weaker aspirants. Teachers there are also well paid, held in high esteem and trusted to get results without being forced to teach to the test. But America’s educational system is a lot bigger, messier, less centralized and more focused on market-based solutions than Finland’s. Also, our greater income inequality and thinner social safety net make for much wider variation in student performance, and a toxic political climate has encouraged our traditional low regard for teachers to flower into outright contempt.

“Still, if everyone agrees that good teachers make all the difference, wouldn’t it make more sense to devote our resources to strengthening the teaching profession with better recruitment, training, support and pay? It seems misguided to try to improve the process of learning by putting an expensive tool in the hands of teachers we otherwise treat like the poor relations of the high-tech whiz kids who design the tool.

“Are our overwhelmed, besieged, haphazardly recruited, variably trained, underpaid, not-so-elite teachers, in fact, the potential weak link in Amplify’s bid to disrupt American schooling? Klein said that we have 3.5 million elementary- and middle-school teachers. “We have to put the work of the most brilliant people in their hands,” he said. “If we don’t empower them, it won’t work.” Behind the talking points and buzz words, what I heard him saying was Yes.”

The Atlanta Journal Constitution reporter Heather Vogell conducted a two-year investigation of standardized testing and discovered many errors in them.

Yet with all these errors, the test scores are being used and misused to make life-changing decisions about students, teachers, principals, and schools.

Standardized tests are a weak reed on which to base a decision for firing staff and closing schools.

Vogell and the AJC were key in exposing the widespread cheating scandal in Atlanta. Now the AJC reports:

Miscalculated scores, flawed questions and other errors on standardized tests have become near commonplace in public schools across the country, according to a new investigation by The Atlanta-Journal Constitution.

Repeated failures in quality-control measures have allowed mistakes to keep happening even as testing took on a more crucial role for students and teachers, the newspaper found. In some cases, students have been initially denied diplomas or entry into special academic programs because of incorrect scores.

The findings expose significant problems in the execution of the landmark No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, which sought to use test scores to hold schools publicly accountable for students’ academic performance. The newspaper has previously reported other problems with standardized testing, exposing widespread cheating in Atlanta Public Schools. A follow-up investigation in 2012 revealed nearly 200 school districts nationwide had high concentrations of suspect scores.

In the current year-long investigation, the AJC’s Heather Vogell studied test design, delivery and scoring and reviewed statistical reports on the quality of more than 92,000 test questions given over two years to students in 42 states and Washington, D.C.

The investigation revealed that almost one in 10 tests nationwide contained significant blocks of questions that were likely flawed. Such questions made up 10 percent or more of those tests — threatening their overall quality and raising questions about fairness.

Anyone wanting to read about the built-in flaws of the testing industry should read Todd Farley’s book Making the Grades, which exposes the scandalous lack of qualifications of those hired to score test questions, their poor training and supervision, and the superficial attention they give to the answers students write.

A charter chain that has run into legal problems in Philadelphia
and Chicago plans to open
three
schools in North
Carolina. Lindsay Wagner of the NC Policy Watch writes in the
“Progrssive Pulse”: “The NC Department of Public Instruction
received 171 letters of intent last week from charter school
operators keen on opening up new schools in time for fall of 2015 —
the highest ever received since lawmakers lifted the 100-school cap
in 2011. “ASPIRA is a national advocacy organization dedicated to
developing the educational and leadership capacity of Hispanic
youth. ASPIRA also supports the charter school movement in
districts where significant numbers of Latino students are failing.
“In Chicago, ASPIRA has run into allegations of financial
corruption and misconduct at its charter schools. Last year, the
CEO of ASPIRA Illinois, Jose Rodriguez, was fired by the charter
operator’s board. “And in troubled Philadelphia, ASPIRA Inc. of
Pennsylvania owes more than $3 million to four charter schools it
runs, according to the Philadelphia City Paper. That money,
according to school district officials, is taxpayer funds intended
to fulfill the purposes of the charters. The organization has also
spent $17,000 to a union-busting law firm to deal with a “teacher
unionization issue,” according to the City Paper.” – See more at:
http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/09/13/troubled-charter-operator-aspira-intends-to-open-three-charter-schools-in-nc/#sthash.ccu4IQJ5.O3QpNDSH.dpuf

Red Queen in LA writes a snappy and irreverent blog.

This post is her best ever, or at least the best I have read.

In it, she decimates the decision by Los Angeles school officials to spend $500 million on iPads–using money from bonds that will be paid off in 25 years–and another $500 million to upgrade the schools for Internet connectivity, plus $38 million for keyboards, plus untold millions for professional development and other unforeseen needs, at a time when teachers are laid off, class sizes are huge, facilities are crumbling, and programs are cut.

This was not a wise decision for many reasons, she argues. For one thing,  “tablets” are no substitute for computers:

We all know this about tablet “computers”:  they are not real “working” machines.  When I proposed buying a tablet for my student the dude behind the counter told me: “Don’t do it.  You’ll have to buy a keyboard, it has way less memory and no ports, a smaller screen and slower speed:  it’s just not what a serious student needs.  By the time you’re done adding on, you’ll have a machine almost as expensive as a real computer with far less functionality”.

Any parent will have received that advice from just about any computer salesman.  And while there are a few serious students out there who no doubt feel otherwise, I think it’s a fairly safe bet that the word on the street is:  tablets are no substitute for a computer; students need computers.

But she is even more outraged that the district leaders pulled a bait and switch, first asking voters for permission to sell 25-year bonds to repair the schools, then using that money to buy tablets with a short lifespan. She writes:

“A fool and his money are soon parted”; common sense dictates a little skepticism be employed in warding off financial chicanery.  There are so many get-rich – excuse me, get-“smart”-quick schemes floating about EdReform/Common Core Land that their sheer volume belies legitimacy.

No one purchases a car with a 30-year loan.  Long-term financial “instruments” are intended for a more “durable” purchase like, say, a house.  Or a school building.  If you purchased your Honda Civic with a house mortgage, you would find yourself paying for that auto to the tune of several times its original worth, a dozen years or longer beyond when it was melted into candlesticks.  How does it make sense that LAUSD stakeholders should be purchasing ephemeral electronic equipment with long-term constructionbonds?  Where’s the common sense in hoodwinking tax-payers with such a scheme that doesn’t even seem legal?  When will the average voter ever agree again to finance any child’s public educational needs when there are only foxes in charge of the hen house?

And more:

Maybe this is all more complicated than it seems.  But since it was we taxpayers who invoked the common sense solution of approving bond money to maintain school facilities sufficiently, we deserve transparency regardingdecisions that reverse course on how this money is spent.  And we deserve legal redress should the caretakers of our money not spend it according to our wishes.

Our children need teachers — more teachers — who can conduct school within classrooms of a manageable, teachable size.  Our children need a village-worth of support staff to enable and assist those teachers to engage their learners.  Our children need to attend school in facilities that are clean, commodious, safe and stimulating.  Diverting funds from rank-bottom pedagogical necessities in favor of frivolous electronics in service of opaque commercial ends, just makes no Common Sense.