Archives for the month of: September, 2013

This is a fascinating
exchange
between John Merrow and Mercedes Schneider.
Merrow, a PBS correspondent, explains his independence from his
funders.

Here are my two cents. Merrow is the only mainstream journalist to pursue the cheating scandal in D.C., and he took a lot of criticism from rightwing bloggers and other admirers of Rhee’s slash-and-burn tactics. I admire him for his courage and integrity. How many other journalists were willing to admit they were misled?

Schneider, a Louisiana teacher with a Ph.D. In research
methods, challenges Merrow’s positive coverage of the “rebirth” of
the schools on Néw Orleans. She also takes issue with his decision
to abandon his search for what happened in DC on Michelle Rhee’s
watch.

The old Lion vs. the young Tiger.

Merrow writes that the mainstream media has ignored the Rhee story, and Rhee’s admirers have
disparaged him for reporting it at all: “And as for covering
Michelle Rhee, I think my critics ought to be writing Nick
Kristoff, Charles Blow, Bill Moyers, Tom Friedman, Diane Sawyer,
Katie Couric, the editors of the Washington Post and the Atlantic,
Diane Rehm, Jon Stewart and all the other folks who have far more
influence than I. Why aren’t they on this story? The data could not
be clearer: her ‘scorched earth’ approach has been tried, and it is
an abject failure. And why isn’t the failure of the mainstream
media to cover this story a story of its own? “You know that I have
exposed Rhee’s failure to act when confronted with evidence of
cheating; have shown how her basic approach to ‘reform’ all but
guaranteed cheating; have documented the hollow and fatally flawed
nature of every one of the so-called investigations; have given
chapter and verse of the Washington Post’s editorial page shameful
cheerleading (especially when contrasted with the courage of the
Atlanta Journal-Constitution); and have called out the national
media for its failure to report the story. “I went to Dartmouth,
where “vox clamantis in deserto” is a college motto, but being a
voice crying in the wilderness in this case is actually
counter-productive. Right-leaning bloggers dismiss the evidence by
painting this as personal, a vendetta, calling me Ahab or a high
school senior whose prom date stood him up. That would be laughable
if it were not effective–some people want to cling to Rhee’s
narrative, which they have adopted.”

It is odd that both Time and Newsweek put Rhee on their covers, but then refused to follow the story as John Merrow did.

Time is running out on the Bloomberg administration, so his compliant board will vote at its next meeting in October on a record giveaway of public school space to privately managed charters.

The panel, which has a majority of members appointed by the mayor, will consider more than 40 proposals for co-locating schools at two meetings next month. More than 30 of these plans are for new schools.

Communities will debate the proposals, but the mayor’s “Panel on Education Policy” never listens to what communities want. If the past is any guide, there will be cries from parents and students not to force another school into their building, but they will be ignored. The board will follow the mayor’s orders.

Voters overwhelmingly disapprove of the mayor’s education policies–polls show only 22-26% approve of closing schools and opening schools, closing schools and opening schools, again and again-but it’s full speed ahead for the failed policies of Mayor Bloomberg.

Why so many “failing schools” after more than a decade of mayoral control?

No surprise: Sacramento gets new charter schools staffed by inexperienced Teach for America recruits, non-union, of course.

Michelle Rhee’s husband is mayor of Sacramento.

How many would choose a doctor or lawyer with five weeks of training? Raise your hand.

Lots of money from the anti-union Walton Family Foundation, as well as Gates and Broad.

Maybe the foundations think that it’s good enough for poor kids, not for their own.

I will be speaking about “Reign of Error” at Congregation Beth Elohim in Park Slope, Brooklyn, on October 8, in conversation with New Yorker writer David Denby.

This is part of a book series called “Brooklyn by the Book.”

Admission is free but reservations are suggested.

Arthur Goldstein has taught in New York City public schools for almost thirty years. He has been trying to figure when and how teachers and public schools became objects of scorn rather than respect. He found it in “Reign of Error.”

He writes:

In Reign of Error, Ravitch demonstrates how, by ignoring poverty, America has managed to shift blame to public schools for its consequences. That’s clear when the Governor of New York declares schools with poor test scores deserve the “death penalty,” and the mayor of Chicago closes 50 schools in one fell swoop. The fact that all so-called failing schools have high percentages of high-needs kids is either attributed to coincidence or ignored completely. Standard practice is to replace them with privately run schools that generally perform either no better or much worse. Still, no one can argue they don’t place more tax money into the pockets of investors.

Reign of Error shows us corporate reform is largely about where the money goes. Americans are led to believe teachers earn too much, and entrepreneurs like Rupert Murdoch and the Walmart family earn too little. To correct this inequity, corporate reformers work to erase collective bargaining, unionism, teacher tenure, and other outrages that have left middle-class people able to make a living. This, of course, is all done in the name of helping children.

Arthur Goldstein has taught in New York City public schools for almost thirty years. He has been trying to figure when and how teachers and public schools became objects of scorn rather than respect. He found it in “Reign of Error.”

He writes:

In Reign of Error, Ravitch demonstrates how, by ignoring poverty, America has managed to shift blame to public schools for its consequences. That’s clear when the Governor of New York declares schools with poor test scores deserve the “death penalty,” and the mayor of Chicago closes 50 schools in one fell swoop. The fact that all so-called failing schools have high percentages of high-needs kids is either attributed to coincidence or ignored completely. Standard practice is to replace them with privately run schools that generally perform either no better or much worse. Still, no one can argue they don’t place more tax money into the pockets of investors.

Reign of Error shows us corporate reform is largely about where the money goes. Americans are led to believe teachers earn too much, and entrepreneurs like Rupert Murdoch and the Walmart family earn too little. To correct this inequity, corporate reformers work to erase collective bargaining, unionism, teacher tenure, and other outrages that have left middle-class people able to make a living. This, of course, is all done in the name of helping children.

When the U.S. Department of Justice filed suit against Louisiana’s voucher program, on grounds that it threatened to undermine court-ordered desegregation, Jindal went on a well-publicized rant against the DOJ, claiming politics. Suddenly, Jindal presented himself as a leader of he civil rights movement, trying to save poor black kids from failing public schools. His op-eds appeared in the Washington Post, the Chicago Tribune, and other media. Shocking that the U.S. Department of Justice was upholding court orders intended to protect the roghts of black children!

Jeb Bush rushed to Jindal’s side, claiming that the voucher program was already showing amazing results. So did GOP leaders in Congress, including John Boehner.

Of course, none of this was true.

The courts in Louisiana said the funding for the voucher program was unconstitutional. So many voucher schools taught creationism and lacked qualified teachers that the voucher program made the state an international laughingstock.

The test scores of the students in the voucher schools were appallingly low, but, hey, there’s always next year.

Here Louisiana blogger CenLamar shows how cynical Jindal was.

He writes: here about Jindal’s claims:

“Unfortunately, that’s just not true. None of it. The truth is, from the very beginning, Bobby Jindal and John White worked with a group of highly-paid political consultants to market the voucher program, almost exclusively, to African-Americans. The Louisiana Black Alliance for Educational Opportunities (or LA BAEO) was created, seemingly out of thin air, by a national organization of conservative “school choice” activists, and they spent months touring the state and recruiting African-Americans to participate in the program, with very little understanding of the public schools they were attempting to disparage as “failures.” For example, about a year ago, I got into a Twitter exchange with one of LA BAEO’s principal consultants over remarks he had made about Peabody Magnet High School in my hometown of Alexandria. Peabody may not be an academic powerhouse, but it is a damn good school with an amazing campus and a deep connection with its community. But nonetheless, LA BAEO held town hall meetings in Alexandria in an attempt to convince parents to take their kids out of Peabody and, instead, enroll them in voucher schools. It didn’t seem to matter that the voucher schools in Central Louisiana are, with only a few exceptions, fly-by-night church schools with shoddy facilities, questionable finances, and uncertified teachers.

“See, the real issue– and how Bobby Jindal duped John Boehner– is that, on the whole, Louisiana’s voucher schools are significantly worse than the public schools. Jindal and Boehner both argue that Louisiana’s voucher program provides students with the opportunity to seek a “better education.” In reality, however, Louisiana’s voucher program is comprised, in large part, of unaccountable and completely unregulated schools, many of which rely on thoroughly discounted, ahistorical, and anti-scientific curricula.

“Last year, voucher students scored thirty points less on the LEAP test than their peers in public schools. Notably, while Superintendent White and Governor Jindal love to use test results as a way of gauging the performance of public schools, neither of them were willing to make the same argument against the dramatically worse performance of voucher schools.”

CenLamar sums up Jindal’s voucher program: “We’re not sending 91% of Louisiana’s voucher students to the best and most important voucher schools. This is not about integrating African-American students in traditionally and well-established and high-performing private schools; this is nothing to do with integration and almost everything to do with quietly re-codifying segregation.”

Stephen Dyer is a former legislator in Ohio who now works for a public policy organization called Innovation Ohio. In my book, I drew on some of his research.

In this post, he situates my work in a longstanding American tradition. I especially liked these lines:

“As I read the book, I couldn’t help but think of what Alexis de Tocqueville wrote in 1835 — that America’s commitment to education for all its citizens, not just landed gentry, was “the originality of American civilization.” The Land Ordinance of 1785, authored by Thomas Jefferson himself, set aside the heart of every community for “public” education — a true revolution coming from our founders who were mostly well-to-do landowners.

“The thought that every child in our country deserves the same opportunities as the most fortunate among us is a uniquely American gift to the world — our great legacy. Ravitch’s passion is rooted in this understanding. It is what gives her purpose so much strength. And it is what gives her latest work undeniable potency.”

[Forgive the posting of the headline with no text. I am at NY1, our local all-news station. No sooner did I put in the headline when I was called in to be interviewed by Sam Roberts of the New York Times. I closed my iPad, and the blank post flew into cyberspace. ]

The Atlantic has a comprehensive article about the education wars in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

The Democratic machine was shocked by the victory of the insurgent slate, which made clear that they are not fans of Paul Vallas. Of course, there is a fascinating backstory, and the article represents it fairly.

Most fascinating is that the article speculates that the Bridgeport election may indicate that the tide is turning against the corporate style of testing-accountability-privatization-teacher-bashing. Not just in Bridgeport. The public is catching on.

When the public catches on and demands change, the politicians follow.

With the election of Bill de Blasio in New York City, the discrediting of the grading system in Indiana, the resignation of Tony Bennett, the defeat of the deceptive parent trigger in Florida twice by Florida parents, the voter rejection of vouchers last fall in Florida, the indictment of the biggest virtual charter operator in Pennsylvania, the rejection of the Luna laws in Idaho……drip, drip, drip, drip.

[Forgive the posting of the headline with no text. I am at NY1, our local all-news station. No sooner did I put in the headline when I was called in to be interviewed by Sam Roberts of the New York Times. I closed my iPad, and the blank post flew into cyberspace. ]

The Atlantic has a comprehensive article about the education wars in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

The Democratic machine was shocked by the victory of the insurgent slate, which made clear that they are not fans of Paul Vallas. Of course, there is a fascinating backstory, and the article represents it fairly.

Most fascinating is that the article speculates that the Bridgeport election may indicate that the tide is turning against the corporate style of testing-accountability-privatization-teacher-bashing. Not just in Bridgeport. The public is catching on.

When the public catches on and demands change, the politicians follow.

With the election of Bill de Blasio in New York City, the discrediting of the grading system in Indiana, the resignation of Tony Bennett, the defeat of the deceptive parent trigger in Florida twice by Florida parents, the voter rejection of vouchers last fall in Florida, the indictment of the biggest virtual charter operator in Pennsylvania, the rejection of the Luna laws in Idaho……drip, drip, drip, drip.