Salon printed today a lengthy excerpt from “Reign of Error.”
Enjoy.
On the other hand, Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post printed a very strongly worded attack on me personally and on the book, calling its arguments “ridiculous.”
Blogger Perdido Street School describes the article in the New York Post in this way:
The writer “accuses Ravitch of making stuff up, ignoring scientific evidence, being a hair-shirt-wearing zealot, engaging in nepotism and taking bribes from the teachers unions.
It’s a hit piece that uses harangue, invective and personal attacks to try and destroy her arguments that the education reform movement is actually a privatization movement.”
And goes on to add:
These attacks serve only to try and marginalize Ravitch as a crazy person, a zealot, and in the case of the New Republic attack, corrupt and vengeful.
They have no place in the Post review, but since the whole Smith review is just vitriol masking as a rebuttal of Ravitch’s book, I see why the writer has so many there.
That the Post published an attack on Ravitch that is this personal and this fraudulent just goes to show how much she and her arguments are getting under the skin of the corporate reformers.
A few years ago, every time you saw an education story in the news, it almost always contained a corporate reform agenda frame to it.
But that is no longer the case these days, as the reform agenda narrative about charters, choice, merit pay and the like gets challenged.
Diane Ravitch is not the sole reason why the reform agenda gets challenged these days in the media and the culture, but she is certainly a large part of the reason why because she has been the most prominent and outspoken in her challenges to the reform movement and those promoting it.
It is clear from the viciousness of the personal attacks against her that the corporate education reformers and their allies in the corporate media are not taking her critiques lightly.
In a strange way, the more vicious they get, the clearer it becomes that the arguments against the corporate reform agenda made by Ravitch and other critics are starting to take hold.

Murdoch fears losing out on a share of the 500 billion spent on public education if Ravitch and her allies succeed in stopping the privatization movement.
LikeLike
Murdoch is such an upstanding citizen. I’m sure everyone will believe a person who hacked into a murdered girl’s phone. He is so trustworthy when it comes to guiding the public.
LikeLike
Sadly, the Post article has no comments section.
LikeLike
They also haven’t posted the article on their Facebook page or tweeted it. They’re cowards — they know the comments won’t all be loving.
LikeLike
Hope you know to wear an attack by the NYPost as a badge of honor. Wouldn’t line my bird’s cage with the paper…it might lower his intelligence.
LikeLike
The energy vampires don’t like Reign of Error exposing them to the sunlight, do they?
By their words you shall know them.
LikeLike
Kyle Smith is a movie reviewer who writes about highbrow films like the Sydney Leather’s porn movie, “Weiner and Me.”
http://nypost.com/2013/08/22/dont-get-xxx-cited-over-sydney-leathers-porn-movie-weiner-and-me/
The fact that this is who they chose to review your book, I think, is quite telling. It is a painful reminder that our children’s schools are in the hands of men like Rupert Murdoch, who thrive and enrich themselves by making our world an uglier more sordid place.
That he and Joel Klein have a seat at the table in education discussions is one of the greatest injustices of our time.
Diane, this is nothing more than a hack job, and reveals more about Murdoch and his deplorable paper than your courageous book.
LikeLike
Darcie Cimarusti: Kyle Smith leads off his cliché ridden movie review with the following forgettable words: “I didn’t even have to pay to see Sydney Leathers’ hardcore XXX movie, “Weiner and Me,” and yet I want my money back. Plus disinfectant.”
I think we should all applaud Rupert Murdoch for paying Mr. Smith to put this on public display for all the world to see. **Note to Mr. Murdoch: when it’s on the world wide web, you can’t hide it as easily as you did the phone hacking. You are now associated with this article for the rest of your life.** I have been reading various education (and other) blogs over the last five years. This piece might qualify as the poster child for “#1 Hack Job” —that gives greater luster and shine to the object of the hack attack.
It might seem an impossible task, but the author does a masterful job of bringing together almost every last charterite/privatizer slur and half-truth with generous doses of, er, omission mixed in. In addition, it is so relentlessly uninformed and needlessly insulting—yet so prominently on display in a major media forum—that defenders of the education establishment are on notice that
Y’all need to come to “Diane Ravitch’s blog A site to discuss better education for all” and personally express your deep regret and dismay over what [according to the standards y’all apply to the owner of this blog and others] is completely unacceptable behavior in the ed debates.
I invoke your own Holy Mantra: No Excuses. No posting = silence = agreement.
Remember, it’s all about the kids. Not $tudent $ucce$$. That’s what you say over and over and over again.
I’m not from the “Show Me” state of Missouri, but their adage fits here: “I’m from Missouri, you’ve got to show me.” Show me and the many many viewers of this blog that self-styled “education reformers” believe in the time-honored American tradition that “you have to give respect to get respect.”
I am not joking or taking cheap shots or asking for showy self-abasement. One-line expressions of disapproval would be fine. For example, I would be a bit disappointed if Michael J Petrilli didn’t show up. While I often disagree with him, I do feel he maintains enough self-respect and honor to do the right thing.
A ver qué pasa/let’s see what happens.
P.S. Diane Cimarusti: thank you so much for your blog.
🙂
LikeLike
May Amplify and Wireless Generation and inBloom tank…..keep your hands off our kids Rupert and Joel. Go back to hacking the cell phones of celebrities and leave missing, murdered children and their families alone. You are despicable, dishonest, evil people.
LikeLike
Isn’t there basis for a libel suit in that “review”? Or is all of that idiocy protected? There are specific accusations that have no merit and seem actionable to me. But then, I’m not an attorney (though I play one on TV). 😉
LikeLike
Michael, when you are a public figure, the libel laws offer no protection. Consider the source.
LikeLike
Dianne, not sure about public figures having no protections. From a Supreme Court ruling:
“The constitutional guarantees require, we think, a federal rule that prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with ‘actual malice’ — that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.”
LikeLike
I wonder if they consulted their lawyers in advance, because it’s presented as an “opinion,” which is much more difficult to dispute in regard to libel than a piece that claims to be a report of factual information.
LikeLike
In one of the dialogues dealing with the death of Socrates–I forget which one–the great man says that the surest sign of the decline of a culture is the proliferation of lawsuits.
LikeLike
For all of you above who wrote about any legal action: it would be a colossal waste of Diane’s very precious time to engage in any–which is exactly what her detractors would like. This is exactly what’s going on in U.S. education–while our time should be spent solely on educating children, the “reformers” are wasting OUR precious time by lobbing issue after issue at us–testing & more testing, inappropriate teacher evaluation, charters & privatization, expanding class sizes, obliterating school libraries, union busting, pension reform…& on & on, ad nauseum. And these are exactly what Diane is working to remedy. She/we can’t afford time taken away from working on this issues.
But an article in the N.Y.Post written by a film critic?
Deserving of absolutely no attention at all.
LikeLike
Diane, how disappointing to find out you’re taking bribes from the teachers’ unions. I thought your motives were pure.
So will you send me a private email telling me how I can get a piece of that action? I’ve been trying to get some serious coin from Gates or Broad or Hastings, but they won’t write back. Shoot, Hastings, that cheapskate, won’t even give me a discount on a Netflix subscription.
Then there’s the Waltons. Even after I explained about all the pencils and paper I’d bought for my students over the years . . . nothing.
Clearly, I gotta start my own blog, right? Is that the key to getting some of that union $$$?
That’s it, isn’t it? That’s why you see folks like Paul Thomas and Mercedes Schneider and Anthony Cody and Kris Neilsen and Jim Horn jetting around the country, showing up on red carpets at Sundance and the VMAs! They’re all on the take!
Twerk me, baby, I’m on to something here. I don’t wanna post this, then everyone will know the scam and try for a piece of the action. Gotta hit “delete” rather than
LikeLike
As my dad (and many others) have said…If you’ve got a target on your back, you must be doing something right.
LikeLike
I ask you to judge me by the enemies I have made.
Franklin D. Roosevelt
LikeLike
: )
LikeLike
Wonderful quote, Linda. As usual, spot-on—thanks!
LikeLike
The New York Post has no legitimacy left to lose. The paper is amere extension of Rupurt Murdoch’s conservative ideology. It is beyon believe that this is the same newspaper that proudly presented columns by Murray Kemptpm and Pete Hamill. No doubt Diane remembers these writers from her teaching time at TC (Columbiia University, Teachers College). To have achieved a vitriolic baiting column in the Murdoch New York Post indicates that her ‘work’ is to be feared by the leaders of “Education Reform” and their minions.
LikeLike
I’m curious about how the criminal investigation into Murdoch’s activities in the UK will affect Murdoch’s Amplify/Wireless Generation federal and state contracts in the US?
News reports seldom disclose that Rupert Murdoch owns Amplify. Klein loves an interview and seeks opportunities to peddle the tablets, however; he NEVER discloses that his boss, Murdoch owns Amplify/Wireless Generation.
From the UK: Met investigating Rupert Murdoch firm News International as ‘corporate suspect’ over hacking and bribing offenses
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/exclusive-met-investigating-rupert-murdoch-firm-news-international-as-corporate-suspect-over-hacking-and-bribing-offences-8771560.html
LikeLike
Guess what I just got in my email box:
Your Amazon.com order of “Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger for America’s Public Schools ” has SHIPPED!
Take that Rupert!
LikeLike
: )
LikeLike
I was thrilled to get my copy last Wednesday, FOUR days after I’d ordered it, & over a week before the release date!
Trust an independent book store to get the job done!
LikeLike
I have an assignment in one of my lower level college courses which aims to help students recognize and appreciate credible sources of information by comparing an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal with an article in the popular press / mainstream media. For the latter, students may select an article from the NY Times, NY Daily News, etc., but they may not use an article from the NY Post, because that’s a tabloid –no different from the National Enquirer etc. To my surprise, every single one of my students has approached the assignment with a lot of background knowledge about the differences between tabloids and the popular press and has been readily able to comprehend the matter without issue.
I suspect now that this is the case for the majority of readers with a high school education. Many people expect tabloids to routinely make totally outlandish, sensational claims, like if the Post had written that Diane has two heads or that profiteers care more about people than money.
Honestly, I don’t think one needs to worry about what people think about the nonsense tabloids print. Many folks know that the truth is most likely to be the opposite, so this article could actually work in Diane’s favor.
LikeLike
Just look at the election primary election results in NYC. All major media endorsed Quinn. De Blasio won and Quinn came in third. Public got it right on this one despite Quinn’s support from tabloids and the NY Times.
LikeLike
Cosmic, since you seem knowledgeable about this stuff…
Is USA Today a tabloid? I always considered it to be one, but then I started to notice that it often had more accurate reporting on education issues than the MSM tended to.
Can you offer any comments on this phenomenon?
LikeLike
Ron, I don’t consider USA Today to be a tabloid, so I let students use that as an example of the popular press.
When it first came out, USA Today seemed to focus a lot on the entertainment industry, which might be why you thought of it as a tabloid. But I think they are now more broadly focused, and I’ve never seen them print the kinds of unfathomable stories that appear to be totally devoid of fact checking which seem typical of tabloids.
LikeLike
“In a strange way, the more vicious they get, the clearer it becomes that the arguments against the corporate reform agenda made by Ravitch and other critics are starting to take hold.”
Hear! Hear! They know they’ve been had.
Well done. Diane!
LikeLike
I know it’s hard to wait till Tuesday, but the timing of the publication couldn’t be more perfect. Read the excerpt. Compare it to the venom already being spit at it. Realize there’s nothing the massive education reform advocacy industry can do to stop it from blowing their lies aside, and bringing daylight into the discussion of public education.
School just started and results of demented standardized tests are being delivered to increasingly skeptical parents. The destructiveness of the corporate attack on education in Philly, Detroit, and Chicago couldn’t be plainer. There will be locally important elections coming up in November. Interest is high, and getting higher.
Diane, your courage and stamina are beyond question, of course, but please do get any support or help you need for the coming historic book tour. The continent is teeming with supporters for your effort.
There are ways to guard your stamina, also. Do you have one of those GelPro floormats to stand on? Do we have an Alexander Technique teacher in the New York area who will volunteer to help you keep your neck free, and your head up and forward …?
LikeLike
probably fair to say that the Post author resorted to ad hominems because he cannot dispute the evidence Diane musters in chapters 11-20 of the book, where she takes apart the favored approaches of the “reformers” – if people read what she has written, which is clear and forceful, they will quickly realize that the emperors of education reform are naked
LikeLike
“Kyle Smith is a movie reviewer who writes about highbrow films like the Sydney Leather’s porn movie, “Weiner and Me.”
Another education expert. I know it shouldn’t continue to amaze me, but it continues to amaze me.
Is there anyone in this country who ISN’T an education expert? Celebrities, CEO’s, movie reviewers, it just goes on and on.
It’s incredibly arrogant. I guess the “thinking” is everyone went to school so everyone is an expert.
I’m relieved this nonsensical approach hasn’t (yet!) been extended to the airline industry.
LikeLike
Chiara–good point! That’s right–EVERYONE out there is an education expert.
LikeLike
Is this the guy writing in the NY Post?
Kyle Smith (born 1966) is an American critic, novelist and essayist. He is a staff film critic[1] for the New York Post.[2] A writer in Entertainment Weekly described Smith’s film-reviewing style “an exercise in hilarious hostility”.[3]
Why would you assign an Entertainment writer to do a review of a scholarly book? I see why they say he uses “hilarious hostility” but I don’t find it so hilarious. It is like the articles where they call Obama Felix the Cat because he is “lucky” … now That’s Entertainment! Sorry our culture has so severely fallen into the “entertaining ourselves to death” (A. Kohn told us about that , too)
LikeLike
Time to produce another documentary based on “Rein of Error”:
“You’re waiting for Superman but we’ve got Superwoman! Let the truth be told.”
LikeLike
Just ordered my copy from Barnes & Noble on the Nook. Will be downloaded on September 17th. Can’t wait to read it and will probably have to take extra blood pressure medication.
LikeLike
Michael, I guarantee that you’ll need that medication! Unfortunately, I’ve been reading the book right before I go to bed–DON’T do that!–hard to fall asleep & having nightmares because of the daymeres (i.e., what is happening in real life).
LikeLike
the first part of the book, after the intro, documents in detail what is wrong. But in the intro Diane makes clear she will offer proposals that have evidence that they work. When you get to that part of the book, you are likely to go “duh” as in “why don’t people focus on these obvious things?”
LikeLike
LOL but thanks for the warning!
LikeLike
I agree that this is all due to Murdoch’s entrance into the Education market. Meanwhile the NYTimes did a puff piece (IMO) on his company which in now under a new name. Unfortunately, the comment section is impressed. That’s because they are not from NYC to personally witness the harm Klein has done.
The only bottom line will be in sales of your book!! So to you I say….Congrats for pissing off The New York Post!!
LikeLike
schoolgal–Dontcha just love it when companies change their names so as to seem innocuous–e.g.-Millken’s K-12, Pear$on’s Scott Foresman (haven’t yet changed the name to Pear$on–keeping S.F., which has been known to be a well-respected textbook publisher)…too many examples to list here.
LikeLike
I never let school stand in the way of my education-Mark Twain
For the motivated and inquisitive a teacher is irrelevant-Aristotle
Memory is the Foundation of intelligence-Plato
Thank God for the public libraries. I have ordered Ms. Ravitch’s book, as well as Ripley’s and the one with the three authors who detail the fact that America spends more on education than any nation but for the last 20 years achievement has remained stagnant or has regressed-and standards have been lowered for the sake of ‘tolerance’ or ‘diversity or ‘inclusion’.
The thing of it is Ms. Ravitch doesn’t seem to want debate. I don’t hold with Dewey or Cremins or Kirp- to a certain extent education needs to be formal. I believe in the Art of Memory and Wit. Lined up against Plato and Cicero I see jargon and vitriol-drill and kill, teach to the test and my favorite ‘critical Lincoln skills” and it is all the same vitriol Ms. Ravitch is railing against.
I can’t comment on her latest-I read The Late Great.American School system and it was good journalism-she seemed dispassionate as well as subjective.
Nevertheless if you can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
At least she is getting some attention and that sells books.
I’ve written my own and if I have had trouble getting it out it is not because I’m wrong it’s because people don’t want debate or competition.
LikeLike
You don’t seem to want to debate either, sir, since you never respond to reasoned criticisms. Dr. Ravitch takes on debates all the time.
And real classy to promote your book on someone else’s blog….
LikeLike
Bringing forward a set of reasoned, alternative viewpoints is, at long last, creating the debate we’ve always needed. Thank Diane Ravitch for being a leader of the opposition to corporate deform.
Re: “the fact that America spends more on education than any nation but for the last 20 years achievement has remained stagnant or has regressed-and standards have been lowered for the sake of ‘tolerance’ or ‘diversity or ‘inclusion’.”
We also spend the most on health care, but have the 37th best health care system.
Consider how lack of equal, full access and too much money funneling into administration tie these two industries together as an exercise.
LikeLike
“engaging in nepotism and taking bribes from the teachers unions.”
You know, the broader basis of this charge is baloney. Public school advocates shouldn’t accept it. That media accept it is outrageous.
Reformers are biased and self-interested. If a public school teacher defends public schools because the teacher is worried about a paycheck, the same charge can be leveled at reformers who have made lucrative careers out of ed reform. Michelle Rhee makes a hell of a lot more off school reform than a middle class public school teacher. Bill Gates’ entire legacy now relies on this “working”. He’s self-interested. Arne Duncan has been claiming success since he was in Chicago. It’s the basis of his career. He’s self-interested. Joel Klein now has a direct financial interest in “blended learning”. Self-interested! If you own or run a charter school, you’re self-interested, in the terms of the “debate” that reformers have set.
Public school advocates should never have implicitly accepted this argument by defending themselves against it. It’s baloney. It wouldn’t pass muster in a county court, let alone at the Highest Lofty Levels of National Policy.
If media and reformers continue to pitch this nonsense at public school advocates to “discredit” them, pitch it right back at them. It works both ways. To me, it’s a measure of the extent that they have gotten a complete pass that ANYONE bought this weak argument, let alone media and people who are supposed to be experts.
LikeLike
LikeLike
“. . . but for the last 20 years achievement has remained stagnant or has regressed-and standards have been lowered for the sake of ‘tolerance’ or ‘diversity or ‘inclusion’.”
What “achievement has remained stagnant”?
What “standards have been lowered”? Are they flying at half mast?
LikeLike
Looks like he did not read Diane’s article. Some people have been suckered in by the “reform” drivel that’s been perpetuated by politicians and corporate leaders for the past 30 years and then spit it back as if it’s truth. I think those with an axe to grind are most likely to join in on the spewing of shock doctrine, in order to justify their rage and resentments. You can easily tell who they are because they use every quote they can find to deny the value of a formal education and condemn teachers.
Here are some of the positive quotes they tend to ignore:
“The one exclusive sign of thorough knowledge is the power of teaching” ~Aristotle
“It is the supreme art of the teacher to awaken joy in creative expression and knowledge.” ~Albert Einstein
“A master can tell you what he expects of you. A teacher, though, awakens your own expectations.” ~Patricia Neal
LikeLike
Excellent quotes, thanks!
LikeLike
Congratulations, Diane! You are a threat to the unscrupulous people who are trying to make Big Bucks off of public education, especially as it applies to poor children of color (Surprise!). I was about to say something like “Stay safe” but then I remembered the best thing about being in our seventies is that we’ve already enjoyed a full life span. So we are not afraid, are we?
LikeLike
Wow. I suppose I should expect such shameful behavior when there is so much at stake, but I keep getting surprised. It is hard to be a public figure, and I really appreciate Diane Ravitch’s courage in this most important undertaking. I am sure it feels terrible to be attacked, and I hope you feel heartened by the support of so many as you speak for us. And we really all speak for the children.
LikeLike
When people distort others’ arguments as utterly as did this thug, the distortion will have one of the following effects:
1. People will see, immediately, that the capo brought in the goon, and they won’t take what was said at all seriously except as a breach of civility.
2. The attack will set people up for learning, later, that the actual arguments bear no relation, at all, to the ones described–they will find that they were lied to–and they won’t like that. People don’t like being lied to.
In either case, the propagandist loses.
A lot of folks in the reformy crowd don’t have any respect for anyone not clearly part of the oligarchical class, and as a result, they constantly underestimate the sense of ordinary men and women. This is a good thing. It means that, in the long run, they lose.
LikeLike
I predict that there will be a LOT of these attacks over the next couple months. The other side has a LOT of money and a LOT of media control, and they don’t like, AT ALL, that this book has been written and will be read. But you know what,
the truth, once known, can’t be unknown
We’re not in Orwell’s Ingsoc yet.
LikeLike
Diane, I feel that you are leading the charge against the forces whose real goal is to destroy the teachers union and enrich themselves through the destruction of public schools. But, I think you need to research the film “Blackboard Jungle”. I remember Sidney Poitier and at least one Hispanic student in Glenn Ford’s class. I have confronted Michelle Rhee when she was pimping the film, “Won’t Back Down” and I was able to embarrass her by quoting statements she had made because I had your book with me. Unfortunately, you give the other side ammunition when you make any statement that isn’t true. I would hope you can fix this. Thanks for all your hard work.
Jerry Rosenblum
LikeLike
What statements are you referring to?
LikeLike
As for discipline, it bears remembering a 1955 film called “Blackboard Jungle,” about an unruly, violent inner-city school where students bullied other students. The students in this school were all white.
LikeLike
Diane, I feel that you are leading the charge against the forces whose real goal is to destroy the teachers union and enrich themselves through the destruction of public schools. But, I think you need to research the film “Blackboard Jungle”. I remember Sidney Poitier and at least one Hispanic student in Glenn Ford’s class. I have confronted Michelle Rhee when she was pimping the film, “Won’t Back Down” and I was able to embarrass her by quoting statements she had made because I had your book with me. Unfortunately, you give the other side ammunition when you make any statement that isn’t true. I would hope you can fix this. Thanks for all your hard work.
Jerry Rosenblum
LikeLike
Jerry, you are right, and I will make that correction. My bad.
Diane
LikeLike
As I had commented on Fred Klonsky’s Blog,
Short & sweet: N.Y. Post–once a rag, always a rag.
LikeLike
Thanks.
LikeLike
To Cosmic & Ron way, way up there: Since USA Today was the paper that broke the D.C. (&, I believe) Atlanta test cheating, & has also carried some really good education reporting (& I like their state-by-state-at-a-glance page–they often have some really good bits I haven’t read anywhere else), I have a healthy regard for that publication. That being said, I ALWAYS buy USA Today when I’m on a trip and, when at home, I read it at our local library.
LikeLike
The NYPost also had their fangs into de Blasio trying to paint him as someone who will destroy the city. This is a paper that gets it way through fear mongering.
LikeLike
School gal, I hear the NY Post calls him “Barack de Blasio,” but I don’t that will hurt him with NYC voters.
LikeLike
What the hell is a hair shirt ?
LikeLike
if I may quote from a Catholic source:
“A garment of rough cloth made from goats’ hair and worn in the form of a shirt or as a girdle around the loins, by way of mortification and penance. The Latin name is said to be derived from Cilicia, where this cloth was made, but the thing itself was probably known and used long before this name was given to it. The sackcloth, for instance, so often mentioned in Holy Scripture as a symbol of mourning and penance, was probably the same thing; and the garment of camels’ hair worn by St. John the Baptist was no doubt somewhat similar.”
LikeLike
Thanks, TeacherKen. I really enjoy your blog. Quoted last night for in a thing on unions.
LikeLike
Look at how they attacked Matt Damon for putting his kids in a private school when he moved his family to LA. It was like a mobbing in cyberspace. Jeb Bush and John Deasy went after Damon as did a bunch of bloggers, including some guy with TIme. They channeled up Wally George and called him a limousine liberal. It was like 1986 again! . All of this revealed their ignorance and arrogance. Valerie Stuass ripped Bush an new one, calling him “witless” and Deasy revealed how little he knows about education paradigms and ethics by saying he could accommodate Damon’s political quirks with “progressive” schools ( no so such thing in lausd) and urged him to come by for a personal conference anytime. A orogressive school is apolitical, liberal arts or himanities based, not heavily tested or big on lessons that are scripted . Also an official does not provide special attention to a parent simply because he is a celebrity.
LikeLike
Let’s call it “The New York Past,” instead of “The New York Post”.
LikeLike
: )
But I fear that we are not talking about taking us backward but very into a dystopian future the likes of which we have not seen
LikeLike
Depends on how you look at it. If we win, then the New York Post of today will be a thing of the past.
LikeLike
Oooo…very good. NEW YORK PAST.
LikeLike
Is there no way to comment on the opinion piece at the New York Post?
LikeLike
The DEFORMERS are running scared, thus their tactics of fear and punishment. It’s sick.
LikeLike
Yes, Yvonne, watch who the “deformers” attack. The truth is starting to crumble their false narrative and it scares them to no end. How grateful I am to Diane Ravitch and others who have the courage to print the truth!
LikeLike