Massachusetts has consistently scored at the top of the National Assessment of Educational Progress in recent years in fourth and eighth grades, in reading and mathematics. Massachusetts and a few other states participated in the TIMSS, an international test of math and science, and Massachusetts did very well, so well that its 8th graders placed second in the world, behind only Singapore, in science.
The New York Times writes about the ingredients of the Massachusetts’ success story. Underlying the improvements in the state is the Education Reform Act of 1993, described below, which was a deal made in which the state provided a massive new infusion of funding in exchange for higher academic standards.
What are the students doing in science? Hands-on projects, active learning, doing not listening to lectures.
What was not part of the reforms?
“Also noteworthy was what the reforms did not include. Parents were not offered vouchers for private schools. The state did not close poorly performing schools, eliminate tenure for teachers or add merit pay. The reforms did allow for some charter schools, but not many.” The legislation permitted only 22 charters for the entire state, subsequently increased to 25. Note also that the state has strong teachers’ unions.
Here is more about the legislation that created the structure for the reforms.
In 1993, the state legislature passed the Education Reform Act. Legislative leaders and education leaders made a “grand bargain.” As Tom Birmingham, one of the leaders at the time, described the deal, it was: “We will make a massive infusion of progressively distributed dollars into our public schools, and in return, we demand high standards and accountability from all education stakeholders. This grand bargain is the cornerstone of education reform.”
“Our fidelity to these two core principles helps explain our extraordinary achievements. Throughout the 1990s and in the first years of this century, support for public education was the top priority of state government and our budgets reflected this. From 1993 to 2002, state spending on public schools increased 8 percent per year, for a total of over $2 billion.”
The Education Reform Act established the following reforms:
1) curriculum frameworks in each subject;
2) state testing (the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System);
3) state tests for graduation, which students could take beginning in the tenth grade, and which they were given multiple opportunities to retake until they passed;
4) more time for instruction;
5) entry tests for new teachers;
6) a new foundation budget that raised funding across the state, especially in high-needs districts;
7) 22 charter schools for the entire state.
It is also noteworthy that the state increased early childhood education funding by 247% between 1996 and 1999.
Massachusetts has made remarkable gains.
But if we use TIMSS as a measure, it is worth mentioning that U.S. students performed surprisingly well in both math and science. A few states, in addition to Massachusetts, took the TIMSS to gauge how well they were doing by international standards. In fourth-grade math (where Massachusetts did not participate), North Carolina ranked as one of the top-performing entities in the world. Yes, you read that right: North Carolina, where the extremist governor and legislature are busily destroying public education.
In eight-grade math, students in Massachusetts, Minnesota, Indiana, and North Carolina ranked among the world’s top-performing entities. In eighth grade math, black students in Massachusetts received the same scores as students in Israel and Finland.
Singapore, Hong Kong, Chinese Taipei, and Japan lead the world on these tests. But we really should get over the idea that international test scores are future economic indicators. The U.S.’s international test scores were absolutely dreadful when the first international test was given in the mid-1960s. We were last and next to last in the first international math test. Our students typically ranked average or below average on most such tests over the past half century. And yet we simultaneously became the world’s most powerful nation with the world’s largest economy.
I write about this in greater detail in my new book in a chapter called “The Facts About International Test Scores.”

Thank you for running through this, Professor Ravitch. I think it really can’t be emphasized enough that a massive overhaul of the state finance system for education was a big part of the ’93 law here in Massachusetts; in fact, the law was signed the same week that a lawsuit against the state around education funding inequities was settled.
I would also say that I’ve seen a loss of just this sort of “hands-on” science in our schools since NCLB came through testing only math and reading. Many schools now only do science and social studies on alternate weeks, if that, with far too little time devoted to either.
LikeLike
>Since you will be visiting my city soon, I thought I’d send you a note. I am a Special Education Teacher in the Pittsburgh Public Schools. I work in what would be considered a failing school. I am sure you know about my districts commitment to Bill Gate’s school reform and the creation of a new Teacher Evaluation System. This school year will be the first in which the evaluations will be used to exit or fire teachers. The system is set up where two satisfactions in a row will cost one their job. There are other facets of the system that are complicated and hard to get answers too. All I know is that the odds ofgetting evaluated fairlyare very low. For example 50% of evaluation is classroom observation,30% is aVAM score, and a Student Survey is15%, and school wide VAM 5%. Since I teach less than 15 kids in a class I get a school wide VAM which is very low, and a district wide Survey also on the low side. As far as the Student Survey, the special ed. kids can not even read the questions because of their disability and reading levels. If I score a fewBasics onsections for my class observation, I will most likely rate Unsatisfaction. My school is 85% African American and most receive free lunch. They come from a very poor and rough area of the city. Many of these kids lack motivation and have no parental support. I could go on and on, you know the situation. In conclusion I would like to know if any lawsuits have been attempted, or will I have any grounds to pursue a legal path. How can I be rated on kids I do not teach, cant read, and do not come to school? HELP >GB > > > > >________________________________ > >From: Diane Ravitch’s blog >To: genebrickley@yahoo.com >Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 11:23 AM >Subject: [New post] How Did Massachusetts Become Number 1? > >dianerav posted: “Massachusetts has consistently scored at the top of the National Assessment of Educational Progress in recent years in fourth and eighth grades, in reading and mathematics. Massachusetts and a few other states participated in the TIMSS, an international t” >
LikeLike
On average how much does Massachusetts spend per pupil to educate their children?
LikeLike
In Cambridge it’s over $25K per student. In many suburbs it’s ball park $10K per student. The average can be found on the Mass DOE website.
LikeLike
On average how much does Massachusetts spend per pupil to educate their kids? What percentage of kids Massachusetts live in poverty?
LikeLike
Not to take anything away from Massachusetts, but I think it is also important to highlight what was buried three quarters of the way through this fawning NYT story:
“While scores have improved across the board, the gap between the highest achievers and the lowest — notably blacks, Hispanics and special education students — has persisted.”
I also found it troubling that the article attributed a large part of MA’s “success” to high-stakes testing, while never producing one shred of evidence of causation. And this was in the Science TImes!!!
LikeLike
Tracy, Wendy and seabea’s comments are well taken. The important investments brought by MA Ed Reform often get overshadowed by a relentless focus on the role of standards and high-stakes tests. Massachusetts actually did quite well, though it had large achievement gaps, before Ed Reform, thanks to our relatively affluent and well educated population. The tests have actually been damaging to hands-on science instruction and, as Wendy points out, test score gaps remain large, reflecting Massachusetts’ growing income inequality. My co-authors and I discussed these points, and others, in our recent report: http://www.citizensforpublicschools.org/20-years-after-education-reform-cps-calls-for-new-direction/
LikeLike
It also helps to have one of the lowest poverty rates in the nation.
There it is again – that pesky economic stuff.
Click to access acsbr11-01.pdf
LikeLike
Sorry, my comment below is misplaced:
Yes. And universal health care (particularly for children) before others did. And high rates of adult education. And…you get the idea.
LikeLike
Yes, absolutely. Of course, the “eliminating or reducing poverty is the key to educational success” storyline does not play so well with the elite. The Times article takes at face value the description by the Braintree educator: “We’re sort of, we used to say, a blue-collar area,”
A little digging (and I mean a really little) would have revealed the median family income of Braintree is about $100K. (http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_11_5YR_DP03)
I don’t think that’s blue-collar.
LikeLike
You know, here in Rhode Island when we are given pep talks by the pep talkers from and about how great Massachusetts is doing, we somehow never hear about massive infusions of funding. In fact, this is the first I hear of the Education Reform Act, and I have been made to sit through several talks regarding how “we can do it too”. I wonder why that is.
LikeLike
Yes. And universal health care (particularly for children) before others did. And high rates of adult education. And…you get the idea.
LikeLike
No matter what it seems that they made the proper moves and now they are paying off. It is probable that if these methods were used also in poor areas they would also work. Good teaching is always good teaching and children learn. It has been done a lot of times in the past and can be done again. What is not happening is for those who have rapidly turned around to get into a room and put together a plan. From my talking to a few of those they all do basically the same thing and #1 is proving that the students are #1 not the adults and that the adults are there to assist them. Everything else comes from that. The fish rots from the head and with a good head it does not rot.
LikeLike
Did you not see the comments above – the economics in MA is better than other places. They’ve had universal health care. They have one of the lowest poverty rates in the U.S.. They infused large amounts of cash into the system.
Even more interesting is that they still have an achievement gap.
“Good teaching is always good teaching” is circular. What goes on outside of that teaching is often times what makes a particular brand of “teaching” good. Children learn more because of what goes on outside of that “teaching” than the teaching itself.
Good teaching cannot save us. Good teachers cannot save us.
Good governing policy at all levels will save us. We don’t have that. We have governing policy that protects the wealthy, rebuilds distant countries (including their schools [while we close our own]) after we’ve destroyed them, they protect corporations, and they could care a less about our kids. Wealth inequality and social mobility are the bane of our existence.
LikeLike
And yet Massachusetts legislators let Arne & Obama “show me the money” and signed on to Race To The Top’s bottom line, shoving aside our State Standards for Common Core’s. Tracy said it herself – science and social studies are “specialty” subjects, and today’s 6th graders don’t know the most very basics of either…last year I asked my students to raise their hands if anyone traveled out of the country over the summer. Almost all did. Only one REALLY did. The others went to NYC, Florida, and even The Berkshires!! It’s pathetic. They’re equally ignorant about science.
LikeLike
The MA Ed Reform Act did not require standardized tests but did require (for the first time in MA) statewide assessing of students in a few grades. The then-board of ed planned to use portfolios, tasks, limited standardized testing without high stakes attached to those tests. Then there was what amounted to a coup as Gov Weld worked with Dem leaders in legislature to remove the board and appoint a new one headed by reactionary John Silber and a group of equally conservative members who represented neither the views of the state nor of the education profession. Silber et al moved quickly to scrap the multiple measures plan and impose high-stakes testing, which then nearly tripled in quantity with NCLB, along with even higher stakes. FairTest and allies have been pushing over the years for a different approach, much more like the original plans. See http://fairtest.org/fact-sheet-better-way-evaluate-schools-pdf.
LikeLike
I just moved from Massachusetts after having lived there for the last 13 years. I never heard of TIMSS. Is this one of those tests where the state selects only certain schools/districts for participation? Is it really a fair gauge of the entire state?
LikeLike
It is a random sample of students in states. It is supposed to be a good statistical representation as it is the only measurement we gather where we can compare states.
LikeLike
OOPPSS! I was thinking NAEP. TIMSS is more for international comparison so I would think that state to state comparison would be less valid.
LikeLike
The success in Massachusetts can be attributed to a perfect storm. Governor Bill Weld, coupled with the authors of MERA, Tom Birmingham and Mark Roosevelt from Beacon Hill (state legislature), Commissioner of Education David Driscoll and BOE leader John Silber all insisted on a no excuses approach for the significant influx of state money. This was all coupled with MCAS, the most rigorous state assessment in the country, along with the graduation requirement for competency determination to earn a high school diploma. With these latter two variables, students in Massachusetts soon discovered they were going to have to put in some effort and actually demonstrate academic competency as opposed to the previous practice of seat time qualifying them for a high school diploma. The grand bargain has indeed paid off quite well.
MCAS and the graduation requirement have become a way of life here in the Bay State and our students are better off for it. Yes, the achievement gap persists but we’re making progress on it every year with a higher percentage of students of color not simply passing MCAS but also scoring at the proficient and advanced levels.
My one concern was when we signed on to CCSS at the risk of (at least the opinion in some quarters) of jeopardizing our already exemplar state standards developed by such stalwarts as Sandra Stosky.
LikeLike
I am unsure what the purpose of hand-wringing over achievement gaps is when (for example) Mass. black students are close to leading the world in math.
How much of the so-called “achievement gap” is really due to poverty?
LikeLike
Paul,
Did Massachusetts schools do anything with curriculum that helped bring about their stellar results?
LikeLike
@Rodgers,
Curriculum is still pretty much a local option. While the standards are the same statewide, each district is relatively free to adopt/implement the curricula they believe best meets the needs of their students.
@Diane,
You’re absolutely correct – a HUGE gamble. There’s no way of telling how it’s going to pan out. The amount of money we received from RttT as “brownie points” to go with CCSS was a very questionable move and objected by a number of people (myself included).
LikeLike
Paul Hoss, your state of Massachusetts took a huge gamble by dropping its proven standards to adopt Common Core.
LikeLike
Thanks for the original post and for this comment. How ironic: Massachusetts education thrived because the state bucked the quick-fix trend and stuck to a consistent strategy and curriculum for more than a decade. Now it has jettisoned a tried-and-true curriculum for the untested common core.
I keep thinking about what will happen at Brockton High–the largest and, at one time, one of the poorest performing schools in the state. The “miracle” that transformed Brockton was a decade-plus of consistent leadership with an obsessive commitment to improving literacy. Oh, and a bunch of middle-aged teachers with 20-plus years of experience. To read more, please see: http://andreagabor.com/2011/09/30/a-school%E2%80%99s-decade-long-literacy-obsession-and-how-it-transformed-brockton-high/
LikeLike
I don’t see how the MCAS has helped Massachusetts students at all. In our school, it was a distraction and took valuable time away from real teaching and learning. The teachers had no way to interpret the results to help the child who needed it. They have no access to the students results to find out why they might have scored poorly on a test; they can only teach to the test (teach strategies for passing the test as opposed to teaching subject matter). In our case, a daughter had a near perfect score in 4th grade language arts MCAS, and the next year nearly failed; on math she scored consistently high each year. The teacher had no clue what the problem was or how to interpret the score. All she could do was prepare her for the next year’s test (strategize to pass).
MCAS is a complete waste of valuable time and resources all around.
LikeLike
Jamie,
I’d have to question (respectfully) your story because the district I worked in for 35 years received an itemized analysis every year (question by question) for each test. It told us which questions were right/wrong so teachers could then adjust their teaching the following year to (hopefully) improve on their inadequacies. So from a teacher’s perspective the tests and the reported results were quite helpful.
LikeLike
Paul – Our daughter’s teacher told us she could tell how the student scored, but she couldn’t tell why the student scored the way they did. She didn’t know how the student responded to the question, only the score that was given. She also had no way of knowing if there was an error in scoring. Doesn’t it seem odd that a student would go from an extremely high score one year, to extremely low the next year? The result is meaningless. As the parent of the student, I can say it tells me nothing but that a very bright student did very poorly on a single test, or that there was some technical reason for the score that can’t be determined. Can you imagine what this does to the self confidence of this student? What if the teacher was being graded on the very poor performance on this test when we know the student has no difficulty with the subject?
LikeLike
The high schoolers in MA who are doing well on tests (whatever that’s worth) are the ones who were toddlers and preschoolers around a decade ago, when MA invested heavily in early childhood education.
LikeLike
That’s the question I have. What is the value of doing well on this test? Are these standardized tests better than the other standardized tests out there that seem to be meaningless?
LikeLike
I believe it’s all bogus. Massachusetts has good public schools, higher income levels, and higher educated households. MCAS is not better test than any of them.
LikeLike