Archives for the month of: August, 2013

Robert Shepherd posted an interesting comment about where our society is willing to”throw money”:

“How well I remember George Bush senior setting the direction for decades of policy by saying “You can’t solve the education problem by throwing money at it.”

“Well, we seem to have no problem throwing money at prisons in this country. As of year-end 2011, 6.9777 million U.S. adults were “under correctional supervision,” that is, on probation, on parole, in jail, or in prison. That’s about 2.9% of the U.S. population. It’s the highest rate in the world. As of 2010, according to a Pew report, average cost of incarceration per inmate in state systems was $47,421 in California, $50,262 in Connecticut, $38,268 in Illinois, $38,383 in Maryland, $41,364 in Minnesota, $54,865 in New Jersey, $60,076 in New York. . . . You get the picture.

“We can pay on the front end to create compensatory environments for the children of the poorest in our society, or we can pay and pay and pay on the back end.

“We have to face the fact that our system is failing the children of the rural and inner city poor and that MAGICAL nostrums like standardized tests aren’t going to fix that (but, in fact, will make things much, much worse). The savage inequalities that Kozol wrote about decades ago are back with a vengeance, and until we address the poverty of kids’ communities and put a great deal of money, much more than we are now spending, into creating COMPENSATORY ENVIRONMENTS, we’re not going to make progress. Only an idiot thinks that one can make real change in the life of a child with meth- or crack-addicted parents simply by testing him or her more.

“Every child deserves a shot at a decent life. That is the promise of our Declaration of Independence. For millions of American kids, that promise is a cruel joke, but every one of those kids, every one, matters.”

Earlier today, the news broke that the notorious Wall Street-funded corporate Stand on Children had selected John R. Connolly as their favorite for mayor and planned to give him $500,000-700,000.

But it must have played badly in Boston, because Connolly announced that he would reject their campaign contribution.

Surely there are enough successful hedge fund managers in Boston to pay for their guy’s campaign without seeking funding from out of state.

Let’s keep an eye on this and see what candidates actually say, as opposed to ads saying that they love little children and are devoted to improving education.

We have heard that song before.

We have often heard that charter schools will “save poor kids trapped in failing public schools.”

We have also often heard that NYC has the best charter schools in the nation because the city chooses the authorizers so carefully and monitors them frequently.

It is interesting, therefore, to look at the performance of the charter sector on the absurdly hard Common Core tests, where most kids across the state of New York allegedly “failed.”

Here is a link to the charter scores, as reported by the New York City Charter Schools Center.

Unfortunately, the Center can’t stop boasting about how many ways the charters “beat” public schools, an obnoxious habit those folks have, when they should be interested in collaboration with public schools towards a common goal.

If you scroll down to the list of charter schools and their scores, you will find they are spread out all over the place.

Some are high, some are very low. Most are in the middle.

Some saw their 2012 proficiency rates drop more than those of public schools, as much as 50-60%.

Deborah Kenny’s much-celebrated Harlem Village Academy Leadership Charter School, for example, fell from a proficiency rate of 86.5% to 33.7%, a drop of 52.8%. (Now I understand why my interview with Katie Couric–lasting 30 minutes–never was aired. She is on the board of Kenny’s HVA, as is publishing magnate Rupert Murdoch.)

I don’t mean to pick on charter schools as such. I just think it is ridiculous that they are seen as a systemic answer to the problems of public education when they enroll so few students, have high teacher attrition, and have the freedom to exclude or push out kids they don’t want. Some have high test scores, some have low scores, but they are a distraction from the needs and problems of a city with 1.1 million public school students. I wish they were all successful. I wish all the public schools were successful. What these rotten scores show is that what we are doing now (No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top) doesn’t work.

The status quo has failed.

We need education with a human face. 1.1 million of them.

Jersey Jazzman reports that Chris Cerf has selected an inexperienced young man, age 32, formerly on Cerf’s staff in New York City, to take charge of the Camden, New Jersey, public schools.

Paymon Rouhaniford graduated from college ten years ago. He worked on Wall Street for Goldman Sachs. He worked for the New York City Department of Education, mainly in developing new charter schools.

For the past 10 months, he has been the “Chief Strategy and Innovation Officer” in Newark, which translated, means charters and privatization.

Notice that aside from his two years in TFA teaching sixth grade, he has never been a principal or a superintendent.

He probably has no licenses to teach or administer in the state of New Jersey, although Cerf may have abolished all such requirements by now.

This is truly innovative, selecting an inexperienced young man who has never run a school to run a district of very poor kids.

Here is what Chris Cerf said:

“Every child in New Jersey, regardless of zip code, deserves access to a high-quality education, and I’m confident Paymon Rouhanifard is the right person to make this goal a reality,” said Christie. “Paymon has a proven track record of improving the lives of hundreds of thousands of students in Newark and New York City, and brings innovative leadership that Camden needs moving forward. He has shown a deep commitment to working with parents and teachers to put students at the center of all decisions. Under his leadership, I know Camden’s schools will improve on the progress of these last few months.”

Cerf does not specify what he means by a “proven track record.”

 

 

When Kevin Huffman (ex-TFA) brought in his friend  Chris Barbic (ex-TFA) to run a district made up of the state’s lowest performing schools, the district was euphemistically called the Achievement School District.

Barbic promised that within five years, these schools would rank in the top 25% in the state.

In its first year report, the state ranked it 5 out of 5 in growth; math scores were up by 3% but reading scores were down by 5%.

Gary Rubinstein reviews the numbers and finds it amazing that the state could recognize a drop in reading scores in the state’s lowest performing schools as a sign of extraordinary growth.

Since Gary, also ex-TFA, knows the people involved, he holds out hope that Chris Barbic will be the first of the big-name corporate reformers to do a 180 and recognize that high expectations and TFA are not enough.

It is sad that this kind of hype has become predictable, when it should be inexcusable.

Stefan Pryor was named state commissioner of education in Connecticut two years ago.

He was a co-founder of the Achievement First charter chain,  which has achieved a certain notoriety for its sky-high suspension rates (even in kindergarten), inflated graduation rates, and its very low numbers of English language learners (or none at all).

Pryor has favored the charter sector at every turn, and Achievement First whenever possible.

Jonathan Pelto reports that Pryor selected an Achievement First administrator to run the state’s new “turnaround” division, even though the person in question has never been certified to teach in Connecticut.

Pelto writes:

Pryor’s choice for the job, Morgan Barth, reports that he was a founding teacher at Achievement First’s Elm City Preparatory Academy in New Haven and then went on to serve as principal there and then a principal at Achievement First Bridgeport’s Middle School.

However, Morgan Barth has never held Connecticut certification to be a teacher or an administrator.

The news means that the time he spent working at Achievement First, Inc. prior to July 1, 2010 was in direct violation of Connecticut state law.

In an email that went out yesterday from Commissioner Stefan Pryor, Pryor wrote, “Mr. Barth will serve as the Division Director for Turnaround in the Turnaround Office.  He will guide all of the work of the division.  Mr. Barth brings a wealth of experience as an educator and school leader – particularly in school environments that are in need of intensive intervention.  Before coming to the SDE, he led improvement efforts at two of the lowest performing schools in the Achievement First Network, first at Elm City College Prep and most recently at Achievement First Bridgeport’s middle school.  At Elm City, he taught fifth and sixth grade reading for four years before becoming the principal and taught fourth grade in Arkansas before coming to Connecticut in 2004.”

But despite coming to Connecticut nine years ago, Morgan Barth never bothered to acquire certification under Connecticut’s teacher and administrator certification law.

In 2010, with the assistance of a $100,000 lobbying contract with one of Connecticut’s most influential lobbying firms, Achievement First, Inc. was able to convince the Connecticut General Assembly to pass a law that exempted Connecticut’s charter schools from Connecticut’s mandatory certification requirements.  As a result of the law, Connecticut’s charter schools could have up to 30% of their staff non-certified starting in July 2010.

Thus, in the years preceding 2010, Morgan Barth was working as an uncertified teacher and/or administrator, which was illegal at that time.

Many “reformers” see certification as an unnecessary hoop or hurdle through which talented people must jump. But every profession has some form of qualifying process, by examination or course-taking or something.

Hairdressers need to be licensed by the state. So do morticians.

Should education function without any qualifications for those who would teach or administer schools?

That is not reform. That takes us back to about 1850.

Funny, Connecticut was one of the very first states to insist on professionalism in education, under the leadership of Henry Barnard, who was Pryor’s predecessor as state commissioner of education in the nineteenth century.

He must be turning in his grave as he sees what Governor Malloy and Stefan Pryor are doing to demolish his work.

One of our loyal readers in Boston informs us that one candidate in the Boston mayoral race–Rob Consalvo– has appealed to his fellow candidates to refuse funding from out-of-state groups.

Fat chance.

Not only is Stand on Children (allegedly based in Oregon) throwing in between $500,000-750,000, but other groups including New York-based Democrats for Education Reform (the Wall Street hedge fund managers) have taken a keen interest in the race.

It would not be surprising to see Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst sending money to John Connolly–the choice of Stand on Children–and also to see the arrival of hundreds of thousands of dollars–maybe millions– from New York City Michael Bloomberg, Los Angeles billionaire Eli Broad, Netflix owner Reed Hastings, publishing magnate Rupert Murdoch, and the billionaire Walton family. These individuals have added big dough to school board races in Louisiana, Idaho, Georgia, and California.

Local school boards should be chosen by the people of the school district, not purchased by billionaires with a hunger for power and control, which they use to privatize public education.

Although billionaire Eli Broad’s candidates lost the last two school board elections, he will still maintain his grip over the Los Angeles school system. The newly elected Mayor Eric Garcetti announced the selection of a Broad-trained educator as his education advisor.

Thelma Melendez de Santa Ana was a classmate of Superintendent John Deasy in the class of 2006 in the unaccredited Broad Superintendents Academy.

“The Melendez appointment comes two months after she retired as superintendent of Santa Ana Unified, the largest district in Orange County, with more than 57,000 students. In a letter announcing her retirement, Melendez noted that she’d been instrumental in creating key performance indicators for the district and improving parent engagement.

“According to published reports, however, the two years that Melendez spent at the district were marred by conflict with the Santa Ana teachers union and by turmoil at a middle school caused by students running amok.

“In May, she was one of five finalists for the job of Pasadena Unified superintendent, but withdrew from consideration before a scheduled interview with the district’s school board.”

More about her background:

“From 2009-11, she served as assistant secretary for elementary and secondary education under U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan. That position followed three years spent as schools chief of Pomona Unified, where she also worked as deputy superintendent and chief academic officer from 1999-2005. She was named 2009 Superintendent of the Year by the Association of California School Administrators.”

In an unusual arrangement, the city will pay her salary while the schools pay her benefits. This is intended to build up her state pension.

A reader follows Secretary of Education Arne Duncan’s Twitter feed (I do not; I do not monitor him). She noticed that he often promotes commercial, for-profit vendors. Others have noticed how often he lauds privately-managed charter schools and how seldom he praises public schools, except when their staff has been fired. She writes:

 

Speaking of monitoring, Duncan’s Twitter feed is absolutely amazing. 90% of his links promote some commercial aspect of education reform. Here’s today’s prominent product placement:

“School models that don’t fit within traditional definitions are largely excluded from receiving E-Rate support. Florida Virtual School, the largest virtual school in the United States serving more than 148,000 students, uses a model built entirely around connected learning resulting in
a broadband tab of $53 million, yet the E-Rate only reimburses $5,237. Schools using blended learning approaches that “flip the classroom,” where students watch lectures online at home and use class time for interactive discussion, also do not receive full E-Rate support.”

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/education/317329-new-education-models-need-a-new-e-rate#ixzz2cbzyzhXm
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

I don’t even think he has to go thru the revolving door from government work to the private sector, like so many of his staffers have. He’s promoting private sector education schemes while in his government job. It’s just shameless.

If there is a watch list at the U.S. Department of Education, surely Anthony Cody must be on it, along with me.

Anthony has been one of the most articulate critics of Arne Duncan and Bill Gates and the whole corporate reform agenda.

Just when I think he can’t outdo his last column, he proves me wrong.

This time, he explains his efforts to engage with Arne Duncan and how Duncan brushed him off.

He writes:

I actively sought a dialogue with the Arne Duncan and the Department of Education way back in November of 2009, when I wrote an open letter to President Obama, and started a Facebook group called Teachers’ Letters to Obama. In December of that same year I sent a packet of more than 100 letters to Secretary Duncan and the White House. In return I got a short note from a staffer at the DoEd, and no response at all from the White House. Eventually, the Teachers’ Letters group got a short phone conference with Secretary Duncan, and he followed up with a short personal call as well. But that was a very frustrating and aborted sort of dialogue, where the main emphasis on the part of Department of Education was to convince us all that we were somehow incapable of accurately perceiving their policies and their real-world consequences. Widespread frustration with this sort of response, and with administration policies, led to more than 6000 of us gathering in front of the White House at the Save Our Schools March in the summer of 2011.

Anthony never gave up trying, and was unable to break through the administration’s stony insistence that they know what they are doing, and their minds are closed.

Anthony is a teacher, and he believes in education, so he keeps reaching out. I think even Anthony now realizes that this administration has no intention of changing course, no matter what the evidence.