This is a terrific article from an unusual source: George Ball, past president of the American Horticultural Society and chairman of the Burpee Seed Company.
Ball writes:
“Frequently, these days, I’m reminded of Edward Lear’s whimsical illustration, “Manypeeplia Upsidedownia.” The drawing depicts an imagined botanical species, with a half dozen characters suspended upside down from a flower’s bending stem. It is a product of the Victorian golden age of nonsense, but it is fitting today, now that we Americans seem to have landed in our own, darker era of nonsense, one in which we take our follies seriously and act upon them. To see folly in full flower, look no further than the Common Core State Standards.
“Now adopted in 45 states, including California, and the District of Columbia, this federal effort sets uniform standards on how math and English are taught in American schools. A top-down program imposed on states in order to qualify for Race to the Top funds, the curriculum is the fruit of a process tainted with politics, vested interests and a lack of transparency.
“The Common Core Curriculum is being implemented without empirical evidence of its value, and imposed hurriedly without consulting the very people most affected: students, teachers and parents.”
Mr. Ball is under the illusion that a massive change in federal policy should be based on trial and evidence, something he may have learned from studying plants. How curious.
He notes: “In July, the state of New York announced the results of its first tests based on the Common Core: The region hasn’t been this battered since Superstorm Sandy. Just 26 percent of students in third through eighth grade passed the English exam, and only 30 percent passed the math test. In one Harlem school, just 7 percent of students received passing scores in English, and 10 percent in math. We’ve gone from No Child Left Behind to Well-Just-About-Every-Child-Left-Behind: progress of a kind. If “learned helplessness” is the Common Core’s goal, it’s a stunning success.”
He concludes with the wisdom of an expert on growing plants from seed:
“What’s lost in Common Core is the human factor. Teachers, whose performance evaluations and salary are pegged to their students’ test results, are deprived of the freedom and creativity that is the oxygen of learning. In an ever-changing world, common sense would propose a broad range of educational approaches rather than a single one designed to ready all students for college. In education, as in gardens, a monoculture is doomed to decay and eventual failure.
“After genetics, the most advanced psychological research tells us a child’s development is determined by micro-relationships – the ever-present, barely perceptible gestures, expressions and glances – that are the soul of communication, nurture and empathy.
“Common Core sacrifices the magic of teaching and learning on the altar of metrics. Teachers, students and administrators are no longer engaged in an organic process geared to the individual. Largely designed by testing experts, not teachers, the monolithic curriculum is like detailed gardening instructions from someone who has never set foot in a garden. “Grow faster!” is the experts’ motto. Well, children are not cornstalks.
“Rather than embark on this Upsidedownia national educational experiment, let’s begin at the local, really local, level: the individual child. Hire smart, empathic teachers with depth and vision, and watch our children grow into a harvest of creative, thoughtful, articulate intellects and citizens. This is, one might say, the cure for the Common Core.”

Folks,
Check out: http://www.nonsenselit.org/Lear/ns/nb.html
Two perfect species to describe the edudeformers and edupreneurs:
Phattfacia Stupenda
Piggiawiggia Pyramidalis
LikeLike
Bravo George Ball!!! This post needs to go viral. I’ll do my part in that regard.
LikeLike
We need more intelligent, insightful people like George Ball to speak out! Yes! This post needs to go viral!
LikeLike
You’re all too negative: If no child can read then we will have effectively eliminated the achievement gap. After all, they’ll have plenty of time to learn to read when they’re in jail.
Nice piece by George Ball. I’ll post it later on my Facebook page.
LikeLike
Chuckle.
LikeLike
“let’s begin at the local, really local, level: the individual child.”
” a child’s development is determined by micro-relationships – the ever-present, barely perceptible gestures, expressions and glances – that are the soul of communication, nurture and empathy.” These two excerpts almost made me cry! I am so pleased to see someone in a profession outside of PK-12 education hasn’t fprgotten about about the children. Wonderful post! Thank you, Mr. Ball. Thank you.
LikeLike
“Hire smart, empathic teachers with depth and vision, and watch our children grow into a harvest of creative, thoughtful, articulate intellects and citizens.” I know this won’t quite fit on a poster or bumper sticker but this IS it. It would run all the scoundrels out of OUR buildings, as none of them can do this, standardized it, package it or profit from it. Only smart, empathic, deep-visioning teachers should apply. Thank you!
LikeLike
Wow, this is beautiful! When my dad was alive, he often shared this wisdom , “All the answers to life can be found in the garden.” How simple and common sense was my dad and Mr. Ball’s viewpoint, and also so very true. Thank you Mr. Ball for speaking out for those who cultivate, nourish, and help others grow.
LikeLike
Beautiful and so true.
LikeLike
As a gardener I absolutely love the use of language to describe the problem with the common core as a one-size fits all, grow faster process. Thank you Mr. Ball!
LikeLike
George Ball for President!!!!
LikeLike
HOORAY FOR GEORGE BALL! Cleverly done, insightful, and right to the point. George Ball is a rock star! Now if that nutty crowd (present and past) in our nation’s capital would just stop digging this nasty hole they are throwing our children into, take a breath, and heed what George and others on this blog are screaming at them.
LikeLike
You’ve got to be kidding. I left teaching after 20+ years not because of Common Core. I still don’t understand why the standards are even an issue unless you really don’t know the subject matter you teach. Why is verifying with evidence a bad thing? I’ve been transitioning to CC for years after reading how much IN DEPTH thinking there was in the standards and numerous blog speak out against it I’m sure in an effort to actually hold everyone down.
Due to testing demands, educators have been in a downward spiral for years. I’ve been told to follow plans “with a team” of lesser educators (loosely termed) so that we all get the same scores regardless of the needs of the students and in direct opposition to best practices and my style of teaching. Education is due to implode and I can’t wait for it to happen so creativity can be recaptured. Printing nonsensical workbook pages or website pages and shuffling more than 20 pages a day to 8 year olds is utter nonsense, but that’s the way it worked prior to Common Core in more than 1 school where I trudged with a heavy heart. Education has to fail, so we can rebuild. Common Core is one more initiative that will be pushed aside in favor of making robots out of students and teachers.
LikeLike
Apparently, you see CCSSI as being high-quality stuff (evidence, please?) that is grounded in sensible research and actual practice with real children (evidence, please?). You suggest that this is a battle between drones who LIKE giving out workbook pages (not that I’m denying that they exist; they do, and I see them pretty much everywhere, painful as it is to have to try to get them out of their comfort zones) and people like you, and that the Common Core represents the anti-drone viewpoint and ethic.
If only it were that simple. Do you have a sense of Diane Ravitch? Do you believe she is an advocate for drone-style teaching and passing out workbook pages? If not, explain, please, her passionate opposition to the Common Core, and that of the many teachers weighing in here and all over the ‘Net in opposition who are NOT fans of the style of teaching you, too, hold in contempt.
Something doesn’t quite compute. Perhaps I’m misreading or misunderstanding you. But right now, your comment seems at odds with itself and with the reality I see in my own opposition to CCSSI and that of many other serious, professional, creative folks who oppose it.
LikeLike
I totally agree with what you say. I just retired after 26 years teaching middle school because I could not longer put up with this incompetent system that keeps using bandaids to fix a broken back. The whole structure needs to be demolished and rebuilt from the ground up. I’ve been saying this for the last 5 years. NCLB has destroyed public education and CC hopefully will put the lid on the coffin and the sooner the better.
LikeLike
I don’t think the author is implying that one shouldn’t teach to a high level; his point is that teaching should be organic and responsive, depending on the child in front of you. Verifying with evidence is fine as long as your students understand the prerequisites of that – i.e. observation, fact versus opinion, etc.
Children develop differently – which has always been the case. However, these standards (skills) are quite prescriptive by grade level and will demand demonstration of these skills per the standardized test. In many cases, these earlier skills are beyond the developmental level of the child, only now someone decided that is called “raising the bar.”
This will cause a number of students to be deemed as “failures” when they are simply at a different place on the continuum of learning.
LikeLike
‘ In many cases, these earlier skills are beyond the developmental level of the child, only now someone decided that is called “raising the bar.” ‘
Why stop with pre-K or K? Why not raise the bar on birth to 3? Now all 9 month olds should be able to walk.
LikeLike
As he states, what’s left out is the human factor.
Just like the zombie houses sitting empty from the real estate boom and then crash. No end users means no value because what humans would actually do with all those houses was not consideredd.
Parents know this. . .making plans about your children is very different than when they actually are involved. We can plan what a succesful day will look like for our children, and it is good to have an ostensible plan, but it might have to be tweaked as you go in order to allow for that child to be who they are and in considering the circumstances beyond your own control (illness, finances, other members of the family). So yes, maybe the Common Core is the ostensible plan, but it hasn’t been tweaked yet (so maybe its adoption was a little premature).
I think most mothers have left half-full grocery carts in the store because a temper tantrum about cookies required that you take the child out of the store–a plan changed because of a child’s needs. Human development has to be factored in.
LikeLike
and knowing this type stuff comes from experience working with children. Which is why those who have experience in doing so need to be consulted more, I think.
LikeLike
Well Said Joanna
The Human Factor has been thrown out and these students are treated like a product at a Quality Control Assembly Line.
I worked on one during a summer to have enough money to survive and I just wanted to experience a factory job.
These people certainly deserve all of the pay and more.
I made 10 times what I would have made at Summer School.
The Super’s of the new ED-Data-CO are treating students as objects.
LikeLike
You got it neaderthal! CCSS are for a quality control assembly line. What did you do with defective products?
LikeLike
May the seeds he has planted in this article grow and grow.
LikeLike
Today’s Portland Press Herald reports a growing move in Maine for a voter referendum on the adoption of Common Core by the LePage administration.
LikeLike
Here’s the link, which isn’t showing as highlighted in my original post:
http://www.pressherald.com/news/Maine-group-seeks-to-repeal-educational-standards-.html
LikeLike
It’s not the standards that are the problem. It’s the assessments.
LikeLike
That is what I’ve been told, too, by classroom teachers.
LikeLike
It is both: the standards themselves were drafted by people with no educational expertise and they are completely inappropriate to the interests or capabilities of children. While I shun the term and concept of “developmentally appropriate practice,” it is not true that you can teach anything to anyone at anytime. There must be a basic receptivity and a fund of experience, both academic and lived, that allows children to make meaning of the things they encounter in the classroom, or the world beyond. So the concepts of indentured servitude v. slavery are simply not on the radar of 6 year olds (and why should they be?), although they can certainly begin to understand the experiences of people their own age who lived long ago or far away in a range of different contexts through story, rather than the “fact-based” narratives that CC favors. The problem with the standards is that they are not written nor vetted by teachers or parents or anyone who knows and care about kids.
LikeLike
It is also the lack of an organized text aligned with the standards.
Do you have any idea how many resources are offered on google?
The Powers at the top of the Pyramid want teachers to research and find or create the good material(which they have always done to supplement) but in this case…the job is overwhelming.
After the teachers find the material, the state wants them to hand it over to them to put on a website so that even the lazies can have access to the material.
This is a 17 hour day job….and all weekend…
It is so chaotic trying to put together a 5,000,000 piece puzzle that is literally thrown all over the globe.
Look at your garden…there is a Core Stem…and from there ..after the right nourishment….the delicious fruit appears…all different…some we eat..some we plant for the birds and the bees…(know how important those bees are to our survival?)…
This ccss is without a core..regardless of what they say.
The children are used for guinea pigs.
This is a chaotic day for education and teachers are education is in a turmoil!
LikeLike
This post is brilliant. It should be shouted from the rooftops. It made me think of a poem I had written in the late ’60’s. It is exponentially more poignant now.
mediocre maniacs
a bureau-cracy
means
a “rule” by offices, desks.
rulers measure, so
are sealed from real,
are schizo-crazy.
the peopling of a bureaucrazy
impersonnels:
proliferates itself asexually
when duties much-room.
it vegetates un humane ly.
every flower grower knows
cross-fertilizing yields
a variegated beauty.
LikeLike
Awesome work, George Ball! Common Core is not developmentally appropriate for early childhood grades. Anyone with access to Phi Delta Kappan should read the article “Warning: The Common Core Standards May Be Harmful To Children”. It is written by Joanne Yatvin who states that she has been an early childhood educator and principal for most of her life. For a fee, the article can be read on-line even if you don’t have a subscription to this journal; just Google the article. I was able to print a copy when I visited a local college’s library that I knew subscribed to this journal.
(Kappan; V94,N6; March 2013; pgs. 42-44.) http://kappanmagazine.org/
LikeLike
This morning I sent this to many contacts. The replies have been amazing. Teachers that were in tears , as I was, when reading this beautifully written missive. Kudos.
LikeLike
At what point in history did we start learning only for employment purposes? Higher education once included students with passion for the arts. Individuals would enroll in universities etc to improve who they want to be. Pink Floyd’s, The Wall comes to mind. Churning out clones.
LikeLike
I totally agree Dr Burleson!!
LikeLike
“Hire smart, empathic teachers with depth and vision, and watch our children grow into a harvest of creative, thoughtful, articulate intellects and citizens. ”
Meanwhile, here’s an inspirational word from the Secretary of Privatization- promoting something or other (mostly himself):
Khan Academy @khanacademy 5h
Sal will be interviewing Ed Secretary @arneduncan. Tweet your Qs tagged #duncankhan by 8/22! Video available after.
Retweeted by Arne Duncan
LikeLike
Oh, perfect: one know-nothing interviewing another. Have to get that onto the MUST MISS page of my calendar.
LikeLike
>What’s lost in Common Core is the human factor.
While this is certainly turning out to be the case in ELA, mathematics presents a different situation.
We’ll extend Ball’s metaphor. A planted seed has but one goal: to germinate and extend a shoot to the surface. It may face obstacles, such as rocks, bad soil, lack of nitrogen, too hot or too cold temperatures, or too dry or too wet weather, but it must find any way to persevere under trying circumstances. Ultimately, it either succeeds or fails.
K-12 mathematics proceeds similarly (again, in the metaphorical sense): basic skills are rocks to push through, but the student’s ultimate goal is to push through the surface: to figure out a way to solve a problem, to appreciate that a problem can be solved in any way possible, and to appreciate that mathematics education is about picking up tools that facilitate finding at least one of those ways.
In a math classroom, it is the sharing and comparing of problem solving techniques that makes for effective discourse, one aspect of the human factor.
If a student learns basic skills, but can’t solve problems, then the student is like an ungerminated seed. Something in the process has failed and growth has stopped.
And here’s where we may differ from Ball: since learning how to solve problems is more important than the problems themselves, it’s not inconceivable for every teacher in every class to present the same problem, so long as that problem is chosen well. The human factor would remain in that students could apply their own ways of thinking and find their own ways to a solution.
“Chosen well” is the rub, though. If Common Core were forging a path to well chosen problems, we’d have no complaint; but instead it offers an array of mathematics to students that is testable but has little or no problem solving potential.
Common Core’s inundating students with impertinent mathematics is why we will continue to pop up like weeds on various blogs to continue to make the point.
LikeLike
I think you’re right, but with at least one caveat: let’s assume they did forge a path to well-chosen problems (and that we could agree on what those were like. I’m thinking just for a second of the book THE OPEN-ENDED APPROACH by Becker and Shimada but we could readily pick many other volumes as resources, so if that’s not to your liking, substitute one that is).
The problem for the US (as opposed to a more homogeneous country like Japan), is that it’s just ridiculous to assume that things will go similarly across the broad spectrum of districts in this country. And even within the same district, building, or grade, I would assume sufficient variation, surprise, creativity, difficulties, etc., that a given teacher needs not to be forced to stay in lock step with everyone else. Who knows the kids better than their teacher, at any given point in time, anyway?
A more sensible approach would be to have multiple pathways, multiple choices within those pathways. More ways through the woods than one. More exits at the other end of the forest than one. As long as each destination is worthwhile, and each journey is meaningful to each traveler, who are the Common Core gurus to limit the possibilities so narrowly?
I just don’t buy that ANYONE knows THE right way to travel through math (or any other subject, or through education in general). As soon as someone tells me s/he does, I know that I’m going to disagree in lots of places with what follows.
Why this obsession with standardization and narrow control? Something stinks, really, really awfully, even if I didn’t think that the goal is short-term failure of the schools to buy them up on the cheap and turn them into profit centers for the rich.
LikeLike
Wise words. Have you seen the common core curriculum for first grade? Domain six- world civilization? Please check this out on engageNY. I am still not sure if this must be adopted or adapted ( my principal cannot give me answers). Regardless, the fact that the “experts” deem this appropriate for first grade makes them lose all credibility. Would be perfect fodder for Jon Stewart- although he wasn’t there for the Hare and the Pineapple debacle. Thanks for being our voice.
Another frustrated first grade teacher
Sent from my iPhone
LikeLike
I will post the NY first-grade curriculum in a few days.
LikeLike
There is room for the magic of teaching with the CCSS! Our students are demonstrating the ability to think deeply about text and mathematical concepts! They are thriving and our teachers are amazed by what they can do when we have high expectations for them! How is this a bad thing?
LikeLike
Eloquent. I have not seen it said any better. I thoroughly enjoyed reading this piece. Lots of “A-ha’s”!
LikeLike