Archives for the month of: July, 2013

Katherine Lee Bates taught English literature at my alma mater, Wellesley College. She wrote the words to this song in 1893, when she was teaching for that summer at Colorado College in Colorado Springs. Over the years, some have suggested this song should replace “The Star-Spangled Banner” as the national anthem, because it is easier to sing, and the lyrics are more beautiful. But the idea never caught on.

AMERICA, THE BEAUTIFUL

O beautiful for spacious skies,
For amber waves of grain,
For purple mountain majesties
Above the fruited plain!

America! America!
God shed His grace on thee,
And crown thy good with brotherhood
From sea to shining sea!

America! America!
May God thy gold refine
Till all success be nobleness,
And ev’ry gain divine.

O beautiful for patriot dream
That sees beyond the years
Thine alabaster cities gleam
Undimmed by human tears.

America! America!
God shed His grace on thee,
And crown thy good with brotherhood
From sea to shining sea.
Original poem (1893)[edit]

David Saville Muzzey was widely recognized for most of the twentieth century as the greatest writer of U.S. history textbooks in the nation. He was a historian at Barnard College, Columbia University, and he was a gifted storyteller.

His books read as the work of a single writer, vigorous, thoughtful, and opinionated, but not in a partisan sense. He knew history and he knew how to write the great stories and weave facts into a coherent narrative. The first edition of Muzzey’s textbook was printed in 1911 and was so popular that it was regularly updated. At some point, I am not sure exactly whether it was before or after his death, his popular textbooks became a committee project, and over time they lost the distinctive quality that had made them so beloved. That distinctive quality was, of course, his voice. Over time, they were ground down into the voiceless and turgid informational text that we associate with the typical history textbook.

Many years ago, I found a first edition of Muzzey’s An American History. The front cover is spotted and the spine is broken but the prose still sparkles.

I want to share with you his concluding paragraph. Set aside for the moment his omission of women and his reference to the nations vying to control “the destinies of the undeveloped races,” which dates him. But what is not dated is his message. It speaks to us today, a century later:

The problems of a democracy are ever changing to meet the developing needs and the unfolding ideals of the people. Our problem in America at the opening of the twentieth century is no longer that of George Washington’s day,–to establish the forms and powers of a republican government; nor that of Andrew Jackson’s day,–to admit to a full share in that government the sturdy manhood of the nation; nor that of Abraham Lincoln’s day,–to save the life of the Union while cutting from it the cancer of slavery; nor that of William McKinley’s day,–to introduce the United States among the nations which are to control the destinies of the undeveloped races of the world. To-day we are rich, united, powerful. But the very material prosperity which is our boast menaces the life of our democracy. The power of money threatens to choke the power of law. The spirit of gain is sacrificing to its insatiable greed the spirit of brotherhood and the very life of the toilers of the land–even the joyous years of tender childhood. Unless we are to sink into ignoble slavery or fall a prey to horrid revolution, the manhood of the nation must rise in its moral strength to restore our democratic institutions to the real control of the people, to assert the superiority of men over machines, and the value of a brotherhood of social cooperation and mutual goodwill above the highest statistics of commercial gain. Our noble mission is still to realize the promise of the immortal words of Abraham Lincoln, that “government of the people, by the people, and for the people shall not perish from the earth.”

I am posting this on the 4th of July because it is about one of the most offensive state policies I have seen in many years.

According to the Tuscaloosa News, Alabama has created “Plan 2020,” which sets different goals and academic accountability standards based on race, disability, and economic status. This is in contrast to the unrealistic goals of No Child Left Behind, which demanded that all children reach “proficient” on state tests.

These are the percentages of third-graders expected to pass math in their subgroups for 2013 are:

 93.6 percent of Asian/Pacific Islander students.

 91.5 percent of white students.

 90.3 percent of American Indian students.

 89.4 percent of multiracial students.

 85.5 percent of Hispanic students.

 82.6 percent of students in poverty.

 79.6 percent of English language-learner students.

 79 percent of black students.

 61.7 percent of special needs students.

The response of parents who were quoted in the article was eloquent and pointed:

Some parents and community activists say Plan 2020’s “race-based” standards unfairly set low expectations for black, Hispanic, English language-learner, impoverished and special needs students.

“I think having a low bar means they can just pass them on,” said Tim Robinson, the father of two black children who attend Alberta Elementary and Englewood Elementary. “I think it’s dumbing our race down and preparing our boys for prison.

“The teachers aren’t even going to teach all of them anymore. Not the black boys and girls. And if we sit by and let this happen, it’s on us.”

Andrea Alston, the mother of a black student with special needs who’s transferring from Central High School to Pleasant Grove High School, said she knew about Plan 2020 but had heard nothing about the plan’s accountability standards by subgroup. She said school systems should have notified parents of the change.

“If this was of value and interest to the parents, why didn’t local school boards tell this to the parents?” she said. “Plan 2020 says it’s going to close the achievement gap and every student is going to graduate, but how is this going to benefit that?”

Nirmala Erevelles, the mother of a Woodland Forrest Elementary student who is of mixed race, said she doesn’t think the new accountability system is fair.

“I’m not sure what’s the science behind this,” she said. “The science of knowing that only a certain percentage of black kids or other kids are going to pass this. Evaluation measures should be individualized to kids’ needs, strengths and weaknesses. Standardized tests don’t do that, and using another type of standardized test won’t necessarily take care of kids’ needs.”

The last parent is exactly right. “What’s the science behind this?” Why are standardized tests being used this way? There is no science behind it. Every child is a unique individual. Every child deserves equality of educational opportunity.

Plan 2020 is accountability run amok. Tests should be used diagnostically, to provide the support that children and teachers need.

The state of Alabama should ditch the race-based, economic-based, disability-based goals and focus instead on one central American idea: Equality of educational opportunity for every child.

Journalist Daniel Denvir calls out Philadelphia’s local NBC station. Its coverage parroted Governor Tom Corbett’s claims without doing a fact check.

Denvir shows how little investigative reporting the local media does.

When they say that the teachers’ union is not “sacrificing enough, ” what they mean is that the union should okay the layoffs of teachers of the arts, sports, counselors, security guards, etc.

It would be nice if the various parties could set aside politics and focus on Philadelphia’s students.

I am grateful to Darcie Cimarusti, an activist public school mom in New Jersey who blogs as Mother Crusader.

I am grateful that she listened to Pitbull’s speech at the national charter school conference. The other keynotes were delivered by Arne Duncan and Joel Klein.

I am grateful she listened because now I don’t have to.

You too can read her blog and watch the video or just her summary. She has done the heavy lifting.

It seems like only yesterday that Mayor Villaraigosa was trying to take control of the Los Angeles public schools. Now there is a new mayor, and he clearly had little influence over the choice of a new school board president. The vote for Dr. Richard Vladovic was a decisive 5-2.

Monica Ratliff was sworn in by her mother, in both Spanish and English.

Ratliff was elected despite being vastly outspent by the usual corporate reform crowd, who were beaten twice this spring, first by Steve Zimmer, then by Monica Ratliff.

Ratliff immediately stepped into her role, requesting that the candidates for board president describe their priorities.

Zimmer spoke at length about corporate greed. He said, “We should never be data driven…We should be data informed… We should avoid the seduction of easy answers.”

It is a new majority in Los Angeles. This should get interesting.

Valerie Strauss posted Secretary Duncan’s speech to the charter schools conference, without comment. This is the same conference where the foul-mouthed, misogynistic rapper Pitbull was also a keynote speaker.

I am tempted to raise many questions–about the predatory practices of some charters, about the very concept of “chain” schools, about the racial segregation that charters accept as routine, about harsh disciplinary policies called “no excuses” that middle-class parents would not tolerate, about for-profit charters that rip off kids and taxpayers, about online charters that offer shoddy education while raking in millions…..but I leave the questions for my readers.

In this remarkable speech to a large gathering of Teach for America recruits, Dr. Camika Royal laid out the details of the disaster in Philadelphia and laid the blame on the state, where it belongs. She told the recruits that Philadelphia is a microcosm for urban districts across the nation, where public schools are under attack and are folding. She questioned why young people like those in her audience should replace experienced educators who had been laid off. She warned that cities like Philadelphia need “servant leaders,” people willing to listen and learn, not “self-serving saviors.” She repeatedly said, “Examine yourself.” Her message, which refuted the TFA party line, was greeted with wild cheers.

This is a woman of intellect and character. Independent thinkers like Camika Royal and Gary Rubinstein represent the best hope for the future of TFA, the hope that it someday escape its heritage as corporate tool, as helping to privatize high-poverty schools.

A reader comments from Georgia:

“Mr. Norreese Haynes and I of the Metro Association of Classroom Educators (MACE) here in Georgia are putting together a book that we have written, decrying the fact that the Socialistic Left and the Capitalistic Right have joined together to take the teaching profession hostage. Classroom Educators are used as Levitical scapegoats for all of the ills in public education. But, at MACE we know that you can’t have good learning conditions until you first have good teaching conditions.

We are now putting up one chapter per day for the month of July. MACE is beginning its 19th year here in Georgia, and our message has not changed one scintilla. Teachers don’t give a rat’s ass about tote bags and spelling bee contests. They want protection and empowerment. They want to be freed up to do their jobs! They want to be creative, and they want the snoopervisors to leave them alone.

The incompetent, petty, angry, and abusive administrators have ruined public education, and now they are supported and emboldened by the likes of Arne Duncan, Bill and Melinda Gates, Eli and Edyth Broad, the Walton Foundation, the Pearson companies, ALEC, etc. A union has to kick ass for teachers! I tip my hat to BAT!

I am Dr. John Trotter, and I approve this message! Ha!

http://www.themacemanifesto.com”

Anthony Cody explains that the nine most terrifying words in the English language to an educator are, “I’m from Big Business, and I’m here to help.”

Business ideas about competition and incentives, he says, don’t work in schools.

Profit-driven reforms don’t work either.

Businesses and schools have different bottom lines.

As he concludes:

“The market system demands winners and losers, and the biggest losers of all are the students who find themselves left behind in schools that are unprofitable, or because they are more difficult to educate, and thus are liabilities to whatever schools they enroll in….

“I wrote a week ago that our schools are like a living organism under attack by those who wish to divert resources into profitable ventures. Those of us resisting this are perhaps becoming more activated, like white blood cells are activated when the body’s immune system detects an invasion. We need to understand the reasons business interests are realigning our schools, and work to preserve the core mission of our public education system. Our schools do not exist to prepare students to be compliant workers in an ever more efficient economic system. We are in the business of creating thinkers, not workers, creators, not drones.”