Archives for the month of: June, 2013

I recently attended the commencement ceremonies at Queens College in New York City, one of the nation’s finest public institutions.

At the ceremony specifically for graduates of the education program, the dean opened his remarks by citing an African proverb, “How fare the children?”

The answer should be “The children are well.”

In a good and decent society, we take care of the children, because in doing so, we not only express our humanity, but we ensure our future.

In this society, it might be well to ask, “How fare the 1%?”

The 1% fare exceedingly well. Their share of the national income rises each year.

And none fare so well as the Pritzker family of Chicago.

Penny Pritzker was a member of the Chicago Board of Education.

She voted to close 50 Chicago public schools while increasing the growth of charter schools, one of which bears her name.

Soon she will be President Obama’s Secretary of Commerce.

Her brother fares well too.

How fare the children?

Not so well.

Nearly one of every four children in the United States lives in poverty.

Many go to bad hungry; growing numbers are homeless.

Many are in schools without art or music, without guidance counselors or librarians.

Many are in classes so large that they get no individual attention.

Whose fault is this?

It must be their teachers.

They must be graded, ranked, evaluated closely.

Makes no sense, but the mainstream media has swallowed it whole.

 

Something unusual happened at the most recent Los Angeles school board meeting. Even before newly elected Monica Ratliff was sworn in, the pro-privatization majority was in retreat.

Here is a fascinating account of the background and context:

So glad you are reporting this. I only wish that Zimmer had gone ever further on the class size issue and had reminded everyone that LAUSD has the largest numbers of charter schools. Every time a start up charter or independent conversion charter gets approved, money gets taken out of LAUSD’s budget. This has been brought up time after time, and even the budget director mentioned it at a recent meeting. So, it begs the question as to who Galatzan and Garcia are really supporting? Who is more important to them, charter schools or the vast majority of students in traditional schools?

I think the answer is obvious. After all, where does the big money come from when it comes time to collect campaign funds? The list of funders from Garcia’s recent board race reads like a who’s-who list of charter friendly corporations and charter operators.

Below is a paragraph from a recent IG report on how special education funding is negatively impacting LAUSD and thus contributing to class size increases. This happens because charter schools have a much lower percentage of special ed students and for those they do enroll, most have the least severe disabilities.

Click to access 13497FUNDINGSPECIAL%20EDUCATION%20PROGRAM.PDF

“An increasing number of charter schools is eroding the District’s ADA base for special education funding. The California funding system for special education is based on Census-Based funding model that funds special education programs based on school’s Average Daily Attendance (ADA) numbers. The establishment of charter schools takes away ADA numbers from the District resulting in less funding for the District’s special education program.”

Another item not discussed anywhere was the denial of a charter school.

From the LA Times:

“The board also voted to reject a bid from an independently operated charter school to remain open. Anahuacalmecac International University Preparatory High School had sought a second, five-year charter, as well as permission to expand to offer a kindergarten-through-12th-grade program.”

This charter has two schools. The last time one of their schools came up for renewal, denial was also recommended. But, Garcia convinced her buddies on the board to overturn the charter division’s recommendation. After the vote, she got out of her chair and went into the street to celebrate with the head of the school, leaving behind her duties and missing out on voting on other issues.

This time, things were different. While the school was allowed to present their reasons for overturning the denial, when the board was asked to vote, NONE of the board members said a word. There was NO discussion…..ZERO!!! The vote was taken immediately and it was 6-1 in support of the denial. Of course, Garcia voted to overturn.

I suspect that this silence was pre-determined decision by the board. Perhaps it was because of the horrific report from the Inspector General’s office:

Click to access 12492ACADEMIA%20SEMILLAS%20CHARTER%20SCHOOL.PDF

The report above clearly states that, when an audit was requested, the school repeatedly refused to turnover any records. Perhaps the head of the school felt he had Garcia’s back and that, like before, the board’s charter friendly majority would ignore this “minor” problem. But not this time. Perhaps the board did not want an open discussion during which it may have been revealed that the board has been complicit in rubber stamping a charter that so blatantly disregards the rules.

Bottom line….the charter friendly board members took a major hit on Tuesday. Actions and statements by Garcia and Galatzan received numerous negative responses from the audience. Most certainly, this was only a precursor of what is to come.

This is an extraordinary article, not only because of what it reveals, but because it appears in Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post, which has been a reliable cheerleader for our billionaire mayor.

Investigative reporter Tom Robbins details how Mayor Michael Bloomberg used his billions to silence critics and to win the support of or intimidate almost every civic and cultural group.

In other times and places, people worry that big money will buy the mayor’s support. In New York City for the past dozen years, the mayor has bought the support of almost everyone who might have been a critic or might have an independent voice. One of his favorite gambits was to cut the budget of a group that is heavily dependent on city funding, then make an allegedly anonymous contribution to the same group. The media often printed long lists of these “anonymous” contributions, acknowledging that they came from the mayor and were dispersed through the Carnegie Corporation.

This strategy made all the groups he “saved” dependent on his personal largesse. He was truly the Lord of the manor.

Robbins did not discover every trick the mayor used to buy support and silence critics. He has no way of knowing which influential intellectuals and power brokers are on the Mayor’s personal payroll, because the mayor is under no obligation to disclose his private spending.

It may be years before Mayor Bloomberg finds his Robert Caro. Caro writes in-depth biographies of famous people. In time, it will happen, and we will learn how Michael Bloomberg employed his vast fortune to win support, to intimidate once-independent critics, and to buy off activists from various communities.

Until then, Tom Robbins has pulled back the curtain in Oz. There is no magic; just a whole lot of money. Like, $27 billion.

When Kevin Huffman was sworn in as state commissioner in Tennessee, he was offered a salary of $200,000 a year, 11% more than his predecessor.

Granted that he believes experience and degrees are worthless, wouldn’t an elemental sense of fairness compel him to cut his own salary, having cut salaries of teachers across the state? After all, a teacher with a masters and a doctorate and 20 years experience will make less than $60,000.

Who provides greater value?

I received the following email:

Hi, Dr. Ravitch:

I am a film teacher at a Buffalo Public School (www.cityhonors.org) and one of my students made a video on her own time about the draconian cuts that the Buffalo Public Schools is making with its instrumental music program. This is a direct effect of the per pupil funding that has been instituted in the BPS. I thought you might like to see it. It is interesting that NYS has billions to pay Pearson, but we can’t keep instrumental music programs in place.

Thanks…

Sincerely,

Melisa Holden
Librarian & IB Film teacher

A teacher in Tennessee reacts to the state board’s decision to reduce her future pay for investing in an advanced degree:

After teaching in East TN for 20 years as a special educator, I decided to get my Ph.D. because I wanted to learn more about teaching reading. I am in the final stages of my dissertation and am sick at the thought that I will not be able to pay off my student loan of $15,000. (I worked full-time and paid for the rest of it by teaching art classes, selling stained glass and working extra jobs during the summer and on nights I didn’t go to classes. I am 60 and guess I will be working until I drop dead at this rate.

State Commissioner Kevin Huffman persuaded the Tennessee State board of Education that teachers should not be paid more for advanced degrees.

The state board agreed that less education is better than more. Tennessee doesn’t want teachers to be too educated. They might ask too many questions.

Dumb is good in Tennessee.

Do you want to know what it really means to put students first?

It doesn’t mean making millions of dollars to promote privatization. It doesn’t mean speaking to corporate titans. It doesn’t mean fighting to strip teachers of all rights and privileges.

This is what it means. It means joining the Moral Monday protests in North Carolina. It means fighting for your students when legislators cut the budget and programs and seek to privatize the schools.

To the teacher who wrote this post, it means: I am ready to be arrested and go to jail for my students. That’s putting students first.

She writes:

Today, June 17, 2013, North Carolinians gathered for the seventh “Moral Monday” protest at the North Carolina Legislative Building. Since late May, thousands have protested the General Assembly’s ultra-conservative agenda and over 450 people have been arrested as part of a growing wave of non-violent civil disobedience. Holly Marie Jordan is a public school teacher from Durham who was arrested as part of today’s protest. Her testimony is below:

As a public school teacher in North Carolina—not an “outsider” that Governer McCrory alleges is at the helm of the Moral Monday protests, but an educator grounded in and devoted to the community of Durham—I am ardent to stand up for the future of my students by getting arrested at Moral Monday.

When I came out of college straight into teaching seven years ago, I believed that teaching English was going to be about, well, teaching English. I thought that my task was to impart in my students a love of, or at least a less fervent dislike for, Shakespeare and To Kill a Mockingbird. Within a few short weeks I learned how mistaken I was. Sure, there was still room for Boo and the Bard, but teaching was really about providing stability, respect, and compassion to teenagers desperate to learn in a system that was failing them. It was about talking to K about why he shouldn’t drop out. It was about visiting J in the hospital after her miscarriage. It was about tutoring 15-year-old T so he could move past a fifth grade reading level. Because that was what my students needed, that’s what teaching became for me. It is what teaching means for thousands of teachers, counselors, teaching assistants, and other public school workers across the state, as we prepare our students for successful futures, not just academically, but in every way. We work long past our salaried hours to create instruction that challenges our students to grow as critical thinkers. We advise clubs where our students can express themselves. We coach sports to promote health and self-discipline. We counsel the crying, laugh with the happy, protect the bullied, and motivate the discouraged. We are honest with our students about their struggles and successes, and about our own. We do all this not for professional gain but because we firmly believe that these children are worth everything we can give them. We do it because what we teachers want is no different than what our students need.

What the General Assembly wants, however, is in stark contrast to what the children of North Carolina need. In their pursuit to destroy public education via budgets that cut funding, school vouchers that favor private companies, and the elimination of master’s degree pay, the legislature shows how little they care about the quality and longevity of those educating our kids. I am a seventh year teacher whose pay is frozen at the second year rung of the pay scale, in the state with the 4th worst teacher pay in the country. I have seen dozens of excellent teachers move on to other professions or other states so they could sustain themselves and their families. At my school, students regularly ask new teachers “will you be here next year?” because they are so used to our terrible turnover rates.

It’s not just education legislation that is bent on destroying our most vulnerable communities through persistent instability. The General Assembly is curbing voting rights, letting unemployment benefits expire, and repealing the Racial Justice Act, all while giving tax breaks to corporate giants. My students aren’t naïve. They know that their communities are being marginalized. Last year, a student at our school was murdered. In the weeks that followed, my students and I cried out in anguish and anger and asked the toughest questions one could imagine: Why did this student end up where he was? What could any of us have done? How can we keep this from happening again? Our teenagers know to ask these critical questions, but the leaders in Raleigh have failed to ask them: How do we make sure justice is served for all North Carolinians? How do we transform struggling communities into havens of health and stability? My students create solutions, like organizing a march to the early voting polls and memorial for their classmate. Meanwhile, politicians ignore humanity and count capital.

Next school year, as I always have in the past, I will tell my students every day that they are important and loved. What I wish I could tell them is that the people in power agreed—that our General Assembly believes in their futures just like I do. Unfortunately, it’s unlikely I’ll be able to do that. I will get to tell them, however, that thousands of North Carolinians testified to their worth during the Moral Mondays, and that a movement that believes in them is coming. This movement is not the work of “outside agitators,” as the Governor believes, but the best and bravest that our state has to offer. It’s a movement led by and fighting for the well-being of 9.7 million insiders—the people of North Carolina who desire a healthy, sustainable future in our state for generations to come.

Holly Jordan has been a resident of Durham and an English teacher at Hillside High School for the past seven years. She is a National Board Certified Teacher and a member of NCAE and People’s Durham.

Today, the blog recorded 5 million page views!

The blog started April 24, 2012. That’s about 14 months ago.

Wow.

As you know, the blog has no advertisements, no funding, and no staff. Just me.

I plan to keep it that way.

Thank you for making the blog a place where everyone who cares about improving education, defending childhood, respecting the dignity of the education profession, and supporting public education has a safe place to converse.

Thank you for agreeing and disagreeing and, with rare exceptions, respecting the basic rules of civility.

Thank you for tolerating my many glitches, like the times (all too often) when I forget to add the link.

Thank you for pointing out grammatical or spelling errors that are usually caused by auto-correct or my haste.

Thank you for adding your comments to stories.

Thank you for allowing me to post many of your great comments.

Thank you for sending me stories from your hometown or state.

Together we are building a movement of people who want something better for our children and grandchildren.

We want schools with small classes and experienced teachers.

We want teachers who know how to instill the love of learning.

We want our teachers to be treated as professionals, with the autonomy to make decisions for the children in their classrooms.

We want our schools to be centers of their communities.

We want the school closings and the budget cuts to stop.

What we have all learned together over the past year or so is that the issues and conflicts in one community are similar to the issues and conflicts in many other communities.

If we want great education for all our children, we will have to organize and fight for it.

Thank you for sharing in the conversation, adding your voice and your ideas.

In his relentless effort to raise teacher quality in Tennessee, Kevin Huffman will cut the salaries of most new teachers.

The ax will fall most heavily on teachers who get an advanced degree.

You see, the way to improve teacher quality is to remove any incentive for additional education. If it can’t raise test scores, why bother?

Huffman got a law degree, but maybe that doesn’t count. He worked for Teach for America and was its communications director before becoming Commissioner in Tennessee. Maybe that’s what really counts.