http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/common-core-clash-aft-president-fires-back-at-state-ed-officials/2013/05/21/a93321e8-c245-11e2-8c3b-0b5e9247e8ca_story.html
Common Core clash: AFT president fires back at state ed officials
By Lyndsey Layton,
The Washington Post
Tuesday, May 21, 3:45 PM
The head of a major teachers union fired back Tuesday at state education officials who had dismissed her call for a moratorium on stakes associated with new standardized state tests in public schools.
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, said the Chiefs for Change, a small group of state education officials, was distorting her call for a moratorium on the use of new standardized tests based on Common Core standards to evaluate teachers and students.
The Common Core standards in math and reading are rolling out across the country and will be in place in 45 states and the District by next school year. Next spring, students in grades 3 through 12 will be tested on the new standards, which will significantly change the way reading and math are taught.
While a majority of teachers polled by the AFT support the new standards, most said they were not being adequately prepared by their school districts.
Weingarten said states should not use test scores based on the new standards to judge the performance of students, schools or teachers until the Common Core standards have been fully implemented. She was backed by Dennis Van Roekel, the president of the National Education Association. Together, the two unions represent most public school teachers.
Weingarten, a Common Core supporter, warned that the new approach is being poorly implemented and requires a “mid-course correction” or the effort will fall apart.
Last month, when New York administered new tests based on the Common Core standards, teachers, parents and students complained that the tests were poorly designed, covered material that had not been taught and frustrated children to the point of tears. Like many other states, New York plans to use the test results in decisions about student promotion, teacher job evaluations and school closings.
States should implement a moratorium on consequences for at least one year until teachers and students across the country are sufficiently steeped in the new standards, Weingarten said.
New York and Kentucky are the only states to have begun testing based on the new standards; the others are scheduled to follow in 2014.
The AFT said about 37,000 teachers, parents and others have written to Education Secretary Arne Duncan to support its call for a moratorium.
But Chiefs for Change, a group of state education officials organized with help from former Florida governor Jeb Bush (R), released a letter Tuesday to Duncan in which it said states should move ahead with plans to use the new tests to assess students and judge teacher performance.
“Recently, some members of the national education community have advocated for pulling back on accountability in our schools,” the group wrote to Duncan. “. . . [We] reject any calls for a moratorium on accountability. . . . We will not relax or delay our urgency for creating better teacher, principal, school and district accountability systems as we implement more rigorous standards.”
The group includes Janet Barresi, Oklahoma state superintendent of public instruction; Tony Bennett, Florida commissioner of education; Stephen Bowen, Maine commissioner of education; Chris Cerf, New Jersey commissioner of education; Deborah A. Gist, Rhode Island commissioner of elementary and secondary education; Kevin Huffman, Tennessee commissioner of education; Paul Pastorek, former Louisiana state superintendent of education; Hanna Skandera, New Mexico public education department secretary; and John White, Louisiana state superintendent of education.
Weingarten hit back at Chiefs for Change in her own letter on Tuesday, saying “contrary to your claim, we are not ‘pulling back on accountability in our schools.’ We are trying to make accountability real. By allowing teachers and districts to create and agree on implementation plans, field-test the new assessments and make necessary adjustments, we will actually be building a stronger accountability system.”
“Can you imagine doctors being expected to perform a new medical procedure without being trained in it or provided the necessary instruments—simply being told that there may be some material on a website?” Weingarten wrote. “Can you imagine a successful business rolling out a new product without the proper research and development, and without testing it? Of course not, but that’s what’s happening right now with the Common Core.”
________________________________
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for the named addressee(s). If you are not a named addressee, you should not copy, alter, post, forward, distribute or disseminate the contents of the e-mail or attachments. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the individual and do not necessarily represent those of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT).

Janet Barresi, Tony Bennett, Stephen Bowen, Chris Cerf, Deborah A. Gist, Kevin Huffman, Paul Pastorek, Hanna Skandera, John White – now there’s a real honor roll. Let’s throw Michelle Rhee in the mix. We will then have The Committee of Ten for a new millennium. Oh never mind…The Committee of Ten actually had some teaching credentials.
LikeLike
Here we go.
“While a majority of teachers polled by the AFT support the new standards, most said they were not being adequately prepared by their school districts.”
This is how lies become media “truth”: 800 AFT members polled, 288 from New York State. 600 (75%) said in a phone interview (no specific instrument or protocol provided) that they were “in favor” of CCSS.
Yet this article reports, “The AFT said about 37,000 teachers, parents and others have written to Education Secretary Arne Duncan to support its call for a moratorium.”
AFT favors CCSS and wants to play both sides with a “moratorium.”
Meanwhile, Jeb Bush’s lapdogs, “Chiefs for Change,” say they want to keep CCSS in play because Jeb does.
Read about the lapdogs here:
And in case you missed it, read about Weingarten’s “survey” here:
Interesting how neither Weingarten nor Bush really is asking what teachers want. (Sorry, Randi: 800 teachers surveyed is a sad comedy.)
LikeLike
Mercedes,
If you would like a copy of the questionnaire email me at: dswacker@centurytel.net
Duane
LikeLike
Thanks for sending it to my blog, Duane. I plan to pick it apart.
LikeLike
Click to access KeepEdLocal_CC.pdf
ALEC has been against Common Core.
This is going to be interesting.
LikeLike
Fingers, ALEC decided to remain neutral on Common Core in response to Jeb Bush support for it.
LikeLike
Crapatronic Horace Manic, ya beat me to the punch! Ten most wanted is more like it. Shame on me for not knowing the makeup of the Chiefs for Change, a rouges gallery of corrupt ideologs, the core collection of failed policy pushers.
LikeLike
I am getting so cynical now that i am wondering if the “chiefs” did it just so Randi Weingarten can polish her rather tarnished halo. She needs to redeem herself in the eyes of the membership, and since she has toadied to the reformers in the past, she has a lot of polishing to do.
LikeLike
John Fallon also opposes a common sense approach to testing. John Fallon? Oh he is the new CEO (CHIEF executive officer) of Pearson.
LikeLike
Yes, you can become a professional overnight by osmosis. No, you cannot do that. Is this a difficult decision? It shouldn’t be yet when it comes to schools this is supposed to be sense when it comes to a Prez. and Sec. of Ed. from a city that is failed and only coming coming back to sense because of the combination of the teachers union, parents, students and the community not because of those in Washington, D.C. I wish it was not this way but it is what it is. Therefore, in all reality, you must first implement and test a system before you put it into everyday operation. Can you imagine what would happen with a military war machine which was not fully tested before deploying in the field. That would be unacceptable for a lot of reasons as is completely changing a system to an unknown untested system and arrogantly assuming that you are so perfect that stuff does not happen because you know better. That is a ticket to destruction and always has been such. There are always problems with the unknown and you should know this if you are a PROFESSIONAL. Or are you?
LikeLike
Randi Weingarten already signed ON to the Common Core standards. She endorsed them, and implicitly stated that most teachers endorse them too.
Weingarten has been getting some well-deserved blow-back.
Her call now for a “moratorium” is merely an effort to sidetrack her sellout and to assuage her many critics.
Where did the Common Core standards originate? They came from the National Governor’s Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers. But most importantly, the Gates Foundation.
Behind the NGA and the CCSSO lie the Gates Foundation dollars and the vested interests of the College Board (which continues to pimp for all of its mostly worthless products). Conservative state school officers –– like Deborah Gist, knucklehead Kevin Huffman, and Janet Barresi, who hates public schools –– support the Common Core. And evangelical Michael Gerson, George W. Bush’s former top speech writer –– he claims he coined the term “Axis of Evil” –– is in the bag for the Common Core. Gerson demonstrates his utter lack of knowledge of educational issues by citing know-nothing Michael Petrilli of the conservative Fordham Institute, who calls the Common Core standards “conservative” and says other state standards are based on “left-wing drivel.”
Gerson repeats the nonsensical criticism of public schooling that was contained in A Nation at Risk, writing that “mediocrity would be a distinct improvement.”
See: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/michael-gerson-gop-fear-of-common-core-education-standards-unfounded/2013/05/20/9db19a94-c177-11e2-8bd8-2788030e6b44_story.html?hpid=z2
Other corporate-style “reformers” are on board too. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, vile organization that it is, issued this canard: “Common core academic standards among the states are essential to helping the United States remain competitive and enabling students to succeed in a global economy.” As I’ve noted previously, the alleged goal of corporate-style education “reform” is “economic competitiveness.” All the supposed “reformers” cite it. But the U.S. already IS internationally competitive. The World Economic Forum ranks nations each year on competitiveness. The U.S. is usually in the top five (if not 1 or 2). When it drops, the WEF doesn’t cite education, but stupid economic decisions and policies. But where does the finger of blame get pointed? At public schools. Seriously, you’d almost have to be a moron to buy into this stuff. Of course, some of those “reformers” have ulterior motives…they look at public education and see dollar signs. Lots of them.
But Randi Weingarten bought into the nonsense. Now, she’s trying to remedy her error.
But it’s too little, and far too late.
Maybe Weingarten should go back to teaching in a classroom. Then we can watch as she gets hoisted on her own Common Core petard.
LikeLike
Democracy,
Weingarten cannot go “back” to the classroom because she is not a real teacher: she taught for six months while being groomed for the UFT presidency. Before that she was an occasional substitute.
Her proclaimed classroom experience is fraudulent, as is her claim to being a bona fide union leader.
LikeLike
Michael,
Weingarten was “groomed” for the AFT leadership by whom? And why, if she had little genuine teaching experience?
And why do the rank-and-file still vote for her?
Aren’t there some real, teacher leaders in AFT? If there are, why aren’t they pushing hard to replace Weingarten with someone who actually represents the interests of public education?
LikeLike
democracy,
Randi Weingarten was groomed by the previous head of the UFT/AFT, Sandra Feldman, who was the protege of Albert Shanker. Feldman also had minimal classroom experience.
As for why Randi was the anointed one, I’m sure part of the reason was her intelligence (combined with craftiness) and work ethic. Intellectual dishonesty aside, she is a very intelligent and hard working person. On a deeper, historical level, you’d have go into a detailed history of the internal politics of the UFT, a rather dark and depressing tale.
As for why the rank and file vote for her: they don’t. Democracy in the UFT/AFT exists in (debased) form, but without substance: rank and file teachers don’t vote for AFT president, who is elected by delegates from the locals in bi-annual conventions.
With the UFT (NYC’s local) being the tail that wags the AFT dog, and with Unity Caucus having gerrymandered the vote (current UFT President Mulgrew was essentially re-elected last month by retired teachers), the union is controlled by less than a handful of people, and The Most Important of those people, Ms. Weingarten, apparently lives to get patted on the head by Bill Gates and Eli Broad.
LikeLike
What is wrong with this picture?
Most of the Superintendents in Jeb Bush’s Chiefs of Change (cute – have the cowboys become native Americans?) organization are graduates of the Broad Superintendents Academy, an organization which has trained hundreds of Superintendents nationally in how to carry out the privatization of public schools.
Weingarten has been affiliated with the Broad Foundation since 2002 where she lead training of the Superintendent trainees in management/labor collaboration. ( http://tinyurl.com/opnqlav see page 2)
She has continued on good terms with the Broad Foundation.
( http://tinyurl.com/oztuo3 )
In addition to large donations from the Broad Foundation, her causes have been heavily funded by the Gates Foundation, the main sponsor of Common Core.( http://tinyurl.com/opfvmpz ) ( http://tinyurl.com/bpelh34 go down the list to the AFT )
LikeLike