Archives for the month of: April, 2013

Robert Shepherd, experienced designer of textbooks and assessments, wrote the following:

“I believe in my heart of hearts that there are good, well-meaning people on both sides of the accountability debate. I also believe that there are certainly roles to be played by standards and evaluation systems and testing.

“I fervently hope that we shall see, over the coming years, prudence, vigorous but respectful debate, more caution than has been shown to date with regard to new implementations, and real innovation, INCLUDING competing, vastly differing models for what school looks like. It’s complete hubris for ANY OF US to think that he or she has THE solution.

“Consider, for example, online learning. On the one hand, it can be a godsend, allowing for immediate feedback, embedded formative assessment, and tailoring of education to particular students’ particular needs and propensities. On the other hand, it can mean warehouses of students doing what are basically worksheets on a screen with little interaction with teachers who might serve them as models of what a learner is. One can point to examples of really, really dreadful computer-assisted instruction and to really, really superb examples. And in everything related to these debates–with regard to standards, to high-stakes testing, to teacher evaluation systems, the same can be said: some of what is being done is wonderful. Some of it is really awful.

“I doubt that anyone, except, perhaps, a few test prep publishers, really wants kids to be spending a third of the school year doing test prep drills. I doubt that anyone thinks that that is what his or her reform efforts sometimes amount to, and I think that a lot of folks would be horrified to find that that’s often the case. And it’s because I believe that most people involved, on both sides of the accountability and reform issue, are well-meaning, that I have hope that the egregious excesses we’ve seen from the reform movement can be addressed and that we can all find common ground on which we can have real dialog.

“My personal position is that where there is competition between models, innovation occurs, and so I don’t like blanket prescriptions and blanket, top-down mandates from the left or the right.

“I have followed Diane Ravitch’s work for many years now. I still think that her Left Back is the single best book ever written on American education. And I’ve known her, over the years, to be a stalwart defender of a rigorous, rich, broad-based curriculum in literature, the arts, history, and the sciences. And I have great respect for her as a scholar, someone who doesn’t believe in simple, magic solutions where there are complex underlying determinative phenomena that those solutions don’t address. I am grateful for her voice. We all should be. Vigorous, sometimes messy debate is the hallmark of a pluralistic democracy. I believe in standards. I believe in frequent testing that is NOT high stakes. But I’m not a supporter of mandatory standards, and I think that there are major problems with the CCSS in language arts. That said, I hasten to add that I like many of Mr. Coleman’s underlying ideas–his focus on what texts say rather than on isolated instruction in skills, his emphasis on having kids read related texts over extended periods. These are VERY IMPORTANT, VERY VALUABLE ideas. But I think that implementing those ideas is incompatible with turning our schools into test prep factories.

“We need a lot less debate (and name calling) and a lot more discussion. We need a lot less precipitous prescription and a lot more cautious experiment.”

Steve Strieker, a veteran teacher in Janesville, Wisconsin, has written a fable about the Free Market Fairy.

The Free Market Fairy solves all education problems.

When the Free Market Fairy sprinkles its magic across the community, the problems of poverty and segregation disappear.

If you believe in the Free Market Fairy, don’t pay attention to the men behind the curtain.

They will distract you.

The Néw York Daily News has been jumping for joy at the prospect that the Common Core tests will show just how hopelessly dumb the students of NYC are.

Its latest editorial practically gloats about what is surely (the editors think) bad news. The writer also seems to believe that the harder the tests, the smarter the students will be (someday).

But wait a minute! This is the same editorial board that has cheered every twist and turn of Mayor Bloomberg’s high-stakes testing regime for 12 years! Don’t they realize that if the scores are low, Bloomberg is accountable? Every child in the public school system was educated on Bloomberg’s watch.

Isn’t it time to do what the mayor asked, and hold him accountable?

Parents in Rochester, New York, filed a federal class action lawsuit against the state and their son’s school, which punished him for refusing to take the tests in accordance with his parents’ wishes.

The school not only punished the boy, but sent the sheriff’s office to the ballfield to make sure he was not allowed to play baseball.

Good for them! I would sue too.

The story says:

“New York has no policy on “opt-out” protests, so students in one district may be disciplined for “insubordination” while students in a neighboring district can sit out “without fear of reprisal,” lead plaintiffs Melissa and Craig Barber say in the complaint.
” They sued the state, its Department of Education, the Rush-Henrietta Central School District and School Board, its superintendent and the principal of Burger Middle School.
“The Barbers say they told their son’s school by letter that they did not want him to take the test. But not only did the school punish him for being “insubordinate,” it called the sheriff’s office to send officers to a ball field to be sure he did not play baseball while the school was punishing him, the parents say in the complaint.”

Members of Governor Rick Snyder’s administration have been meeting in secret since December with like-minded allies from far-right think tanks, hoping to develop a quasi-voucher in a state where the Constitution bans vouchers.

Thanks to publicity about the project, its future meetings will be held in public or at least have some public oversight.

Their goal, apparently, is to come up with a “value” school, with fewer teachers to save money. It will be the Michigan Model: Cheap education for the masses. Not better education, just cheap education.

I received an email from a parent in Long Island who has decided to join the campaign against high-stakes  testing. She blames Common Core for her children’s unhappiness with school, but Common Core is just the latest manifestation of the testing obsession embedded in No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top. She blogs, writes letter, button holes elected officials. She is fighting for her children and for all other children. With more parents like her, we could turn this situation around.

She writes:

Hi Ms. Ravitch,

I’m a Mom from Long Island, NY. I would like to share my story about how my son’s kindergarten experience  was Hijacked by the Common Core and how this has motivated me to fight harder for Public Education. I attached a picture of the sad reality of what Kindergarten has looked like this year for my son.

My son started Kindergarten this past September and my daughter entered the second grade. I thought my son would love kindergarten since he loved the Universal Pre K program, but I was wrong, he hates school.  I asked my son why he hates school and he said “It’s not fun and all we do is work and it’s too hard.” Knowing my daughter had a wonderful experience in Kindergarten two years prior I thought my son was giving me excuses. I thought maybe he was having trouble making friends, so I asked the teacher and she said, “No everybody loves Mikey. He is very compliant and eager to please.” Then the Pearson worksheets and graded math tests started appearing in my son’s folder. Then I realized my son was right, there is too much work and most of the content was way too hard for a kindergartner. My son’s kindergarten experience has not fostered a love of learning but it has fostered a hatred for school.

Inline image 3

When my 5 year old said I rather be dead than go to school I knew I had to do something more than just opt out of testing.

I increased my research into CCSS, created a Refusal Guide for state tests which is being circulated on LI, in NYS, and nationally, attended the United Opt Out rally in Washington DC for 4 days to occupy the DOE, and began political action by contacting and visiting state politicians. 

My research has led me to a new philosophy.

State and federal Education departments have been applying band aide after band aide on our current education system for the past 50 years. Education Reform has become part of the norm. We create policy after policy, mandate after mandate, yet nothing changes for the better.  It’s time to rip off the band aides and start developing a whole new system.

In order to have a strong education system we need to rid the old one and develop a whole new education system; an education system designed by educators who have spent years in a classroom, instead of our current system that has been designed by lawyers, politicians and corporations.

 

Thank you for taking the time to read about my Son’s Kindergarten Experience 

Warm Wishes,

Sara Wottawa

http://nocommonsenseeducation.blogspot.com/?m=1

This teacher wrote a math problem into a Tweet. He got a negative response from someone he did not know. The next day, he was pulled out of his class and suspended on suspicion that he had leaked a Common Core test question on Twitter.

This is a frightening story. His reputation was nearly destroyed by suspicion and allegation.

This is his story:

I need to set the record straight

I teach my students that their reputation is the most important asset they own. Your reputation is determined by your actions, your deeds, and also how you are viewed by others. Therefore, it is vital that  you understand that your reputation ultimately defines you. Success is not judged by how much you make, but rather, real success is judged by your character and how others view your actions and deeds.  I believe this with my heart and soul.

Unfortunately, my character was questioned by an unproven allegation. Ultimately it was determined I did no wrong and the allegation was unfounded. I write this posting today as a record of what has transpired over the last two days. I also owe my students and their parents an accurate representation as to what occurred so that they may be fully informed.

My views on the Common Core and high stakes testing,  are well documented on this blog as well as on other web sites including Facebook and Twitter. I  assumed that one day, I would be challenged for my beliefs, and I have even commented that teachers live in fear of retribution for their beliefs. Well this week it was my turn to be challenged. Not only was my professional judgement challenged, my First Amendment Rights were challenged.

It all  began Wednesday evening with the following “tweets”;

tweet ccss

My initial tweet was an editorial comment based on a Common Core standard (which includes a similar example in the standard), and included a generic example that can be found in many practice workbooks. As you can see Allison Sitts, aka, IthacaGorges took exception to my message and accused me of posting an actual test question.  I followed up with a response stating that it was not an actual test question. At this point I thought little of Allison, I didn’t remember conversing with her before and just assumed the conversation was over.  Well it wasn’t!

The next morning ( Thursday) I administered part 2 of the New York State Math  Common Core Math assessments to my class. Immediately following this exam, ( It was literally minutes after collecting the test books.) My principal was standing at my classroom doorway , with a very distraught and serious look on her face, and says, “I need you to come outside now.”

I say, “OK, I’ll be right there.”

She then says, ” I need you right now. “

My first thoughts are about the well being of my elderly parents, my wife or my children.. so I leave the room and find my Superintendent there, who immediately hands me a letter, and says. “you must come with me now.” Without having time to read the letter, I grab a pen, and a notebook and then he, and my principal escorted me downstairs, into the administrative wing and ultimately into his office. On the way down he informs me that my union representative and union president are on the way and that they will join us. Once in the office, as we waited for my representative to arrive, I read the letter and it said that I was going to be interviewed regarding concerns about my workplace conduct. So there I sat.. wondering what is this about?

Once my representatives arrived, I was initially questioned whether or not I posted test questions on the internet, on my blog , or on Twitter. I replied I did not and then I was shown the tweets that are at the center of this controversy. I explained that it was a generic example with an editorial comment, and that I am entitled to post  my opinion. He then informed me that Alllison Sitts , who I just then found out is a math specialist for Tompkins-Seneca-Tioga- Boces, sent an e-mail to my principal accusing me of posting test questions and suggested my district conduct an investigation. ( Now to be fair, as of today I have not read that e-mail because it has not been provided to me yet.)

Based on this,  my superintendent informed me that he would be contacting the Nassau County BOCES Superintendent and the New York State Education Department, regarding my ” posting of a state test question.” He then informed me that I would be placed on administrative leave and would not be allowed back into my classroom. As you can well imagine, a heated discussion followed which I will not disclose at this time. Throughout the entire discussion I maintained my position that under the First Amendment I am entitled to post my opinions, and that I did not post any test questions.

I immediately expressed a concern for my students. I told him my students saw me removed from my classroom, and I know that they will be upset.I was basically told,  they don’t know why you left and they’ll get over it. I also expressed a concern that my students are facing a 6th day of extensive testing the next day and that it was unfair that they will be forced to face it without their teacher ‘s encouraging words. As you can imagine, that appeal fell on deaf ears.

I asked why didn’t they wait until my prep period to summon me thereby not having the children observe me being escorted out. I also questioned, why I was being removed from the classroom, and why couldn’t the investigation continue while I was teaching. Was I a threat to the school or my students???

 I was told that upon the advice of the district’s counsel I was being placed on administrative leave.

I was offered the choice of remaining in an office to work on lesson plans or I can work from home. At this point, after consulting with my representatives, and a NYSUT ( our union) attorney I decided to work from home. I then had to wait until my students lunch period, so that I may be escorted by my principal to my room, to gather my personal belongings.

I then left the building and went home.

On Friday, I received a hand delivered letter at home, with a directive to pick one of three thematic units to develop. As I sat home wondering when I would be allowed to return to my class ( I never had any doubt  that I wouldn’t) I set to work on my project.. Upon the advise of my counsel. I ‘laid low’ , I didn’t tweet, post on my blog, or answer parent’s emails that were questioning what happened because they heard I was escorted out. I put my energies into the task at hand, developing a Social Studies- LA unit. As you may have guessed I decided to develop a unit based on the Bill of Rights, specifically the First Amendment.I knew I would be vindicated so I did  what I was instructed to do.

As I was completing my task, just before 3 PM I received a phone call from the District Superintendent. He informed me that he filed a report with the New York State Education Department and that they have cleared me. I was now welcome to go back to my school on Monday.

Last night as I was answering parent e-mails that I put aside during this ordeal, I discovered that parents thought I was arrested! You see my students went home upset, and one thing led to another.

Hopefully my student’s parents will find their way to this blog, the rumors will end, and my reputation will be made whole. I look forward to teaching my students the importance of the First Amendment and how you should never allow anyone to take your rights away.

Having followed the corporate reform movement closely, I have noticed that the adherents of this strange movement think they have all the answers. They make grandiose promises, set impossible targets, and make impossible claims. And they are never held accountable. They like to arrange things so they don’t have to listen to anyone who disagrees with them.

Tom Sgouros, an engineer in Rhode Island, has been vocal in protesting the corporate steamroller. He has been especially vocal in opposing the use of the standardized NECAP test as a graduation requirement. But he has been ignored. If you want to see how easily it is to dismiss an intelligent critic, read this. Sgouros showed up for a public hearing  and waited for hours for his chance to testify. Eventually, he got two minutes to speak.

He concluded:

“What have I learned?  That there is essentially no forum in the state of Rhode Island in which one can address the kinds of technical concerns I have aired about the state Department of Education’s misuse of the NECAP tests. The people who are interested have no power to change the situation and the people with the power to change the situation apparently have no interest in hearing about it. The reporters dutifully report both sides (sometimes), but the conventions of modern journalism, along with the need to write for an audience who isn’t really familiar with the statistical issues involved mean that articles can’t even rise to the level of he said/she said. 

I have two daughters, five grades apart. Comparing their experiences is instructive. My town has a relatively high-performing school department. There have been several changes in our schools between my first and second daughter, and as far as I can see, they fall into two categories: budget cuts and NECAP prep. Before my younger daughter entered seventh grade, the school department did away with seventh-grade foreign language instruction in favor of a second period of reading — to address NECAP deficiencies. While in the eighth grade, part of her shop class was turned over to NECAP prep for math. In the ninth grade, she is not taking a year-long biology, chemistry, or physics class, but a year-long science survey class that hopes to touch on all the topics covered by the science NECAP. Have any of these changes actually improved her education?

Remember, this is a relatively high-performing district, but RIDE rules demand improvement every single year, even for districts that are already doing fine. It is a truism of policy studies that a regulation that sounds good — demanding constant improvement from everyone — can have seriously counter-productive results, but the evidence is rarely as stark.

“Along with the NECAP adjustments, budget constraints have had the music program cut back in the elementary grades, the high school has reduced the number of AP classes, and there are fewer buses to accommodate after-school activities. And much more.

“So far as I can see, not a single one of the changes in my town’s schools over the past five years between my children has had anything at all to do with improving the quality of the education, and the changes to accommodate the NECAP test have been every bit as destructive of my daughter’s educational opportunities as the budget cuts.

“So, buckle up everyone. The destruction of public education wrought by misguided RIDE testing policies has only just begun. Some people apparently buy the argument that simply demanding results gets results. For those of us who think this a dubious strategy, there is no real reason – beyond the personal promise of Deborah Gist – to think that these policies will improve education in Rhode Island and quite a number of reasons to think it will get a lot worse before it gets better. But if you want to bring these matters to anyone’s attention? Talk to the hand — for no more than two minutes.”

John Thompson understands that the big money has been betting heavily on testing and accountability. When did the billionaires realize that test score gains were the result of cheating? Did they care? Will they learn? Or will they continue to promote the same failed policies? Why? What do they hope to accomplish?

As Laura Clawson writes at The Daily Kos, Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst honored an anti-gay legislator in Tennessee as its “legislator of the year.” Last year, the organization picked a Georgia legislator known for his strident anti-immigrant views.

Rhee supported 105 candidates in 2012. 90 were Republicans.

Her organization spent nearly $1 million in Tennessee legislative races to make sure the state legislature was in the hands of the most rightwing candidates, the ones who would push hard for privatization and for stripping teachers of any job protection and academic freedom.