Archives for the month of: March, 2013

One of the saddest consequences of the merger of education with partisan politics is that we now no longer can trust pronouncements from many of our state and local departments of education. Instead of accurate data, we are apt to get spin, hype, distortion, and outright lies, all in the service of someone’s political agenda.

One of the worst offenders is the Florida Department of Education. For years, under Jeb Bush and now Rick Scott, the department has been incapable of impartial analysis or self-criticism. Instead, its goal is to parrot the party line of testing, accountability, charters, vouchers, and online learning.

The latest embarrassing public relations stunt from the state DOE is a “study” claiming that charter schools in Florida outperform public schools. This is intended to help the privatization movement–for-profit and nonprofit–get a bigger market share.

The latest “study” was not conducted by independent reputable scholars but by the Department itself. That explains a lot.

Consider that only four months earlier, an independent study concluded the opposite: that public schools perform the same or better than charter schools.

The key finding in that study was:

“The average charter school is doing about the same as the non-charter school when no adjustments are made for poverty and minority statuses. When the adjusted scores are considered, the average charter school performs significantly worse than the average non-charter school.”

An investigation by the Miami Herald determined that most charters do not accept severely disabled students.

Half of the F-rated schools in the state are charters.

Charters were seven times more likely to be rated F than were public schools.

Reputable studies have reached the same conclusions: Charters in Florida perform about the same or worse than public schools.

One study concluded that their achievement growth is lower than that of regular public schools, but that after five years, charters produce similar gains.

The Credo analysis found that Florida charter schools performed significantly less well than their public school peers.

In a recent post, I referred to a decision by the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing to set higher standards for those who teach the state’s neediest students, especially English-language learners.

Some readers thought this decision was unfair to Teach for America recruits, who get only five weeks of training before assignment to difficult jobs.

However, a reader who closely follows the work of the Commission described the decision, as follows:

“In a nutshell, when TFA teachers as a group are compared to other teachers in their same schools (who are also less likely to be fully prepared and certified than most teachers), they typically do about the same in reading and sometimes better in math, especially in middle / high school.

“However, when entering TFA teachers are compared to fully certified teachers, they tend to be less effective, especially in their first year (and also often in their second year) and especially in elementary reading. Some studies also find them significantly less effective in elementary math. TFA recruits become equally effective after they are certified but then they are ready to leave.

“Of relevance to the California situation are two studies finding that TFA teachers are less effective than certified novice teachers when teaching Hispanic or Spanish-speaking students.

“Anne Ware, R. Jason LaTurner, Jim Parsons, Adam Okulicz-Kozaryn, Marshall Garland, Kristin Klopfenstein, Teacher Preparation Programs and Teach For America Research Study, The University of Texas at Dallas, Education Research Center, January 2011: Study of TFA teachers in Texas: Data on p. 16-17: Although in general, TFA teachers showed relatively strong outcomes for their students in comparison to novice beginning teachers, Hispanic students of TFA teachers had significantly lower gains than students of novice non-TFA teachers in reading / English language arts at the elementary and high school levels, and in math at the elementary level in 2009-10.

· “Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., & Vasquez-Heilig, J. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 1-51.Controlling for teacher experience, degrees, and student characteristics, uncertified TFA recruits In Houston were found to be less effective than certified teachers on 6 tests over 7 years, and the negative effects were largest for limited English proficient students who were tested in Spanish.

“Also of relevance to the CA situation are another two studies finding that they are less effective than certified novice teachers when results are looked at on the SAT-10 test (which measures more conceptual understanding). TFA recruits tend to do relatively better on the Texas TAKS (basic skills, high-stakes). Their training is increasingly focused on how to teach for the current high-stakes tests. This is relevant because of the state’s move to the Common Core, which aims at higher level skills, which require greater skill to teach to.”

Now that so many of our policymakers consider standardized testing the ultimate measure and goal of education, it is a good time to step back and remember how error-prone these instruments are.

Fortunately there is a new website that is collecting truly stupid test questions.

In my seven years on the NAEP board, I saw many questions with two good answers or none.

Be sure to read it and submit your own entry.

Julian Vasquez Heilig, a scholar of education at the University of Texas, has noticed an interesting phenomenon: A growing number of TFA alumni are contradicting the company line. They know how hard the work is. They discover they are miracle-workers and they are not going to close the achievement gap. They don’t like being used to sell a false narrative. One even said it was time for TFA to close down.

Meanwhile, in Louisiana, bloggers are asking why TFA wants the state to pay $5 million for their teachers, on top of a payment of $3,000 per teacher, each of whom will get a full salary. The question becomes pointed because TFA is rolling in hundreds of millions of dough while Louisiana’s public schools are under-funded.

I am speaking in Baton Rouge on Thursday.

The first event will be hosted by Leaders with Vision at Drusilla’s restaurant. My talk will be followed by comments by Charles Roemer, president of the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.

Then, I will speak at a teacher Town Hall. Admission is free and open to all.
Doors open at 5, and I speak at 5:30 pm.
Location: BREC Administrative Building Ballroom, 6201 Florida Blvd, Baton Rouge.

We read about the insulting contract offer to Philadelphia teachers: cut their pay and benefits, lengthen their work day, eliminate seniority, water fountains, supplies, teachers’ lounges, parking areas. No more bonuses for advanced degrees or national board certification. Did they leave anything out? The school leaders must have laughed their heads off dreaming up whatever they could think of to punish and humiliate and demean their teachers.

An educator in Philadelphia writes about the School Reform Commission’s determination to expand charter schools while starving public schools of resources:

“We keep reading stories of malfeasance by Charter CEO’s, yet the SRC and powers that be, claim that parents choose Charter Schools. Many students have addresses without a neighborhood school. If these families want to send their children to public school, they have to make an application at the School District Headquarters, which may be miles from home. The former neighborhood schools have been converted to Charters and if the Charter is at full enrollment the students are denied admission.

“The blatant disregard for the students in Philadelphia Public Schools is evidenced daily with the lay off of 100+ Certified School Nurses, School Police Officers and Librarians. The bare bones budgetary restrictions that principals must manipulate to run their buildings would be laughable if it was not so tragic. They are proposing “Community Partnerships” as one solution- so far this looks like student nurses coming to schools for their public health rotation. When student teachers are placed in schools to learn how to become effective teachers are they going to claim that this support is for the benefit of the classroom teachers? It is really heartbreaking to see the demise of public schools. There is no REAL choice for the students of Philadelphia.”

EduShyster is very excited about Joel Klein’s new product. It is not only software but a real tablet!

And yes, there is even some App where Tom Sawyer battles the Brontes.

The question is whether any of the students have ever read Tom Sawyer or anything written by the Brontes, or were they too busy reading informational text?

Brian Ford, teacher and author, writes:

Repeat after me:

THE GREAT MISTAKE AND OVERRIDING DANGER TO PUBLIC EDUCATION IS THAT
THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS WILL BE LINKD TO HIGH STAKES STANDARDIZED TESTS, TEACHER EVALUATIONS AND SCHOOL CLOSINGS

I know it is not catchy, but say it twice more:

THE GREAT MISTAKE AND OVERRIDING DANGER TO PUBLIC EDUCATION IS THAT
THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS WILL BE LINKD TO HIGH STAKES STANDARDIZED TESTS, TEACHER EVALUATIONS AND SCHOOL CLOSINGS

THE GREAT MISTAKE AND OVERRIDING DANGER TO PUBLIC EDUCATION IS THAT
THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS WILL BE LINKD TO HIGH STAKES STANDARDIZED TESTS, TEACHER EVALUATIONS AND SCHOOL CLOSINGS

I recently posted a news story from Grand Rapids, about teachers who say their pay qualifies them for food stamps.

Eric Zorn of the Chicago Tribune writes that college adjuncts are not likely to qualify for health care. At their current low wages, they already qualify for food stamps.

The New York Times wrote recently that the college degree is akin to a high school degree. Just to get a job as a file clerk or a receptionist, it reported, requires a four-year degree.

When college graduates receive neither compensation nor respect, how can we encourage more young people to sacrifice to get a college diploma? What message are we sending them?

Why should we aspire to be first in the world in college graduates when their prospects for employment and a livable income are so meager?

Stan Karp of New Jersey, who taught for 30 years, here explains the long-term impact of charter schools on public education. He understands that the original idea of charters was progressive: they were supposed to be teacher-run schools that reached out to the neediest students.

But now they have become a means of privatizing the schools.

As Karp writes:

“It has become impossible to separate the rapid expansion of charter networks from efforts to privatize public education. Commissioner Cerf has spoken of replacing the current “school system” with “a system of schools.” Former deputy commissioner Andy Smarick campaigned to “replace the district-based system in America’s large cities with fluid, self- improving systems of charter schools.” Governor Christie, a longtime supporter of private school vouchers, was once a registered lobbyist for Cerf’s former company, Edison, Inc., then the largest private education management firm in the nation.”

And more:

“Our country has already had more than enough experience with separate and unequal school systems. The counterfeit claim that charter privatization is part of a new “civil rights movement” addressing the deep and historic inequality that surrounds our schools is belied by the real impact of rapid charter growth in cities across the country. At the level of state and federal education policy, charters are providing a reform cover for eroding the public school system and an investment opportunity for those who see education as a business rather than a fundamental institution of democratic civic life.”