Yinzercation, a terrific blog in Pennsylvania, describes a concerted effort by citizens to define great public schools.
What would you change?
This is their vision:
“What is your vision for great public education? If you could wave your magic wand today and create the perfect public school in your neighborhood, what would it look like? At the Rally for Public Education last month, over 320 people from our grassroots movement thought about just this as they filled out postcards addressed to Governor Corbett, answering the questions, “I came to the rally today because …” and “If our priorities were in the right place, and everyone paid their fair share, our public schools could/would …”
From those postcards, messages on Facebook, the blog, Twitter, and in conversations with others in our movement, a common vision for public education has begun to emerge. We shared some of our insights with the coalition that produced the Vision Statement for Pittsburgh schools, distributed Monday evening at the PIIN town hall meeting. Today, A+Schools released its own Vision Statement focused on the city school board races. The grassroots vision is broader than these two, more detailed, and includes elements relevant to schools both in and outside the city of Pittsburgh.
Having a vision statement is useful as a framework for guiding our work. It identifies our shared priorities and reminds us of what we are working towards. Here is what our movement’s shared vision for great public schools is starting to look like. What would you add?
A Vision for Great Public Schools
Every child has the right to a great public education. As parents, students, teachers, and community members we are committed to great schools for all children. That means we are focused on equity, on the experience of the whole child, and on the larger role schools serve in our neighborhoods. We seek adequate, equitable, and sustainable public funding as well as public policies that support our public schools. We believe public education is a public good.
Our shared vision for our public schools:
A rich, engaging, and culturally relevant curriculum for every student with full art, music, library, science, history, and world language programs in addition to reading and math.
Safe, orderly, respectful and nurturing learning environments.
Appropriate facilities and adequate books and materials in every school.
Smaller class sizes (research shows any reduction in class size produces positive learning results and there is no magic threshold that must be reached before students benefit: our goal should be class size reduction, not expansion, as it currently is).
Meeting the needs of every child with a qualified and high-quality teacher in every classroom, using truly differentiated instruction.
Restoration of tutoring programs.
Early childhood learning opportunities and full day Kindergarten so every child has a solid foundation.
A full-time librarian in every school so that students can use their libraries, learn critical information searching skills, and find support for their classroom learning (new research unequivocally demonstrates the learning benefits for students with a full time librarian).
The return of rest time and playtime for Kindergartners.
The return of adequate, daily recess for all students.
A full and varied athletic program.
Restoration of student transportation.
Reducing the focus on and time spent on test prep and high-stakes-testing; changing the culture from “achievement” to “learning.”
Serving the special education needs of all our children.
Mental health, community based programs, and wrap around services for children and families.
Nurses and social workers in our schools every day of the week.
Bully prevention programs in every school.
Disciplinary policies applied equitably to all students; the use of alternative / in-school suspensions and positive behavior programs.
Attracting and retaining excellent teachers by supporting their work with enhanced professional development and paraprofessional staff who help create the best learning environment.
Support struggling schools most in need without threatening to close them down.
Recognition and accommodation of school-specific needs (for instance, a parent engagement specialist at one school, a tutor at another).
Making local schools hubs of community life, in which parents and community members can engage in meaningful dialogue with educators and collaborate to help our children learn and grow.
This means an emphasis on preserving neighborhood schools and recognizing that school closures rip the fabric of communities.
Ensuring all schools have an open-door, welcoming policy that encourages family engagement in student learning.”

I would only add one thing: a CERTIFIED librarian. We know that administrators will put anyone in there and say they have a librarian in the school.
LikeLike
Strong list. I would add: 1) Integrated content areas so that students have authentic encounters with math, science, humanities, reading, engineering, art, music, technology, etc. More of a focus on rich, authentic, project-based experiences through which content, dispositons, and skills are developed; 2) Access to state of the art technology in EVERY school. Students learning on 7-10 year old software (or hardly using technology at all) means that they are not learning to use the tools of our economy and thus, lack the skills needed to become leaders and innovators; 3) School policies and structures that are driven by what is best for student learning– which may mean that a one size fits all approach doesn’t make sense and some traditional structures are abandoned (think building relationship with students and the power of looping; think flipped classrooms, think about mobility of teaching staff due to advancement policies). Everyone in the education enterprise rethinks how each policy does or does not serve student learning and we fix the ones that don’t; and, 4) A broadened range of truly valued student outcomes…beyond reading, writing, math, and science…to be successful, we need to attend to creativity, love of learning/curiosity, civic engagement, persistence, persuasive capacity, oral communication, relationship-building and so many more.
LikeLike
I agree with everything except this: “the use of alternative / in-school suspensions and positive behavior programs.”
How about discipline programs that get away from rewards and punishment for behavior altogether and focus on the underlying reasons for the behavior? “Discipline”, after all, means “teaching” not “controlling”. “Positive behavior programs” especially gives me the willies as I envision star charts and trinket grab bags for “good behavior”, which too often means kids who sit down, shut up, do what they’re told and don’t raise a fuss.
LikeLike
This is a wonderful vision. But implying every child has a “right” to such an education implies that someone, somewhere has a duty to provide it. Who has that duty? Can they be compelled to perform that duty? No one, I think, would dispute the desirability of such schools. From a taxing point of view we just have to ask “how much” is a “fair share”? Just asking for a number.
LikeLike