Archives for the month of: October, 2012

How many times have you heard a leader of the reform privatization movement say,

“We don’t have time.”

“The kids can’t wait.”

This reader from Montgomery County, Maryland, which has the nation’s best teacher evaluation system (it does not rely on test scores but on professional judgment) writes:


We in MoCo don’t hire inexperienced people. The people that are hired in Montgomery County are well vetted professionals with earned degrees and experience. They are also well compensated and most who opt to come here can be reasonably assured of a long and productive career.

In addition, in MoCo there is a culture of high expectations for all students. Parents, teachers and students are involved and engaged in the schools and the educational process. Employees are treated with courtesy and respect. Unlike their teaching counterparts in major urban areas, their isn’t the daily and constant teacher bashing, vilification and demonization in MoCo.

In addition, we spend over $2.2B per year on our public schools. One last thing, unlike the major urban and close in suburban schools that are supposedly “failing” in MoCo they aren’t testing every day in the name of achievement. Surprisingly, there is real teaching and learning taking place. What’s not to like.

Can this model be replicated? Yes. Will it in urban areas? No. Why? It takes time. Something, according to Arne, Michelle, and Joel we don’t have.

We previously read an article claiming that for-profit entrepreneurs are necessary to reform American schools. The article began, in its original version, with a vulgar and gratuitous insult directed at Anthony Cody.

Here are two great responses. The first is by Anthony Cody.

The other is by Audrey Watters.

I asked earlier if there were districts that still manage to offer a full curriculum despite the federal mandates. Where are the good things happening. There were many good responses. These are some of the most provocative:

Response #1:

In California, there are over 1,000 separate school districts. Each reflects a different community. Districts that have access to wealthy constituents have been successful at raising new money to hire staff and maintain programs. Small districts have exercised substantial creativity and leveraged the occasional windfall into other wonderful things.

You’ve never heard of most of these schools.

In Humboldt County on California’s north coast, several elementary schools have maintained a program where every child can learn to play the violin.

Anderson Valley High School in Boonville, CA, has its own space program.

Public school kids from all over Northern California go to a week-long Outdoor Science School at Mendocino Woodlands State Park. http://www.mendocinowoodlands.org/ross.html

Others attend an overnight Living History at Fort Ross State Park, living the life of a native Kashaya, an Aleut, or a Russian officer. http://www.fortrossstatepark.org/elp.htm

There is Living History on the tall ship Balclutha in San Francisco Bay. http://www.nps.gov/safr/forteachers/index.htm

If you go through the Donors Choose site, you’ll see teachers putting together all kinds of interesting and innovative projects on their own time.

There are wonderful things happening in American schools – even Title 1 schools. It’s just that the staff and parents are too busy doing them to tell the world about them.

Response #2:

Absolutely there is a vast difference between affluent schools and schools in poverty when it comes to test emphasis. My own kids attended an “exemplary” campus where tests happened, but were not freaked out about, because the kids were all going to do fine. They had the background knowledge and schema to perform well. They were read to as toddlers. The test was considered a starting line, not a finish line.
I teach in a vastly different environment, where 96 percent of our campus is economically disadvantaged. These students are in survival mode. It will take an act of God for some of them to even approach passing because kids don’t learn well when their basic human needs are not met. So we are stressed about the tests all the time.

Response #3:

I live in California near many affluent districts such as Los Alamitos, Beverly Hills, Palos Verdes and San Marino. Visit any of these schools and you will see a rich and balanced curriculum that will compete nicely with those in private schools. Parents at these schools often have “Foundations” that raise thousands of dollars each year to support art, music and P.E. Highly educated parents often volunteer in classrooms, essentially bringing down the student/teacher ratio to 10:1, at least in the primary grades. And of course there are no Teach for America people in these schools because they only hire fully qualified, mostly experienced teachers.

As for test scores, although they are certainly taken seriously, there is no test-prep from September to May because teachers know that almost everyone will score high.

The inequity that exists in our educational system is a national disgrace. Let’s hope we get some authentic reform soon.

Katie Osgood, who teaches children in a psychiatric hospital in Illinois, has some good suggestions for President Obama.

You should read her letter to President Obama.

Jersey Jazzman has developed an equation: reform=disrespect.

Another way to put it: these so-called reformers don’t like democracy.

He detects a growing opposition to the top-down methods of the privatizers.

Something is happening in Jersey, and the rest of the country: slowly, a groundswell of opposition is building against the corporate reform agenda. People are starting to resent the idea that a California billionaire like Eli Broad has more influence over the directions of their children’s schools than they do. Paterson and Jersey City are also straining under their state-imposed yoke. Camden is pushing back against plans imposed from outside its borders. Even the ‘burbs have had enough.

Please write a letter or email to President Obama and share your concerns about the future of our schools. be sure to send it to Anthony Cody or me so we can add your voice to the whole.

The instructions on where to send your letter or email are here. Be sure oe of us gets a copy.

Here is an interesting and curious coincidence.

Edushyster reported the list of schools in Massachusetts with the highest suspension rate.

Most of them were charter schools.

The school with the highest suspension rate in the state of Massachusetts is Roxbury Prep. This charter school suspended 56.1% of its students for one or more days last year. The Boston public schools suspended less than 5% of its students last year.

Guess who was one of the founders of Roxbury Prep?
John King, the young State Commissioner of Education in New York, who was appointed based on his charter school experience in Massachusetts and New York.

The New York Times described Roxbury Prep as one of the top charter schools in Massachusetts.

Now we know why.

Is that one of the lessons that public schools can learn from charter schools? Suspend your students early and often? The more you suspend them, the better your school?

Is that 21st century thinking?

In a stunning article, Richard Rothstein has dissected Joel Klein’s claim to have grown up in poverty, living in a public housing project, saved by a “great” teacher.

This story is used cynically by Klein and other advocates of privatization to attack public education, teachers and unions. (Wasn’t that great teacher a member of the union in NYC?).

Rothstein says that Klein was not poor, that he actually lived in a public housing project built for white middle-class families. Rothstein further argues that these projects were part of a larger pattern of government subsidy for racial segregation. Klein’s story, he concludes, does not prove what Klein so often claims about the irrelevance of poverty.

This is a must-read.

A teacher knows how the achievement gap grows:

My wife and I are both elementary teachers in the same district but at completely different schools. She teaches at a school with over 80% free and reduced lunch whereas my school has 7%. When I ask her about the policies in her school versus the policies we have in my school IN THE SAME SCHOOL DISTRICT, it led me to this conclusion: rich kids get taught, poor kids get tested.

I speak at City Club breakfast on Monday at 7:30 at Maggiano’s.

At 4, speaking to CTU teachers at 4 pm at Lane Technical High School.
ALL WELCOME.