When the news broke that the Camden, New Jersey, had rejected four charters, their reasons for doing so were not clear. This article in the Philadelphia Inquirer provides some more detail and context.

The charters had powerful political support: Not only from Governor Christie but from George Norcross, whose foundation was in partnership with KIPP to create a five-campus school that would enroll as many as 3,000 students.

The largest application came from the partnership of the Norcross Foundation Inc., a charity created by the family of Donald Norcross and his brother George E. Norcross III; the charitable foundation of Cooper, which George Norcross chairs; and one of the nation’s largest charter-school operators, the Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP). George Norcross is a managing partner of the company that owns The [Philadelphia] Inquirer.

The four proposals would have a large financial impact on the district:

Companies could build and operate the schools and receive from each student’s home district up to 95 percent of the amount the district would have spent for that student.

The effect of the new schools on the existing district factored into some board members’ decisions Wednesday, they said.

Between $18 million to $22 million for each proposal would be diverted from the district in per-pupil costs, according to a quick estimate by the district business administrator, Celeste Ricketts. Because the Renaissance proposals could mean the shift of more than 4,000 students from the district and result in consolidation of schools, Ricketts said, she could not estimate the total loss or cost to the district if the proposals went through.

I am not clear how many students are enrolled in Camden, but it is not a large district. It sounds as though the board was invited to outsource its responsibilities, its students, and its budget to private operators. Just the kind of thing Governor Christie likes.

UPDATE: A reader informed me that Camden has an enrollment of about 13,000 students. The charter proposals would have drained away almost 1/3 of the district’s enrollment and a large part of its budget. No wonder the board said “no, thanks” and defied the power structure, both Republican and Democrat.