This is one of the most powerful articles I have read in a long time.
Robert Putnam describes life in his home town of Port Clinton, Ohio, population 6,059, as he was growing up in the 50s.
Port Clinton was “ a passable embodiment of the American dream, a place that offered decent opportunity for the children of bankers and factory workers alike.”
But today, “wealthy kids park BMW convertibles in the Port Clinton High School lot next to decrepit “junkers” in which homeless classmates live. The American dream has morphed into a split-screen American nightmare. And the story of this small town, and the divergent destinies of its children, turns out to be sadly representative of America.
“Growing up, almost all my classmates lived with two parents in homes their parents owned and in neighborhoods where everyone knew everyone else’s first name. Some dads worked in the local auto-part factories or gypsum mines, while others, like my dad, were small businessmen. In that era of strong unions and full employment, few families experienced joblessness or serious economic insecurity. Very few P.C.H.S. students came from wealthy backgrounds, and those few made every effort to hide that fact.”
Putnam and his generation grew up in a healthy society, where opportunity was widely available and many did well in life. Nearly three-quarters got more education than their parents and succeeded economically as well.
But then manufacturing collapsed; jobs were outsourced. The social fabric of the community wore thin.
“The social impact of those economic hammer blows was initially cushioned by the family and community bonds that had been so strong in my youth. But as successive graduating P.C.H.S. classes entered an ever worsening local economy, the social fabric of the 1950s and 1960s was gradually shredded. Juvenile-delinquency rates began to skyrocket in the 1980s and were triple the national average by 2010. Not surprisingly, given falling wages and loosening norms, single-parent households in Ottawa County doubled from 10 percent in 1970 to 20 percent in 2010, while the divorce rate more than quadrupled. In Port Clinton itself, the epicenter of the local economic collapse in the 1980s, the rate of births out of wedlock quadrupled between 1978 and 1990, topping out at about 40 percent, nearly twice the race-adjusted national average (itself rising rapidly).
“Unlike working-class kids in the class of 1959, many of their counterparts in Port Clinton today are, despite toil and talent, locked into troubled, even hopeless lives.”
What is happening to our country?
Why are the bankers and the major corporations blaming teachers and public schools for problems they not only created but benefit from?
Why do they think that adoption of the Common Core standards or the privatization of public schools will heal the deep economic and social problems caused by the outsourcing of our manufacturing base and deep income inequality?
How many shell games will Americans fall for?

Are we assuming that the children of bankers and factory workers in Port Clinton in the 50s were all white christian males?
LikeLike
That’s your focus after reading this article? Did you read it?
LikeLike
That was my reaction to the claim that the American dream was available to all in the 1950’s. if your not a white Christian male, I think there is a strong argument that the American dream is more achievable today.
LikeLike
To be fair, professor Putnam does acknowledge that only males could expect a steady job in the 50’s.
LikeLike
As far as your last question, well, someone once said “There’s a sucker born every minute.”
LikeLike
Everybody knows that China is the world’s leader in exporting manufactured goods. What few know is that Germany is #2 and that Germany’s workers are more expensive and less productive than American workers. We could be manufacturing again and doing well. But that would mean corporations would have to accept something slightly less than record profits. Our biggest issue is greed.
LikeLike
That’s very interesting. How does Germany have a robust economy despite their high tax rate?
LikeLike
Part of the answer is that Germany instituted some important labor market reforms about ten years ago. Here is an Economist article about it:http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21573583-ten-years-how-does-germanys-agenda-2010-package-rate-wunderreform
LikeLike
Germany also has a very strong union movement, Germans are not rabidly anti-union, there is no war on unions as there is in the US. The right wingers in the US claim that unions killed Detroit, unions forced industry overseas, unions killed off the auto industry and so goes the anti-union script. Germany did not go on an off-shoring binge as the US did and its auto industry is unionized; the unions even sit at the board of directors table of the big industries. Germany has universal health care and relatively inexpensive higher education; home schooling is actually illegal in Germany. In the US, we have blame the unions first syndrome, this is not true in Germany and most of northern Europe.
LikeLike
It also helps that the euro is relatively weak from the German perspective.
LikeLike
Germany’s economy was strong long before the Euro even came into being. While a weak Euro may help today’s Germany, it’s not the reason that Germany became strong.
LikeLike
A weak euro is why Germany is a strong exporter these days.
LikeLike
The Kennebec Journal criticizes Maine Education Commissioner Bowen’s defense of Bennett. Also, questions are raised about Bowen’s attempt to blame the supporters of the “status quo”.
http://www.kjonline.com/opinion/education-chiefs-defense-of-friend-imperils-credibility_2013-08-05.html
LikeLike
After reading the article it appears he needs to defend the A-F rating system to maintain his worth or need in Maine, therefore he must defend his lying, conniving friend.
They all follow the same playbook and when that is exposed, he’s on the chopping block, too.
So for the Maine commissioner this is about saving his job…it has nothing to do with students, teaching and learning. That’s crystal clear.
LikeLike
How many shell games, indeed? And of possibly more importance, what is the next shell game in the works to be played after this one has played out?
LikeLike
This is powerful writing. The reality of our society needs to be addressed. As a retired public school teacher I see the cuts in our own local small town school where I taught but unless something is done at the ballot box, things will not change.
LikeLike
“…but unless something is done at the ballot box, things will not change.”
We “Vote” at the ballot box and we “Vote” with our wallet, every
time we make a purchase.
The “Wallet Vote” or American Consumer Demand, supports taxable
(Public sector funding) domestic labor, OR Foreign labor (Reduction
of Public sector funding).
What role does the “Ballot Box” play to balance the DICTATES
of Capital, enacted by the NON-ELECTED/ APPOINTEES?
What role does Domestic Consumer Demand play in the tax base
and Domestic Employment?
LikeLike
Looking at the current physical and economic landscape of many of our cities and towns, it is as if Mr. Potter was successful in buying out George Bailey.
LikeLike
And Scrooge never had his transformation. I can’t figure out for the life of me why these stories are so popular given that most voters seem to regard the current inequality as a given, if not a good thing.
LikeLike
Oh the wishful thinking for simpler times. Fairness, equal opportunity for the majority (certainly not everybody-ask anybody Black or the American Indian), the American Dream, rah rah and sisboomba! What happened? Well, for one thing with technology life became more complicated, more aggressive, more measurement conscious, give it to me fast, give it to me better, give it to me with all the bells and whistles, more more more, better better better, choice choice choice! Get the point! Buy the hype and the product. Get that robot to clean your house and tone your muscles for better health to live longer and eventually to have to forage for food or think of how to survive in a purposely non directed world for most and a gated community for the privileged few.
Have we really arrived at that sad scenario? If we let it happen it will and it won’t take long. Remember, Lord of the Flies and every Sci-Fi movie plot with the have and have not scenarios? It has always been and will always be but it can be better then the worse expectation of some.
It also became unfairly punitive with all that measurement for a better tomorrow. A better tomorrow for some (certainly not all) who have narrowed to a few. But what happened to enjoying today? It has changed and it has lost sight of not having to rush for success as the only reward. For some, that is all there is, and for others with a minimalist view having less is not such a shock or felt to be such a failure.
If the few came to understand the importance of a world fairly distributed for the dignity of a life of work and survival with an educated mind, and they could be comfortable without greed as their mantra, we just might succeed as a community of people and not as a bee hive working for the Queen while killing off the workers. Looking back to the nostalgia of someone’s fortunate past is a good read but it does not reflect the Truth for all and it does not give us a roadmap for this brave but very unequal and fast moving new world order.
LikeLike
I did not know what divorce was until I was in the sixth grade in 1962. A girl in my class had a different last name than her mother. I asked her why and she told me her mother was married to a man who was not her father. I thought her father died but she told me her parents were divorced. I suppose I was somewhat sheltered but society has simply changed – in many ways for the better and many for the worse. I would love for my kids to come from stable two parent homes but just a stable home for them would be wonderful.
There are positives and negatives in all things. Change happens. When studying ecosystems we learn it’s adapt or die. We go forward and hope to adapt enough to survive but not so much that we lose the good stuff.
LikeLike
From Wikipedia article on the nuclear family: As of 2000, nuclear families with the original biological parents constituted roughly 24.1% of American households, compared to 40.3% in 1970. Roughly two-thirds of all children in the United States will spend at least some time in a single-parent household.
The right-wingers in the United States who go around talking about family values need to get the message that the family, in the United States, takes many, many forms. It doesn’t look like the traditional nuclear family any more. But that nuclear family–Mom and Dad and the kids isolated in a home in the burbs–was a blip in history. For most of our history on this planet, we hominids have lived in extended families–in bands. The “creative destruction” of that extended family unit model by modern industrial capitalism created an alternative that doesn’t quite work, as stats like that I quoted above show.
LikeLike
Putnam didn’t get the memo that Greed is Good. Sending people’s jobs overseas and replacing workers with “customer self service portals” are examples of “creative destruction.” Creative destruction makes for more efficiency and so improves the lot of all over time. It happens to serve the self interests of the currently wealthy and powerful, but that’s not why they indulge in it. They do so because they care. Big Brother loves you–well, perhaps not you in particular, but you meaning people as a whole.
It only appears that the masters in the oligarchy are working very, very diligently to create the conditions (e.g., Citizens United) whereby they can ever more effectively buy politicians a) to create regulatory roadblocks that ensure their monopolistic control over industries and b) to ensure a steady flow of trillions of dollars of no-bid contracts for a nonproductive mechanism, the war machine. (In other words, it only appears that much of the productive capacity of the country is being turned to that end.) And it only appears that the whole economic system is based upon creating wage slavery and obedience through debt and on continued growth of consumption in the face of finite resources, an increasingly greater share of which is being concentrated in a few hands. We have a fix for these misunderstandings. We’re going to create a single national repository of all the responses and test scores of the proles and feed all their curriculum to them via worksheets on a screen, and some of those worksheets will teach them to love Big Brother and his economic theory.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Scary.
LikeLike
Hard to know where to start here. I certainly agree that markets should be free, open and competitive, but that also means that goods produced abroad should be allowed in to the US market.
LikeLike
I agree, TE, emphatically.
LikeLike
TRADE DEFICITS, are icing on the cake, that you can have and
eat.
LikeLike
Sorry, my comments were written in haste and were meant to be satirical. I hear a lot of talk about “free markets,” but damned if I know of any.
LikeLike
So, is access to water a “right” or is water a commodity with a price? (See Brabek film above) Similarly, is education a “right” or a commodity with a price?
LikeLike
Or put it this way, is education “free,” or is it a service that must be paid for?
LikeLike
Is education a state of mind, or is it the mind of the state?
The proof is in the pudding.
LikeLike
Education, of course, is not free. There is always an opportunity cost to anything we do.
LikeLike