Pearson has sent a solicitation to principals: If you allow us to use your students to field test items, we will give you an IPad or another electronic device of your choice. The principal who sent this to me put it somewhat more plainly: Should I turn my kids into guinea pigs in exchange for a free IPad?
Field Study November 2012
Program Information and Participation Form – Grades 3-7
Dear Principal,
ACT has engaged Pearson in a national effort to try out new test materials. ACT and Pearson have worked together since the earliest days of ACT’s history and share over 50 years of cooperation and experience developing and delivering the highest quality assessments. We are seeking your participation in a field study that will help lay the foundation for the next generation assessments that address college readiness and the Common Core State Standards.
By nature, educators are future-focused believers in the potential of the next generation. Their professional ethic is to help young people reach this potential and achieve their dreams. And, at the highest levels, educators understand the need for systematic evaluation and guidance to pave the way from dreams to reality. Will you be one of those who help ACT set the guideposts on the path to success for the next generation?
Pearson is requesting applications from districts/schools willing to assist in the development of these test materials while offering an opportunity for your school to generate benefits in return for your school’s participation.
Why Should You Participate?
Educational excellence is the core of a nation’s economic prosperity, and just as data drives the decisions of those who manage corporations, measures of educational achievement inform the decisions of those, like you, who manage our educational institutions. But these measures must reflect such achievement accurately, so, partnership between educators and testing professionals is critical. You are the key.
In return, we will give you a choice of an iPad, iPod Touch, Nook Tablet, or Kindle Fire. For grades 6 and 7, you can select an online administration of ACT’s new ENGAGE™ 6-7.
Incentive Packages |
For every 80 assessments completed:
Grades 3, 4 & 5
2 iPod Touches
OR
3 Nook Tablets
OR
1 iPad
OR
2 Kindle Fires
Grades 6 & 7
80 ENGAGE™registrations
How does ENGAGE™ benefit your school?
For every completed assessment in grades 6 and 7, one of your students can be assessed, at no charge to your school. ENGAGE™ is a low-stakes, self-report assessment that measures students’ behaviors and psychosocial attributes–critical but often overlooked components of their success. It can assist in the identification of students who may be at risk of academic difficulties or dropout. ENGAGE™ is anextremely powerful way for educators to improve their graduation rates and directly reach students whose personal challenges go unreported in standardized academic tests.
What Will Your School be Required to do for the Field Study?
- Fill out the online application:
https://www.surveymk.com/s/EnrollNovemberPilot
- Submit your classroom rosters which include students’ demographic information.
- If testing online, complete system setup and have teachers participate in an online training session.
- If testing on paper, receive and distribute materials to your participating teachers.
- Teachers will administer one to four 30-40 minute tests, with mainly multiple choice items. Tests will also include a few constructed response items.
- Submit and return materials by designated deadline.
Our intent is to gather data for analyzing our testing program while offering your students an opportunity to practice their test-taking skills at no cost to your school.
Project Details
- · Public, private and charter schools are eligible to participate.
- · The field study is available to grades 3 through 7.
- · The project is to be group administered any time between November 1 and 30, 2012.
- · Each test will cover one of four subjects: English, mathematics, reading, or science.
- · We request schools register to test all of the four subjects. However, if circumstances prevent your school from testing all four subjects please indicate the number of subtests your school may administer. Please note, if you register for less than four subjects, Pearson will assign the subject tests to you and notify you as to what tests you will be administering.
- · The testing does not necessarily have to occur in a class of the same subject.
- · You may choose to administer the computer-based or paper-based assessment. Minimum system requirements are necessary for the online assessment.
- · No score reports will be available as this assessment is in the developmental phase.
What to Do Next?
1) Apply online: https://www.surveymk.com/s/EnrollNovemberPilot
2) Share this opportunity with colleagues who may also be interested.
We appreciate your interest and look forward to working with you.
Shouldn’t they offer an iPad for each kid?
Sigh.
Warning…Warning….Warning…Somewhere and somehow, this will not end well for the principal(s) who decides to go rogue.
Pearson does an end-run around local Boards of Education and central administration. Privacy issues like FERPA 1974 are the first that come to mind. There are others, but to possibly end a career for an iPad….NO WAY! And for so cheap a price; marketing surveys, studies and panels or focus groups cost so much more. A couple hundred dollars to sell out your kids? No, if you’re going to do so, hold out for more. That’s the least you can do. After all, you’ll argue that, “it was for the kids” as they drag you away from the school house.
Brave Principal to stand against Pearson. Another brave person is Prof. Barbara Madeloni of the UMass Schl of Ed in Amherst who stood with her grad students protesting Pearson’s field testing a teacher-eval exam on them. For this, Prof. Madeloni was fired. She deserves our support too.
Why yes your honor I did hand over federally protected information about my students and violated a number of ethical principles required to be a principal, but I got these two really cool I-Pod touches…one for me and one that I can give my kid at Christmas.
And not only does the principal get gifts, but “for every completed assessment in grades 6 and 7, one of your students can be assessed, at no charge to your school. ENGAGE™ is a low-stakes, self-report assessment that measures students’ behaviors and psychosocial attributes–critical but often overlooked components of their success.”
We’ll see school systems telling parents that they’ve acquired, at no cost, a state-of-the-art psychosocial testing system that will allow the principal to better identify which kids to pull out of the population that is taking the standardized tests so that the entire school will look better when it comes in with higher looking scores and they can call it an enhancement to their special education programming!
And all you have to do is take more time away from actual learning.
Do these Foundations have no souls? I wonder how much of this sort thing is going on in Charters ready? Of course, there will never be any full disclosure, ever.
They are one step away from driving past playgrounds and passing out iPads from an old van.
How cunning and deceiving. All for 1 or 2 iPads? hope they get a lot of NOs!
Wouldn’t the parents have to be notified that we are collecting and sending data on your children? Once parents catch on this isn’t going to be so easy?
Thanks to the Department of Education, parental permission may not be needed.
How the feds are tracking your kid –
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/how_the_feds_are_tracking_your_kid_xC6wecT8ZidCAzfqegB6hL?CMP=OTC-rss&FEEDNAME
Ed Lettis could you re-post the link? At the moment I get a generic page. Hopefully, the people at DoEd haven’t completely lost their minds. Yes, waivers do seem to violate NCLB. One can also question the legality of RttT. I hope they haven’t thought about waiving FERPA 1974. If so, we have a rogue agency and Cabinet Secretary. Time to impeach, if this is the case.
How the feds are tracking your kid
By EMMETT MCGROARTY & JANE ROBBINS
Last Updated: 12:13 AM, December 28, 2011
Posted: 11:01 PM, December 27, 2011
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/how_the_feds_are_tracking_your_kid_xC6wecT8ZidCAzfqegB6hL?CMP=OTC-rss&FEEDNAME
I believe that the question in your title was already asked, in different form, by a fellow named Faust. He put it like this: “Should I sell my soul to the devil in order to enjoy this world to the fullest?”
Pearson should state clearly what these “psychosocial” tests contain. There’s nothing about this “Engage” assessment on the Pearson website.
A Google search turned up some Pearson assessments for the workplace. They appear under the category “Engage” but don’t seem to be related to the “Engage” product.
http://www.talentlens.co.uk/engage.aspx
Clearly Pearson is gearing up to launch a new sort of test. The public should know about it.
Such a great benevolent company…Will they take care of us from cradle to grave?
Pearson is the world’s leading learning company. We have 36000 people in more than 70 countries, helping people of all ages to make progress in their lives.
http://www.pearson.com/
Now maybe it’s me or the lateness of the hour- but doesn’t their offer of iPads violate their values?
http://www.pearson.com/responsibility/values/code-of-conduct.html
Likewise, we do not ever give money or gifts to gain influence for ourselves or for Pearson.
Gifts or entertainment of small value may be given or accepted in circumstances where they can be reciprocated and where they don’t compromise us or the company, and provided they’re disclosed.
For a moment I thought it might be a hoax. But no–there’s more about ENGAGE on the ACT website. This isn’t a Pearson product; Pearson is just partnering with ACT in this.
http://www.act.org/engage/college_features.html
It seems a bit intrusive to me. Here’s a sample student report:
Click to access 6-9_samp_report_student.pdf
How the iPad deal came into the picture is another matter. Is Apple involved with this too?
Just to clarify that the “test” Pearson is “testing” is NOT a Pearson product, but (and this is the worst part), an ACT (the “nonprofit” organization that produces and administers the college admissions test–that by the way sells students’ names to colleges and universities–but so does The College Board) test.
I can assure you that Pearson and ACT are “competitors.” You should see how ACT’s employees celebrate every time the media smashes Pearson! ACT is really not very fond of Pearson (I know, I used to work for ACT). But like any “profit-oriented business” (though they go the distance to emphasize they are a “not-for-profit”–not a non-profit–organization, ACT partnered with (“hiding behind” is a better term) Pearson to make more money. Who do you think is paying for the iPad? None other than ACT! Which test is Pearson referring to? None other than ACT’s ENGAGE, a newly-developed behavioral instrument.
From an ACT perspective, it’s better to “let Pearson take the blame for this marketing gimmick. After all, Pearson has been in the news for so many “mistakes” and non-compliance, not to mention the issue with Florida’s FCAT (prepared by Pearson, and garnering million$ of $$ for that company ). ACT has been precisely targeting Florida for such a juicy contract.
So which one is to blame for this marketing aberration? Understand that I am not favoring Pearson either, but there is no secret Pearson is a for-profit company–they don’t hide their business structure behind a tax-exempt organization, but ACT? This is the “not-for-profit education organization” that prides itself on its mission, which supposedly is: “Helping people achieve education and workplace success.” So which one is NOT being honest here? Pearson or ACT? Think again.
ACT’s objective is multi fold: 1) having ALL students in the NATION take ACT’s suite of tests (EXPLORE, PLAN, ACT, and now ENGAGE, the “behavioral” leg of all these tests) as many times as possible, so they sell these to states, which in turn they make it “mandatory.” 2) having all employers in the NATION use ACT’s WorkKeys tests, as a “filter” to deny employment opportunities to minorities (of course, they say it is to be able to select the most “qualified candidates.”
So this is not about “giving the students to Pearson” but also “giving” them to ACT! From now on, we should put these “enemies” in the same basket; together to shame them publicly, so both are mentioned in the same sentence, for the same aberration of wanting to profit from students, who most certainly don’t even know what’s going on; much less their parents. Then ACT will have a better reason to laugh and celebrate!
Pearson has completely taken over the Huntsville City Schools in Alabama. The district is tracking teachers use of “technology” and using the data as part of the teachers’ review. All 3rd-12th graders have personal laptops and parents weren’t allowed to opt out. Teachers were given 3 days of training and currently many of the computers aren’t working or the systems can’t handle the number of students online. I wonder what kind of deal Pearson and Wardynski have made and if it involves students data.
File a Freedom of Information request or to protect yourself, have a friend do so. You can get vendor information on the state website.
Sure! Haven’t you noticed that these days “students are for sale” as long as they don’t receive the good education they deserve?
That’s exactly what ACT and SAT have been doing for AGES with the names of their test-takers to the point that such business activity is an easy way of making MILLION$. Who cares if students learn or not; close the achievement gap or not; score high or not as long as they are an “income-producing” cash cow?
This is exactly what Chris Whittle did with TV.