Archives for category: Missouri

There are very few unionized workers in Missouri, but nonetheless voters rejected a law passed by the Legislature to cripple labor unions. The legislature passed the law in 2017, the labor movement gathered enough signatures to force a referendum, which was decided yesterday. The vote was overwhelming, 63% opposing the law. In politics, 63% is a landslide.

Robert Kuttner of The American Prospect explains what happened:

Kuttner on TAP

Labor’s Astonishing Missouri Win—and the Opening It Portends. Ohio’s razor-thin vote for an open House seat got most of the headlines, but the bigger story was the defeat of a right-to-work ballot proposition in supposedly right-wing Missouri.

The bill to make Missouri America’s 28th state with a “right to work” law was passed by the legislature in 2017 and signed by then–Republican Governor Eric Greitens. But the labor movement qualified a ballot initiative overturning the measure, and it passed by a margin of 2 to 1, including in very conservative parts of a state carried overwhelmingly by Trump.

The “right to work” option was added to labor law by the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act. Passed by the Republican 80th Congress over President Truman’s veto (he denounced it as a “slave labor act”), Taft-Hartley allows states to pass laws permitting workers to opt out of paying union dues even when a majority of workers sign union cards.

The name “right to work” was always a fraud. Even in states without such laws, anybody can take a job at a unionized facility. Workers merely have to join, or if they don’t want to join, to pay dues after they are hired.

“Right to work” makes it much harder to organize in such states. Until the last few decades, these measures were largely confined to the anti-union South and Mountain West. Lately, they have been enacted in Michigan, Indiana, and Wisconsin. In the past decade, they’ve been beaten with ballot initiatives in California and Ohio.

The Missouri vote not only extends and intensifies that success in a supposedly far more conservative state. It shows the latent appeal of pocketbook issues and trade unionism even in Trump country. It shows that the labor movement may be down, but it is far from out.

In Missouri, just 8.7 percent of workers are members of unions. But most working families know someone with a union job and they know the difference a union can make.

The right to have a union signals concern for the forgotten working class. By trying to crush labor, Missouri Republicans signaled not individual rights—the usual pitch for the misnamed “right to work” law—but their contempt for working people, who got the message.

The Missouri outcome also bodes well for the re-election of Senator Claire McCaskill, one of the supposedly endangered Democrats up this fall. More importantly, it signals the resurgence of the labor movement—and reminds Democrats that progressive economics are the indispensable ingredient for success on the beaten-down American heartland. ~ ROBERT KUTTNER

I have no link, but if you want to get the email blasts from The American Prospect, sign up here.

During the tenure of former Governor Eric Greitens, Missouri had no state school board because the legislature refused to confirm his appointees. The new governor appointed new members and at last there is a quorum. Yesterday they had a meeting to renew charter schools, which are allowed only in St. Louis and Kansas City. Five charters were renewed despite their middling performance.

Typically, the board has judged charter performance against the performance of the district, but the charters said this was unfair.

Charlie Shields, president of the state board, said that it was time to review charter school laws.

“Shields was critical of the performance of the St. Louis charter schools renewed Thursday, arguing that they do not convincingly outperform St. Louis Public Schools. He said the state Legislature allowed charter schools to operate in Missouri on the premise that charter schools would be easy to open, but poor-performing charter schools should be easy to close.”

St. Louis was taken over by the state because of low performance and is hoping to have local control restored. Yet charter schools do not outperform the district, and charter leaders say that it’s unfair to expect them to do so. Once again, we see reformers moving the goal posts and lowering expectations.

Whiners. Remember when we were told that charter schools would “save poor kids from failing public schools” and would “close the achievement gap.” They don’t and they haven’t. They fight to survive because they want to.

Under Republican control, don’t expect Missouri to set meaningful accountability standards for charters.

The question now is:

“Who will save poor kids from failing charters?”

Governor Eric Greitens has resigned, after acknowledging an extramarital affair.

I have followed Governor Greitens because of his determination to increase the number of charter schools in Missouri. He packed the state school board with allies, who proceeded to fire the nonpartisan State Commissioner. Greitens had lined up his choice, a charter advocate. But he never bothered to have the State Senate confirm his appointees, and they had no authority to make decisions so for the foreseeable future, Missouri has no Governor and no State Board of Education. They did not have the legal authority to fire the State Commissioner but they did anyway.

Missouri Governor Eric Greitens withdrew all his nominees for the state school board so that they would not be barred for life. The state senate won’t confirm them because Greitens is under indictment for sex crimes.

At this moment, all the seats are vacant.

Republican Governor Greitens wanted to replace her with a crony who loves charter schools.

Here is a puzzle:

Why was this unconfirmed state board allowed to fire the non-controversial state commissioner, Margie Vandeven? How did they have the authority to do that? They are still nominees, not confirmed by the Senate.

She should sue to restore her job.

http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/20180511/greitens-says-education-nominees-withdrawn-for-confirmation

http://www.stlamerican.com/news/columnists/mike_jones/public-education-and-child-endangerment/article_2d7dd154-2183-11e8-bd15-ff4cd5090b84.html

 

Mike Jones is a member of the Missouri State Board of Education. He expects that Governor Eric Greitens will not reappoint him, as he has been remaking the board to satisfy his privatization agenda. Greitens is currently under indictment for invasion of privacy, involving matters of sexual indiscretion. Greitens appointed a majority , who promptly fired the state commissioner Margie Vandeven. But his board has not been confirmed by the senate.

Jones published this thoughtful and insightful reflection on the state of education of Black children in Missouri. He is spot on. 

The Republican Governor Eric Greitens was recently indicted for felony invasion of privacy, having been charged with taking nude photos of his mistress or consort and threatening to put them on the Internet. The House voted unanimously to investigate the governor’s conduct.

On the education front, Greitens stacked the state board of education with appointees who pledged to oust the state commissioner of education and replace her with someone that Greitens wanted, a charter advocate. His hand-chosen board fired Margie Vandeven, but then ran into a problem. None of Greitens’ appointees had been confirmed by the State Senate, as required by state law. Thus, the state board lacked a quorum because only three of its eight members were legitimate. It remains a puzzle why their firing of the state commissioner was okay.

Now, the governor has fired and reappointed his five hand-picked members, to give their appointments a new lease on life. Some Republicans in the legislature are not happy. The board continues to lack a quorum, and all decisions requiring its approval are stalled.

A handful of senators had vowed to block Greitens’ appointees, and if Greitens hadn’t withdrawn their names from consideration, then opponents would have had to stall the process for only 30 days to kill the nominations — and ban them from serving on the board for life.

Because the appointments were resubmitted after the legislature convened for the 2018 session, the Senate has until it adjourns in May to contemplate the nominations.

Parker Briden, spokesman for Greitens, said the governor made the moves after being contacted by members of the Senate seeking more than the allotted 30 days to review and vote on the board appointees.

“I know there is a desire among senators to be involved in this process and to give our advice and consent to well-qualified appointees,” Senate President Pro Tem Ron Richard said in a statement Wednesday afternoon. “Today’s action will free up extra time for the Senate to give prompt consideration to a number of the Governor’s other important interim appointees.”

Senate Majority Leader Mike Kehoe, a Jefferson City Republican, said that “allowing the Senate additional time to weigh in on these very important positions on the State Board of Education was a positive decision by the governor.”

But two Republican senators made it clear Wednesday that they would still work to stop Greitens’ appointments from being confirmed.

State Sen. Gary Romine, a Farmington Republican who heads the Senate education committee, said the five appointees don’t deserve to be considered because they showed poor judgment in voting to fire Vandeven at the governor’s behest.

He was joined by state Sen. Rob Schaaf, a St. Joseph Republican and frequent critic of the governor, who said Greitens would do well to find new nominees.

“If he resubmits those names to the Senate, there is a big chance those people will be barred forever from serving,” Schaaf said.

Later, Schaaf discussed how long a filibuster of the governor’s nominees might go.

“We could go a long time,” he said. “A very, very long time. An infinite amount of time.”

I ask again, in case this post is read by any member of the legislature in Missouri, how was the board selected by Greitens but not approved by the State Senate allowed to fire the state commissioner? The board was not legal when it fired her. Why was she removed by an illegal board?

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article192800879.html#storylink=cpy

 

 

Republican Governor Eric Greitens was indicted for invasion of privacy.

“Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens was indicted and taken into custody Thursday for felony invasion of privacy, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner’s office announced Thursday afternoon…

“Gardner’s statement said a grand jury found probable cause to believe Greitens violated a Missouri statute that makes it a felony if a person transmits the image contained in the photograph or film in a manner that allows access to that image via a computer.

“The indictment apparently stems from allegations made in media reports last month that, during the course of an extramarital affair, he took a photograph of his bound and partially nude lover and threatened to publicize it if she exposed the affair.”

Greitens is of interest on this blog because one of his first actions was to pack the State Board of Education and force the firing of the uncontroversial state commissioner of education. Greitens is a huge supporter of privatization and was planning to replace the Commissioner with a charter lover.

But the governor forgot that his appointees were supposed to be approved by the Legislature and they were not. Consequently, none of his appointees serve legally, and there is no quorum on the state board.

What is not clear is why Greiten’s non-legal Board was allowed to fire the state commissioner.

 

 

Missouri Republican Governor Eric Greitens wants to remove the state superintendent and install his own choice, a buddy who believes in privatization.

The state board is, by law, supposed to be independent, not politically subservient, but Greitens appointed members who were supposed to do as he told them.

One of his five appointees refused and was removed.

When the vote was called, the board split 4-4, so for now the governor won’t get his way.

More than three hours after the meeting ended, Greitens responded by slamming local school district officials and education organizations, saying the state earmarked more money for schools this year, but the money didn’t result in higher pay for teachers and improved test scores.

“Today, the system works for insiders and bureaucrats who get paid real well, but it fails too many students, families, and teachers,” Greitens said. “There are a lot of people committed to the status quo. They’ve been willing to harass and intimidate anyone who stands up to them. That won’t stop us from doing what’s right. We’re fighting to get results for Missouri teachers and students.”

The four recent appointees who supported Vandeven’s ouster included Eddy Justice, Doug Russell, Sonny Jungmeyer and new member Jennifer Edwards.

Vandeven’s supporters say she is doing a good job and that Greitens is meddling with a school board that operates independently of politics.

“It is critical that the independence of the state Board of Education be maintained so the board can make the best policy decisions for the nearly one million students in Missouri’s public schools,” said Melissa Randol, executive director of the Missouri School Boards’ Association.

Imagine that! The state spent more money on education this year, but test scores didn’t go up!

New Republican Governor Eric Greitens has gained control of the state board of education, and he is pressuring them to fire the state commissioner, Margy Vandeven, who has some centrist nonpolitical ideas about helping improve the public schools.

One of the new board members is balking at the pressure from the governor. He doesn’t think he knows enough to fire the state commissioner.

The governor wants to bring in a chum who is committed to opening charter schools.

The state constitution says the board is supposed to be independent and nonpolitical.

The governor is politicizing the board so he can push the DeVos agenda. Apparently he wants to bring in a friend named Kenneth Zeff, who is allegedly a charter school expert. The two of them worked together as White House Fellows during the second Bush administration. Jeff has his BA in economics from the University of Michigan and an MBA in business from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a Broadie who worked in the Fulton County (Atlanta) schools and before that for the Green Dot Charter chain in Los Angeles.

The Missouri Association of School Administrators is unhappy about the governor’s effort to take control of the state board.


Melissa Randol, executive director of the Missouri School Boards’ Association, said the governor’s moves are “troubling.”

She said Zeff’s apparent support for charter school expansion “could have a negative impact on all public schools, but especially in rural areas where charter expansion would encourage school district consolidation.”

“We must preserve the integrity of our state constitution to ensure the commissioner does not become a political appointee of the governor,” Randol said.

Vandeven, who earns $191,544 annually, took the helm as commissioner in January 2015, replacing Chris Nicastro. Her goals then included expanding access to early childhood education, improving teacher quality and increasing accountability for teaching colleges.

In recent months, Vandeven, the state education department and state board have also taken a hard hand in demanding charter school quality by heightening pressure on charter school sponsors.

Just today: a challenge to the governor on his removal of state board members:

http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/the-buzz/article184779833.html

Missouri officials threw out the results from two tests as useless.

Both tests were constructed by Questar.

“JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri education officials on Wednesday said results from two statewide tests can’t be used to gauge how well public school districts are educating high school students.

“Education Commissioner Margie Vandeven told reporters that the high school Algebra I and English II end-of-course assessments from this past school year are being tossed out because they lacked “year-to-year comparisons.” They won’t be used as part of accountability metrics to determine how well schools are doing and whether they’ve progressed over time.

“That’s absolutely our primary concern, is making sure no one is negatively penalized for this type of experience,” Vandeven said.

“The department noticed potential issues when the results were delivered in late July, Vandeven said. An advisory committee on Aug. 18 recommended that both the Algebra and English test results not be used in school metrics.

“Vandeven declined to provide more details on what went wrong with the tests, but she said they’re holding Minneapolis-based developer Questar accountable. Department of Elementary and Secondary Education attorney Bill Thornton said the agency is hesitant to discuss more specifics because the issue might end up in court.

“A request for comment to Questar was not immediately returned Wednesday.”