My website is dianeravitch.com. I write about two interconnected topics: education and democracy. I am a historian of education.
Diane Ravitch’s Blog by Diane Ravitch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at dianeravitch.net.
Diane Ravitch's blog 
TODAY ran a piece that included clips from the cut 60 Minutes CECOT piece that aired in Canada.
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIRm7JDnY9Y
Using pull quotes from TV news is generally legal under the doctrine of fair use in U.S. copyright law, provided the use is for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, or education, and the portion used is brief and attributed.
LikeLike
Now Trump is going to build a “golden fleet” of “Trump class” battleships for the Navy, the first of which will be called ‘The Defiant’. He’s flexing his big bully muscles and seems to be itching to go to war –as long as he can stay safely at home to nurse his (fake) bone spurs.
But who does he plan to go to war against? Battle ships would be overkill for fighting “drug lords” in fishing boats from Venezuela. And it sounds very expensive –especially for something that’s for show and not really needed –except to feed his ego. I fear there is a bigger war plan that he’s not mentioning yet –like the way Hitler simultaneously built up his military and signed peace pacts with the UK and Russia before he started World War II… OMG https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/u-field-trump-class-warships-224701178.html
LikeLike
He’s so impulsive and stupid that it’s impossible to figure out what he intends to do. His obsession is renaming everything for himself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That naming stuff is the terrible 2 year old in him who wants everything he sees, says “mine” repeatedly and grabs it all, taking ownership without regard to anyone else or how they feel.
That explains his internal drive for expansionism, like his claim yesterday that the “US ‘has to have’ Greenland” (See: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgmd132ge4o) It sounds like he plans to attack the native people who live in Greenland, as well as Denmark, in order to get it. Does he know that Greenland is the country which is vastly covered with snow and ice and that it’s Iceland which is the country that’s green? So why does he want it –to give it as a gift to Putin? Doesn’t he realize that Putin only wants it so that he can have easy access to us and then he can take over our country –because he’s got expansionist goals as well? Yes, “stupid” is right on target!
LikeLike
I can’t say for sure, but I think Greenland has a lot of “rare earth minerals” underneath all that ice. Wanting it is old-fashioned colonialism.
LikeLike
It’s true that there are rare earth minerals, as well as the possibility of opening a previously frozen ocean transit route as climate change melts the tundra. But don’t lose sight of the ambitions of the techbros to establish one of their Network States, free from governmental interference. Seems impossible, but the billionaires backing Trump don’t inhabit the same reality as the rest of us.
https://www.thenerdreich.com/tech-billionaires-want-to-build-a-network-state-in-greenland/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow.
What was the South American city-state you wrote about?
Or was it Honduras?
LikeLike
Yes, it was Honduras, where techbros established the city of Próspera, on the island of Roatan, under the corrupt president Juan Orlando Hernández. The current government of Honduras is trying to oust the billionaires. Trump’s flagrant pardon of drug lord Hernández is thought to be tied to those billionaire interests.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/28/magazine/prospera-honduras-crypto.html?unlocked_article_code=1.408.berh.DF1EFaX4tj0c&smid=url-share
Sadly, it was under Hilary Clinton’s watch as Secretary of State that the Hernández coup of Manuel Zelaya occured.
LikeLike
Denmark is a member of both NATO (since 1949) and the European Union (since 1973), playing an active role in both security and economic integration, making it a key Nordic nation in Western alliances. It is a founding member of NATO and is involved in many international efforts through these organizations, focusing on peace, security, and global challenges.
If Trump and his fascist MAGA KKK regime stays in power long enough to attempt grabbing Greenland by force using the US military, that means the US may end up in a war with NATO and the EU, which includes Canada.
Also, if that happens, I think many if not all of the blue states might break away from Trump and the red states he controls and join Canada, NATO and the EU to fight Trump’s regime.
WWIII
LikeLiked by 1 person
He said it’s not about natural resources, and that it’s due to the need for national security –as protection from RUSSIA and China! As if we are all as dumb as he is and would fall for that nonsense!!! It sounds like a bad joke… (“Stupid is as stupid does.”
LikeLike
Turmp revealed his goals when he let us know he wants Canada and Greenland, which are both NATO nations. If he starts a war to take them, he will be going to war against NATO and the EU because Greenland is a Denmark territory and Denmark is a member of both NATIO and the EU.
I think Trump and his extreme right billionaire allies do not want NATO and the EU military alliance to be able to use Canada and Greenland for military staging areas once they start the next World War.
What’s happening in Venezuela, the $40 billion to Argentina, the prison in San Salvadore deal, and Trump’s threats to take back Panama and attack Mexico fit into that plan. Trump and his regime are planning to go to war if needed to dominate all of the Americas and build an empire for the Trump Dynasty to rule over.
“President Trump’s administration has formally articulated a goal to reassert U.S. “preeminence” and “dominance” within the Western Hemisphere, a strategy framed as a modern interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine.
“A primary objective is to counter the influence of “adversarial powers” like China and Russia that have increased their trade, investment, and military presence in the region.
“The administration emphasizes that a secure Western Hemisphere is essential for securing the U.S. homeland.
“The strategy calls for a larger U.S. military presence, including “targeted deployments” and the potential use of lethal force, to combat migration, drug trafficking, and criminal organizations (such as cartels).
“The “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine specifically highlights the importance of guaranteeing U.S. access to key hemispheric locations like the Panama Canal and Greenland for national security and economic reasons.
“The overall approach is driven by an “America First” foreign policy that aims to ensure every action makes America “safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” which has led to critiques from allies and foreign policy analysts.”
All while destroying the US alliances with the other NATIO nations and moving closer to Putin’s Russisa.
If the Toxic T stays in power as he plans for the rest of his life long past 2028, I expect the United States will get a name change to TRUMP.
England
France
Poland
Germany
Canada
TRUMP
Russia
Ukraine
Sweden
Finland
Iceland
Mexico
Brazil
et al.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Important points, Lloyd! We are being led to believe that both Russia and China are our enemies though, and yet our countries have many of the same goals and we are even working towards achieving some of them together. Weird stuff!
Maybe it’s a matter of “Keep your friends close and keep your enemies even closer”? That can be rather confusing though, and those involved are so self-centered that I highly doubt what they are doing is to the world’s advantage…
LikeLike
I do not believe for one second that Trump and Putin are adversaries. I think whatever Putin wants, he will get from Trump and vise versa, probably because Putin’s got something on Trump (Why else would their relationship look so much like a bro-mance?) See: “Putin nods to Trump plans to seize Greenland” “https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7432451el7o“
LikeLike
Of course Putin would approve of Trump seizing Greenland, destroying trust between allies. Serves Putin’s interest in sowing discord.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lloyd, Wow, there are so many ways we need to shore up our Constitution, as suggested by all that has been noted here, because the Founding Fathers never envisioned the two party system, let alone where one of them goes rogue and is led by a greedy billionaire class that can never satisfy their desire for more money, land, natural resources and power.
“I think many if not all of the blue states might break away from Trump and the red states he controls and join Canada, NATO and the EU to fight Trump’s regime.”
I live in a blue state and I’d hate to see another Civil War, let alone WWIII, but I would vote to secede from the union and join Canada/the UK in a New York minute if it was possible to do. So I think we need to consider how we can add a legal way for individual states to secede, without having to go to war and physically fight against our own country.
LikeLike
I researched this and there may be no legal way to leave the union.
Still, without a working US Constitution, I don’t think there would be anything to stop states from leaving. After all, it is the US Constitution many (like me) swore an oath to defend against enemies like Putin and Trump and Trump’s loyalist MAGA KKK hate cult.
If it takes leaving the union, Turmp controls as a dictator, to save the US Constitution from Trump’s autocratic, greed and hate based Project 2025, I think the states that leave would be justified in leaving, taking the US Constitution with them. Then adding amendments to get rid of the Electoral College and strengthen voting rights, the first amendment and correcting the 2nd amendment.
“The U.S. Constitution doesn’t explicitly mention secession, but it implies a perpetual union, forbidding actions necessary for separation (treaties, alliances, etc.) and the Supreme Court ruled in Texas v. White (1869) that states can’t unilaterally leave, calling the Union “indissoluble” except through revolution or consent.
“While the Declaration of Independence speaks of a people’s right to alter government, the Constitution established a more permanent federal structure where secession is generally considered unlawful, with the Civil War settling the matter militarily and legally.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
From what I have researched, the states that might leave hold about half the population of the current United States.
About one hundred and seventy million people.
If that US stays in NATO, then they’d still led by the US Constitution and would be more than able to defend itself because of Canada with another almost 42 million people. Most of those states also share borders with Canada or are connected to states that do.
Who knows, Mexico might join that United States. Especially after Trump renames the United States he controls as TRUMP.
The following pull quote comes from Gregory Waleed Kavalec on Quora.
In the end, the blue states combined like that would still be able call themselves the United States vs TRUMP, after he renames the red states after himself.
Trump would probably try to start a war over that split, but I don’t think he’d be able to get it off the ground. His billionaire supporters would lose too much wealth if the blue and red states split and ended in a bloody Civil War.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lloyd, you wrote: “the Supreme Court ruled in Texas v. White (1869) that states can’t unilaterally leave, calling the Union “indissoluble” except through revolution or consent.”
I looked but couldn’t find the answer to this: Who may provide “consent” for a state to leave the union? SCOTUS or Congress??
LikeLike
I lost my first reply. WordPress does that all the time. I type very fast and often lose what I type without knowing why it’s happening, which is why I can’t stand WordPress anymore. Before the Block Editor the site was much easier to use.
Anyway, I think the states will decide what that means when the time comes. The Constitutional oath my play a significant role in those decisions.
Just happened to me again. Lost another paragraph.
Trump is dismantling the US Constitution while getting rid of the separation of powers between the three branches. I don’t think the states will need the permission to leave when the separation of powers doesn’t exist anymore and Trump rules through Executive orders for every branch.
The US is already moving in that direction. Recently I read that Trump has ignored about a third of the lower court rulings against him and nothing seems to happen to his regime. If they have to pay a fine, they don’t pay. The taxpayers do. The DOJ, which is not Trump’s Department of Revenge is supported by taxpayers. ICE agents acting like they are working for Hitler are also support by taxpayers.
How that money is supposed to be spent, should be up to Congress, which Trump is also ignoring.
I think the states that keep the US Constitution and support it be breaking up with Trump’s regime will have the support of a vast majority of their citizens.
Trump on the other hand, keeps losing support as he continued to erode the division of powers and implement Project 2025.
If it comes to a violent Civil War to break up with Trump, I think Trump’s loyalist MAGA KKK fascist army will get slaughtered since they will be outnumbered, outspent, and outfought on all fronts.
LikeLike
Virtually everything pointed out in this thread by people blogging here and by Diane is very possible and, I think, cuts into the meat and the very heart of what’s going on in the world right now!
Of course Trump et al would deny current billionaire and national interests in exploiting natural resources, as well as opportunities to colonize and profit from that without government interference –regardless of how they try to obscure their intentions and actions. Great job everyone! Stay alert because it doesn’t end in Antarctica.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/china-condemned-trump-venezuela-blockade-101142469.html
LikeLike
“Zombie Ship Shows US Targeting Darkest Corner of Oil Fleet” https://www.yahoo.com/news/finance/news/zombie-ship-shows-trump-targeting-071930230.html
LikeLike
Whatever they can get away with in the Arctic, they”re going to try elsewhere as well, regardless of environmental protections, since exploiting natural resources for free $$$ and colonial powers are their primary objectives –and they’ve already been trying. See: Antarctica: What’s the big deal over resource exploitation?: https://www.dw.com/en/antarctica-whats-the-big-deal-over-resource-exploitation/a-67131242
LikeLike
As Llyod mentioned, the people running our government, in this Administration as well as other government workers such as the military, took an oath and swore to uphold the Constitution. The president swore to “preserve, protect and defend” it, however, as a dictator-wannabe. he and his posse have been allowed to ride roughshod over the separation of powers and other important aspects of our Constitution –and it’s those very things that distinguish our nation as a democratic republic. But that is being torn asunder now, so it sounds like if states want to secede from the union, not having a Constitution in force anymore might be a justifiable reason for doing so, but then again, maybe not.
Probably most Americans don’t want to see blood shed and lives lost over this, so I think there has got to be a better way than revolution to resolve this issue, such as the 2026 vote. If Trump does not let it occur, that will be because he does not want to lose control of either house in Congress, as typically occurs after the election of a president, especially since he currently controls both houses. Then that will be another matter, so I think we should wait to see how this plays out.
LikeLike
Meanwhile, we need to do what we can to make sure that citizens are able to and do vote in 2026.
LikeLike