For years, the City of New York has tried to force its public service retirees to give up their Medicare and move to a private Medicare Advantage plan. Many retirees understood that MA means privatization. Any serious medical needs required prior approval by the insurance company; it also meant that the insurance company could decline to pay. Retirees were furious, but it seemed hopeless, especially when a few powerful unions, including the United Federation of teachers, supported the city’s plan.
Marianne Pizzitola, who retired as an Emergency Medical Technician for the Fire Department, organized resistance to the plan. She found other retirees who were opposed to giving up Medicare and educated others about the downside of making the change. Marianne created an organization called the NYC Organization of Retired Public Service Workers.
The organization lobbied elected officials, litigated, and kept up the pressure.
Today, they won! They stood up the government of the City of New York, against overwhelming odds. And they won!
Brad Lander, the Comptroller of the City of New York sent out this letter this evening:
Dear New Yorkers,
Massive news for New York City retirees: Today the New York Court of Appeals rejected shifting retirees to a Medicare Advantage plan.
Today’s ruling is the final win for the 250,000 some retirees fighting to keep the health care they worked for and were promised! Seniors will continue to have access to all providers who accept Medicare, a victory for our public sector retirees.
The City’s Medicare Advantage plan would have constrained our retirees to a smaller network with more restrictive requirements on care. Many public servants entered the municipal workforce with the promise of middle-class wages, pensions, and a retirement plan. The shift to anything less than that full promise was a hard pill to swallow.
When the Medicare Advantage contract was submitted to my office last year, we declined to register it, knowing that litigation raised doubts about the City’s authority to enter into the contract. As a matter of public policy, beyond the scope of our office’s specific Charter responsibility for contract registration, I was seriously concerned about the privatization of Medicare plans, overbilling by insurance companies, and barriers to care under Medicare Advantage.
It is vital that all our seniors—and all New Yorkers—get quality health coverage as a basic human right. At the same time, given the growing costs of health care for both retirees and active employees, we cannot ignore that there are real cost questions facing the City when it comes to health care.
Yeah! And if we got rid of Medicare Advantage plans (what advantage?), Medicare premiums would be reduced and it might be possible to expand benefits. I hope NYC’s retirees success expands across the country. Who was it who said, “And when we fight, we win!” And eventually we will.
And do not forget also that this caused Unity to lose the retired teacher chapter to Retiree Advocate. We have passed resolutions in the UFT delegate Assembly saying that no teacher can ever be forced in MA and any change on health coverage must pass the DA. By the way, I am one of the 300 newly elected delegates. This has awakened a sleeping giant.
It’s a big victory for the retirees and one that will, hopefully, snowball into other workers’ health plans (both active and retired).
As a delegate representing the retirees of the UFT (NYC Dept of Education’s unionized workers), I’ve seen quite a lot of this drama unfold.
What’s concerning (besides the obvious of our country’s medical system) is that Michael Mulgrew (United Federation of Teachers President) has been staunchly fighting alongside the City for this switchover for years, despite the retiree’s vocal concerns and objections. Kept on claiming how great it was, disregarding the obvious problems that kept on coming up on the news and through personal experience reporting.
It wasn’t until we, in a recent election, replaced the decades long entrenched retiree Chapter Leader (and ally of Mulgrew) with one who ran heavily on this Medicare issue, that Mulgrew finally relented and formally withdrew his support of the changeover.
We as a nation need to stay vigilant on this issue. The reason Dr. Oz was appointed to lead Medicare and Medicaid in the Trump administration is due to the fact that he has been a proponent and investor in Medicare Advantage. https://www.commondreams.org/news/dr-oz
This is a very important win for NYC retirees. Our health plan does not cost the City large amounts of money. We worked for less wages for promised healthcare in retirement. There is a bill in the NYC city Council (1096) that would enshrine our healthcare. Please contact your council member if you live in NYC. Ask the member to sign on to the bill sponsored by Marte and then pass it.
Yeah! And if we got rid of Medicare Advantage plans (what advantage?), Medicare premiums would be reduced and it might be possible to expand benefits. I hope NYC’s retirees success expands across the country. Who was it who said, “And when we fight, we win!” And eventually we will.
LikeLike
And do not forget also that this caused Unity to lose the retired teacher chapter to Retiree Advocate. We have passed resolutions in the UFT delegate Assembly saying that no teacher can ever be forced in MA and any change on health coverage must pass the DA. By the way, I am one of the 300 newly elected delegates. This has awakened a sleeping giant.
LikeLike
Congratulations New York! Now Chicago needs to do the same. We have Medicare disadvantage.
LikeLike
It’s a big victory for the retirees and one that will, hopefully, snowball into other workers’ health plans (both active and retired).
As a delegate representing the retirees of the UFT (NYC Dept of Education’s unionized workers), I’ve seen quite a lot of this drama unfold.
What’s concerning (besides the obvious of our country’s medical system) is that Michael Mulgrew (United Federation of Teachers President) has been staunchly fighting alongside the City for this switchover for years, despite the retiree’s vocal concerns and objections. Kept on claiming how great it was, disregarding the obvious problems that kept on coming up on the news and through personal experience reporting.
It wasn’t until we, in a recent election, replaced the decades long entrenched retiree Chapter Leader (and ally of Mulgrew) with one who ran heavily on this Medicare issue, that Mulgrew finally relented and formally withdrew his support of the changeover.
LikeLike
We as a nation need to stay vigilant on this issue. The reason Dr. Oz was appointed to lead Medicare and Medicaid in the Trump administration is due to the fact that he has been a proponent and investor in Medicare Advantage. https://www.commondreams.org/news/dr-oz
LikeLike
There will never be Medicare for All if MA plans continue to expand.
LikeLike
This is a very important win for NYC retirees. Our health plan does not cost the City large amounts of money. We worked for less wages for promised healthcare in retirement. There is a bill in the NYC city Council (1096) that would enshrine our healthcare. Please contact your council member if you live in NYC. Ask the member to sign on to the bill sponsored by Marte and then pass it.
LikeLike
This is great news! We’re on the NYC retired employees program & have been watching this fight, hoping it would all pan out.
LikeLike