The Boston Globe published a story about climate change that scared me. The story has the headline “Climate Change Has Destabilized the Earth’s Poles, Putting the Rest of the Planet in Peril.” President Biden has a sense of urgency about climate change, but thus far he has been unable to move the 50 Republicans and one Democrat (Manchin) to care about the future of the planet. Why is climate change a partisan issue? Don’t we all have a stake in the habitability of the earth? Don’t Republicans care about the world their children and grandchildren will inherit? I don’t get it.
The story begins:
The ice shelf was cracking up. Surveys showed warm ocean water eroding its underbelly. Satellite imagery revealed long, parallel fissures in the frozen expanse, like scratches from some clawed monster. One fracture grew so big, so fast, scientists took to calling it “the dagger.”
“It was hugely surprising to see things changing that fast,” said Erin Pettit. The Oregon State University glaciologist had chosen this spot for her Antarctic field research precisely because of its stability. While other parts of the infamous Thwaites Glacier crumbled, this wedge of floating ice acted as a brace, slowing the melt. It was supposed to be boring, durable, safe.
Now climate change has turned the ice shelf into a threat — to Pettit’s field work, and to the world.
Planet-warming pollution from burning fossil fuels and other human activities has already raised global temperatures more than 2 degrees Fahrenheit. But the effects are particularly profound at the poles, where rising temperatures have seriously undermined regions once locked in ice.
In research presented this week at the world’s biggest earth science conference, Pettit showed that the Thwaites ice shelf could collapse within the next three to five years, unleashing a river of ice that could dramatically raise sea levels. Aerial surveys document how warmer conditions have allowed beavers to invade the Arctic tundra, flooding the landscape with their dams. Large commercial ships are increasingly infiltrating formerly frozen areas, disturbing wildlife and generating disastrous amounts of trash. In many Alaska Native communities, climate impacts compounded the hardships of the coronavirus pandemic, leading to food shortages among people who have lived off this land for thousands of years.
“The very character of these places is changing,” said Twila Moon, a glaciologist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center and coeditor of the Arctic Report Card, an annual assessment of the state of the top of the world. “We are seeing conditions unlike those ever seen before.”
The rapid transformation of the Arctic and Antarctic creates ripple effects all over the planet. Sea levels will rise, weather patterns will shift, and ecosystems will be altered. Unless humanity acts swiftly to curb emissions, scientists say, the same forces that have destabilized the poles will wreak havoc on the rest of the globe.
“The Arctic is a way to look into the future,” said Matthew Druckenmiller, a scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center and another coeditor of the Arctic Report Card. “Small changes in temperature can have huge effects in a region that is dominated by ice.”
This year’s edition of the report card, which was presented at the American Geophysical Union annual meeting Tuesday, describes a landscape that is transforming so fast scientists struggle to keep up. Temperatures in the Arctic are rising twice as fast as the global average. The period between October and December 2020 was the warmest on record, scientists say.
Separately on Tuesday, the World Meteorological Organization confirmed a new temperature record for the Arctic: 100 degrees Fahrenheit in the Siberian town of Verkhoyansk on June 20, 2020.
Another story in the Boston Globe said that New England is warming faster than the world as a whole.
New England is warming significantly faster than global average temperatures, and that rate is expected to accelerate as more greenhouse gases are pumped into the atmosphere and dangerous cycles of warming exacerbate climate change, according to a new study.
The authors of the scientific paper, which was published in the most recent edition of the journal Climate, analyzed temperature data over more than a century across the six New England states and documented how winters are becoming shorter and summers longer, jeopardizing much of the region’s unique ecology, economy, and cultural heritage.
Their findings were underscored this year in Greater Boston, which is on track to having the warmest year on record since 1900, according to data compiled by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
“Based on the data presented here, and the continuing increase of greenhouse gases, it is clear that humanity does not have its hand on the rudder of climate control,” the authors wrote. “We are in a climate crisis, and we need to take concerted steps to reduce our production of greenhouse gases as soon as possible. The temperature changes that are currently happening . . . threaten to disrupt the seasonality of New England, which will disrupt the ecosystems and the economy of New England….”
The warming in the region already has exceeded a threshold set by the Paris Climate Accord, in which nearly 200 nations agreed to cut their emissions in an effort to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. If global temperatures exceed that amount, the damage from intensifying storms, rising sea levels, droughts, forest fires, and other natural disasters is likely to be catastrophic, scientists say.
With New England’s annual temperatures expected to rise sharply in the coming decades, the authors of the study said the region should expect major disruptions to its economy, including coastal waters that will become increasingly inhospitable to iconic species such as cod and lobster; fewer days when skiing and other winter recreation will be possible; less maple syrup and other agricultural products produced; and a range of other consequences.

Straight Out Of Hollywood. We Are Warned.
LikeLike
Kathy, another warning is streaming now: “Don’t Look Up”
LikeLike
I am getting figuratively beaten over the head for not having watched this yet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
if you wait a while, the water level will be rising rapidly and you will then be told “don’t look down..”
LikeLike
“Don’t Look Up” isn’t even a satire. It’s reporting.
LikeLike
A number of years ago I was sitting next to a gentleman on a seven hour flight who I later learned was not only one of the top climate scientists in the world, many of them consider him to be THE top climate scientist in the world. He explained climate change to me in a simple way that I could easily grasp and have never forgotten.
Regardless of what you call it–global warming, climate change, whatever–the key concept to understand is how it affects water and moisture. The warming of certain areas creates a catastrophic imbalance in the earth’s moisture. Simply stated, there’s too much water in the atmosphere, and the amount of it sort of self-regulates the climate. That water accumulates and has to come down somewhere, sometime. So instead of normal weather patterns, the accumulations of moisture drop in some areas as they absorb the moisture of other places creating drought and widening the reach of higher temperatures. This explains why there will be more unpredictable catastrophes ranging from flooding to abnormal snowfalls while in other places drought will persist and get worse. It also explains why storms, tornados, hurricanes, typhoons, and monsoons will continue to get worse; they feed on the moisture in the atmosphere.
Just as with American democracy, we have likely crossed the point of no return. Now it’s all about minimizing damage. Past experience gives me no hope.
LikeLike
A lot of this has to do with our politicians having no understanding whatsoever of science. You can’t magically wish reality away. The mechanism of climate change can be demonstrated with THIRD-GRADE SCIENCE EXPERIMENTS. It’s not difficult to understand. But it is beyond the understanding of every Republican and many Democrats who are “leading” us off a cliff. We are being led by utter fools.
Our founders did not foresee the toxic combination of universal suffrage with mass consumer culture idiocracy.
LikeLike
Our founders did not foresee the toxic combination of universal suffrage with mass consumer culture idiocracy and fundamentalist religion.
LikeLike
“Biden has been unwilling to move the 50 Republicans and 1 Democrat… to care about the future of the planet.”
Wow. This framing of the problem is so very wrong. Have we all bought into the Republican mindset now, that they are so out of control that they can’t be blamed for anything? Why are Democrats, the responsible, caring, and empathetic leaders, are automatically held responsible for the across-the-board failures of Republicans to govern? Why should we blame Biden for the fact that Republican senators, en masse, want to condemn us to a future of a failed nation state and failed planet?
Put the blame squarely where it belongs, please.
LikeLike
Excellent.
LikeLike
Pretty much, yeah.
LikeLike
Sereia, you caught me in a grammatical error. Biden is not “unwilling” to move 50 Republicans and at least 1 Democrat, he is unable to do so. Where are the Republican “moderates,” like Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Mitt Romney. If only one of them voted to support climate change funding, Biden could get his major legislation through Congress. If the Republicans win control of the House or the Senate, all efforts to manage climate change will end, and we will revert to Climate change denial.
LikeLike
Understood and agree.
LikeLike
Interesting article about this.
https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/621225/
LikeLike
Many years ago a Canadian friend had talked about (going by an article) that, with the poles melting, our Earth risked shifting balance for lack of ice’s weights. So this latest article about the Earth’s Poles destabilizing doesn’t come as a surprise. Of course, human kind won’t stop until goal is reached: destruction and extinction.
LikeLike
The last three words of your comment remind us of something that was in the news for a brief time years (decades?) ago: the fundamental belief of evangelicals that the world, regardless of what anyone does, will end in destruction and extinction on this world in exchange for the glory of another. Never forget that as you see policies made in a few years and ask yourself, How did they come to this nutty conclusion? And it explains their indifference to this issue.
LikeLike
Bad idea to generalize about evangelicals. Several years ago, I met an evangelical who was almost an environmental terrorist in the making. I also met a guy at a strip mine that believed that the use of fossil fuels needed to be accelerated to hasten the apocalypse and the second coming.
Like most groups, evangelical Christian attitudes are all over the road. Generalizing about them pushes them together, making them more tribal. Let’s use issues to break up tribalism. How else can we combat those who want us to break into our little worlds so we can be manipulated?
LikeLike
Are there or are there not believers of this in the highest places of reactionary politics? Can I please point you to the primary source of right wing evangelicals’ support for Israel? Are those bad ideas or facts?
LikeLike
Does the truth set one free or does it push people together and make them more tribal? Is that the same as claiming political opponents are evil, unAmerican, or that it should once again be legal that Blacks are “so inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect”? Which is truth, which is tribal?
LikeLike
Greg: Many good questions you pose, as usual. My belief is that using the label of evangelical herds people into a tribe rather than freeing those people to have their own views of particular issues. The right wing tries to pick issues and use labels to herd their supporters into their tribe. Opponents should try to do the opposite. We should focus on the issues.
My Aunt Mary Alice was very much involved in the church all her almost 100 years of her life. It influenced her thinking, but she rejected Israeli treatment of the Palestinians long before most people had come to the needs of those people. Let us stick to the basic issues. Leave labels at home.
LikeLike
I think I finally (I hope) realize where we part. You are obviously a caring, committed, passionate teacher who thinks deeply about the times in which we live. You pay attention. But where you and I part is that you are much more forgiving and charitable towards the neighbors with whom you disagree than I would be. Indeed, based on the conclusion above, I might even characterize you as characterizing me as seeing the world as too black and white, or as you say, I label people.
I agree, I do label people often for arguments sake to make a point. But I also see a connection between the neighbors whose views you abhor and leave you baffled and, in this case, the so-called evangelical christians on the right. It’s nuanced and when you put them side to side, they are very, very different. But when you take a step back, you see the connections and I believe they need to be pointed out if we are to have an honest discussion and quit letting one side lie to the point of leading us to fascism. There are a lot of shades of gray that connect them. So where you say leave the labels out of it, I would argue that someone needs to have a talk with the self-proclaimed evangelicals of the left to recognize their connections as well as their differences with self-proclaimed evangelicals of the right. Same goes for Catholics. The time for people like me to talk to them has passed.
LikeLike
You won’t talk to Catholics?
LikeLike
Like most groups, evangelical Christian attitudes are all over the road.
Nope. There are rare exceptions to the general idiocy among these people. I know a couples of these personally and consider them friends. But the overwhelming majority of evangelicals are firmly in the Trump and climate denial camps.
LikeLike
Jacques Chirac, the former President of France, tells in his autobiography about receiving a phone call from George Bush, Jr. in which shrub told him that he had to invade Iraq because of a Bible prophecy. Here’s the story as related on Cleveland.com:
Now out of office, Chirac recounts that the American leader appealed to their “common faith” (Christianity) and told him: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East. . . . The biblical prophecies are being fulfilled. . . . This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a New Age begins.”
This bizarre — seemingly deranged — episode happened while the White House was assembling its “coalition of the willing” to unleash the Iraq invasion. Chirac says he was boggled by Bush’s call, and “wondered how someone could be so superficial and fanatical in their beliefs.”
After the 2003 call, the puzzled French leader didn’t comply with Bush’s request. Instead, his staff asked Thomas Romer, a theologian at the University of Lausanne, to analyze the weird appeal. Romer explained that the Old Testament book of Ezekiel contains two chapters (38 and 39) in which God rages against Gog and Magog, sinister and mysterious forces menacing Israel.
LikeLike
Religious superstition guiding policy at the highest level in the United States.
LikeLike
Aie yie yie. That comment about religious superstition is an elaboration on a different comment of mine, above, that is in moderation. This freaking happens to me all the time. After the Repugnican fascists seize complete control in 2025, ofc, everything will be immoderately moderated.
LikeLike
Roy Turrentine
I am long past my Kumbaya moment. The next time there is a natural disaster in Gods Country. I will urge my representatives to send paper towels. Since before the Moral Minority got organized in 1979 over SCHOOL INTEGRATION! I have put up with the nonsense that they should be understood.
LikeLike
Roy Turrentine
You keep mentioning individuals without acknowledging that they are a relatively small minority.
“The AP VoteCast survey shows that 81% of White evangelical Protestant voters went for Trump this year, compared with 18% who voted for Biden. The Edison exit polls estimate that 76% of White evangelicals voted for Trump, 24% for Biden.”
I am sure there were good Germans as well. In the early to mid 30s would criticizing the support of the German people for Hitler, have driven those few who refused to raise their right arm into Hitlers camp.
LikeLike
I do not argue with any of these points. My only contention is that generalizing about groups tends to force them into their camp. The delightfully sarcastic Mencken said a lot of things about people in the South back in the 1920, but most of what he said did little to change the minds of the people he criticized. Indeed, I have often wondered if he did not pave the way for modern fundamentalism by his attacks.
I believe we should attack policy not people.
LikeLike
Roy, Mencken’s critiques were occasioned by the fact that modern fundamentalism was already completely entrenched in the U.S. at the time.
LikeLike
100, 75 or even 50 years from now when the climate has gone to Hell (quite literally), do you suppose people will buy the claim that “Nothing could be done, cuz one guy was effectively holding up all progress”?
Would it even sound the least bit plausible that in a country of 300 million , one guy — and not even a particularly powerful guy (from a backwater state, no less) — could effectively block everything?
I know what I would call such a claim and it wouldn’t be “plausible” or any word like it in meaning.
LikeLike
Feel free to leave guesses as to what I would call it.
LikeLike
One guy may now be the difference, but a lot of people who reject the solutions that have been proposed for so many years are the real problem. We have maintained an astonishing capacity as a people to ignore minor adjustments to our lives that might have made a difference, not just where the environment is concerned, but in a lot of other areas as well.
Now we are on the verge of being ruled by a very small minority of people who reject any solution to problems, not to mention those who reject the idea we have problems at all.
LikeLike
Actually, it won’t ever be plausible — not now, not in the future – that “one guy was the difference”.
LikeLike
Not picking on you, Roy, you comments just cause me to think out loud (on virtual paper) as I sort out my ideas. I could not agree more with your final sentence above. It says all that I have been saying for years. But from my point of view, I see a clear and fundamental connection between that very small minority of people and your neighbors (and my neighbors, for that matter, it’s not a North/South thing). In fact I see a connection between them that just doesn’t exist between me and that small minority. And that connection is a fundamental misunderstanding they have about the role of formal religion in our public life according to the founders and framers. Their narrative is just factually wrong. I believe it should not be there. They, regardless of where they are on the spectrum, believe that their interpretation of religion should somehow affect my public life, whether it be through public policy like taxes, public schools, housing, employment, or health care. I think those decisions should be made without those overt influences. And it’s the job of the people within that group to start the conversation within their group when they disagree.
LikeLike
My point was that future generations are going to view such an excuse (which is what it is) as complete bullshit.
LikeLike
Greg: I feel the same disconnection with many of the people I come into contact with. I am not sure, however, if that comes so much with their religious world view as it does with their refusal to think through things. Most people I know use religion to justify after the fact. You want to justify slavery? Go into the Bible and find a statement here and there. Want to justify genocide… You get the point. All of this is just rationalization after the fact. It bears little resemblance to any ethical system.
LikeLike
I guess you could ask them “What would Jesus Do?”
LikeLike
https://www.npr.org/2021/07/13/1015581092/biden-promised-to-end-new-drilling-on-federal-land-but-approvals-are-up
LikeLike
Biden has not been unwilling to move Republicans and Manchin to protect our climate. One does not make a heart of stone feel empathy, eyes blind with self interest to chose compassion and minds closed to all else save what is mine become open to the common good. Only voters can move these deniers of climate reality. Our youth will live with the consequences of their inaction. Their parents will suffer casualties. Their grandparents will die in despair. Republicans do not care. Voters can change the future or they can suffer their own indifference. What will be is ours to determine.
LikeLike
Robert, all of us will suffer because of the intransigence of all Republicans and two Democrats. I changed “unwilling” to “unable.” My error.
LikeLike
Voters can change the future, or they can suffer as a result of their own indifference.
Exactly. This was never truer than it is right now. Failure of Democrats to show up for the midterms will be an utter disaster of unprecedented proportions for the U.S. and for the rest of the world.
LikeLike
It is important for folks to work together on the things they agree on. Many people here believe we have too many folks in prison. So does the Koch foundation. Work with them on that. Many here reject the views represented by the newsweekly The Economist, but here is an editorial from 33 years ago warning of the danger from climate change and endorsing an extremely sensible policy that has yet to be really implemented anywhere: https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/1989/05/19/a-tax-to-keep-cool
LikeLike
Here’s more bad news:
What would happen if global warming causes the Gulf Stream in the Atlantic to reverse?
“A weaker Gulf Stream would mean higher sea levels for Florida’s east coast. It could lead to colder winters in northern Europe (one reason many scientists prefer the term climate change to global warming.”
https://phys.org/news/2019-08-gulf-stream-seas-hotter-florida.html
What Happens If Atlantic Ocean Currents Cease To Churn?
https://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/atlantic-ocean-currents-amoc/
LikeLike
“The ice shelf was cracking up…. One fracture grew so big, so fast, scientists took to calling it ‘the dagger.’ ‘It was hugely surprising to see things changing that fast,’ said Erin Pettit. The Oregon State University glaciologist had chosen this spot for her Antarctic field research precisely because of its stability…. It was supposed to be boring, durable, safe.”
This is yet another example of how climate change has increased way beyond the estimates and understandings of even our specialist scientists. Hardly a week goes by without news of another such discovery.
LikeLike
Republicans have a long, long history of being emphatically wrong about things. Wrong about the Vietnam War. Wrong about desegregation. Wrong about Iraq. Wrong about legalization of marijuana. Wrong about legalization of gay and lesbian marriage. Wrong about masks and vaccination. And now, wrong about climate change.
But this might be their last chance to be wrong about something and then pretend that that was never the case.
LikeLike
How the current minority, Fascist Repugnican Party seizes it all and ends democracy in the United States. Thanks, Susan Schwartz, for sharing this with me.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/01/how-republicans-are-taking-over-election-system-big-lie/
LikeLike