Just when you think the Trump administration has exhibited the depths of stupidity and malevolence, along comes a new outrage.
“A resolution to encourage breast-feeding was expected to be approved quickly and easily by the hundreds of government delegates who gathered this spring in Geneva for the United Nations-affiliated World Health Assembly.
“Based on decades of research, the resolution says that mother’s milk is healthiest for children and countries should strive to limit the inaccurate or misleading marketing of breast milk substitutes.
“Then the United States delegation, embracing the interests of infant formula manufacturers, upended the deliberations.
“American officials sought to water down the resolution by removing language that called on governments to “protect, promote and support breast-feeding” and another passage that called on policymakers to restrict the promotion of food products that many experts say can have deleterious effects on young children.
“When that failed, they turned to threats, according to diplomats and government officials who took part in the discussions. Ecuador, which had planned to introduce the measure, was the first to find itself in the cross hairs.
“The Americans were blunt: If Ecuador refused to drop the resolution, Washington would unleash punishing trade measures and withdraw crucial military aid. The Ecuadorean government quickly acquiesced.
“The showdown over the issue was recounted by more than a dozen participants from several countries, many of whom requested anonymity because they feared retaliation from the United States.
“Health advocates scrambled to find another sponsor for the resolution, but at least a dozen countries, most of them poor nations in Africa and Latin America, backed off, citing fears of retaliation, according to officials from Uruguay, Mexico and the United States.
““We were astonished, appalled and also saddened,” said Patti Rundall, the policy director of the British advocacy group Baby Milk Action, who has attended meetings of the assembly, the decision-making body of the World Health Organization, since the late 1980s.
“What happened was tantamount to blackmail, with the U.S. holding the world hostage and trying to overturn nearly 40 years of consensus on best way to protect infant and young child health,” she said.
“In the end, the Americans’ efforts were mostly unsuccessful. It was the Russians who ultimately stepped in to introduce the measure — and the Americans did not threaten them.”

“In the end, the Americans’ efforts were mostly unsuccessful. It was the Russians who ultimately stepped in to introduce the measure — and the Americans did not threaten them
And why did the Americans not threaten Russia?
The Trump administration and people who are supporting this nonsense do not want women to take care of their children. Kids are bargaining chips. Every member of Congress that supports the Trump agenda needs to be voted out of offices ASAP, along with the state and local clones.
LikeLike
I am so angry I cannot put into words how angry I am at the stupidity of the American delegation and the absolute stupidity of Trump. Again, American comes out on the loosing end of what could have been a win, win for American and the rest of the world. Again, as at the southern borders of the United States children are the victims, the real losers.
LikeLike
It is not stupidity that upsets me, disgusts me, it is the vileness and cruelty of the US delegation and the lack of compassion and understanding of the authoritarian president currently occupying the WH.
LikeLike
We’ve become the worst of capitalism, a festering pay to play swamp of special interests.
LikeLike
America has sold its soul to big business.
LikeLike
The research on a mother breastfeeding her own children is overwhelming that it boosts the child’s immune system
The GOP and the Trump administration has declared war on the world’s children — not just children in the U.S.
When I Googled, “feeding a child mother’s milk improves the immune system in the child”, there were 49 million hits.
a few examples:
“We learned that breast milk helps develop immunity in infants. Do these antibodies (from the mother) stay in the baby’s body for his or her entire life? Or does the immune benefit only last until the baby develops its own immune system? Also, if a baby hypothetically breast fed from multiple women, would he or she develop a more comprehensive immune system?”
http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=1698
Breast milk is better for babies than formula because it “kick starts their immune system”,_ The Daily Telegraph_ reported.
https://www.nhs.uk/news/pregnancy-and-child/breast-milk-raises-immunity/
“FORMULA CANNOT OFFER THIS PROTECTION”
“Human milk provides virtually all the protein, sugar, and fat your baby needs to be healthy, and it also contains many substances that benefit your baby’s immune system, including antibodies, immune factors, enzymes, and white blood cells. These substances protect your baby against a wide variety of diseases and infections not only while he is breastfeeding but in some cases long after he has weaned. Formula cannot offer this protection.”
https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/baby/breastfeeding/Pages/Breastfeeding-Benefits-Your-Babys-Immune-System.aspx
LikeLike
Thanks for the information and the links. We just can’t enough of those given our fact-starved leadership in the White House.
It’s good to have them handy for when Trump’s trolls attack.
I was thinking today, I wonder if there is some central repository on the internet, an online listing of factual rebuttals to whatever nonsense Trump and his minions are spewing.
So, say, if Trump’s apologists were posting nonsense about breastfeeding, I could just go to this site, check and copy the facts/links, and post them as a rebuttal. I imagine an index of topics (Climate change, first amendment, job losses). There would be “truth bombs” ready to be dropped… right off the shelf.
The anti-drudge….a Reality Report….an act of self defense for our nation.
LikeLike
Fact check sites, maybe. They might not fact check everything that comes out of the Kremlin’s Agent Orange’s administration but I think they get most of it.
“Top 10 sites to help students check their facts”
https://www.iste.org/explore/articleDetail?articleid=916
If all 10 sites strike out, there is always a Google search.
LikeLike
Busy, busy day working outside. What beautiful weather. (In sharp contrast to the monstrosity that is Trump, who is like a poison cloud, always hovering nearby.)
Just saw your reply. The link is an interesting site. Thanks, Lloyd.
LikeLike
Trump is a poison cloud. He’s also a poisoned ocean. The air he exhales after he takes a breath is also poison. Every breath he takes repeatedly poisons everyone on the planet.
LikeLike
Trump is willing to bully everyone who stands in the way of his dystopian, survival-of-the-fitness agenda, except the other apparently stronger bully, Putin.
LikeLike
“It was the Russians who ultimately stepped in to introduce the measure — and the Americans did not threaten them.”
What does Russia hold over Trump? This is absolutely crazy.
Baby formula is often unhealthy and is used by many poor women in third world countries. Often it is watered down. They have been brainwashed into believing it is superior to mother’s milk and they want the best for their infants.
LikeLike
Warped people are in charge. SICK MALES.
LikeLike
“Sick Males”, yes, but don’t forget about Betsy DeVos, Hope Hicks, Kellyanne Conway, Sarah Huckabee Sanders … unless they are really men in disguise.
LikeLike
Yes, but most of the world is controlled by males and a “masculine” way of thinking – competition, hierarchy, violence, war…If you disagree, why are teachers, child care workers, and all of “women’s work” not taken seriously and some of the lowest paying jobs on earth?
LikeLike
No argument.
But it isn’t all that dismal for women. There are a “few” countries that are better for women. So all is not lost.
Here are the top ten countries to live in if you are a woman. I’m not suggesting that women in the U.S. move to Denmark or one of the other top ten countries but maybe we can learn from them what can be done in the United States to improve life here.
But we are not going to change a thing unless we get rid of Trump, Pence, the Alt-Right, the Koch brothers, and every freak that is a member of ALEC and/or thinks like members of ALEC.
Germany
New Zealand
Australia
Switzerland
Canada
Finland
Netherlands
Norway
Sweden
Denmark
https://www.thrillist.com/news/nation/best-countries-for-women-to-live-in
Then there are countries that are worse than the United States. The US doesn’t make the best or the worst list for women.
“the United States ranks 22nd overall, and is on par with other top-ranking countries on inclusion and justice. But American women aren’t as safe from intimate partners as in other developed nations. The U.S. security ranking thus suffers from high rates of intimate partner violence — which is more than 10 percentage points above the mean for developed countries.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/11/07/this-chart-shows-the-best-and-worst-countries-for-women-in-the-world-today/?utm_term=.33b7cbcdddd0
What is disgusting is that “American women voted overwhelmingly for Clinton, except the white ones.” What is wrong with non-college-educated while women in the US?
https://qz.com/833003/election-2016-all-women-voted-overwhelmingly-for-clinton-except-the-white-ones/
LikeLike
Unfortunately, the United States government has absolutely NO INTEREST in looking at other countries and how they do things to improve women’s lives or education or anything for that matter. We are ruled by greed. You know that already. At this point, I wouldn’t mind living in any of the countries you suggest!
LikeLike
‘the United States government’
That isn’t specific enough. Hillary Clinton has a long history of working for women and children’s rights and well being and she was 1st Lady for eight years and then a U.S. Senator from New York.
But Donald Trump was elected president of the US in 2016, and the Republican Party now controls every branch of the U.S. government.
However, even though the Democratic Party is now the minority party, there are still elected representatives in the government that are Democrats and some of them still believe in supporting women and children’s rights and well being.
For instance:
There are 23 women in the U.S. Senate and 17 are Democrats. Only 6 are Republicans.
There are 84 women in the U.S. House of Representatives. 61 are Democrats. 23 are Republicans.
If you want to change the U.S. government vote for and help elect more women to Congress and to state legislatures who are Democrats that have a record of supporting women and children’s rights and well being. That means you have to vote in the Democratic primaries and support women like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
As long as elected representatives in the Congress that care about women and children are in the minority in Congress, nothing will change. They must become the majority.
LikeLike
“If you want to change the U.S. government vote for and help elect more women to Congress and to state legislatures who are Democrats that have a record of supporting women and children’s rights and well being.”
Thanks Lloyd!!! I will do that! My family has been in that business here in New York for a while now!
LikeLike
Will Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez represent you and your family — I hope?
LikeLike
No, she’s in the Bronx and Queens. I live upstate.
LikeLike
Indeed, Lloyd. DeVoodoo is a ditz.
LikeLike
It will be interesting to see how Trump twists out of this BS.
LikeLike
It must be to benefit the bottom line of corporate interests. Trump will have no problem explaining that it’s all about MAGA.
LikeLike
bethree5
Actually, I can respond to your theory with one line from Hollywood.
” I don’t think they give a shit”
The modern opposition to Republican is a spineless gutless cabal birthed in an unholy alliance of Northern Politicians beholden to immigrants and Southern Politicians in the Jim Crow era. As such even though, those dynamics have changed there will always be one or two Democrats who cross over and prevent progressive legislation and change. To occur the Mueller investigation is sinking in the polls because almost no democrats dare call it treason.
The Republicans have no such problem they make up scandals and run with them for years. Uranium 1 the IRS Benghazi. When they are disproven they continue.
The Democrats will tell you that the Clinton impeachment led to Republican losses. Even though they gained the whole show in 2000.
Perhaps the American People can tell the difference between Treason and oral sex.
But tonight the Orange monster will appoint a justice who will not only gut Roe but the voting rights act and probably the NLRA .
Two or thee Democrats will vote for him putting their career over Principal allowing the phony senator from main off the hook to vote for the nomination.
The alternative would be to hold solid and force Murkowski and Collins to put their careers on the line. Then the vote might be put off till November when the House may flip in a large enough manner to force Republicans to moderate the nomination.
Not happening so
I don’t think they give a dam.
LikeLike
Joel, I think this is in response to below thread? (“This kind of publicity, while it keeps his core running dogs salivating, can only serve to get more registered Dems voting, & move more fence-jumpers back into the fold.) While I agree re: many Dem reps & all Party regulars, I’m referring to the public: the many Dems who didn’t vote in ’16, & borderliners who switched to Green or Trump.
LikeLike
I would love names to be named in this action!! Who were the politicians who pushed this?
LikeLike
If they were members of the Trump administration or one of The Kremlin’s Agent Orange’s appointed buffoons, then it all leads back to The Trumpist-Idiot Syndrome that only one person in the world has.
Blame Trump for everything even when he doesn’t know what his people are doing or he forgot what he gave them permission to do.
“Ex-Trump workers describe egocentric micromanager: ‘Donald loves Donald’
“Interviews with former employees point to detail-obsessed boss with little regard for diversity or low-level staff: ‘His identity is wrapped around being a winner’” …
“In interviews with 12 former employees of Donald Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination and now one of the most controversial figures in modern American politics, none disagreed with Pinkett’s frank assessment of his former boss’s inflated sense of self.
“I don’t think it’s possible to quantify the size of his ego,” said Barbara Res, a former Trump Organization executive vice-president throughout the 1980s. “It’s too big.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/14/donald-trump-former-employee-interviews-ego-diversity
LikeLike
Lloyd, you don’t need to be a former employee of Trump to detect his narcissism and self aggrandizement.
You can see in footage when he makes public speeches and how grotesque, inappropriate, and unpolished he is.
But I actually think this is a wonderful, beautiful, and productive thing because it will continue to fully uncover all the hidden and covert workings and ideologies of both parties (first the GOP, then the Democrats), and how grossly in favor of the ownership class they are, how they care not about the majority but pander to the rich, and how badly they want to turn our country back into Edwardian England.
I call it “The Trump Effect”, and it’s educating millions of people you would think are not so educable or open minded. AND, it’s prompting so many to get informed, get involved in civics and run for office.
Thank you, Mr. Trump. The more evil you and your cronies are, the more we stand to flip this country on its back and turn it into the democracy it serves to be, one for the people! Wealth and power will inevitably be redistributed toward the middle and lower classes, as is should be. But we must continue to fight relentlessly to make that happen.
LikeLike
I agree. The fight will be relentless and longterm. I have suspected for some time that Trump has a syndrome called verbal dysdecorum (Losing the ability to censor yourself and saying rude, mean, or inappropriate things.).
This is the cause of the “Trump Effect” you mention and most if not all of the other autocratic, micromanaging billionaires that belong to ALEC and similar Extreme Right Wing organizations don’t have that syndrome even though they think like and agree with much of what Trump says and does.
Trump’s most loyal followers that are not wealthy support him because he says what they think but dare not say — well, at last until Trump came along and emboldened them to talk like their god.
LikeLike
Yes, this Orange Oaf with gold plated toilet seats and limos and a staff of 100 persuaded his base that he is just like them.
LikeLike
“I have suspected for some time that Trump has a syndrome called verbal dysdecorum (Losing the ability to censor yourself and saying rude, mean, or inappropriate things.).”
Nah, Lloyd, don’t give La Donald an out by labeling his gross behavior a “syndrome.” He didn’t lose the ability to censor himself; he never had it!
LikeLike
LOL
True, he never had it. When it comes to lying, Trump started out as a child prodigy out of the womb except Trump isn’t good at it like a prodigy is supposed to be.
The only reason Trump gets away with his endless and obvious lies is that millions of deplorable Americans want to believe anything he says without fact checking or knowing how to fact check.
Every day, I see another new piece from a traditional media source like The Washington Post listing Trump’s latest lies and repeated lies.
LikeLike
dianeravitch
He didn’t have to convince them of anything. They have been waiting for his arrival for decades.
LikeLike
Joel,
You’re right. I think “they” have been waiting for Trump for decades because the GOP and the Democrats have both largely abandoned the working classes, and now that includes working class with or without higher education. This is a class war, and appropriately so.
LikeLike
Robert Rendo, NBCT, M.S.Ed.L.
But the problem as I see it is ” I could hire half the working class to go out and kill the other half”. Jay Gould
And King has yet to be proven right when he asserted.
“White supremacy can feed their egos but not their stomachs.” They seem to be willing to go hungry.
LikeLike
Robert Rendo, I agree: “But I actually think this is a wonderful, beautiful, and productive thing because it will continue to fully uncover all the hidden and covert workings and ideologies…”
The ugly machinations displayed here by the WH delegation have no doubt been at work since the 70’s, as Dienne says– but sub rosa , taking cover under lip-service given to idealistic international pronouncements. It takes the supreme arrogance of a Trump admin to rip off the mask and blatantly promote profit above planetary good (both here & in our w/dwl from Paris climate agreement) – no doubt, just to tick off more anti-Euro campaign-promise points. This kind of publicity, while it keeps his core running dogs salivating, can only serve to get more registered Dems voting, & move more fence-jumpers back into the fold.
LikeLike
Next, drinking water will be discouraged, with the recommendation of only drinking gatorade or mountain dew for optimal health.
LikeLike
These mothers will need to purchase the more expensive premixed formula since adding “drinking” water which might be contaminated with bacteria would be harmful to their infants.
Score one for the makers of Enfamil and Similac along with baby food producers Gerber and Beechwood.
Score zero for Humankind.
LikeLike
This is what evil looks like. Here, some background on this topic:
http://www.businessinsider.com/nestles-infant-formula-scandal-2012-6
LikeLike
Nestle’s marketing techniques parallel those of the education privatization industry. There’s a special place in hell for those who exploit vulnerable women, infants & children for profit.
“Creating a need where none existed.
Convincing consumers the products were indispensable.
Linking products with the most desirable and unattainable concepts—then giving a sample.
Knowing that fear and anxiety can actually stop lactation, companies consciously design marketing strategies that aggravate in-built worries and interfere with the pyschophysiology of the human body in order to sell more of their products.”
https://newint.org/features/1982/04/01/babies/
LikeLiked by 1 person
In many parts of the world, use of formula is very, very dangerous because the water is contaminated. This puts babies at risk. Everyone knows this now. So, what was done here is simply evil.
LikeLike
Scumbags.
LikeLike
Just when I was saying I am too disgusted to post and was looking for a like button. I scrolled down to your post. Now only us NYers could get away with this because everyone expects us to be crass and rude.
You forgot the F
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why be disgusted, Joel? After all, I am told that “This has happened under both Republican and Democratic administrations with White House support”. Just poor put-upon Trump getting bashed for doing the same thing that the hypocritical and evil Democrats have always done in the White House, up to and including Obama.
LikeLike
NYCPSP,
MY final warning. You are welcome to comment here, but please stop attacking other readers. I’m putting you in moderation. That means I review every comment before it is posted. If you attack another reader, it will be deleted.
LikeLike
Thank you, Diane. NYCPSP is at worst antagonistic and at best, fact-posing. Needless antagonism towards allies should be regulated if he/she decides to stay.
LikeLike
Obama paved the way for Betsy DeVos, as did GW Bush, NYCPSP.
LikeLike
Robert Rendo,
I agree Obama paved the way for Betsy DeVos! I’m a huge critic of Obama’s education policies. What I don’t understand is why progressive Dems like Elizabeth Warren are not much better.
I’m not sure if you are accusing me of “fact-posing” or if that is a typo. I hope it is a typo, because I try to post facts to support my positions and I certainly welcome anyone here correcting what I post if I am posting untruths instead of facts.
I’m not trying to antagonize allies. I’m hoping to stop the same kind of propaganda about Democrats that resulted not just in Trump’s 2016 victory, but in voters turning away from good progressive Democrats running in House and Senate races being defeated by right wing Republicans. The Democrats are flawed – especially on education – but sometimes a flawed candidate like Elizabeth Warren or Tim Kaine (who is pro-public education) is far superior to any Republican — even Susan Collins — who helps enable the right wing agenda.
(I don’t know if this reply will make it out of moderation, but I hope it does.)
LikeLike
It has far less to do with Trump than it does with Nestle. Google “Nestle breastfeeding scandal” and you will see that U.S. corporations (mostly Nestle) have actively discouraged breastfeeding around the world since at least the 70s. This has happened under both Republican and Democratic administrations with White House support.
LikeLike
I assume you can provide evidence about how Presidents Clinton and Obama were quashing UN resolutions promoting breastfeeding.
“The intensity of the administration’s opposition to the breast-feeding resolution stunned public health officials and foreign diplomats, who described it as a marked contrast to the Obama administration, which largely supported W.H.O.’s longstanding policy of encouraging breast-feeding,” the Times reports.
So obviously the NY Times was reporting fake news again.
I didn’t need to read your links since I have known for a long time about Nestle’s scandals. But your post helpfully informed me that every White House from Jimmy Carter through Obama was aiding and abetting Nestle’s and other corporations. Your post helpfully informed me that every White House from Jimmy Carter through Obama had been quashing efforts to promote breastfeeding because they were tools of the corporations.
Your post helpfully informed me that Trump’s White House is no different than what any Democratic White House has been on this issue. How wrong I was for thinking Trump was worse when you know for a fact that he is exactly like those evil Democratic White Houses — at least on this issue.
Shame on me for thinking Trump was worse. Your informative post tells me truthfully that he is no different than the evil Democrats in the White House who had the same position. To think I believed the fake news of the NY Times when all along Trump just is not any different than Democrats.
LikeLike
My god you need anger management.
LikeLike
dienne77: No, but we all do like to read facts. NYC public school parent and the rest of us are tired of unending lies and distortions.
Reading Trump’s version of ‘truth’ is tiring.
LikeLike
dienne77,
You have a point about my “anger issues” and I apologize. I should have just ignored your comment. I confess that the current occupant of the White House’s non-stop lies and disregard for the law and his use of his bully pulpit to actually bully (and far worse) do make me angry. And it does astonish me that anyone is still showing up at his rallies and cheering him on as he slurs Maxine Waters, Sen. Warren and the like.
And then I read comments like yours that explain exactly what those acolytes cheering on Trump’s bullying believe. That Trump isn’t that bad — he’s just acting like all Presidents before him and it’s just that they are part of the in-crowd now and they love it.
Those people twist reality to fit their own certainties and that allows them to embrace the worst. To many of us, it seems to be a frightening abandonment of critical reasoning that is the precursor to fascism.
So I apologize for my “angry response. I should not have posted in anger. Your post happened to push my buttons as I watch Trump supporters cheering him on and believing that they are good and moral people.
carolmalaysia,
Thank you very much. You expressed my feelings in a much more admirable way.
LikeLike
So why does it push your buttons so much every time I point out that time didn’t start with Trump? Is there something about how we got to Trump that you’d rather not acknowledge and deal with?
LikeLike
So let me push more buttons. Assuming you want Trump gone in 2020 (as do I, as little as you believe that), the Democratic Party is going to have to confront the reasons why he won in 2016. So far the only two reasons they have been willing to acknowledge are (a) people in flyover country are deplorable racist rednecks and (b) PUTIN! Even to whatever extent those two factors may have been influential, the Democrats have no control over either one. We’ve always had and will always have racists. That’s not going to change, certainly not by calling all of flyover country deplorable. And Putin is Putin. Oddly, he doesn’t view the world with American interests at heart.
But there are other reasons why the Democrats lost, most of which boil down to corporate control of our government and our country. This is not a partisan, “Republicans bad!!!” issue. This is fully bipartisan and people are tired of it. Many people are done voting for one flavor or another of corporatism (i.e., do you like your corporatism with a side of gay rights or a helping of theocratic fervor?). Politicians like Bernie and Ocasio-Cortez who are willing to acknowledge the evils of this system have a chance of uniting enough votes against the likes of Trump. Politicians like Hillary and Booker don’t. It’s really that simple. So you can vent your spleen at me as many times as you want, but it’s not going to change the facts. If you want another four years of Trump, by all means, keep yelling at progressives and independents who point out uncomfortable facts.
LikeLike
A fresh take from Charles Pierce at Esquire
https://t.co/z2pplH3soX
LikeLike
Trump won because he is a skilled demagogue, like Mussolini and Hitler. He played like a masterful demagogue on people’s fears, not their hopes and dreams. We haven’t ever seen his like at the national level.
LikeLike
“Politicians like Bernie and Ocasio-Cortez who are willing to acknowledge the evils of this system have a chance of uniting enough votes against the likes of Trump.” The difference I see between them and you is that both see the value in working within the system, seeking compromise with other politicians to advance their agenda inch by inch. I’m sure if we look back through Bernie’s voting record over the years we could find some votes which could be colored as not progressive (enough). If we take each vote at face value without a thorough understanding of the trade offs, I’m sure we could besmirch Bernie. After all, wasn’t he the ultimate sellout in supporting Hillary? Ocasio-Cortez has indicated a similar willingness to work through the system.
LikeLike
Dienne77 said
“Politicians like Bernie and Ocasio-Cortez who are willing to acknowledge the evils of this system have a chance of uniting enough votes against the likes of Trump. Politicians like Hillary and Booker don’t. It’s really that simple.”
What is simple is that Clinton won the popular vote but lost by a total of 50,000 votesin Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. Democratic Voter apathy for a bland candidate handed us the worst president in the history of the US, and an ultra conservative SCOTUS that will swing the country for decades. Every single person who chose not to vote for Hillary (Jill Stein!?) owns this.
The democrats need to appeal not only to the socialist base but also to the centrist independents. If the democrat platform is only wide enough for Bernie and Octasio-Cortez, get ready for years of Trumpism.
LikeLike
Dienne, nicely said: “Many people are done with voting for one flavor or another of corporatism (i.e., do you like your corporatism with a side of gay rights or a helping of theocratic fervor?) — perfectly expresses the callous bipartisan manipulation of social issues to drive same-old corporatist agenda. However, I also agree w/ AZ parent’s “If the democrat platform is only wide enough for Bernie and Octasio-Cortez, get ready for years of Trumpism.”
Corporatism will be running our elections until we make some legislative changes – re-regulation, if you will – and I can think of no better place to start than a Dem Party platform drive to reform campaign funding with specific proposals, spearheaded by determined ‘David’ candidates who model crowd-funded campaigns against Goliath – putting their $ where their mouth is.
LikeLike
If you don’t vote in 2018 because the choice is between a Trump Republican and an establishment Democrat, prepare for 8 years of Trump followed by 8 years of Pence.
LikeLike
I’d rather have an establishment Democrat than anyone in the Trumpish GOP.
It would be great if we had more than one Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, but we don’t … not yet.
If you don’t vote in the primaries, then you have no say in the choices for the actual election. The primaries often offer us a choice between someone like Alexandria and an establishment Democrat, but few voters turn out for the primaries and it is too late by the time the real election comes around.
LikeLike
dienne77,
https://nypost.com/2018/07/08/de-blasio-spends-weekend-at-bernie-sanders-summer-home/
I see that corrupt and evil Democrat Bill de Blasio and his family were spending a few days at Bernie Sanders’ house and hanging out with Sanders and his wife. I have no doubt that is all the evidence any deluded progressive needs to know that Bernie is now one of the co-opted. After all, he has a summer home on the lake, so there’s plenty of stuff for right wing trolls posing as progressives to use to attack Bernie and plenty of foolish people who will repeat the attack that Bernie Sanders is yet another reason to avoid voting Democrat and after all, they are as evil as Trump.
When no criticism of Trump can be made without a self-described progressive jumping in to explain that the evil and corrupt Democrats do this awful thing, too, then fascism is taking hold. When the self-described progressives see no difference between what Trump did, and what they claim every White House before that did, then fascism is starting to take hold.
Yes all countries do bad things. That doesn’t mean that there isn’t a difference between Hitler’s Germany and FDR’s United States. That doesn’t mean it isn’t a lie for someone to post – after any criticism of Hitler — that FDR and Truman were just as evil and murderous.
Democrats can be progressive, moderate or conservative. That is democracy. And it only works when Americans don’t believe dishonest propaganda and demonize politicians because they disagree with them and they have fallen for a PR campaign telling them not to trust evil Democrats.
LikeLike
Christine Langhoff, good article. Best piece: “The Cynic believes… that the modern American corporate business model is fraud, that the primary purpose of the American financial system is to make money on money. He believed this before the crash of 2008… and today… [and] under at least the last 5 previous presidents of the US… [and] believes that they believe it [–] that all 5 of them… accepted the new business model as being as implacable a force as the wind and tides… [which] led directly to the election as president* of a pure product of modern American business fraud.”
The fraudulent biz model [make $ on $ – incl payday lending et al – believed ‘implacable as wind & tides’ by Reagan, HW, WJC, Bush Jr & Obama] is just unreg corps doing what unreg corps will & are able do once enough $ has trickled up. Hence my recommendation below that Dem platform start w/ campaign reform [et al specific ‘get the $ out’ proposals].
LikeLike
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not ONLY unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Theodore Roosevelt Jr, Republican, the 26th President of the United States of America, 1901-1909.
How much has this country progressed? Teddy made sense and our homegrown IDIOT doesn’t.
LikeLike
To contemporary Republicans, TR has been reclassified as a RINO.
LikeLike
I think it’s okay to criticize Trump as long as you make it very clear that what Trump is doing is the exact same thing the corrupt Democrats have been doing. As long as your criticism of Trump is framed so that the listener understands that the entire Democratic Party is just as bad, it is acceptable to make a criticism.
But to make a criticism of Trump without mentioning how the corrupt Dems do the same things is not allowed.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent: Trump and his administration is the one that is in power now. We have nothing to gain from the current GOP. We do have things to gain from the Democratic party, even though they are far from perfect.
I’m tired of whataboutism. Trump is the topic. What is to be gained by trashing past presidents who weren’t perfect but much better than the Orange Lardpit who wants to destroy our environment, our economy, our respect for government, our allies and our healthcare while giving huge tax breaks to himself and other wealthy people. He loves dictators like Kim Jong Un and Ergodan who don’t allow any protesting.
LikeLike
NYCPSP,
I think you should calm down and take a deep breath. Try not to attack other readers of the blog. Disagree respectfully. Your rage undermines your credibility.
LikeLike
Diane,
I’m sorry that you characterize my posts as filled with “rage”. I admit to be snarky, but I think that calling people “angry” and full of “rage” is how the right wing has always managed to shut down their opponents.
They are allowed to post lies, but if you call out those lies you just seem “angry”. I guess I am angry because I see a repeat of 2016 where any Democrat who is too dangerous to the right wing gets smeared by propaganda that the left eats up.
I think Obama didn’t get angry enough. I think the Democrats don’t fight this propaganda enough. But I will respect your blog and try to only speak in very polite terms when someone is defending Trump as no different than the entire Democratic Party. I hope they will please stop. I hope they will stop bashing Democrats who have a different opinion than them as evidence that the entire party is corrupt.
I hope they will understand that this is what happened in Nazi Germany when Hitler rose to power because too many Germans decided the opposition to him wasn’t perfect enough.
LikeLike
NYCPSP,
You are in moderation. Please comment on posts or add your insights. Do not attack other readers.
LikeLike
Diane,
Thank you. I hope my future posts will be less angry and not attacking other posters but if I do forget I absolutely respect your decision not to post them.
(I posted most of my replies on here before I saw your first comment to me or I would have been more careful not to sound angry or criticize other posts.)
LikeLike
How much has our country progressed since Andrew Jackson, 75 yrs prior to Teddy? All we needed was a 21stC Jackson clone to put all the old crap back on the front burner.
“During Andrew Jackson’s administration, racist ideas took on new meaning. Jackson brought in the “Age of the Common Man. Under his administration, working-class people [if white males] gained rights they had not previously held, particularly the right to vote… European immigrants were pouring into the North… Classist and ethnic prejudices did exist among white Americans and had a tremendous impact on people’s lives. But the bottom line was that… no matter how poor or degraded they were, they knew there was a class of people below them… simply by virtue of being white. Because of this, most identified with the rest of the white race and defended the institution of slavery… even though [it] did not benefit them directly, and was in many ways against their best interests.” (from PBS Resource Bank’s “Race-based legislation in the North”)
And from USNews&WR 2/13/17 “The New Old Hickory”: “Like Trump, Jackson was brash, abrasive, defensive and quick-tempered and both were described as vulgar and unfit to govern. Jackson was also thin-skinned and felt the world was against him and that the ruling elites looked down on him. Both expressed extreme loyalty to controversial advisers nd elevated them to powerful positions in their administrations with disastrous effect. Both were called tyrants and bullies and like Trump, Jackson professed to always put American interests first and inveighed against “alien enemies.”
LikeLike
Nestlé is the evilest of the evil corporations. The infant formula scandal is well known to women who were of childbearing age in the ’70’s, and this is just a redux.
However, still more vile is that Nestlé has been busily buying up the aquifers of small impoverished towns, in the US and worldwide, and pumping them dry by bottling up the water. In New England, for example, there was a local brand of bottled water called Poland Springs, which was literally bottled at the source in Poland Springs, Maine. Nestlé bought up the company, retained the name, and now sources the water from any number of tiny towns and villages. Read the fine print on a bottle sometime.
Nestlé has an agreement with Michigan which allows it to pump 400 gallons of water PER MINUTE from the state’s groundwater table, over the objections of nearly 82,000 people who spoke out against the agreement. Nestlé pays $200 per year for the permit to do so. And Flint is still without clean water.
Nestlé bottles under a host of names, and recently had a decision reversed which prohibited bottled water sales in our National Parks. That water is sold under the Deer Park brand. Ice Montain, another of their brands, is actually tap water. San Pellegrino is also owned by Nestlé; Perrier too.
Here’s what Nestlé’s Chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe said on the commodification of water:
“There are two different opinions on the matter [or water]. The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs, who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution.”
https://www.zmescience.com/science/nestle-company-pollution-children/
The NYT last year published a long form story detailing how Nestlé has enlisted women in Brazil, and elsewhere in the third world, to become door-to-door vendors of its junk food products, leading to obesity, diabetes and high blood pressure in poor communities which lack access to a real supermarket. The traditional diet is being displaced by highly processed foods with little nutritional value.
Nestlé and Trump are natural partners.
LikeLike
Wow. Thank-you for this info on corporate America’s stealth campaign to privatize the world’s water supplies. Clean public water systems are now the “extreme” position. I suppose Flint’s lead poisoned water is yet another opportunity for the Waltons to sell bottled water as the better option than clean public water systems.
Wall St financiers have long known that climate change would bring about a world wide water shortage of clean, accessible water. As climate change depletes the world’s supply of clean water, privatizing public water means business.
LikeLike
Christine:”…as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution.”
What an )($#(^#&^BB&$B^(#_$)(+ !!!
I have signed a number of petitions against Nestle for doing exactly what you mentioned.
LikeLike
Also trump and his crew add in retaliation and revenge if you do not do it their way…so these poor countries do not have a choice…
LikeLike
Trump proved once again his ignorance…and bragged about it by putting down a 94 year old ailing former president.
President George H.W. Bush – Points of Light: “A “thousand points of light” became shorthand for Bush’s vision of a kinder and gentler America. He spoke of individuals finding meaning and reward by serving a purpose higher than themselves, thereby illuminating society.
This is something totally foreign in the Orange One’s vocabulary. Life for him is, “All for me and total loyalty.” Serving a purpose higher than himself??? HA! Other former presidents also had uplifting things to say. Our Orange Buffoon can’t comprehend such lofty sentiments. Maybe these presidents didn’t live up to these goals but they at least had the decency to say something kind and gentle and up-lifting.
……………………..
Trump’s confusion about Bush’s slogan illustrates his narrow view of the presidency
Trump ridicules Bush’s ‘thousand points of light’
BY JAMES HOHMANN
with Breanne Deppisch and Joanie Greve
THE BIG IDEA: Donald Trump sounds genuinely baffled by George H.W. Bush’s 1988 campaign mantra. “A thousand points of light,” the president riffed during a rally in Montana on Thursday night. “What the hell was that? … What did that mean? Does anyone know? … Has anyone ever figured that one out? And it was put out by a Republican!”
“I know one thing,” the 72-year-old added. “‘Make America Great Again’ we understand! ‘Putting America First’ we understand! ‘A thousand points of light,’ I never quite got that one.”
Bush, seeking election after two terms as Ronald Reagan’s vice president, believed America was already great. It also never would have occurred to the World War II hero, now 94, to use “America First” as a slogan because he had come of age in the 1930s when Charles Lindbergh and other isolationists were using the same maxim to advocate the appeasement of the Nazis.
A “thousand points of light” became shorthand for Bush’s vision of a kinder and gentler America. He spoke of individuals finding meaning and reward by serving a purpose higher than themselves, thereby illuminating society.
“I’ve spoken of a thousand points of light – of all the community organizations that are spread like stars throughout the nation doing good,” Bush said in his 1989 inaugural address. “I will go to the people and the programs that are the brighter points of light, and I’ll ask every member of my government to become involved. The old ideas are new again because they are not old. They are timeless: duty, sacrifice, commitment and a patriotism that finds its expression in taking part and pitching in.”
Trump’s bewilderment when it comes to these concepts stems, at least in part, from the fact that he holds a fundamentally different view of the presidency than most of his predecessors, particularly the patrician Bush. The current occupant of the Oval Office has done little to indicate that he sees unifying or uplifting the country as central responsibilities of his job. Recall his “both sides” response to the violence in Charlottesville last summer. He’s embraced many divisive wedge issues since then, including attacking NFL players for kneeling during the national anthem, and pushed policies that are designed to help red states at the expense of blue states, such as in the tax code overhaul.
“The presidency is not merely an administrative office,” Franklin Roosevelt once said. “That’s the least of it. It is more than an engineering job, efficient or inefficient. It is preeminently a place of moral leadership.”
“You have to appeal to people’s best interests, not their worst ones,” said Harry Truman. “You may win an election or two by doing the other, but it does a lot of harm to the country.”
“For only the president represents the national interest,” said John Kennedy.
The same week as Bush’s inaugural, Reagan evoked John Winthrop’s “city upon a hill” in his farewell address to the nation. The outgoing president said he always envisioned the shining city “teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace … with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity.”
“If there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here,” Reagan said. “That’s how I saw it and see it still. … And she’s still a beacon, still a magnet for all who must have freedom, for all the pilgrims from all the lost places who are hurtling through the darkness toward home.”…
LikeLike
“You have to appeal to people’s best interests, not their worst ones,” said Harry Truman. “You may win an election or two by doing the other, but it does a lot of harm to the country.”
See Christine Langhoff’s link posted above for an in-depth look at whether Obama’s continued appeals to ‘people’s best interests’ – & his [perhaps patrician] refusal to name and counter the ugliness that countered his every move – worked in best interests of public. It’s an interesting read.
LikeLike
“A thousand points of light” was a Peggy Noonan-penned, sleight-of-hand cynical political ploy. It didn’t do or mean one damn thing that made our country better. There is very little difference between that trite talking point and our Dear Leader’s MAGA. Both are the rhetorical equivalent of a Hollywood set with plywood building fronts.
And while Reagan used the same ploy with his “city on a hill,” can we all agree that Reagan’s fabled “city” was an exclusive gated community?
LikeLike
GregB: You are right. It was a political ploy by a politician who did a LOT of damage to the workers of this country. I remember how upset my father was when Raygun put in new air traffic controllers. Eventually they had the same problems that the striking ones had.
Still, it is better that the daily Tweets that our Glorious Orange IDIOT spews out. He makes no attempt to do anything but divide and create chaos.
LikeLike
Yes, Carol, Ahhhm witcha (translation: I’m with you—and your dad)! I will only refer to the DC airport on the Potomac as Washington National. To have named it after Reagan is just rubbing right-wing salt into the wound. I can’t do that.
And you are right, as cynical as the 80s administrations might have been (one former Assistant Secretary of Education excepted), it sure looks tame compared to the contemporary disgrace we are stuck with.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Nikki Haley has words to condemn the UN report against American poverty. “..the U.N. report says [what] we should do about poverty. It reads like a socialist political manifesto of higher taxes, government-run health care, and “decriminaliz[ing] being poor” (never mind that nowhere in America is it a crime to be poor).”
Quote from UN Report: The United States also “has the highest youth poverty rate in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and the highest infant mortality rates among comparable OECD States. Its citizens live shorter and sicker lives compared to those living in all other rich democracies…
“The Trump Administration has brought in massive tax breaks for corporations and the very wealthy, while orchestrating a systematic assault on the welfare system,” he said. “The strategy seems to be tailor-made to maximize inequality and to plunge millions of working Americans, and those unable to work, into penury.
“Locking up the poor precisely because they are poor, greatly exaggerating the amount of fraud in the system, shaming those who need assistance, and devising ever more obstacles to prevent people from getting needed benefits, is not a strategy to reduce or eliminate poverty. ”..
………………………………………………
The United Nations’ Patently Ridiculous Report on American Poverty
By NIKKI HALEY
July 9, 2018 6:30 AM
…The fight against poverty is a complicated, multi-dimensional battle, but it is one that has the attention of Americans at all levels.
It certainly has the attention of the Trump administration. Its economic policies have helped bring unemployment down to the lowest level in decades. Its tax-reform law included a landmark measure to direct billions in new capital into distressed communities in every state.
But as the United States ambassador to the United Nations, my job is to help protect American interests and tax dollars at the U.N. It is patently ridiculous for the U.N. to spend its scarce resources — more of which come from the United States than from any other country — studying poverty in the wealthiest country in the world, a country where the vast majority is not in poverty, and where public and private-sector social safety nets are firmly in place to help those who are…
The report also distorts and misrepresents the facts about poverty in America in ways that a biased political opponent might…
Unsurprisingly, Senator Bernie Sanders has strongly embraced this U.N. report. Senator Sanders criticized my comment that the report was “patently ridiculous.” But when the U.N. takes sides in an American political debate and shifts resources from truly needy countries to prosperous ones, I fully stand by my characterization. All the more so when it’s largely American tax dollars that are paying for it…
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/07/united-nations-report-on-american-poverty-distorts-and-misrepresents/
LikeLike
This report was written by an independent, fact-finding reporter for the UN Human Rights Council. Do we believe this report about the abuses the poor in this country endure or do we believe Nikki Haley, another Trump appointee?
……………………..
Mr. Philip Alston (Australia) took up his functions as the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights in June 2014. As a Special Rapporteur, he is part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.
LikeLike
Christine: thank you for the Nestle link. Nestle is a truly evil corporate monopoly, & has been for a very long time. As has been done w/Koch products (those lovely “Dixie” products, for example: they had some very clever paper/plastic plates for the 4th of July), I look through product listings to make sure I do NOT buy anything that was made/is owned by Nestle. The tainted baby formula scandal should have been enough to make us swear off Toll House Cookies* forever.
*Econo chocolate chips make just as good cookies…even better, because they’re more reasonably priced.
LikeLike
Speaking of chocolate, I didn’t post the link to Nestlé child labor scandal in harvesting cacao: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/sep/02/child-labour-on-nestle-farms-chocolate-giants-problems-continue
“In court documents, the three plaintiffs claim that they were trafficked from their homes in neighbouring west African countries and put to work on plantations on Ivory Coast. They describe how they were whipped, beaten and forced to work for 14 hours a day before retiring to dank, dark rooms without windows to rest. One plaintiff, referred to in the case as John Doe II recounted how guards would slice open the feet of any child worker who were caught trying to escape.”
LikeLike
Christine: I am continuously amazed at how cruel mankind can be to each other. The US can put children in cages and Nestle can make money off of children.
I am so sad that this is happening. Whatever happened to ‘be kind to others and care for them’? We have a long, long way to go before life is the way it should be.
I signed a petition recently about “Demand an End to Children Working in Tobacco Fields”. Can’t the US do better than this?
Demand an End to Children Working in Tobacco Fields
by: Judy Molland
target: Paul Ryan, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives; Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leadermore
50,724 SUPPORTERS55,000 GOAL
Fourteen-year-old Luis works 12 hours a day in the tobacco fields of North Carolina, starting his day at 5 am to get ready for a van to pick him up, and often not returning until 7 pm.
There are thousands of child laborers like Luis in the U.S.
When 18 is the mimimum age to buy a pack of cigarettes, why on Earth are young children allowed to work in tobacco fields and suffer devastating health effects like nicotine poisoning?
It goes back to the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act, which provided a minimum wage and protected workers, but exempted agriculture, including child labor.
This is appalling and must change.
Please sign my petition calling on the U.S. government to put in place legislation that prohibits tobacco companies from using child labor and ensures regular human rights monitoring for all their workers.
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/embed.js
LikeLike
This is horrible, Christine. I recently was googling history of Mauritius, in connection w/a novel I was reading. Sounds no different than what was going on w/indentured servants brought there to work sugar cane fields after abolition of slavery– in the 1830’s!
LikeLike
Haven’t ’til now started boycotting Nestle but I’m w/you on Koch. The only product that tempted me were those nice big Vanity Fair napkins– ShopRite to the rescue! About a yr ago they store-branded similar hi-quality napkins. Dimension differ [smaller], so I’m hoping they’re made by another corp…
LikeLike
The Orange IDIOT is calling this report by the failing NY Times fake news. Wouldn’t it be great if he would loose his phone and never Tweet again? He is ignorant about conditions in third world countries.
…………………..
Trump attacks NYT over breastfeeding story…Politico
“The failing NY Times Fake News story today about breast feeding must be called out. The U.S. strongly supports breast feeding but we don’t believe women should be denied access to formula. Many women need this option because of malnutrition and poverty,” Trump said in a tweet.
According to the Times, the resolution was written to encourage breastfeeding and to limit “inaccurate or misleading” marketing for breast milk substitutes. The resolution, introduced by Ecuador, did not bar the use of formula.
When attempts to soften language in the resolution were unsuccessful, the U.S. stunned the global community by threatening retaliatory trade measures against Ecuador and the withdrawal of military aid, according to the Times report…
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/09/trump-new-york-times-breastfeeding-703503
LikeLike
The thing I really find stomach-turning is that a WH delegation spokesperson justified these corp-profit-friendly actions by co-opting a liberal activist position – that of calling out those über-breast-feeding fanatics who use misinfo & shaming tactics to arm-twist naïve moms into ‘trying harder’/ w/hdg formula from non-feeding babies.
Meanwhile, stats suggest that what has actually been going on in developing nations is what went on here in the ’50’s: predatory formula mfr reps arm-twisting docs, nurses, hospitals & naïve moms into believing formula is healthier, breast-feeding arcane & shameful.
Granted, developing-nation moms are poor & probably need to get back to work immediately. But if the society understands that breast-milk breeds healthier kids, there will be no stigma attached to backpacking baby with in the fields, breast-pumping on office breaks, etc.
LikeLike