The Gotham Gazette reports that five former and present parents of students in the Success Academy charter schools called on Governor Cuomo to cut funding and increase accountability of Eva Moskowitz’s Success Academy charter chain.
The story reads, in part:
In an open letter to the governor, four parents of former Success Academy students, and one whose child is still enrolled in the network, criticize Success Academy’s disciplinary policies and say its practices are “discriminatory against students with special needs.”
The letter is being hand-delivered Friday morning to the governor’s office in Albany, it was shared with Gotham Gazette in advance. It is the latest in an ongoing, intense public debate over the practices of the controversial charter network, which has seen a series of troubling incidents come to light amid longtime concerns over its strict approach to discipline, suspension rates, and focus on test preparations.
Success Academy was founded by former City Council Member Eva Moskowitz in 2006. It is the largest charter school network in the city, with approximately 11,000 students in 34 schools across the city, in each borough except Staten Island. It also has seven new schools opening in August. Success students, or scholars as they are known in the network’s parlance, perform remarkably well on standardized tests, leading to many accolades and repeated questions about Moskowitz’s “secret sauce.”
But, the network has also faced much criticism for its harsh discipline policies and heavy emphasis on testing. Last year, the New York Times reported that a Success Principal had created a ‘Got to Go’ list to push out underperforming students. Then, last month, the Times released a video that showed a Success teacher scolding and publicly humiliating a first-grade student in front of the rest of her class. The network is also the focus of at least two federal lawsuits that were filed recently.
In face of this criticism, Moskowitz has time and again cited the network’s high performance on standardized tests compared to traditional district schools. While apologizing she has said reported incidents are isolated and not indicative of network-wide problems. She has worn the lawsuits as a badge of honor and said she is tired of apologizing.
The parents who wrote the letter disagree about whether there are systemic problems at Success Academy. “Despite what CEO Eva Moskowitz says, the targeting and pushing out of students, specifically our own, is not an anomaly within this organization,” their letter states.
The parents cite instances where their children were routinely suspended, singled out, and shamed or excluded from field trips. They say Success often called them midday to pick up their children without reporting these events as suspensions. And, they claim Success Academy retaliated by calling the Administration for Children’s Services on them when they spoke out against these practices.
“Because of this ongoing mistreatment of our children, several of us have lost our jobs or had to drop out of school,” they write in the letter. The missive and its demands to Gov. Cuomo come amid budget negotiations when funding for charter schools is being debated. Recent state budgets have been good to the charter school sector, which Cuomo has been allied with for years. Cuomo has appeared to distance himself a bit from charters, but is still seen as an ally.
Poor Andrew Cuomo: He will have to choose between the parents and the hedge-fund managers who underwrite political campaigns. Will it be a tough choice?

Cuomo isn’t up for re-election in 2016. He will probably ignore the letter. At most, his office will release a natural press release that pretty much ignores the letter. Since New York State has no term limits, Cuomo can run again when this current term reaches its end. What are the odds that Cuomo will be elected to a 3rd term?
The New York Daily News speculates on Cuomo running for a third term and said, “The teachers alone can’t take him out.” One source quoted in the piece says he will not only run for a 3rd term but a 4th.
If true, then Cuomo will want that money form the Hedge Funds.
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/dems-start-chattering-2018-blog-entry-1.2199925
LikeLike
Teachers probably can’t take him out, but Preet Bharara might able to.
And it won’t be for lunch.
LikeLike
The odds of Cuomo winning re-election are quite good. As an incumbent democrat, the party apparatus within the state almost guarantees it. He has been cleared of any federal indictments, and he has smartly built a runnable platform of liberal, rights-based policies that have allowed him to keep political relevance. His disastrous Ed policy is but a blip in the overall picture for him, as he is a very successful practitioner of triangulation. For every charter-reform loving policy he pimps, he has a striking down of fracking or some such thing to make things cloudy.
In NYC he has continuously made real sport of making the Mayor look foolish and impotent…..the collective effect of which is that he has made the progressive wing of his party seem foolish and impotent.
Most importantly however, he heads one of the last great “machine” political organizations in the country, and is an expert practitioner within it. His political survival while being one of the most clearly obvious shady-operators in all of politics is proof of this. The NYS Democratic Party is an entity that is best understood not with our current political templates and paradigms, but rather with a deep understanding of machine politics of a century ago. NY is a special place politically, all judgement and ethical thinking aside, and is best seen as an legitimatized organized crime outfit.
Governor elections here are done swiftly and by large, guaranteed blocks of voters who have been pacified via
negotiation and quid pro quo over generations.
Teachout’s 2014 thing was significant in that she came within 80,000 votes or so. But Cuomo won and that’s all that matters. If I were a betting man, I’d bet on him winning again…..so long as he doesn’t end up doing something in the Clinton White House.
Anyone that thinks his Ed policy will be a major hurdle for him winning reelection is dizzy and not within reach of understanding much about NY politics. Remember the shock among many when John King was elevated to Sec of Ed? Yeah…..those folks……they don’t get it.
LikeLike
Yeah. We teachers in NY…..the drama in many ways hasn’t even started yet. Cuomo is going to be around for awhile and making nice with the hedge funds will become an ever-increasing priority. The current “sea change” we are seeing with Ed policy here in the state is, I fear, but some well-orchestrated window dressing. Organized teachers are still the target.
This is why I remain so critical of all of the high-fives and celebrating lately over the new Regents chancellor and “changes.” We need to stay critical, sharp, and aggressive. We need our
Bullshit detectors turned up to 11. And too many of us don’t have em on at all.
LikeLike
That feels NATIONAL: We all need to have our BS detectors turned up to 11, but so few of us seem to even have one!
LikeLike
The fact that so many parents supported their children to opt out last school year says that many do have their BS detectors activated and more are being turned on all the time.
LikeLike
Let’s take the “kids crying” issue. Eva doesn’t believe that the kids’ constant incidents of crying at her schools — reported by N.Y. Times reporter Kate Taylor and 20 former teachers quoted by Taylor —- is an unfortunate consequence of which she disapproves, but an actual “goal” of her pedagogy. On multiple occasions, she has said that it’s good when kids cry, because that means they care… or are being influenced to care about their education through their extreme and demanding pedagogy.
In support of this, Eva keeps bringing up the comparison to Olympic athletes who cry when they perform badly, and lose out on a middle.
No one ever objects to Olympic athletes crying, so what’s the big deal when Success Academy students do?.
Well, the big deal is that, unlike adult athletes, her students are children. Therefore, deliberately inducing states of despair to the point that these states are regularly accompanied by crying is child abuse.
She just said as much at TFA’s 25th anniversary, where they had a module celebrating Success Academy. Here’s Eva’s inability to distinguish between adults performing in the Olympics, and the children learning at her schools.
The NYTimes reporter to whom she refers is Kate Taylor, by the way.
( 1:30:17 – 1:30:45 )
( 1:30:17 – 1:30:45 )
EVA MOSKOWITZ: “It’s frustrating to us that when
a New York Times reporter seeds a kid crying because
the kid didn’t do well, her assumption is that that’s sort
of ‘torture.’ Right? Whereas Olympic athletes, when they
don’t do well, they cry … often. And that’s considered…
’cause they care! They care about their performance in the
sport. Our kids care about their level of growth. They
care about getting as close to the excellence as they can.”
There’s a whole mess of wrong going on at this module:
One of Eva’s principals even says that with
Success Academy Students (as young as
4… i.e. Kinders with late birthdays), the teachers
should place the same demands on them that
a college professor places on university students.
( 1:30:17 – 1:30:45 )
( 1:34:44 – 1:34:44 )
S.A. PRINCIPAL: “Eva likes to talk about how
they’re SMALLER PEOPLE, not just small
children,so you have to respect their intellect, and
everything that you study and plan needs to be done
as if you were in a college classroom.”
It’s hard to respond to something like that, a comment
that is so patently absurd and just plain wrong, particularly
in the early K-1-2 grades
Well, that thinking comes from the top:
———–
“I just watched a one-woman Eva Moskowitz’ horror show… starring Eva herself. It’s her six-minute “Ed Talk” (get it? rhymes with “Ted Talk”) at the 2014 Corporate Reform jamboree called “Camp Philos”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tY719-TpYas
She glowingly tells the story of Sidney — an eighth grade Success Academy student — while projecting her picture on a screen. (Did she get permission?)
“During Common Core testing, Sidney was in a life-threatening battle with sickle-cell anemia. Even at the most severe moment of crisis in her health, Sidney insisted on taking the entirety of that year’s Common Core testing. The adults around argued otherwise, because she had just had her infected spleen taken out that very day, “had lost a lot of weight,” and “was extremely cold and weak.” In the light of this, the principal informed Sidney that she was entitled to claim a “medical excuse” and delay taking the test.
“However, Sidney wouldn’t hear of it, and took the test.
“I want to get a 4,” Sidney replied, with Eva recounting these words with emotion.
Eva’s point?
( 02:10 – 03:03 )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tY719-TpYas
( 02:10 – 03:03 )
“EVA MOSKOWITZ: “Children are incredibly resilient, and I would urge you to think about NOT treating children AS children… I think that we have underestimated in this country the pleasure that comes from achieving mastery, and from performance. In my experience, kids actually want to perform. The want to master. Sidney was a perfect example, even though she was in a life-threatening situation.”
Sweet Lord! What is WRONG with this woman?
“Cue the Supremes:
Indeed, the video Success Academy teacher Charlotte Dial abusing a child is not the “anomaly’ that Eva keeps claiming that it is. It’s a deliberate outgrowth of thinking that is represented in the quotes above.
Indeed, Eva put Charlotte Dial — who has no teaching credential in New York State or any other state, by the way — in charge of training other Success Academy teachers. Making Dial the top trainer of teachers is not just giving Success Academy teachers the “Green Light” permission to do likewise. It’s saying that treating kids the way Charlotte Dial did is actually mandatory.
LikeLike
Watch the video BELOW as Eva lets down her guard a bit, and reveals her hostility towards any type of regulation or oversight, as that is “strangling” her schools — in this case, she smears what she pejoratively describes as the “Special Ed. Compliance Machine,” and the adults who are part of this. She claims that unlike her, those adults don’t really care about the “special ed” children about whom they are supposed to care.
This 25th Anniversary TFA event happened just prior to the Charlotte Dial abuse video, but after the Got-to-Go List controversy.
Eva’s clearly angry about the reports about her schools failing to meet the needs of “Special Ed.” kids, and instead, kicking them out.
In responding to those charges, Eva claims victim status, and insinuates that those critics don’t really care about Special Needs kids,
whereas she, of course, does. To that, she claims that there exists a “Special Ed. Compliance Machine” is “strangling” Success Academy schools.
She wants current policies protecting and looking out for special needs children changed to her liking.
God forbid that should happen. (CAPITAL are mine.)
( 11:02 – 11:50 )
( 11:02 – 11:50 )
EVA MOSKOWITZ: “We think that we’re not really going to make the dream of TFA come true until we change the public policies in this country. And I believe that educators don’t have enough of a voice at the table on those public policies.
“You know, because you’ve been in the classroom, or because you’ve led a school … you know that it’s not just a question of resources. Resources, of course, are helpful. You know it’s about teacher training. It’s about ‘leader training.’
“It’s about not being STRANGLED BY REGULATIONS THAT are really not driven, or ARE NOT REALLY ABOUT CHILDREN. If you take the…
— (sarcastic tone & facial expression, waving her arms)
“the ‘SPECIAL ED. COMPLIANCE MACHINE,’ it’s NOT REALLY ABOUT SERVING THAT SPECIAL NEEDS CHILD, so there’s a lot
of work to do on the educational front… ”
——————-
She just throws that cheap shot out there, but doesn’t elaborate or explain what the-hell she means. She then plays a slick propaganda video for Success Academy.
What exactly is she referring to, anyway?
Eva absolutely despises he fact that school officials are legally required to identify which children have Special Ed. disabilities, and then must provide them with extra, targeted, and yes expensive support– including smaller class sizes, extra classroom aide, an I.E.P. with a team that meets regularly to monitor whether or not the I.E.P. is being implemented.
I know that since the Charlotte Dial abuse video, she’s changed her tune about Success Academy serving all children. Her latest is that for Special Ed. kids, Success Academy is not the place to go, that S.A. cannot be all things to all children.
Well, then don’t call your schools “public schools.”
This whole thing where Eva — to bolster legal action — orders her staff to amass documentation of whatever minute failing on the part of any outside, oversight personnel who visit the school … “and then escalate” … is truly pathetic.
If a member of the DOE’s Committee on Special Education “shows up late, does not act professionally, does not listen, you must document it … and escalate,” the memo reads.
Hey, why stop there? What about if that person has a tie that is crooked? Or body odor?
You’re right, though. Since these interactions are likely not videotaped (maybe they should be), Eva and her ilk can lie, lie, lie all the ding-dong day in court about DOE “Special Ed” compliance officers “not listening” or failing to do their jobs in some manner.
Why doesn’t Eva and Co. use that same energy actually tending to the needs of those students, instead of spending it trying to attack those who are there on campus trying to ascertain if Eva & Co. are fulfilling their legal responsibilities to those students?
LikeLike
If I were one of the NYC DOE’s personnel tasked with visiting Success Academy schools to monitor their treatment of Special Ed. students, and I watched that video (ABOVE) where Eva called me a fraud who doesn’t “really” care about “special ed” students, and that I was not truly or effectively carrying out the work that I had chosen to do in life … I’d be angry, really angry.
As in…
“Excuse me, but who do you think that YOU are in making such a charge? Aren’t YOU in charge of the charter chain where a video was just made public, a video showing one of your so-called ‘model’ teachers is shown viciously abusing a child ?
“Then, in the press conference that followed, you gave an insincere, half-ass apology, then turned that same press conference into a bizarre, paranoid rant — accompanied by pep-rally-style cheering — about being innocent victims of outside persecutors?
“Are YOU REALLY someone who should sit in judgment of MY commitment to the well-being of children? After all, at $600,000/year, you make ten times what I make, and almost double what the NYC Chancellor makes.”
Here’s that press conference, or as I like to call it …
“32 Minutes in Jonestown”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33utMIALM8U
From the ridiculous pep rally-style cheering that accompanies Eva’s entrance… through the entire orchestrated event, a cult expert would have a field day with this, picking out all the red flags. When you consider the video to which Eva & her ilk are responding here — and their defiance to and dismissal of the resulting criticism — this is truly scary stuff.
AND THEY’RE CURRENTLY DEMANDING AND LOBBYING TO BE GIVEN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO OPEN SUCCESS ACADEMY PRE-K CLASSES ???!!!!
Pre-K…. We’re talking 4 year-olds left to the mercy of the Charlotte Dial’s at Success Academy!!!
Unlike the other charter operators who are signing on to cooperation agreements, EVA IS REFUSING TO SIGN ANY CONTRACT THAT GIVES THE CITY Dept, of Ed. ANY OVERSIGHT OF HER PRE-K SCHOOLS, or that demands her schools are in any way even slightly transparent to the people whose taxes will fund these SUCCESS ACADEMY Pre-K classes.
Yeah, I’d want my kid to attend Success Academy Pre-K … NOT!!!
This was bad timing, to be sure.
Here’s the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33utMIALM8U
For a comparison, here’s the doomed Congressman Leo Ryan getting that same cheering from the Jim Jones’ cult followers in Jonestown:
( 00:39 – )
( 00:39 – )
LEO RYAN: “There are people where who think that this is the best thing that ever happened in their whole lives.”
THUNDEROUS CHEERING
———————————–
What some people don’t remember about Jonestown was that Harvey Milk was a huge (and sadly misguided) backer of Jonestown and Jim Jones. Just before his own demise, Milk even attacked the San Francisco media’s detailed exposes of what was going on on Jim Jones’ People’s Temple as … you guessed it … a witch hunt against people who were just trying to do good for the world.
People today have also been played for chumps in a similar fashion by Eva and her PR leviathan.
It’s time for them all to wake up.
LikeLike
See the video at 14:05 where the dad talks about how Success Academy works. I hope the parents who are bringing the lawsuit use this video to demonstrate the very odd “anomalies” that apparently this dad experienced.
When his older daughter was in 3rd grade, they moved to NYC from Florida and enrolled in a public school in Queens where they lived. This dad tells the crowd that one week after enrolling her in her public school, he got a call from his daughter’s teacher recommending that they find a private or gifted and talented school for his daughter because she was so bright because she had nothing to teach her. At the end of 3rd grade she got into Success Academy. First of all, HOW did she get a spot in a Success Academy school? Even today, the Success Academy schools that give priority to Queens residents don’t have any grades older than 2nd grade. So we now know that his daughter was able to get a spot at one of the older Success Academy schools in a district where she didn’t have priority, which makes one question the claims of long wait lists. Not one student in the entire District wanted that spot? Or did she skip the line somehow?
But here is the true kicker: This dad said that Success Academy told him that his daughter would have to repeat 3rd grade if she wanted to enroll. Their standards are so high that a child who is deemed gifted in public school isn’t allowed to join her grade? Say what? What kind of test is this and who decides whether a charter can tell a child she has to repeat a grade or even two — based on a TEST! — if they want to discourage that child’s parents from accepting their spot?
Now you might think that this is just about an ignorant public school teacher who has such low standards that she thinks a kid is “gifted” when Success Academy has judged that child so lacking that she does not even deserve a spot in her rightful grade. That is apparently what the dad thinks — that the Success Academy employee who “judged” his child has some special skill. And yet….
…he then tells us that after the child decided to come anyway and spent some time at Success Academy she skipped TWO years! Not only was she gifted, exactly as her public school teacher recognized, but Success Academy had wrongfully held back a child more than capable of doing grade level work. Why? Who is this untrained pre-enrollment evaluator who has the power to discourage a child from coming by “judging” her as not up to snuff to enter the 4th grade? Why does the story remind me of the “literacy” tests that minority voters were given in the south in which they had to read advanced texts to prove their worth while white folks read a few lines of 1st grade level reading? How could a child who is obviously gifted be judged by Success Academy to be unworthy of accepting her appropriate grade lottery spot before she even spent a week in the school? Do the non-gifted kids who win the 4th grade lottery get told that they have to go back to 1st grade if they want to enroll? Is that how they keep open seats unfilled until they finally get to a lottery winner who can prove they are an advanced learner?
This girl is now in 9th grade – presumably she should only be an 8th grader, since after she was forced to repeat a year she then skipped 2 years. Rather than prove that Success Academy has miraculous teachers who allowed his daughter to skip ahead, the father’s story reveals the way that Success Academy controls who can and cannot come into their school. And this so-called “test” they give to 6, 7 and 8 year olds that judges so many students as unworthy to join their grade is a red flag that instead of trying to teach all kids, they are trying to discourage the struggling ones by telling them they aren’t good enough to even enter Success Academy unless they agree to repeat a year. Or two. Or maybe three. Since no one is looking over their shoulder, the school is free to make whatever decisions they want to discourage a child NOT to take their lottery spot. And the standards they use to judge whether a child is worthy are very, very questionable. As this dad unwittingly proved when he got up and told his story in public.
LikeLike
On the topic of lack of oversight to charter schools, it’s hard to beat this story out of Chicago:
http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/uno-united-neighborhood-organization-charter-schools-chicago-spending-revealed-juan-rangel/
Keep in mind that this is not an aberration in an otherwise sound system. This is a very feature to that system … the enabling of crooks to be crooks… which will continue as charter folks like Eva fight any regulation tooth and nail, throwing up lawsuit after lawsuit from the highest-price-lawyers their ill-gotten taxpayer money can buy.
Given human nature — or more precisely certain individual’s nature — this is what invariably results from de-regulation of public schools: (Notice how hard they fight even Freedom of Information requests… that which one hides is that of which one is ashamed.)
http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/uno-united-neighborhood-organization-charter-schools-chicago-spending-revealed-juan-rangel/
————————————————
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES:
“Even as they ran a network of charter schools for thousands of students in low-income neighborhoods across Chicago, United Neighborhood Organization leader Juan Rangel and other UNO officials were piling up big bills at fancy restaurants and for travel on the taxpayers’ dime, records obtained by the Chicago Sun-Times show.
“In the year before a contracting scandal led to Rangel’s forced resignation, the clout-heavy Hispanic community organization and charter-school operator spent more than $60,000 for restaurants on his American Express ‘business platinum’ card, according to the records, which UNO fought for nearly three years to keep secret.
Promoted Stories from politicsChatter
“Who is Jorge Ramos? 11 things you should know about the veteran Univision newsman
“The spending spree included $1,000-or-higher tabs at Gene & Georgetti, Carmichaels, Vivo Chicago, Rosebud Prime, the East Bank Club, Carnivale, a downtown hotel’s rooftop bar and Soldier Field’s concessions during a soccer game featuring Mexico’s men’s national team.
“And UNO spent more than $60,000 a year on travel in 2010 and 2011, the internal records show. Rangel alone flew out of town 31 times in four years.
PICTURE — CEO of UNO Juan Rangel and Mayor Rahm Emanuel before the mayor announced a new Welcoming Ordinance, at Little Village High School 3120 S. Kostner, which will make Chicago a more immigrant-friendly city. Tuesday July 10, 2012 | Brian Jackson~Sun-Times
“Juan Rangel with Mayor Rahm Emanuel in July 2012. | Sun-Times file photo
“In 2010, Rangel traveled at the organization’s expense to Managua, Nicaragua, the records show. Rangel and two aides, Miguel d’Escoto and Francisco ‘Pancho’ d’Escoto, met during that trip with the d’Escotos’ uncle, a former diplomat advising them on possible expansion.
“Rangel’s and UNO’s fortunes took a downturn after the Sun-Times reported in February 2013 that the organization paid millions of dollars from a $98 million state school-construction grant to companies owned by two brothers of Miguel d’Escoto, who was Rangel’s top deputy, and to other contractors with close ties to the group.
“As federal and state authorities began investigating, the newly obtained records show, UNO officials spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to contain the scandal, which cost the organization millions of dollars in state funding and resulted in a federal consent decree requiring outside oversight of the group’s contracting practices.
“UNO has paid more than $962,000 since the start of 2013 to the firm of Mary Patricia Burns, who became the group’s primary lawyer shortly after the scandal broke.
“Her law firm, Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd., has been a major campaign contributor to Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. The state Democratic Party boss from the Southwest Side sponsored UNO’s state grant — which was the biggest government subsidy given to charter schools in the country. Burns didn’t return calls seeking comment.
“The organization also paid more than $307,000 to retired federal judge Wayne Andersen and others who aided him in an investigation of UNO’s contracting practices.
The spending took place as UNO was operating a government-funded charter schools serving about 8,000 predominantly Hispanic students, largely from low-income families. About 96 percent of students at UNO’s 16 campuses qualify for free or reduced lunches, records show.
“Despite being almost entirely government-funded, UNO leaders fought to keep the spending records secret, arguing that they didn’t have to comply with the state’s Freedom of Information Act because UNO is a private organization. But they ultimately released the records in a recent legal settlement with the Sun-Times.
“Since UNO founded the charter-school chain in 1998, the Chicago Public Schools system has given the privately run schools hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding, in addition to the state funding the organization got for school construction. Until less than a year ago, the UNO Charter School Network — which is separately incorporated — passed along much of the CPS funding to UNO, which managed the schools.
“The charter network cut ties with its former parent organization last year. Before then, it was paying UNO millions of dollars a year for management fees, rent for school buildings owned by the community group and janitorial services.
“The records obtained by the Sun-Times also show that UNO paid:
Victor Reyes, in 2003. Sun-Times file photo
“• More than $600,000 to the Roosevelt Group, a lobbying firm that worked for UNO to get the grant from Springfield in 2009. The Roosevelt Group is headed by onetime Hispanic Democratic Organization leader Victor Reyes and former Madigan aide Mike Noonan.
“• More than $88,000 to Disney Resort Destinations, which hosted UNO employees who traveled to Florida for training.
“• More than $72,000 for board insurance from Mesirow Insurance Services Inc. Mesirow, hired in 2013, has employed the House speaker’s son Andrew Madigan, who made a $2,500 contribution to UNO in November 2012.
“• More than $65,000 to ASGK Public Strategies, a Chicago public-relations firm that helped UNO to respond to the crony contracting scandal.
“• Nearly $150,000 for the grand opening of a new charter school on the Northwest Side in 2012. The cost covered fireworks, a laser-light show and a mariachi band to entertain a crowd that included Mayor Rahm Emanuel and then-Gov. Pat Quinn. UNO spent another $738.40 the next year to fly a son of baseball legend Roberto Clemente from Puerto Rico for an event naming the new school after Clemente.
“• More than $11,600 for 42 buses that brought parents of UNO students to a September 2011 rally at the University of Illinois at Chicago for increased public funding of charter schools. The group also bused parents to demonstrate at City Hall, the Chicago Board of Education and the Thompson Center.
“• $480 at the spa at the luxurious Peninsula Hotel. UNO officials say the organization bought gift cards for staff.
“Rangel said in a written statement that the spending ‘must be put in the right context.
“ ‘Expenses were incurred to advance UNO’s mission and to be a world-class organization that supported our students, our schools and the Hispanic community,’ Rangel said.
“UNO began more than 30 years ago as a Hispanic community group on the Southeast Side but grew to be a major force in politics in all of the city’s fast-growing Hispanic neighborhoods. Rangel forged alliances with politicians including Madigan, former Mayor Richard M. Daley and Ald. Edward Burke (14th). He also served as co-chairman of Emanuel’s first campaign for mayor in 2011.
“Fueling UNO’s growing clout was its entry into the charter business — and the government funding the schools brought. CPS funding to the UNO schools for the 12 months ending last June topped $85 million, out of the charter network’s total revenues of about $91 million, records show.
“In 2014, the charter network paid the parent organization nearly $7.5 million in management fees, about $2.5 million in rent and more than $3 million for janitorial services. Those payments accounted for 87 percent of UNO’s income, records show.
“In Illinois, as in many states, the law allowing for the creation of public financed but privately run charter schools requires them to hold open board meetings and make their records public. But UNO officials argued they didn’t have to open their books, saying the community group was only a contractor working for the charter network and didn’t deal directly with CPS.
“The Sun-Times challenged that stance in 2013, citing UNO’s handling of all management functions for the schools. The newspaper also noted that UNO and the charter network at the time had the same leaders and also shared the same offices and record-keeping system.
Attorney General Lisa Madigan. | Rich Hein / Sun-Times file photo
Attorney General Lisa Madigan. | Rich Hein / Sun-Times file photo
“The Illinois attorney general’s office, which referees Freedom of Information Act disputes, sided with the Sun-Times.
“ ‘For purposes of governing the charter schools, UNO and [its charter network] are inextricably intertwined and act as the same entity,’ Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan wrote in July 2013, ordering UNO to turn over the financial records.
“UNO challenged the attorney general’s ‘binding opinion’ in Cook County circuit court. A judge upheld the attorney general’s decision in February 2015, but UNO appealed.
“Under new leadership, UNO eventually settled the case, providing the news organization with all of the previously disputed documents.
“Those records detail how the organization’s leaders enjoyed perks that many of the working-class families served by the charter schools could only imagine.
“Rangel — whose annual salary was $275,000 — and other UNO executives were regulars at some of the city’s most upscale restaurants. In 2012 and 2013, they incurred nearly 600 charges for meals, totaling more than $80,000.
“The single biggest tab was on Aug. 15, 2012, for $2,387.81 at Roof, on the 27th floor of the Wit Hotel downtown.
“There was also a $2,328 bill on March 13, 2012, at the East Bank Club, where UNO held meetings of its Metropolitan Leadership Institute for young Latino professionals.
“Another big night was at Carnivale, where Rangel charged $1,867.13 in October 2012. UNO officials say the event was a celebration for staff and board members with October birthdays.
“The largest single vendor among restaurants was Tio Luis Tacos on Archer Avenue on the Southwest Side. UNO spent more than $12,000 there in 2012 and 2013 for ‘community outreach events, staff meetings and board meetings.’
“Rangel also used his UNO credit card to pay hundreds of dollars on concessions at Toyota Park in Bridgeview during Chicago Fire soccer matches. He said UNO ‘expressed its appreciation’ to teachers, staff and parent volunteers at the soccer games and other events.
“UNO’s travel spending eclipsed the in-town dining bills. The organization spent more than $68,000 on travel costs in 2011 and about $63,000 in 2010.
“Records show Rangel’s travels included 10 trips to Washington, D.C., seven to New York, three to New Orleans, two to Boston and one each to Memphis and San Francisco. UNO officials said their records indicate outside organizations paid for only a few of those trips.
PICTURE — Cuauhtemoc Blanco waves to fans at the Azteca stadium in Mexico City on March 5. AFP / Getty Images
“UNO paid for Rangel to fly to Mexico in 2010 and China in 2012. Organization officials said Rangel visited soccer academies operated by former Chicago Fire star Cuauhtemoc Blanco and the Pachuca professional club. He and three other UNO leaders accompanied students who made a trip to Beijing and Shanghai, according to the group’s records.
“ ‘I and others at UNO sought out partnerships to bring additional resources and funding from a number of organizations and institutions in New York, Washington, D.C., and many other cities and countries,’ Rangel said.
“Twenty of the organization’s employees, including Rangel, flew to Orlando in April 2012. The costs for those plane tickets totaled more than $8,400. That was in addition to the costs for the training sessions at the Magic Kingdom and a Disney event here.
“ ‘UNO always sought out the best training for its staff, including the Disney Institute, to make sure that our students got the best education experience that the Hispanic community deserves,’ Rangel said.
“Besides the trip to Nicaragua with Rangel and his cousin Francisco d’Escoto, Miguel d’Escoto made two more trips at UNO’s expense to the Central American country in 2010. His uncle Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann is a Catholic priest who was president of the United Nations General Assembly in 2008 and 2009 and previously was Nicaragua’s foreign minister.
“Miguel D’Escoto said he and Rangel met with his uncle to try to form a group that could provide education ‘in areas or conditions of crisis.’
“Miguel d’Escoto quit his $200,000-a-year post at UNO eight days after the first of the Sun-Times’ reports on the group’s spending were published.
“Andersen, the retired judge, was then hired by UNO at a rate of $800 an hour — altogether being paid more than $59,000.
“UNO also paid for two lawyers ($148,264.62), a real-estate development expert ($60,182.50) and a licensed private investigator ($8,667.50) to aid Andersen.
“After Rangel promised to institute reforms suggested by Andersen, state officials lifted a suspension of UNO’s grant in June 2013. But the state funding was frozen again after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission launched a probe that resulted in civil fraud charges against UNO. In June 2014, the group settled the charges, which accused UNO of misleading bond investors about the insider deals.
“In the end, the scandal cost UNO $15 million of the promised $98 million state grant.
“UNO had paid $604,500 to the Roosevelt Group lobbyists between December 2006 and August 2013, records show.
“The lobbyists at first charged UNO $3,000 a month, raising that to $7,500 in June 2009 — when the Illinois General Assembly approved the grant for new school buildings.
” ‘The Roosevelt Group billed an extra $25,000 the day after the law approving the grant took effect. That was for “consulting services for charter capital campaign.’ There also was a $110,000 “additional payment” to the lobbyists in July 2010, six weeks after the state wired the first payment from the grant, for $25 million.
“In a resignation letter in October 2013, Reyes wrote to Rangel that the two large, additional payments to the Roosevelt Group were to compensate his firm for having given UNO a discount during the early years of their dealings.
“Noonan declined to comment.
“Rangel, now 50, resigned under fire in December 2013 and was given a severance payout of $206,250. He had started at UNO in 1992, becoming CEO in 1996.
“The board of the UNO Charter School Network declined to extend its management deal with the parent organization, which ended last June. In November, UNO officials said the organization was “on the brink of insolvency.”
“UNO – Explainer
“Key dates in UNO schools saga
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
“1998 — United Neighborhood Organization opens its first government-funded charter school.
“2005 — The group begins expansion that eventually has it operating 16 schools across the city of Chicago.
“2009 — Spearheaded by House Speaker Michael Madigan, the Illinois Legislature approves a $98 million school-construction grant for UNO schools — a record public subsidy to charter schools.
“2011 — UNO CEO Juan Rangel co-chairs Rahm Emanuel’s first campaign for mayor.
“Feb. 4, 2013 — First stories in Sun-Times investigation expose how contractors with insider ties are profiting from the state grant — including companies owned by two brothers of top Rangel aide Miguel d’Escoto that were paid millions of dollars.
“Feb. 12, 2013 — D’Escoto resigns under pressure from $200,000-a-year post.
“October 2013 — Gov. Pat Quinn’s administration cuts off remaining $15 million in funding from $98 million state grant.
“June 3, 2014 — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission files and immediately settles civil charges against UNO, accusing it of defrauding bond investors. UNO promises never again to hand out insider deals and agrees to oversight by a federal monitor.
“July 14, 2015 — Sun-Times reports Rangel got secret $206,250 severance payout.”
LikeLike