Howard Blume reports today that the achievement gaps among children of different groups widened on the Smarter Balanced Assessment tests whose results were just reported.
The tests are “harder,” “more rigorous,” and so the students who already had low scores have even lower scores.
This is akin to raising the bar in a track event from 4 feet to 6 feet. Those who couldn’t clear the 4 foot bar will certainly not clear the higher bar.
If anyone remembers, we were told repeatedly that the Common Core would close achievement gaps between whites/Asians and Blacks/Hispanics, and between upper income/low income students.
It hasn’t, and it won’t.
The tests were designed to fail a majority of students of every group. Here are the cut scores for the SBAC tests. The developers predicted mass failures last fall.
Let’s just say that the Common Core and the tests aligned to them are a disaster for American education. Kids don’t necessarily try harder when they fail again and again. They may give up.
Many people suspect that the purpose of all this manufactured failure is to make parents eager for charter schools and vouchers. They may be right.
Blume writes:
“This is going to show the real achievement gap,” said Chris Minnich, executive director of the Council of Chief State School Officers. “We are asking more out of our kids and I think that’s a good thing.”
At the same time, he added, “there’s no question that when we raised the bar for students that we’re going to have to support our lower-achieving students even more so than we are now.”
Although scores declined for all students, blacks and Latinos saw significantly greater drops than whites and Asians, widening the already large gap that was evident in results from earlier years, according to a Times analysis.
Under the previous test, last given to public school students two years ago, the gap separating Asian and black students was 35 percentage points in English. The gap increased to 44 percentage points under the new test. Asian students’ results dropped the least on the new tests, which widened the gap between them and those who are white, black or Latino, the analysis showed.
White students also maintained higher relative scores than their black and Latino peers.
A similar pattern occurred with students from low-income families. Their scores in math, for example, declined at a steeper rate (51%) than those of students from more affluent backgrounds (16%). In the last decade, all ethnic groups made significant academic gains compared to where their scores started. But the gap separating the scores of blacks and Latinos from whites and Asians changed little….
In that subject, 69% of Asian students achieved the state targets compared to 49% of whites, 21% of Latinos and 16% of blacks.
Although even Asian students have room to improve, their relative performance stood out. In math, the percentage of Asians who met state targets declined 12%. White students went down 21%, Latinos 50%, black students 54%. More than half the students who took the test were Latino.
The future of California, Lucia said, will depend on students of color graduating from schools with the skills they need to succeed in college and careers.
A top-performing school district was San Marino Unified, which is located in a mostly high-income area and enrolls 56% Asian students; 84% of students met state learning goals in both English and math.
L.A. Unified, which enrolls a majority of low-income, minority students, fared much worse overall. Achievement gaps widened less in L.A. Unified than in the state as a whole but that’s largely because its white and Asian students declined more, according to the analysis.
In L.A. Unified, 67% of Asian students met state targets in English, compared to 61% of white students, 27% of Latinos and 24% of black students.
What is is that these “experts” don’t get? Weathlier districts test results surpass those with high poverty rates. Pay workers a living wage, adequate housing, health care and then discuss test results.
The LA Times telegraphed their punches when they bragged recently that they are in full support of Eli Broad and John Deasy, in the goal of turning at least another 50% of LAUSD public schools into charters, and doing it rapidly. Austin Beutner, the fired and disgraced publisher, only a few weeks ago wrote a full page diatribe to this end. And each day in the past month, they have published soft ed news always showing poor public school outcomes, but superior charter outcomes. One does not have to be a policy wonk, such as I, to understand this is pure ‘moneyspeak’ to influence lazy readers who skim this yellow journalism for their only source of information.
No one at the Times mentions that it is mainly the Black and Brown students who go to bed hungry and only get fed mainly with their free lunches at school. No one mentions that their parents are generally not available to partner with the school in support of these children.
It should not be surprising to surmise that the CC tests are being used to defame these inner city students (and their teachers), torch their self respect, by showing that White and Asian students can be/are “college ready” while Brown and Black students cannot rise to that level.
It is sheer sophistry, cow plops, and a disgrace to demean children and make them feel hopeless and lost in the system. And it is surely a carefully orchestrated plan by the ‘Broadies’ to say to the world, we MUST have all charter schools to overcome these failures.
No one ever mentions real diversity of educational opportunities, such as vocational education for the vast amount of youth who do not aim for college. A college degree does not guarantee a job. A fanciful college degree such one in interior design, acting, art history, and other non technical or non scientific and academic pursuits definitely leaves little chance in the job market even with a BA clutched in by college grads in their sweaty palms. And all this after they are convinced to take out massive student loans which cannot be released even in bankruptcy.
So, being realistic, how many of America’s students have the aptitude to be Medical Doctors, nuclear scientists, highly trained lawyers from Yale and U. of Chicago, etc….and how many could, with good vocational education become outstanding auto mechanics and earn a very good living?
The whole new world of the billionaires Wall Street free market fantasy is destroying education at all levels.
Ellen,
“It is sheer sophistry, cow plops, and a disgrace to demean children and make them feel hopeless and lost in the system.”
I would like to change one phrase, if I may, to make your statement a little more ‘strident’.
Cow plops might be misinterpreted to mean something to the effect of “the cow plops on the fainting couch after reading and MMoOO*ing over such jibberish as this LA Times article”.
I think this more fully says what you intend:
“It is sheer sophistry, bullshit, and a disgrace to demean children and make them feel hopeless and lost in the system.”
*Mental Masturbation or Obligatory Onanism
P.S. Thanks for being that “policy wonk”! We need more of you!
Yes! As far as raising the bar for students, I love it! At least in the school I used to work for, there weren’t many resources to support the students! Students were “tiered” based on test scores and we were expected to teach test standards to the kids. The problem was that our lowest “tier” of kids in an algebra 2 course were really supposed to learn Pre-algebra. I taught the kids algebra 2 (and of course remediated, scaffolded, differentiated, etc) and was told to water down the course for higher student pass rates. I refused. Well, this group of kids increased their test scores! I didn’t teach to the test and I taught a (modified) curriculum. Where am I going with this? If the school I’m describing had more funds for staff, these students could have had a separate lab course to help the students learn actual Algebra 2 course material. Also, many districts split algebra 2 over 2 years, but we were told this was a disservice because the kids’ transcripts wouldn’t “appear” rigorous enough.
I didn’t sign up to teach to make things look great! I taught to make a difference and expose students, AND hold them to high standards that they were willing to achieve. I wish I had more support (like described above), but I did the best I could.
We need more resources (yeah, I know, I know, there’s no money…blah blah), but I bet these “test scores” would increase if more resources were provided to schools! Of course struggling inner city schools may need different resources than an affluent school in the ‘burbs (counseling, homeless families advocates, tutoring, different schedules to accommodate the varying learners, etc. etc. etc).
Of course there’s much more than what’s described above, but it’s there as a start. It’s clear education is not our country’s priority. This needs to change.
I agree that more support is needed but increases in funds at school are too often eaten up on administrative positions instead of classroom teacher positions. Teachers need to be qualified to teach the subject, PE teachers or elementary teachers teaching math, upper level math and English is not going to improve student learning. You would be surprised at how many teachers are teaching out of their subject area. Yes, in California that’s a violation of the Williams consent case but it’s done all the time and teachers are afraid to report it. I did and ended up with that being used against me in teacher jail. Parents have to be diligent in monitoring where their child is placed at schools or they will not learn anything.
And poor kids will sink further if common core means teaching test prep instead of a knowledge rich curriculum.
So true that’s why parents should opt out of these tests, now.
YES, indeed. Parents need to OPT OUT their children for their children’s safety and well-being.
The achievement gap did not widen. The teaching did not get worse. The results gap widened because what the test was measuring changed. What did not change was the condition of children’s lives nor did the inequitable funding of schools nor the racial and socio-economic isolation that contribute the most to unevenness of achievement.
http://www.arthurcamins.com
This.
The achievement gap widened, figuratively speaking. The figures being test data.
“. . . what the test was measuring changed.”
No it didn’t because those tests never ‘measured’ anything to begin with.
Chris Minnich, executive director of the Council of Chief State School Officers. “We are asking more out of our kids and I think that’s a good thing.”
At the same time, he added, “there’s no question that when we raised the bar for students that we’re going to have to support our lower-achieving students even more so than we are now.”
Chris Minnich and the CCSSO have no credibility as spokespersons for what “our kids” need, and his use of “we” assumes that he and the CCSSO not only have superior wisdom about education but also the resources to support students. Wrong. Wrong.
The opt out movement is one of the most inspired ways to get rid of the pathetically warped concept of achievement foisted on public education for almost two decades by the CCSSO, together with Achieve, the National Governors Association, USDE and importantly Bill Gates. We are sick of language about raising the bar, racing to the top, the need for more “rigor” in this and that and whatever, in addition to “impacting” our students with “breakthrough results.”
Here is a thought experiment. Suppose there was no achievement gap of the kind documented in scores on standardized tests.
The idea of an “achievement gap” can be sustained only if you are committed to the principle that education should first and foremost be a scheme for sorting kids by merit as defined by testing companies. You must then promote, aggrandize, and dole out praise to the deserving, the worthies, the kids with the right stuff, the upper crusters, the 11% who can, for example, score high on the SBAC tests. They are, after all, essential players in creating the gap phenomenon. Should we then just dismiss the other kids as loosers, Donald Trump style? Then tap the winners–the top drawer kids–to forge a meritocracy? What does Chis Minnich propose as “resources” sufficient to support lower achieveing students? Surely he has heard that throwing more money at schools won’t improve them.
Does the achievement gap matter if we don’t feel the need to measure and weigh everything? People can achieve with or without standardized tests, and they can also fail with or without them.
With all the measuring, what are we really willing to do about it? We have tried the blaming, shaming and closing of schools. We have tried charters which only work for a few at the top under ideal circumstances. When you factor in all the waste, fraud, loss of democracy, and destruction associated with charters, you have to ask, is this worth the price? If higher test scores are a national goal, show me that there’s an end goal that will improve opportunity for most Americans. Or maybe as Marion suggests above, pay people a living wage, and the scores will improve on their own, since we know scores correlate with income.
Here’s a link from Krashen in which he asks,” Are harder tests better?”http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2015/09/the-new-tests-are-harder-but-are-they.html
We should all be thankful for Steve Krashen. He is respected enough for event he yellow LA Times to print his letters to the editor.
“With all the measuring, what are we really willing to do about it?”
Those tests ‘measure’ nothing!
“Chris Minnich, executive director of the Council of Chief State School Officers.”
I read that at first as “Chris Minnion, blah blah blah.”
And I apologize to all minions reading this blog for misinterpreting, and by the subtle subconscious rendering of minions as less than feeble minded by associating them with the ‘Executive Director’ of the Council of Chief State School Officers. (Can anyone tell me which state is the ‘Chief State’? Did they mean ‘Chef State’ or ‘Cheese State’?)
I think a better argument against SBAC is that the test is not a reliable measure of mathematical knowledge. If it doesn’t measure what it’s supposed to measure, then why all the fuss about the cut scores?
Steve Rasmussen, formerly of Key Curriculum Press, wrote a widely-shared essay about six months ago about the mathematical flaws in SBAC. Many others have also commented on the poorly-worded questions and odd scoring rubrics. Even more damning is that it’s likely a test of computer skills—and working computer equipment!—instead of a test of math knowledge and skills.
There’s a risk that criticizing the passing rates of SBAC will backfire, as it makes the general public think (a) the test is valid, and (b) critics don’t want high standards. Keep in mind that no outside researcher has been able to study the test data yet. There’s a high probability all the odd keyboarding and mouse tricks that students had to master just to answer the questions make the results invalid. That would favor students who practiced in advance (notably Charter schools with teach-to-the-test pedagogies) and it would favor students who are most experienced with computers (i.e., from wealthier populations).
D L Paulson: you reminded me of…
Daniel Koretz, MEASURING UP: WHAT EDUCATIONAL TESTING REALLY TELLS US (2009, paperback edition, p. 221):
[start]
The converse of construct underrepresentation is measuring something unwanted. This goes by the yet uglier term construct-irrelevance variance. The reference here is to the performance of examinees: there is variation in their performance that is irrelevant to the construct intended. This unwanted variance can have any number of sources. The tasks in a test may call for skills unrelated to the construct; they may require unrelated background information that some students lack; irrelevant factors may influence scorers; administrative conditions may affect some students differently than others; and so on. In each of these cases, some students do better or worse because of factors that are unrelated to the construct we think we are measuring.
[end]
CIV. A fact of life, and testing, that the shills and trolls of the education establishment aka rheephormsters that visit this blog cannot bring themselves to even admit exist. Just one more nail in the coffin of the High Holy Church of Testolatry.
But I don’t expect them to abandon their faith in massaged and tortured numbers & stats that mislead because they are meant to be misused in labeling, sorting and stack ranking.
After all, as Dorothy Parker put it:
“You can’t teach an old dogma new tricks.”
😎
“. . . is measuring something unwanted.”
I’ll forgive KTA for using the ‘measuring’ concept since he is obviously refuting that the concept is epistemologically and ontologically sound
“Even more damning is that it’s likely a test of computer skills—and working computer equipment!—instead of a test of math knowledge and skills.”
Actually it’s worse than that according to Rasmussen’s detailed report on sample math questions for various levels (great resource, thanks!). Half of the report relates to the poorly-designed graphic tools students are to use for answering these questions. Computer skills will be of little use here. Every graphic interface for every question appears to be alternately clumsy, inscrutable, counterintuitive, or even actively falsifying correct answers & vice verse!
He describes one, the Connect-Line tool (from a 3rd-gr question) as a “‘Frankenstein’ drawing interface assembled thoughtlessly and arbitrarily from body parts of other drawing software programs”, with an unlabelled un-do process inaccessible to anyone but an adult with 5 mins of trial&error to spare (so forget trying to redraw a segment your 8y.o. finger messed up).
Thanks for making this crucial point, Beth.
“. . . the test is not a reliable measure of mathematical knowledge. If it doesn’t measure what it’s supposed to measure. . .”
More ‘measuring’ talk! The test doesn’t measure anything. Testing as an epistemological and ontological concept is thoroughly bankrupt.
I wonder how the deformer frauds would explain the fact that the United States is ranked 4th or 5th for the ratio to population of college graduates in the world and about only a third of those graduates actually land jobs that require a college education.
It is university accepted around the planet that the United States has the best, highest quality college education system in the world. No matter who comes up with a list that ranks and compares colleges, even the Chiense Communist Pasty, the U.S. comes out on top repeatedly explaining why so many of China’s Communist leaders are sending their children to colleges in the U.S. —- even the current president of China.
How can a country with the alleged worst public schools, according to the deformer frauds, have the best college education system in the world? One does not lead to the other.
Exactly !!!
Great point! How could so many of the students attending these respected schools come from our “failed” public education systems?
Let’s make sure we analyze this statement carefully: common core tests widen achievement gaps. This fallacy needs to stop. Tests MEASURE achievement gaps by whatever methodology set forth by the test producer. They can set it anywhere they choose….these tests have not been shown reliable measures for anything by any reputable analyst yet anyway.
If people want better education for underserved populations, want to “close achievement gaps,” the goals of those individual communities and families must also change. Money can’t solve the problem because the problem is so much bigger than money.
“Tests MEASURE achievement gaps by whatever methodology set forth by the test producer.”
NO!, they don’t MEASURE anything no matter what the methodology used. These standardized tests are not ‘measuring devices’ by any stretch of the meaning.
(but you are correct in picking up on the fact that the post title is not worded well at all).
If you read “The Bell Curve” like I did years ago by Bernstein and Murray, then you aren’t surprised by these results. Just look at the AP test results broken down by race. You can’t “teach” someone to get a high I.Q. That is a liberal, utopian dream. It will never, ever happen. You will never have all people, or all groups of people scoring the same on tests. There is something called inherent, genetic I.Q., whether you want to believe it or not. Everyone has their own genetic limitations in sports or academics. I might be smarter than 95% of people (this isn’t hard to do in America), but I have met geniuses that make me look absolutely stupid. Geniuses can emerge in any racial group, but we are talking about average scores compared to average scores in other groups. Some groups seem to have a higher I.Q. than others. Asians and Ashkenazi Jews are way above the rest (on average), so this isn’t a white superiority thing. No matter what you think, the results will continue to be what they are. Some groups have more members with higher I.Q. than others and vice versa. Harvard and UCLA will have to keep limiting Asians to 30%. Why is that? Is that fair? Should they be blamed for having a higher genetic I.Q. and a real work ethic? These will be realities that we will have to deal with in the future.
IQ is not the only way to be successful.
EXACTLY! My background was with creative types – artists and designers.
Charters are tools for the profiteering of the social agenda which includes segregation. Some are created to spawn little militia – like those in Nashville and Rocketship, etc. Others are created to appear the same but scatter the kids to confuse the “community” to take the TARGET land for developing and prospering. It’s done by first getting those targeted in the agenda to submit to providing lots of DATA.
About data and social engineering, although these are “lite” versions as they both fail to say this IS what is happening now and not as much state sponsored as Billionaire Boy Club Sponsored
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2015/08/18/manipulation-of-personal-data-is-a-bigger-danger-than-info-theft-in-opm-cyber-heist/
This one is really subversive in that it sublimely promotes the public/private sector deals that have been leading us down the path of profitizing everything that once was public.
“Cybersecurity needs to become more of a priority for the government and private corporations. Whatever the solution, public and private officials need to do a better job of weighing the risk-benefit calculation of storing data on Internet-accessible computers and justifying data-handling protocols. Otherwise, continued breaches of databases containing sensitive personal information could very well lead to more strident public demands for a change in the status quo.”
http://www.rand.org/blog/2015/09/is-it-time-to-appoint-a-data-security-czar.html
This article about what happens when you deplete neighborhood schools of neighborhood children.
“Some school choice advocates say that a good school is enough to change a child’s trajectory, but Salcido said she thinks that resources must extend into the community because “schools alone cannot do it.”
“It’s important to go outside and really understand what our kids are facing because those things don’t go away,” she said. Expanding school choice has created hope for many families, she said, but it’s time to examine its effect on neighborhoods that used to revolve around a central school.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/school-choice-complicates-fulfillment-of-promise-neighborhood/2015/09/12/79ffa702-4286-11e5-8e7d-9c033e6745d8_story.html
**About CA test results for Common Core doing opposite of what was promised – Common Core widens the achievement gap between whites/asian and black/latino.
https://dianeravitch.net/2015/09/12/california-common-core-tests-widen-the-achievement-gaps/
The trifecta. The social engineering is segregating the rich/middle/poor by race and intelligence. The data is driving this program and it’s working great for developers who are owned by the Billionaire Boys Club. Like aging, it is happening over time so it goes undetected.
First, scatter the low income and people of color, so they are not aware of what is happening in their own neighborhoods – busy with Charters in every direction. This depletes the public school population so it can turn into a profit based charter.
Meanwhile, where a Charter might eek out some success – the target LAND, area developer money flows in. Remember, “community” has been deconstructed via Charters with kids from everywhere, so sense of “community” is quite fractured.
Bingo – TARGET LAND for new development. Once it’s built and advertised with the successful Charter, more middle class and less colorful people will move in. Once that happens, the scales will be tipped and the Charter School in that area will only be permitting kids from that neighborhood.
Here’s a piece: 3 Qualities More Important Than IQ for Success
1. Self regulation – The ability to manage your behaviors consistently reflects your values and goals.
2. Empathy (something totally lacking in psychopaths with high IQ’s and most if not all of the corporate education deformers are psychopaths and frauds)
3. Grit (to be clear, I don’t think Grit comes from tests and/or scripted lessons — in other words, Grit can’t be artificially inseminated because the Common Core Crap mandates it) is resilience when faced with adversity either physically and psychologically. It’s a trait synonymous with the “Growth Mindset.”
http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/242173
You need to round out your reading with Stephen Jay Gould’s “The Mismeasure of Man” — and be certain to get the 1996 revised edition where he directly addresses “The Bell Curve” and the fact they ignored all of the research and evidence he had already compiled back in 1991.
This is not to say that IQ as measured by intelligence testing is not different across groups, but it is certainly to say that to attribute that to immutable factors is a load of bunk. And we’ve known it is bunk for quite some time.
“This is not to say that IQ as measured by intelligence testing is not different across groups. . . ”
That nebulous concept that is IQ is not ‘measured’ by any intelligence test. Part of the process numerizes/quantifies the supposed amount of IQ a person has but it does not ‘measure’ it. It’s an assessment and a piss poor one at that due to the inherent epistemological and ontological shortcomings of the concept of IQ.
Properly said. My meaning is that the test is there — it produces results that differ. But any inference of immutable qualities from those results is rubbish.
“IQ Buckets”
We’re really just a bucket
To hold our I’s and Q’s
And some of us just struck it
While others sing the blues
That’s a good one, SomeDAMPoet!!!
Please consider reading our book online for free. It explains in detail the multiple weapons being used against our public schools… against ourselves… http://weaponsofmassdeception.org/ These same elite want monopolies in our media, our food supply, our weapons manufacturers, our banks. Same games now being done to our schools. Making commodities of all they can.
So if you want a baby to learn to walk “better” do you trip her/him every time s/he makes an attempt to walk? Or maybe you should force her/his hands down and mechanically swing them back and forth. Perhaps you should correct the flat footed march that is their first approximation. Common sense tells most people that time, practice, and maturity will produce fine walkers without our trying to micromanage the process. Yes, I have oversimplified, but I don’t think that makes the metaphor any less useful.
No, you haven’t oversimplified 2o2t, that’s a great common sense analogy!
I toyed with whether to call it an analogy or a metaphor since it is both. I don’t know why I chose metaphor since I was really trying to emphasize a comparison.
No matter what it’s called it’s an excellent comparison! I also hesitated as I’m not sure exactly what the difference is. Here’s a couple of explanations or perhaps confusions-ha ha!
Briefly, analogy is a perceived likeness between two entities; metaphor is one “figure of speech” which you might use to communicate that likeness.
and
Analogy
If you are trying to show how two things are similar or dissimilar, a figure of speech may not have the desired effect. It is better to draw an analogy with something that is already known to the reader or the audience to make it palatable or understood easily. Analogy is derived from a Greek word analogia that means proportion. The use of analogy cleverly draws a parallel between two things and another set of two things. Analogy is made use of heavily by teachers as it allows them to make students understand a concept. Sun is to day is what moon is to night is an analogy. This analogy tries to draw a relationship between sun and moon in terms of their ability to provide light.
Metaphor
A metaphor is a figure of speech that draws direct comparison between two things to praise or ridicule. Veins are highways for blood cells. This sentence uses a metaphor highway to describe the importance of veins for blood cells. Another example would be- A book is a food for thought. In both these examples one can see that veins cannot be a road or a highway, and a book cannot be food in any circumstances. However, the use of such metaphors serves the purpose well in stressing the point author or speaker is trying to make.
What is the difference between Metaphor and Analogy?
• A metaphor is a direct comparison of two totally different things whereas an analogy is comparing two things with a set of another two things
• Analogy is used to demonstrate how two things are similar while metaphor is used to get your point across in a more emphatic manner
• Metaphor is final and there is no need for any more explanation whereas analogy makes use of another set to make things clear.
You Pick!!
“What is the difference between Metaphor and Analogy?”
In other words, depending on the intention, maybe not much.
Yeah, I’m still pretty much not sure exactly what each is nor how to identify each-hard to gauge intentions.
“When I use a word like “achievement gap’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which test is to be master — that’s all.”
Happy New Year
wishimg you
Dr. Joseph Dalin
Mercedes Schneider’s post earlier this week described how the CA SBAC results measured… basically nothing except the relative wealth of the parents. https://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2015/09/10/californias-smarter-balanced-results-capture-poverty/
So in the end the SBAC tests, like the standardized achievement tests used in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, and the myriad state tests introduced since the implementation of NCLB all prove the same fact: children raised in affluence outperform children raised in poverty. Do you think that politicians and the public would therefore conclude that POVERTY might be a contributing factor? After five decades I think the evidence is compelling… but since it requires us to all spend more money we are unlikely to have any politicians draw that conclusion, obvious as it is.
Not only spend more money, but give some of it to poor people and schools with many poor students. As a society, we seem to have no problem spending money on testing companies, educational consultants, and so on.
“. . . the CA SBAC results measured… basically nothing except the relative wealth of the parents.”
And the result didn’t and can’t ‘measure’ anything, they are results not measuring devices. The results DO CORRELATE, and that’s all, to relative wealth of the parents”.
Agreed! But giving directly does not fit the social engineering agenda that is Data Driven to TARGET communities.
Although these first two links are “lite” versions as they both fail to say this IS what is happening NOW and I believe not so much state sponsored as Billionaire Club Sponsored
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2015/08/18/manipulation-of-personal-data-is-a-bigger-danger-than-info-theft-in-opm-cyber-heist/
This one is really subversive in that it sublimely promotes the public/private sector deals that have been leading us down the path of profitizing everything that once was public.
“Cybersecurity needs to become more of a priority for the government and private corporations. Whatever the solution, public and private officials need to do a better job of weighing the risk-benefit calculation of storing data on Internet-accessible computers and justifying data-handling protocols. Otherwise, continued breaches of databases containing sensitive personal information could very well lead to more strident public demands for a change in the status quo.”
http://www.rand.org/blog/2015/09/is-it-time-to-appoint-a-data-security-czar.html
This article about what happens when you deplete neighborhood schools of neighborhood children.
“Some school choice advocates say that a good school is enough to change a child’s trajectory, but Salcido said she thinks that resources must extend into the community because “schools alone cannot do it.”
“It’s important to go outside and really understand what our kids are facing because those things don’t go away,” she said. Expanding school choice has created hope for many families, she said, but it’s time to examine its effect on neighborhoods that used to revolve around a central school.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/school-choice-complicates-fulfillment-of-promise-neighborhood/2015/09/12/79ffa702-4286-11e5-8e7d-9c033e6745d8_story.html
**About CA test results for Common Core doing opposite of what was promised – Common Core widens the achievement gap between whites/asian and black/latino.
https://dianeravitch.net/2015/09/12/california-common-core-tests-widen-the-achievement-gaps/
The trifecta. The social engineering is segregating the rich/middle/poor by race and intelligence. The data is driving this program and it’s working great for developers who are owned by the Billionaire Boys Club. Like aging, it is happening over time so it goes undetected.
First, scatter the low income and people of color, so they are not aware of what is happening in their own neighborhoods – busy with Charters in every direction. This depletes the public school population so it can turn into a profit based charter.
Meanwhile, where a Charter might eek out some success – the target LAND, area developer money flows in. Remember, “community” has been deconstructed via Charters with kids from everywhere, so sense of “community” is quite fractured.
Bingo – TARGET LAND for new development. Once it’s built and advertised with the successful Charter, more middle class and less colorful people will move in. Once that happens, the scales will be tipped and the Charter School in that area will only be permitting kids from that neighborhood.
Brilliant assessment Clarity…it happened with developers in the South Side of Chicago…and Rahm’s 50 school closings. It is all about money and profits…and In LAUSD, if the district is forced into bankruptcy with half of the students (of the over 650,000 now registered) in publicly supported, privately run, charters, all the most valuable LAND in the nation will be gobbled up by the developers…and leading this charge is Eli Broad.
This boondoggle for the wealthiest among us truly boggles the mind. What other market endeavor has the business funded in perpetuity by the public, with no investment costs by the profiteers???
Diane, first achievement gaps didn’t “widen”. These gaps were already there and it’s just now that the true gap is being reported. Just because there was an easier test previously that compressed these gaps doesn’t mean the gap changed in the last few years.
The goal shouldn’t be necessarily to “close” gaps. It should be to raise the scores of each child. There are gaps between groups within races as well. There are gaps between high aptitude whites and low aptitude whites. This can be seen in the difference in scores among rich whites and poor whites. We will never “close” that gap. We can help both achieve more.
VAMs are particularly revealing in this context. As most know, VAMs measure the year-over-year growth among similar kids. But let’s see how “similar kids” affects the actual calculation. Let’s say a high-performing kid gets a baseline raw score of 800 pts on a test. The low-performing kid gets a baseline raw score of 700 pts on that same test. Let’s further say the low-performing kids gets a middle growth score by increasing his raw score from 700 -> 800 (an SGP of 45% to 55% roughly). In order for the high-achieving kid to get a similar growth score, he will have to improve his raw score by more than 100 points. Yes, the high-achieving kid can learn MORE in a given year thus he must learn more to generate an average growth. By definition, this is expanding the gap between these two kids.
You will hear some propaganda about a whole bunch of goals. There may be some ways to lower the achievement gap by improving the instruction to kids who are receiving poor instruction now. But when you raise standards, this will not by default lower the achievement gap. If we raise all kids scores, that will be success. The only way to close the Hispanic achievement gap is to stop letting the lowest aptitude immigrants determine our immigration policy and enact an immigration policy similar to every other advanced country in the world – one based on skills and talent, not on willingness to break laws by jumping across the border.
(Yawn).
Exit link right.
http://blog.4president.us/2016/donald-trump/
Akademos, you see, this is why the teaching community scares me so much. You claim you want to teach “critical thinking” and “analysis” skills. But yet you possess none of either.
Trump wants to 1) restrict trade, 2) lower immigration both legal and illegal and is 3) pro-union.
I, on the other hand:
1) Want to encourage free trade since it is the greatest poverty alleviation action in the history of the world. It generates positive benefits for both sides and we stand to benefit as we sell high-value goods to growing economies in India, China, Brazil, Turkey, etc.
2. I want to double legal immigration once we convert to a skills-based system like every other developed country. Asian immigrants have higher incomes in all generations than native-born Americans and they start businesses (new jobs) at a higher rate as well. These Asian immigrants represent the typical talented immigrant we want to attract. I do not believe they hurt high-tech wages. In fact, doubling skilled immigration (from 1M/yr to 2M/yr) would completely fix SS and Medicare imbalances.
3. I think unions, for the most part, artificially restrict labor supply and lead to the acceleration of automation against their workers interests.
If you can’t distinguish such major policy differences that I have clearly articulated on here before, you simply don’t understand basic economics and have no analytical capabilities whatsoever. But I think we already knew that from your previous answers.
Apologists for the last 35 years of failed conservative economics can safely be ignored. Their lack of analysis and critical thinking skills is scary, since their kind of thinking still dominates political and economic policy. Those who Ignore the mountains of evidence that show those policies to be destructive and faulty is similar to those who believe the snake oil sold as VAM.
Sorta obvious, isn’t it?
As most know, VAMs promise they can measure the year-over-year growth among similar kids, but when examined closely they measure very little.
Fixed it.
“As most know, VAMs promise they can measure the year-over-year growth among similar kids, but when examined closely they measure NOTHING.
Fixed it.
As most, who know how schools operate on a ground level and how teaching and learning — the real thing, not the catchphrase –actually happen, understand, VAM is far below a poor attempt at measuring student growth with the intent to compare. It is a political tool. It is invalid.
Complex sentence before coffee.
And the inappropriate testing and hyper-classification of children for VAM is repulsive, immoral and dehumanizing to all.
Does anyone know which billionaire is funding this?
“Russlynn Ali is the Chief Executive Officer of XQ Institute. She brings decades of experience in many arenas to her position, prime among them a knowledge of what is truly required to design schools that will best serve American students for years to come. Before coming to to XQ Institute, Russlynn served as Assistant Secretary of Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Education. Russlynn also serves as Managing Director of Education at Emerson Collective.”
They say they have 50 million dollars to distribute for new high schools and/or “overhaul the system” by which I guess they mean run existing public schools. I can’t really tell-it’s written in marketing language. Is this Walton, Gates, Broad or the Enron guy?
http://xqsuperschool.org/about
And Who Is Bill Lucia? “The future of California, Lucia said, will depend on students of color graduating from schools with the skills they need to succeed in college and careers.”
Lucia has worked in various senior education policy roles, including as COO and Director of Policy at (Eli Broad Funded) EdVoice from March 2008 through March 2010.
Prior to joining EdVoice, Lucia served as Senior Vice President for Advocacy and Policy, leading the advocacy and legal defense team at the California Charter Schools Association (CCSA).
Before joining CCSA, Lucia worked as Senior Assessment Policy Liaison for Educational Testing Service, and prior to that, spent five years in Washington D.C. working as a senior official in the U.S. Department of Education (Under G.W. Bush) and in the U.S. Senate.
Lucia earned a Bachelor’s Degree in economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara, and a MA in economics from the University of California, Davis. He also successfully completed Ph.D. coursework and Ph.D. qualification examinations in microeconomic theory, macroeconomic theory, and international economics from the University of California, Davis.
kakthyirwin1, that is helpful information about Bill Lucia.
Did you all get sick of my mentioning about the tests ‘measuring’ nothing? I sure hope so!
The point here that I am trying to show is that too, way too many folks still use the language of the edudeformers and therefore reinforce the false meme/discourse that the teaching and learning process can be ‘measured’.
I beg of all here to quit using, not only quit using the language/discourse of falsehoods and falseness but to stridently call out the discourse for what it is: Bullshit!
@Duane Swacker
Got that right. You might enjoy this guy, Andre Spicer. He explains the Bullshit of Management in this paper. http://www.management-aims.com/fichiers/publications/165Spicer.pdf
And his article here calls out the Billionaire Boys Club and their “Well Being” agenda to collect data on all of us “Human Capital” so we can be sorted and used as their tools as the play Masters.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/01/26/the-dark-underbelly-of-the-davos-well-being-agenda/
Also, Duane….
I had an “Ah-Ha” moment after writing you. It was this: There is NO WAY to measure – via tests or invasive data collection points the “Ah-Ha!” moments which is when REAL learning takes place. The rest is just regurgitation.
“Regurgitation ” is a slur. Repetition is a legitimate form of learning. Have you ever studied a foreign language? One problem with common core is there’s not ENOUGH rote learning of important world knowledge. The authors of cc share your prejudice against “regurgitation ” –alas.
@Chiara
About data and social engineering, although these are “lite” versions as they both fail to say this IS what is happening now and not as much state sponsored as Billionaire Club Sponsored
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2015/08/18/manipulation-of-personal-data-is-a-bigger-danger-than-info-theft-in-opm-cyber-heist/
This one is really subversive in that it sublimely promotes the public/private sector deals that have been leading us down the path of profitizing everything that once was public.
“Cybersecurity needs to become more of a priority for the government and private corporations. Whatever the solution, public and private officials need to do a better job of weighing the risk-benefit calculation of storing data on Internet-accessible computers and justifying data-handling protocols. Otherwise, continued breaches of databases containing sensitive personal information could very well lead to more strident public demands for a change in the status quo.”
http://www.rand.org/blog/2015/09/is-it-time-to-appoint-a-data-security-czar.html
This article about what happens when you deplete neighborhood schools of neighborhood children.
“Some school choice advocates say that a good school is enough to change a child’s trajectory, but Salcido said she thinks that resources must extend into the community because “schools alone cannot do it.”
“It’s important to go outside and really understand what our kids are facing because those things don’t go away,” she said. Expanding school choice has created hope for many families, she said, but it’s time to examine its effect on neighborhoods that used to revolve around a central school.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/school-choice-complicates-fulfillment-of-promise-neighborhood/2015/09/12/79ffa702-4286-11e5-8e7d-9c033e6745d8_story.html
**About CA test results for Common Core doing opposite of what was promised – Common Core widens the achievement gap between whites/asian and black/latino.
https://dianeravitch.net/2015/09/12/california-common-core-tests-widen-the-achievement-gaps/
The trifecta. The social engineering is segregating the rich/middle/poor by race and intelligence. The data is driving this program and it’s working great for developers who are owned by the Billionaire Boys Club. Like aging, it is happening over time so it goes undetected.
First, scatter the low income and people of color, so they are not aware of what is happening in their own neighborhoods – busy with Charters in every direction. This depletes the public school population so it can turn into a profit based charter.
Meanwhile, where a Charter might eek out some success – the target LAND, area developer money flows in. Remember, “community” has been deconstructed via Charters with kids from everywhere, so sense of “community” is quite fractured.
Bingo – TARGET LAND for new development. Once it’s built and advertised with the successful Charter, more middle class and less colorful people will move in. Once that happens, the scales will be tipped and the Charter School in that area will only be permitting kids from that neighborhood.
I get so much edu-spam. LAUSD principals place so much edu-junk mail — and junk food coupons — in my school box. Each one has an array of edu-toys of which they want me to support the purchase on the school site and leadership councils. Every “local district” administrator has a product I have to use if I don’t want to lose classroom autonomy or worse. Every superintendent in my memory has collected extra pay from an edu-company that was awarded a mega contract. A majority of my teaching colleagues, blinded by LA media, even they, teachers, try to convince me I should use this edu-product or that one. Their sales pitch is always the same. We need to boost test scores and close the achievement gap, the technology gap, the college and career readiness gap, else we will be taken over by something, something sinister, and soon.
All of it is driven by fear of the test, and fear of the gap. I believe we teachers can do great things when left to our own devices. I hope it doesn’t sound too rhetorical to say I believe in us. Knowing the distortion of reality that is standardized testing (having read some Diane Ravitch .net) I have to ignore all the adds and sound bytes, and focus on my own creativity and skill. It is a lot of noise to ignore, though. I could be losing my hearing after this decade has developed.
“I believe we teachers can do great things when left to our own devices. I hope it doesn’t sound too rhetorical to say I believe in us.”
I started teaching in 1975, eight years before the flawed and fraud of ‘A Nation at Risk’ came out during the Reagan administration and the corporate deformist fallout that followed. I can testify that teachers do great things if supported properly and left alone unless they ask for help, because I had this opportunity for the first 12 to 15 years of the 30 years I was a teacher and because the habit of doing things my way in my classroom was set by the time the education wars were raging, I kept right on doing what I thought was best for the children I taught.
My record as a teacher speaks for itself, and if anyone challenges me, I have evidence—-lots of evidence.
As reports of so-called proficiency levels on the new assessments from the two federally funded Common Core assessment consortia–PARCC and Smarter Balanced– are released, the public will hear about failure rates higher than in previous state-level tests. Understandably, many will assume that student performance and by extension their schools and teachers are all getting worse. The fact that the new tests and the old state tests are not comparable will be lost in the headlines. First, they attempt to measure different standards. Second, the thresholds between proficiency levels were set with different goals in mind. Third, many school systems have had inadequate time and resources to adapt to the new standards.
Supporters of the CCSS and consequential testing will argue that the times require deeper knowledge and more critical thinking and that the new tests represent more realistic measures of what students need to be ready for college and career. Graduating more students with these talents would be a good thing, but whether the new tests are a sufficient or accurate measures is debatable. In addition, there is not agreement on the features of the very broad goal of college and career readiness.
Critics of the Common Core State Standards have raised many legitimate questions about the process through which they were developed, the age appropriateness and importance of some of the standards, their use as a crude policy bludgeon, and the quality of the test questions. To be clear, poorly conceived standards and test questions did not suddenly arise with PARCC and Smarter Balanced tests. Many state standards and test suffered similarly. However, the rise of ever more consequential assessment have exacerbated their impact.
Critique of the standards, the quality of the tests, over-testing, misuse and misrepresentation of the results is vital, lest the public be frightened into tearing up public education. However, debate about the meaning or lack of meaning of the new test results may be a distraction from bringing to the public’s attention the policies that will actually mediate the effect of race and class inequality on education outcomes or the teaching and learning strategies that are likely lead to deeper more sustainable education for life, work and citizenship in a democratic society.
Many have written about this. My thoughts are collected here: http://www.arthurcamins.com
The goal isn’t so much to push for charter schools. It’s to deem the school as “failing” so local control cans be wrested away from parents. Very calculated and devious.
Joan,
The reformers like the failures because it helps them promote more charters.