Jeff Bryant watched President Obama’s State of the Union address and the Senate’s NCLB hearings, and he concluded that the Democrats had lost their voice, with one exception: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island.
He describes the hearings in this post.
Two Néw York City public school teachers spoke eloquently about the deficiencies and flaws of high-stakes testing.
The only Senator who spoke sensibly about the realities of schooling was Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island.
Bryant writes:
“Finally, at the hearing’s very end, Rhode Island’s Senator Whitehouse said something that made educators everywhere smile: (watch here at the 2:24:30 mark).
“My experience in the education world is that there are really two worlds in it. One is the world of contract and consultants and academics and experts and plenty of officials at the federal state and local level. And the other is a world of principals and classroom teachers who are actually providing education to students. What I’m hearing from my principals’ and teachers’ world is that the footprint of that first world has become way too big in their lives to the point where it’s inhibiting their ability to do the jobs they’re entrusted to do.”
“Indeed, the footprint made by education policy leaders in classrooms has left behind a form of mandated testing that is “designed to test the school and not the student,”
Whitehouse stated, and he described a dysfunctional system in which teachers don’t get test results in a timely fashion that makes it possible for them to use the results to change instruction. Instead, educators spend more time preparing for the tests and encouraging students to be motivated to take them, even though the tests have no bearing on the students’ grades, just how the school and the individual teachers themselves are evaluated.
“Whitehouse compared the federal funding that has poured into policies mandating testing, such as Race to the Top, to “rain falling over the desert. The rain comes pouring out of the clouds. But by the time you’re actually at the desert floor, not a raindrop falls. It’s all been absorbed in between. I’ve never had a teacher who said to me, ‘Boy, Race to the Top gave me just what I need in terms of books or a whiteboard, or something I can use to teach the kids.’”
“Whitehouse urged his colleagues to consider more closely the purpose of testing – not just how many tests and how often but how assessments are used. He concluded, “We have to be very careful about distinguishing the importance of the purpose of this oversight and not allow the purpose of the oversight to be conducted in such an inefficient, wasteful, clumsy way that the people who we really trust to know to do this education – the people who are in the classroom – are not looking back at us and saying, ‘Stop. Help. I can’t deal with this. You are inhibiting my ability to teach.’”
Unfortunately other Democratic senators, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senator Al Frankenstein, support test-based accountability. Apparently no one told them that the original purpose of the historic Elementary and Secondary Education Act if 1965 was resource equity for poor kids, not testing and accountability.
Apparently no one told them that the traditional Democratic education agenda was equity for the neediest, while the traditional GOP agenda was testing, accountability, and choice.
The Democrats have lost not only their voice but their agenda. Even the civil rights groups want to protect testing and accountability, allowing only 1% of students with the most severe disabilities to be exempted and allowing English language learners only one year of exemption. Why this draconian approach to the children they represent?
The GOP has won the ideological debate because Democrats have signed on to GOP ideas. American children and public education will continue to be in deep trouble until at least one of the two parties abandons its reckless devotion to high-stakes testing and privatization.

Which is why we need a new Progressive third party and a law which overturns Citizens United. You won’t get Progressive policies from the Democrats who have sold out and forgotten their heritage (my apologies to Senator Whitehouse- did he campaign for the DINO Raimondo?)
LikeLike
Obama said all the things we wanted to hear…but he also said most of this while campaigning for a first term, then a second term. When he had a Dem Congress however, he turned hard Right in negotiating healthcare with Big Pharma and Big Insurance, and stuck it to all educators with Arne as his mouth piece. I do not think it matters what he says anymore. Only his actions will show whether is completely in Wall Street’s pocket. And now, even if he attempts change, the Rep majority will kill it. So he was safe to imply that he NOW cares about inequality and middle class.
Don’t hold your breath. Our only hope is Elizabeth Warren.
LikeLike
By Diane’s standards, Elizabeth Warren is not a hope. She supports test based accountability and charters.
LikeLike
Until Warren retracts her stance in support of school vouchers, which she promoted in her 2004 book, “The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Parents are Going Broke,” and demonstrates that she is against privatization, she is NO hope for people who care about K12 public education.
From what I understand, Diane spoke with Warren and tried to elicit Warren’s support, but Warren has yet to come forward publicly with new views on K12 ed that differ greatly from status quo K12 education policies. We are better off with a candidate from the Green party, which HAS a platform that is contrary to current neoliberal free market education policies: https://www.greenparty.org/Platform.php#11
Since the Green party platform was adopted in 2000, my main concern is the assumption that non-profits are not profit-oriented, when so much evidence has accumulated since then indicating how many CEOs of non-profits pay themselves outrageously high salaries –and a lot of them justify that by claiming they are comparable to CEOs of for-profit enterprises. This includes non-profit charter schools in states where for-profit charters are not permitted, such as NY, which has multiple non-profit charter school CEOs bagging $500K incomes off the public dime.
LikeLike
Wall Street is currently gearing up for a brand new field of investment—for-profit public education. Convicted junk bond dealer, Michael Milken, has expressed enthusiasm for this new trend, “He told the Wall Street Journal on Friday that he’s trying to build his own education company. ‘If we are successful, I really believe you can have a $50 billion to $100 billion company in the field of education.” Washington Post, 7/5/95
The company was founded in April 2000 by former banker Ronald J. Packard.[1] Initial investors in the company included Michael R. Milken and Lowell Milken of education company Knowledge Universe, who along with the Milken Family Foundation, invested $10 million.[1] Andrew Tisch of the Loews Corporation and Larry Ellison of Oracle Corporation also contributed venture capital
K12 Inc. is a for-profit education company that sells online schooling and curriculum to state and local governments. Its educational products and services are designed as alternatives to traditional “bricks and mortar” education for public school students from kindergarten to 12th grade. K12 is a publicly traded education management organization (EMO) that provides online education services to charter school students. It is paid for from taxes.[3] K12 is the largest EMO in terms of enrollment
Revenue: $522.4 million as of June 2011
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K12_%28company%29
MIlken has only just begun. His dreams of $50 billion may come true if we allow the re-authorization of ESEA as proposed by Lamar Alexander.
LikeLike
Dawn….Rupert Murdoch wrote an op-ed in the NY Times close to 2 years ago wherein he said that he would build public education investment to a trillion dollar investment opportunity.
LikeLike
I am replying to myself to let everyone no of the good news in Pennsylvania today. The Commonwealth Court ruled in favor of Philadelphia’s teachers and the PFT, and against the state commission running the district (SRC) which tried last October to cancel the teachers’ contract and impose a new lesser and more expensive health care plan on the staff. Hopefully with Tom Wolf now in office the next step will be the forced resignations of Bill Green, the Corbett-appointed head of the SRC, and the Broadie superintendent, Hite.
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/school_files/District-cant-impose-contract-court-rules.html
LikeLike
I detest the Broadies. Why does anyone give them credit for anything? They are ass backwards. The appointed/anointed ones. How do they live with themselves?
LikeLike
ditto
LikeLike
At 1:35:15, Senator Warren says that the federal government is good at “shoveling tax dollars out the door.” That would be OUR money, Senator. She goes on to call for accountability from the states for all these tax dollars. She does not mention that the federal government contributes only about 12 percent of direct funding for elementary and secondary schools nationally. That means that 88% of the funding of public schools comes for state and local taxpayers, NOT the federal government.
http://febp.newamerica.net/background-analysis/school-finance
If they want to hold public schools 100% accountable to them, then let them provide 100% of the funding. First and foremost, I am accountable to my students, not to Senator Warren.
LikeLike
Honestly, I think she’s on a completely different track. She’s arguing about federalism. She wants to defend the idea that the federal government can put conditions on funding. Any funding. Here’s it happens to be schools but it could just as easily be roads or Medicaid.
I don’t think what she’s doing has anything to do with public schools, specifically. She sees the “states rights” rhetoric conservatives are using as a threat to a broader ideological and legal theory. .
LikeLike
You may be right– her statement at the hearing does not square with populist position. Vermont Ed is right: fed only pays 12% cost of public ed which is way out of line w/her ‘accountability’ position. I’m sure she could be brought to our side w/appropriate info/ed. Bothers mt because I supported her Senate race w/out-of-state $. How do we contact this lady? Cannot figure from her website. We need her on our side.
LikeLike
Thanks Vermont Educator for this very worthwhile link.
LikeLike
The view from Mount Olympus upon the lowly classroom must be impressive. Too bad. I was hoping Warren would be a true Democrat and not sell out. Maybe I’ll write in Whitehouse in 2016.
The tests are loved because policy makers loath having to really deal with and understand education. It is difficult and complex. It is far simplier to just slap a number on teachers and call it a day. Much more interesting to move on to fighting with the banks or debating foreign policy.
LikeLike
MathVale: I take your second paragraph to be explanation, not exculpation.
In other words, the people responsible for mandating unrealizable goals in public education and failing to provide even a modicum of support for realizing just a bit of those goals—
Are clueless. But clueless doesn’t mean harmless. For just three examples: Arne Duncan; John Deasy; and Michelle Rhee[-Johnson].
But I see it this way: the wrecking ball that is charters/vouchers/privatization is more effectively wielded by those incapable of understanding the damage they have caused and are causing, coupled with a lack of maturity and compassion.
In other words, and I know some might object, what Hannah Arendt described as those embodying the “banality of evil.”
When a Cami Anderson or a John King, e.g., seem nonplussed and stunned that anyone could question their motives and methods, I don’t think they are faking it. They are profoundly out of touch with the impact of their words and deeds on the vast majority of us.
Which means, IMHO, that they cannot self-correct. It’s up to us. And it ain’t going to be pretty.
“It is not light that we need, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake.”
Frederick Douglass was right then. He’s right now.
Thank you for your comments.
😎
LikeLike
I was really disappointed in Warren. I know she was trying for “public funds watchdog” with all the stern, scolding accountability talk but public schools serve children. It’s not like auditing a defense contractor. Third graders aren’t adults and they aren’t products and they aren’t going to be able to produce the easily measurable return on investment she seems to be seeking.
I’m still surprised that congressional Democrats have apparently decided their entire education agenda will consist of this grim, joyless, technocratic numbers game – this forced march to College and Career Ready. I think it’s a huge mistake, both politically and substantively. At this point they’ve so removed themselves from any kind of direct. committed advocacy for public schools they’d rather talk about anything else… pre-k, community college, anything BUT existing K-12 public schools.
LikeLike
“Huge mistake”…. you couldn’t be more correct. Talk about a tin ear. Tragically, that seems to be their case.
LikeLike
Don’t be such a silly “traditionalist” They’re plenty passionate. They said several times they want “great schools”. Isn’t that enough?
They’re just dispassionately observing the data produced.
“Advocacy” would imply “taking a side” and we can’t have that!
It’s vitally important they maintain objectivity. Outputs, not inputs.
LikeLike
Chiara, President Obama and Secretary Duncan have established the agenda. It is not a Democratic agenda–which should be focused on equity–but it is what they want. It’s Race to the Top. It’s competition.It’s testing. It’s VAM. It’s charters.
LikeLike
Yes, Diane…it’s the best Republican agenda a supposedly Dem president could devise and mandate.
LikeLike
yes and:
… it’s an embrace of free market principles and the misguided belief that this ethos embodies values aligned with what’s best for people, community, and culture. It’s a vision whose world concept is based solely on the quantity of things, as opposed to the quality of an experience. It’s not a human value, it’s a market value, and has no heart.
…thus little kindergarten children fumbling with abstract concepts, and a mouse, to take core aligned computer assessments. The data-fest grows….so now we feed even our young to the data-beast.
LikeLike
Sen. Frankenstein says, test-based accountability good, fire bad!
LikeLike
Honestly, if it were not for fear for the students, I would just encourage every teacher to walk out for a day. Every. Single. One. Warren is an @ss for betraying us like that. I already gave up on Hilary. The public that demonizes, daily, teachers is becoming increasingly in danger of being called crazy, hateful, immoral, and frankly intellectually lazy.
LikeLike
The public needs a much deeper understanding of the issues in education and they are not getting it.
LikeLike
“The public needs a much deeper understanding of the issues in education and they are not getting it.”
AMEN!
What is the balance between confusion and illumination?
EDUCATION
What counteracts the mind-control regime of marketing or propaganda?
EDUCATION
What is vital to assist any thinking person with overcoming irrational
prejudices and/or beliefs?
EDUCATION
What exposes the naked emperor and cracks through the mask of
benevolence? EDUCATION
What turns on the “light”, so that all can see, “what” we are doing?
EDUCATION
What is the foundation for civic literacy?
EDUCATION
What is a main component of culture-production?
EDUCATION
What disolves the predominant mythologies established and sanctioned, that clearly work in the service of MONEY?
EDUCATION
What negates the underserved legitimacy of a “system” that functions
AGAINST the people’s best interests?
EDUCATION.
LikeLike
“Even the civil rights groups want to protect testing and accountability–”
not quite accurate.
Only 19 out of 200 civil rights groups organized under one umbrella organization to “speak with one voice” actually signed on to a press-release that advocated annual testing on the assumption, FALSE, this was the only effective means for getting teachers to pay attention to students whose disaggregated scores on tests are low.
The eloquence of Senator Whitehouse needs to be recognized with letters of praise to him. I intend to send one.
LikeLike
True, Laura, that it was only 19 civil rights groups, but that 19 included the big ones:
The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
American Association of University Women
American Civil Liberties Union
Children’s Defense Fund
Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates
Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund
Easter Seals
The Education Trust
League of United Latin American Citizens
Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
NAACP
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
National Center for Learning Disabilities
National Council of La Raza
National Urban League
National Women’s Law Center
Partners for Each and Every Child
Southeast Asia Resource Action Center
United Negro College Fund
LikeLike
The part I don’t get is why would a disability rights group insist that every child with disabilities must take annual high-stakes tests except for 1% with the most severe cognitive disabilities? Why would a group advocating for ELLs insist that they must take the test after only one year in this country?
LikeLike
I found this equally mystifying – until recently. Apparently these advocacy groups are willing to trade the stigma of chronic failure and emotional oppression for test scores that provide quantitative evidence that supports their cause. If they spent one test session observing the torment their kids are subjected to, they just might re-think their stand.
LikeLike
They must think that poor scores on tests will result in more resources that will lead to better test scores. Why they would think that is anybody’s guess. Why they would want to judge their childrens’ education by standardized test scores is especially beyond me (as a former special ed teacher). Either a lot of people are not paying attention to our voices or we are still being drowned out by the voices of consultants, contractors and federal and state policy wonks. The blog world has power but not near the power of the rephormist juggernaut. There are far too many ordinary people whose main way of judging schools is by their own experience as students. Now I don’t know about you, but from where I sit now, I know I had no idea what my teachers’ jobs entailed when I was a student. For the most part, I trusted my local schools to do a good job with educating my children, and they did. I knew the teachers worked hard then before the era of micromanagement. As a former teacher, I am very aware of the hoops teachers are jumping through now. Too many people still do not have a clue.
LikeLike
A place to make comments about NCLB reauthorization– This article ran on our TN Public Radio site. It includes an email to make comments before Feb. 2
http://nashvillepublicmedia.org/blog/2015/01/14/alexander-expedites-nclb-fix-identifies-testing-big-sticking-point/
January 14, 2015 by Blake Farmer
Alexander Expedites NCLB Fix, Identifies Testing As Big Sticking Point
Tennessee Senator Lamar Alexander pledged to fix the No Child Left Behind Law ahead of becoming the HELP Committee’s new chairman. Credit: HELP Committee via YouTube
In his first days as chairman of the U.S. Senate’s education committee, Lamar Alexander is following through on a pledge to fix the Bush-era No Child Left Behind law. He’s set a goal of having a bill to vote on within a few weeks.
The Tennessee Republican says there’s general agreement on some changes, like setting realistic goals. But he says there will be real debate on topics like standardized testing.
“The question is are there too many tests? And who should be in charge of the tests? Who should decide what the tests should be?” Alexander said on the floor of the Senate Tuesday.
Alexander has asked for input from the public by February 2, setting up an email address ( FixingNCLB@help.senate.gov*protected email*) to receive suggestions. The first hearing on fixing No Child Left Behind is scheduled for Jan. 21.
It’s thought that Alexander’s overhaul could end up greatly reducing the federal government’s role in education and leaving more oversight to the states.
LikeLike
Listen to this teacher describe the PARCC teacher instructions for the 2015 ELA 6th grade test. The word “accountability” loses all meaning in this context. Send this link to all politicians who still think by supporting these tests they are ensuring accountability.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV6HoDLsnH8&app=desktop
LikeLike
Dawn, thanks for sharing this powerful video. It is ridiculous that this “ed reform” nonsense has come to a point like this where a teacher is sobbing over the abuse her students must endure at the hands of those they are supposed to trust thanks to top-down nonsense! Clearly this teacher has dedicated a whole life to teaching and it is outrageous for her and fellow public school teachers across the country to be put into such a nightmarish position. Perhaps Elizabeth Warren and the rest of the senate should be sent a copy of this!
LikeLike
“Perhaps Elizabeth Warren and the rest of the senate should be sent a copy of this!”
Yes!
LikeLike
“Al Frankenstein” might have been a typo, but it’s a fitting name for this charter school supporter who masquerades as a Progressive.
Need a name similar to that for Elizabeth Warren, who wrote in one of her earlier books that she supports vouchers –something short but which sends the message that Elizabeth Doesn’t Warrant Being Labeled Progressive About K12 Public Education.
LikeLike
In all fairness, Al Franken has been somewhat insulated from the full weight of CCSS since he hails from Minnesota. They did not buy into that particular fiasco and the rephormist agenda has been less pernicious although not absent. The Minneapolis Star Tribune reported teacher rankings a few months back. Surprise, surprise, the “weakest” teachers were in the poorest schools.
LikeLike
I don’t know anything about Senator Whitehouse, but that was impressive.
LikeLike
I object to these hearings too because I don’t think they’re an honest representation of who is really influential in setting policy for US public schools. Compare the witnesses at that hearing to the people who dominate the public and political debate. Where’s the 5000 ed reform orgs? Bill Gates? Eli Broad? Jeb Bush? We heard from the teachers unions. They revealed their position publicly. Where’s the rest of the crowd?
I’m just not going along with the idea that it’s 2 teachers, a couple of academics, unions and Senators. That’s not true. It has no relation to the truth. I WISH it were true, but it isn’t.
It would be better if they called the ed reform players as witnesses rather than all of us pretending they aren’t going to be hugely influential in anything that comes out of Congress. They are. We just won’t see any of it.
LikeLike
Yes, we live in an Oligarchy. But on a more positive note, American television is really having a “Golden Age.” “True Detective” is spectacular. It is interesting to me how disintegrating cultures produce such great art. Does the widespread suffering produce more artists? From “Sopranos” to “The Wire” to “Dexter”, “Breaking Bad” and now “True Detective.” Outstanding work! My advice to teachers is to lie on the couch, drink a beer, watch “True Detective” and forget what you can’t control. There are great ways to escape. “Reality leaves a lot to the imagination!”
LikeLike
Suggestion: Turn your TV off. Research the influence of the Rockefellers on education and medicine in the United States. They are relying on you to zone out. The television is a very effective brainwashing tool that has been in use for decades. Throw your TV out. Don’t be a tool.
LikeLike
“Reality leaves a lot to the imagination!”
I prefer my reality to be real-1st person real not mediated through 3rd parties.
LikeLike
Palm Beach County School Board – Please opt-out of all standardized tests immediately! Our schools have become test-prep factories year-round. If we continue down this path, we will destroy a generation of our children!
http://youtu.be/0WhlQatHf9c
LikeLike
“Whitehouse compared the federal funding that has poured into policies mandating testing, such as Race to the Top, to “rain falling over the desert. The rain comes pouring out of the clouds. But by the time you’re actually at the desert floor, not a raindrop falls. It’s all been absorbed in between. I’ve never had a teacher who said to me, ‘Boy, Race to the Top gave me just what I need in terms of books or a whiteboard, or something I can use to teach the kids.’”
This is why I don’t buy that state leaders should escape responsibility for accepting the conditions that came along with RttT. If they didn’t now where the money would end up, they should have. Was it worth it? Did they even look at that before they accepted this money with these conditions? That’s their job.
LikeLike
Is it ironic, is that the word, that his name is Whitehouse?
LikeLike
Donna, I wondered too whether it was destiny that Whitehouse is headed for the White House?
LikeLike
Chiara,
You know that “accountability and responsibility” is only for the peons-teachers and not for the masters-administrators and state/federal bureaucrats.
LikeLike
I despair that my Senator, Elizabeth Warren, is so wrong headed on testing. Is it because she is an economist? Her tribe ought to stop mucking about in a field – ours – where they have no expertise. It’s not like teachers tell bankers how to fix their problems. “Banks should be run more like classrooms!” said no teacher ever.
LikeLike
She’s a lawyer.
LikeLike
Oh. Thanks, FLERP.
Must have been the bankruptcy law that got me thinking along those lines.
LikeLike
Now that’s a challenge FLERP! Which is more morally bankrupt: an economist, a banker or a lawyer???
LikeLike
What’s left, then? Three more years of standardized testing for my high school freshman daughter?
Clearly, standardized testing needs to be made a 2016 election agenda.
Sen Warren’s case shows that there needs to be a good, convincing description of how and why teachers can and will do good work without the tests. Offer a positive message.. Is there a good link to a description of a democratic teacher evaluation system?
LikeLike
What do yo want, a loyalty oath? A code of teacher conduct posted on our classroom walls? What shows that teachers need to promise to do a good job? Yeah, I’m being sarcastic. All credible evidence points to a made up crisis that has very little to do with teacher quality. Chances are there are no more bad apples in teaching than there are in any other profession. Sorry, wierdlmate. I’m in a “I’ve had it” mode.
LikeLike
Imagine, just for a minute, that you are, say, Obama. He says
“I want to evaluate teachers, and testing is the best way to do it”.
“But research shows, testing doesn’t evaluate us well.”, a teacher says.
“OK, so then how do I make sure, you do a good job?”
“Well, another thing is that teacher evaluation is not your job because you are not expert.”
“OK, so how do you think teacher evaluation should work?”
Answer?
LikeLike
First of all, it is not Obama’s job to evaluate my job as a teacher. It is the job of the district for which I work to evaluate my performance. they do not need a standardized test to rate my performance. They sit in my classroom, watch the students work, observe how I collaborate with colleagues, listen to the comments of all the players. Do you really need to ask which is the better way of evaluating a teacher?
LikeLike
I add that I do understand your mood, we are in the same boat, believe me, and I even have two kids trying to swim in this test-flood. But I think any protest needs to be accompanied by a convincing, simple, positive message. Gates won’t listen to it, but Warren might.
LikeLike
They will only listen if they can accept that public education was not failing before they started to try to fix it. Certainly, there were and still are problems that can be alleviated by school based interventions but that require societal fixes as well. I believe if you look at schools with less than 25% poverty, they perform as well as most in the world on standardized tests. At no more than 10% poverty, I think we ranked at or near the top. Even if you work from the other end, our poor perform better than the poor in the rest of the world. What we are dealing with now goes far beyond playing with education policy. Public education is being used as a convenient scapegoat to distract us from the necessary investments and changes we must make if we wish to call ourselves a democratic society.
LikeLike
Really? This is a puzzling question that we don’t know how to answer? How can we evaluate teachers is a really big head-scratcher? Wierdlmate, how does your boss know if you are doing a good job?
LikeLike
Jen B asked “Wierdlmate, how does your boss know if you are doing a good job?”
The president of my university thinks that a department’s educational performance can be measured by how many graduates the department produces. He is my boss. How would you explain to him, that that’s a wrong metric (similarly to test scores in K12) —and then how would you convince him that I am doing a great job in the class room?
LikeLike
Does the president of your university have experience as an educator or is he the CEO type?
LikeLike
2old2teach wrote “Do you really need to ask which is the better way of evaluating a teacher?”
Not me. My original point was that however self evident it is for us the way educators get evaluated, many people, such as Warren, have no idea. Now that teacher accountability is in the news, these people ask “how can we make sure, teachers do a good job?”.
These people need to hear not only that VAM is not suitable to evaluate teachers, but, more importantly, they need to learn how the traditional teacher evaluation works, and how it is similar to what other countries, with successful ed systems, do.
In my opinion, protests against high stakes tests *always* needs to be accompanied by the positive message, the description of the right way of evaluating teachers by the correct authority. The positive message needs to be repeated over and over so that people learn to feel comfortable about it.
MLK not only talked about racial injustice but also about his dream—the positive message.
LikeLike
2old2teach writes “They will only listen if they can accept that public education was not failing before they started to try to fix it.”
This is true for hardliners like Duncan, but Warren?
“Public education is being used as a convenient scapegoat to distract us from the necessary investments and changes we must make if we wish to call ourselves a democratic society.”
True. Some would go further, and replace “democratic” by “civil”. About changes to be made: are there any people who want to reduce teachers’ (and students’) loads? US teachers teach 1100+ hours per year, Finish teachers 650, and the international average yearly hours is 800.
LikeLike
Copying from FB:
Jeanette Brunelle DeutermannLong Island Opt-out Info
ACTION ALERT! Please send an email to this address. Add whatever you want but make sure they hear 2 important points:
Dear Senators
–I am opposed to annual testing
–please support option 1
FixingNCLB@help.senate.gov
They are not hearing from enough people! They have reported that the opposition to annual testing isn’t as big as they thought. PROVE THEM WRONG!!
LikeLike
The Democrats and legacy civil rights organizations didn’t lose their voices; they sold them.
LikeLike
Yes sir!
LikeLike
There are 2 worlds – the in$ider clique, and the rest of us. No one lost their voice – they’re social climbing sucks ups who got to the top and want to stay at the top. [there are a bunch of dupes of social climbers …]
Before I gambled on career #3, I tried tutoring in math & was put into a Seattle middle school. Given I didn’t have and don’t have kids, given I hadn’t really done much of anything K-12 since graduating high school in 1978 and having adult life jobs, my jump into the deep end at age 43 in 2003 was quite a plunge!
In the 2nd week I had figured out cliques in the 2 very different classes, and I marvelled at how, in adult world, no matter what I’d done over the decades, those clique dynamics that really fire off in middle school – they just never leave us grow’d ups.
Try grunt level politics in Seattle or Boston & watch out for the elbows when some Big Name pol might be maybe possibly gracing the minions with a glaze of the eye, a nod of the head, a breath from the corpus brilliantus. The sharpest elbows come from those who’ve been high flyers after their Ivy’d college life!
The Senator is 1000% correct – there are 2 sets of us. However, it is hugely $ocial cla$$ divide, and the high flying parasite cla$$ add little of value, other than bidding up property values in their fancy leafy ‘hoods, and keeping fancy car dealerships busy.
This cla$$ of ‘professional’ Democrats did NOT lose their voices – their songs of grovelling are directed at their paymasters in the 1%.
rmm.
LikeLike
Thanks for posting this Diane. Great to see my post sparked such a great discussion. Your readers are the best.
LikeLike
Jeff,
The readers who comment here create the best education discussion on the Internet.
LikeLike
Wonder if ol Lamar will follow his rule and listen to you Diane and start reading this blog.
LikeLike
Well, the discussion here is the liveliest because the posts you make are frequent and the topics are varied. The only problem is that there’s no search function built in, so older posts are difficult to mine.
LikeLike
Wierdlmate, google my name and the topic of interest. I have posted over 10,000 times. Google reveals all.
LikeLike
“The Democrats lost their voice”
They lost their voice on Wall Street
In talks with Jamie Dimon
It’s hard on the voice to just repeat
“I really love your diamond”.
LikeLike