There was once an ideal in American education, which held that the community public school would be a place where children of every background would meet, learn together, and learn to live amicably. This ideal was supposed to promote a sense of American citizenship, a realization that regardless of our origins, we are all Americans.
That ideal, as we all know, was frequently violated. It was violated by racial segregation, which assigned black and white children to attend different schools. It was violated–and continues to be–by class segregation, in which the children of the affluent live in communities with elegant facilities while the children of the poor attend cinder-block schools lacking the playing fields, the small classes, the arts programs, the foreign language classes, the laboratories, and the beautiful libraries found in the schools of the outer ring of suburbs.
And yet the ideal is not dead. There are schools that are racially and economically diverse and that are much admired in their communities. It is important not to forget the ideal, the belief that the common school would bring us together, teach us about what we share as human beings, and teach us the duties and responsibilities of citizenship. The ideal teaches that we are all in the same boat and that we have mutual obligations to one another.
Now we live in a time of growing racial and class segregation. Charter schools are facilitating that segregation. Where the media would once look askance at a segregated black or white or Hispanic school, they are now more than willing to celebrate the “success” of segregated schools.
Sacramento now has a charter school designed for the children of immigrants from the former Soviet Union.
In their early years in Sacramento, members of the region’s fast-growing population of immigrants from the former Soviet Union clashed with public schools. Children had a hard time communicating with teachers, and parents, many of whom were evangelical Christians, expressed alarm over sex education, Halloween and laws forbidding religious instruction.
Today, these families have a public school of their own.
The Community Outreach Academy, an elementary school built inside the former McClellan Air Force Base, is open to all students, but its pupils come overwhelmingly from families that emigrated from the former Soviet Union. The children attend Russian language class twice a week. There’s a Russian library that serves parents as well as children. The principal, a Belarussian refugee, frequently appears on Russian radio.
School administrators say they don’t teach religion, and they follow state laws on sex education. But they’re cognizant of parents’ sensibilities. Halloween, for instance, is not promoted as a school celebration.
The school has high test scores.
Community Outreach is also one of California’s most segregated schools. About 98 percent of its 1,231 students are white. No other school in the state with more than 20 students had a higher percentage of white students in 2013, state data show. In a district with 4,800 black students and 12,000 Latino students, Community Outreach Academy enrolled three black students and six Latinos last year.
Futures High School, a Gateway school that also serves the area’s Slavic population, is 95 percent white, data show.
Charter schools are booming in California; more than 515,000 students attended them last year. And like the Outreach Academy, a growing number are drawing most of their students from a particular ethnic group.
During the 2008-09 school year, roughly 34,000 students attended California charter schools in which at least nine of every 10 students belonged to a single ethnic group, according to the state Department of Education. By 2013-14, that number had nearly doubled to 65,000.
Let us not forget that the public schools were supposed to make us one nation, not to provide a setting in which each ethnic, racial, and cultural group could self-segregate. That was the meaning of the Brown decision. It seems to have been forgotten.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/education/article3654240.html#storylink=cpy

We are headed toward a future of Gated Communities and Gates-Ed Schools.
And then there will be everyone else, gerrymanded to non-person status …
LikeLike
“And then there will be everyone else, gerrymanded to non-person status …”
That’s the thing, though. You can’t have all these “choice” schools outside a backstop of a “common school” system. The common school system is the entity that allows the choice schools to exist.
What baffles me about the “choice” people is their faith that this will be win/win for everyone within the system. That’s delusional. Systems are complex. They have no earthly idea what fragmentation will do. They don’t even know if it will benefit a majority, let alone “all”. It doesn’t matter. It’s full speed ahead!
I think they had to have started from a place where they saw the common system as having SO little value that they literally could not conceive that there might be a net loss from throwing it away. I can’t imagine being that reckless.
LikeLike
Well, we should not confuse actual faith with ad copy …
LikeLike
Might that be another root of the Common Core idea? Maybe they knew entirely scrapping it wasn’t a good idea BUT if all schools were studying the same stuff and being held accountable for the same stuff, well then maybe it would work. . . .?? (in their minds)
LikeLike
“They have no earthly idea what fragmentation will do.”
It is hard to pin down who “they” are.
I do know this. Charter schools may be a side show and the Common Core State Standards not sufficiently understood as the point of departure for radical transformation of American eduation.
The USDE Office of Technology and many of the investors in public schools want to “de-institutionalize” schooling altogether. This means replacing all bricks and mortar schools with an “ecology” of learning centers, learning agents, competency-based, personalized, student-centered playlists. It means “learning supports” provided by “learning agents” who offer products and services based on profiles of parent/guardian values, interests, and aspirations for their children–with increasing opportunities for students to have a voice in what they want to learn.
This system is a souped up version of 1960s programmed instruction, delivered on-line, with community non-profits and for-profit startups offering products, services, certifications, assessments, curriculum modules, all “differentiated” to build what appear to be individualized learning pathways/journeys/playlists…and so on.
The social interactions associated with learning in schools are to be replaced by networks of community volunteers and entrepreneurs and all of the on-line social interaction that high tech can provide, including games and mobile apps galore.
Funding for public education collapses into money flows from corporations, foundations, and remnants of public sums. These sums follows the student via an EduCard or such, like a debit card to buy learning opportunities. Roles such as that of a school counselor are taken up by brokers who can offer up cost-benefit recommendations for purchasing services. Data-gathering is extensive. It is a commodity that every provider of services wants and uses to meet the many niche markets, improve the bottom line, target “communities” of like-minded learners.
Community non-profits such as libraries, art centers, museums generate new funds for services they provide. The phrase “learning agent” replaces the word teacher. Fantasy? I don’t think so. The tech industry can’t wait, neither can the feds.
see Transforming American Education
The National Education Technology Plan 2010 (NETP), which calls for revolutionary transformation rather than evolutionary tinkering.
Or see In a press release dated February, 3, 2014 KnowledgeWorks and The International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL) announced their shared agenda for federal policies that would change “our entire K-12 education system” to fit a student-centered learning environment with demonstrations of competency, free of traditional notions of schools, teachers, and student learning.
or go to CompetencyWorks website http://bit.ly/cwk12fedpolicy
LikeLike
There is much to agree about in this post, but much to disagree with. Using Brown v. Bd. of Ed of Topeka is not an apt comparison. Brown was not permitted to attend the white school that was closer to where she lived. She literally had to walk past her neighborhood school to attend her segregated school. Requirements for charters are different state to state, and many charters are no better than traditional pubic schools and have other issues that need to be corrected and addressed. But complaining about a charter being all of one color or socio economic group when ANYONE may attend is not the Brown issue, and I believe is misinformative at best, disingenuous at worst. We all need to work together to make public education better (I am a teacher). We need to lead the charge in appearing educated and logical in our arguments if we want to be taken seriously by non-educators.
LikeLike
The way in which charter schools damage the historical purpose of building a common culture as well as exposing students to other cultures is often lost in the discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. Our children will live in a multicultural society and need to develop those sensitivities and familiarities early on. Otherwise, everyone is is “those others” not “Someone like the kid I knew in first grade.” We will all be poorer for this -and perhaps more vulnerable if those others remain fragmented and not part of society. We hear the results of that all too frequently every day on the news.
LikeLike
most dangerous word in the English language, I’ve been told, is: exclusive.
LikeLike
Nah, it’s that four letter word that begins with F. . . !
FAIL!
LikeLike
If there were a charter school set up to serve the needs of Hispanic kids who have come across the border as refugees, allowing them to take classes in their native language in order to retain their cultural identities and make their parents feel comfortable, how would that fly? Guessing not too good, unless maybe they were Cubans fleeing that oppressive Castro regime? USA, still fighting against godless Communism.
LikeLike
There is nothing wrong with bilingual instruction, and it can be most effective, if it is done well. Some bilingual programs hire untrained staff, and students languish in the program while receiving sub par instruction. I once had a student transfer from LA where she had been in a bilingual class for three years. While she had some receptive English, she could not speak, read or write. On her report card, there was a blank for an English grade for all three years! This is not what bilingual education is supposed to be.
LikeLike
We have a large Hispanic population in Buffalo and there are several K-8 schools which specifically cater to their needs, although there is a mixture in the schools, not just Spanish speaking students.
LikeLike
I taught ESL/ELL students for over thirty-six years in a very diverse suburban NYC school district. While the majority of my students came from Haiti, Mexico and central America, I had Asian and European students as well. Many Asian and Russian parents were alarmed when they saw the dark skin tones in my class. They assured me that their children were not “stupid.” After a couple of weeks parents’ concerns dissapated, although they continued to be among the most eager to see their children exit from the program. It was a healthy learning experience for the Russians and Asians to learn that the brown children were in the class for the same reason that they were. Many made friends from different ethnic groups, and we had some healthy discussions on color and racism. My favorite was a discussion between a Sri Lankan and a Haitian on who was “blacker.” My point is that we are not the only group in the world that has problems with skin color and preconceived notions. In a diverse public school we were able to address these issues and contribute to a healthier understanding among disparate groups.
LikeLike
Your were, indeed, on the battlefield. I salute your service, sir (or ma’am). I suspect, however, that in our decaying society you were engaged in an honorable rearguard action.
Racial segregation is greater now than it was 30 years ago. Our country (the rulers) flail about looking for a credible external enemy to ‘unify’ us in hatred, but the pickings are slim. Having been trained for 500 years to view ‘race’ as an indication of social status and worth, we are reverting to tribalism based on skin color.
I, too, am a retired teacher (at least I no longer get paid, and am no longer employed by a formal school). I deplore America’s condition. I wish I could have a beer with Thomas Paine and W.E.B. DuBois. I’d try to stimulate the discussion, and then just sit back and listen (and learn).
LikeLike
Well see, aren’t the reform minds at work thinking the common part would be the common core, studied independently at choice institutions. Sort of like the Bible being studied at a myriad of different denominations on a given Sunday (or Saturday).
??? I think that’s what the idea was.
I prefer the Common School idea, myself.
LikeLike
However, isn’t it the underlying purpose of Charter Schools to provide access to specialty programs designed with a certain clientele in mind? It’s only the fact that schools are being “rated” which makes this particular school questionable. That and the funding issue. Oh, also the possibility that there might be a religious component (not simply “opting” out of holidays such as Halloween). Public Schools (including charters) should not be religious institutions.
My concern is that this community is insulating themselves so much that their children will never assimilate into American culture.
In Buffalo there were several K-8 Charter Schools established in the inner city which became 99 to 100% minority due to their physical location. In order to integrate schools, many of the neighborhood schools were closed and children were bused to other buildings, but parents prefer a school their kids can walk to, so these charters were appealing to the black and/or Hispanic community where they were located. Unfortunately, these schools had low scores on the assessments so many have been or will be closed. The charters with higher percentages of white children shine on these tests (in comparison).
Please note that the white population in Buffalo is only 20%.
My major concern is that test results should not be an indicator whether a school is successful or failing. There needs to be a different dynamic, especially when assessing inner city and/or minority schools such as this one.
LikeLike
The problem with test scores is that they usually indicate that the student body represents on average a higher socioeconomic level. They really don’t tell us if a school is actually “better.” In fact, it often indicates that a school may be less diverse.
LikeLike
And if this is the case, Retired Teacher, couldn’t these exams be considered rascist?
LikeLike
Absolutely! They don’t tell the whole story. They are just a snapshot that shows you an average socioeconomic picture.
LikeLike
Talking about ethnic schools, Buffalo Public Schools has Lafayette High School which is being persecuted by Governor Cuomo and Regents Commissioner John King.
Yes, Lafayette’s test scores are extremely low, but the student body has an extremely large population of immigrants and refugees. Refugees who have experienced the results of genocide by witnessing family members being slaughtered. Children who have Lived in Refugee Camps with little or no educational opportunities. A diverse student population which consists of over fifty languages. A school which provides specialty services geared towards the needs of their student body.
Lafayette High School is the most diverse school in NYS and perhaps in the country.
Yet, the state wants it to close. No variance for the language barriers. No empathy for the horrors these families need to overcome. No consideration of this unique situation.
Within a year of arrival, these students are required to take the same exams as children who have gone to school since the age of four or five.
A perfect example of the misuse of test scores.
LikeLike
This is so wrong! Where would these students go if their public school closes? The charters won’t want them. Their best chance is in a public school with a trained, certified staff. In my district every ESL teacher had a master’s degree in TESOL, and some of us had other certifications as a reading teacher, French, Spanish, special education. Gov. Cuomo should be educated in second language acquisition. It takes five to seven years to develop cognitive academic language in a second language. We can’t wave a magic wand and make people proficient in a second language in a year! It takes time. It sounds to me like a lawsuit in the making, perhaps discrimination based on ethnic origin.
LikeLike
The teachers are fighting for their students. I’ll keep you all posted.
LikeLike
One thing I’ve been wondering about this week is whether it’s my imagination or not, but it seems to me that around the same time charter schools were starting in the late 90’s public schools became less able (or willing) to create alternative programs like magnet schools that used to be the way families had some choices within the public schools. For example, where I live in Cambridge the high school used to have about half a dozen alternative programs/schools and now they’ve all been done away with except for the technical arts program – same with the elementary – there were all kinds of arts magnets and alternative schools that have pretty much disappeared. It seems a bit wasteful to have multiple “districts” within the same city all with their own administrations in order to have some flexibility within a school. Is this because of NCLB or did this idea fall out of favor?
LikeLike
I just think there should be a recognition that within a universal public system one school system makes the other possible.
You can’t have a selection of magnet schools without a system of public schools to act as the majority program.
Ed reformers in Ohio wouldn’t be able to run their completely unregulated “charter sector” without somewhere for kids to go when they don’t fit in a charter, or the charter closes, or the charter fails.
I think there WAS that recognition with magnets, etc. within the public system, and now it’s been lost. “The public school system” doesn’t remain static, standing at the ready when they introduce charters and vouchers into it. The public system changes. Whether that change is positive or negative seems to me to be a very important question. I don’t see any kind of care or concern. In Ohio, one can open a charter school across the street from a public school, and there’s just no thought at all about what happens to the public school.
The public school administrators here complain about the online schools, because they see it as importing this “churn” and chaos into their schools, with students dropping in and out. The churn in the charter sector in Ohio doesn’t just affect the kids who are in and out. It affects the kids who remain in the public school. They aren’t even considered.
LikeLike
Magnet schools have less of a negative economic impact on local public schools than charter schools do. Most of the magnet schools may shift funding from one public school to another in the same district, and the magnet schools are generally available in cities or counties with larger populations so the impact is felt far less. With a charter school, the per student allocation is gone, and that total is subtracted from their budget. In a small school district, this loss can be devastating to a budget. In a larger school district, losing large numbers of students can be equally as devastating resulting in a significant erosion of funding.
LikeLike
The magnet programs in Buffalo are still strong. The trouble is the schools which are not “specialized”. They get the leftover students, predominantly minority, and those pesky test scores and graduation rates are low.
Governor Cuomo, Commissioner John King and the Board of Regents threaten to close these schools, but what will happen to the student body?
Whether it’s a charter or a renamed public school, their issues remain the same. The results won’t change if you are only treating the symptoms but ignoring the disease.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I sense an underlying “efficiency” argument here. That if students can self-select into homogeneous schools, that they will learn more and have higher test scores. And perhaps this is so.
Yet if the ultimate purpose of school is to be a functioning member of a democratic community, then this is not very “efficient”, since the the community at-large is multicultural.
And so it seems some people are taking a very narrow definition as to the purpose of schools.
LikeLike
From the research I have read, poor students benefit tremendously from being a school with middle class students, and it also does not hurt affluent or middle class students to have poor students in a school. The middle class students learn how to be more accepting of individual differences. See the research of David Kirp and Arthur Camins on this blog.
LikeLike
My children attended a suburban school near the University of Buffalo which was extremely diverse. There were children from the city who lived in low income housing as well as children of UB students or faculty from other countries. White was not the dominant color, but just one of the mix. I consider it one of the best schools ever.
My eldest daughter laments that my grand daughter goes to a school which is predominantly white. It is an excellent school, but the minority students are few.
Exposure to a diverse population is probably as important as the lessons taught in the classroom.
Maybe if the adults making decisions about our schools had attended such institutions, their views toward public education would be much different.
LikeLike
The school where I taught had about 27% free and reduced lunch, and we were a Blue Ribbon School in 2006.
LikeLike
On the subject of the Obama children’s education vs. the “No Excuses” charter model that the above six schools follow (and on display on the video below) …
… here’s thought experiment.
Imagine what would happen if Barack and Michelle paid a visit to their school, snuck in the back of the class (the point-of-view of the camera) and witnessed this indefensible horror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDnxRVPiMSg
I imagine Barack and/or Michelle interrupting this atrocity, screaming,
————————-
“STOP!!! STOP!!! STOP THIS RIGHT NOW!!! What the BLEEP do you think you’re doing to my child, and to the rest of these children???!!!
(to the teacher)
“What’s your name?! Where’s the principal?! We need to talk to her right now!!!!”
(taking Sasha or Malia by the hand, talk to her)
“We’re getting you out of this freak show before you suffer any more damage!”
————————-
However, we all know that the teaching in this video does not and never will happen at…
Sidwell Friends (the Obama’s kids school),
or at Lakeside in Seattle (where Gates kids go)
or at the Montessori school (where NY State Ed. Commish John King sends his kids),
or at Chris Christie’s kids private school,
or at the Chicago Lab School (where Emanuel sends his kids and also where my own nephew and niece attend, by the way)…
as there is a difference between the education enjoyed by the children of the elite—including the Obama kids—and the education that “corporate reformers”, in their end game, are designing for “other people’s children—those of the middle and working classes.
LikeLike
Perhaps different parents have different preferences and priorities than the Obamas, Christies, and your niece’s and nephew’s parents. Nashville Prep parents almost certainly don’t have the choices those families do. Is there any video from classrooms in the schools these kids are zoned for? It might make things clearer.
Tuition at your niece’s and nephew’s school is $30k–no multi-child discount! Admission is extremely selective–kids who aren’t bright don’t get in, forget about those with disabilities or who can’t speak English. The student body is overwhelmingly upper-middle-class and above: a mere 10% of the students receive financial aid.
This screening and creaming is what makes the Lab School and other elite privates what they are. It is a strange reference to make on a blog post lamenting the perceived decline of community schools.
LikeLike
This looks like the People’s Republic of China! Great job, Mr, President.
LikeLike