Joseph A. Ricciotti, a former professor at Fairfield University in Connecticut, wrote the following post:
One of the most alarming reports concerning the corporate education reform movement and the growth of Common Core in the country was published by Lee Fang in the Nation magazine. Fang’s report highlights how public education is now considered as the last “honeypot” for venture capitalists and Wall Street investors. Investors’ interest in public education as a money making venture was made crystal clear by attendance at the recent annual investment conference in Scottsdale, Arizona which skyrocketed from 370 people the previous year to over 2000 this year. Likewise, the number of companies presenting at the conference increased from 70 to 390, mostly technology companies. It is also no surprise that Jeb Bush, one of the leading advocates of Common Core in the country, was the keynote speaker at the conference. According to Fang, venture capitalists and for-profit education firms “are salivating over the potential 788 billion dollar K-12 education market.”
More and more politicians are learning that, based on the type of corporate reform education policies that they are espousing, these policies will more than likely also impact and lessen their chances of reelection. Take, for example, Governor Dannel Malloy in Connecticut and Mayor Rahm Emmanuel of Chicago, two Democrats who will be seeking reelection in the near future. Both of these political leaders have chosen to advocate typical corporate education reform policies that are basically anti-teacher in nature and have implemented education policies such as advocating charter schools over traditional public schools. Not surprisingly, we may be in for some stunning upsets in the upcoming elections.
In Connecticut, Governor Malloy chose Stefan Pryor as his Commissioner of Education who is not an educator and who has had a history as a charter school advocate. Hence, as a result, we have seen in Connecticut an unprecedented growth of Charter Schools over the past four years with dismal results as well as scandals involving some of their leaders. The appointment of Paul Vallas in Bridgeport as superintendent was another fiasco.
Pryor’s abrupt resignation with no appointment of a replacement in the cards until after the election does not bode well for any indication of change in Malloy’s corporate education policies. Moreover, Malloy may have dug himself into a hole based on the most recent poles and could face extinction come the November election.
Rahm Emmanuel’s actions in closing fifty of Chicago’s public schools has been the catalyst in generating numerous protests from parents and teachers. His battles with the head of the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU), Karen Lewis, may have resulted in a challenge emanating from the CTU against Rahm Emmanuel for the mayoral seat in the next election. The many protests in Chicago are conveying a message to Rahm Emmanuel that, although he is the mayor, he is not really the leader of the people in Chicago as the protestors themselves are the real leaders. As Naomi Klein has said as an outgrowth of the recent climate change march in New York City, when the leaders refuse to take the appropriate action, the people will become the leaders and take whatever action is needed to bring about necessary change.
This is what is happening today with accountability- based reform or a better term is corporate education reform. These policies throughout the country and especially with the less affluent children in urban schools where the Common Core State Standards are being implemented we find that parents are seething with discontent as they observe and witness the massive failure rate of their children on Common Core tests. As more and more Common Core tests are administered with massive numbers of children failing these tests, there will be a revolution that may serve as the catalyst for change.
Unfortunately, teachers cannot be a part of the Common Core revolt as any dissatisfaction or criticism on their part could be construed as insubordination with possible loss of employment. Hence, the parents of students in public schools will have to be the ones leading the revolt. We have in public education today many non-educators with leadership positions who place the interests of Wall Street and the Corporate sector above the interests of students. And, unfortunately, the corporate reform industry has a stronghold in Connecticut as an outgrowth of Governor Malloy and Stefan Pryor’s corporate reform policies. However, according to Diane Ravitch, author of best selling “Reign of Error,” the corporate education reformists may have all the money but we have the teachers and parents and “we will win” the battle for public education.

It’s curious how Big Capital and Big Corruption just naturally go hand in hand.
You’d think that some economists somewhere would have noticed that by now, I mean, if there were any real scientists among them …
LikeLike
. . . or educators . . .
LikeLike
It is a phony science that hides assumptions in numbers. Think of the music man. Promise, take money, flee, repeat. Good observation on the science angle, they ignore the sciences of neurology and medicine vis a vis effects of poverty. They also have no science to back their assumptions. They are a science free lot.
LikeLike
Ricciotti’s use of Lee Fang’s warning:
“Fang’s report highlights how public education is now considered as the last “honeypot” for venture capitalists and Wall Street investors.”
is a reminder of what Naomi Klein warned us about in her book “Shock Doctrine – The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. As espoused by Milton Friedman and later expanded by the corporatocracy, if there is no naturally occurring disaster, create the illusion of one – such as A Nation at Risk – it will work just as well.
Was the real purpose of the corporatocracy to improve education or simply to tap into that last “honeypot”?
LikeLike
I read an interview with Villas in Illinois where he downplayed his devotion to charter schools.
I don’t think it means anything substantively, but I DO think it’s meaningful that they think they have to say they support public schools to get elected.
If privatization was as popular As they claim it is, ed reform politicians would run on it. They don’t run on it. Republicans in Ohio don’t even run on it, not in the rural and suburban counties and precincts they count on to get elected. Why is that?
LikeLike
Here is a link by a parent who took an entire year of research on common core and did an hour long presentation that explains things remarkably well. At times the quality of the video goes in and out of focus… BUT LISTEN. He tells it all.
LikeLike
Cross posted at
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Joseph-A-Ricciotti-Polit-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Accountability_Corporate_Diane-Ravitch_Education-141026-231.html#comment517327
with this common which contains links
Keep in touch with the reality of Public Education, by keeping an eye and ear out for the Network for Public Education, which held its first-ever Public Education Nation broadcast; The panelists presented a united front in depicting the roots of the problems in education: wealthy benefactors, with little to no education experience, leading “reform” without the input of seasoned professionals. Teachers, principals, professors count themselves as troops on the ground, with significant insight into the issues within public education. They have no shortage of ideas as to how to fix them. However, it seems no one is asking them, these professionals say. Hence, Public Education Nation, which billed itself as “the voices of educators, parents and students, rather than billionaires, or those who echo their talking points,” according to education activist, NPE co-founder, and host Anthony Cody.
The speakers included such notable advocates for public education like Diane Ravitch, the prolific author of the national bestseller Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools, education professor and noted BAT (Badass Teacher’s Association member) Yohuru Williams, author of On the Same Track: How Schools Can Join the Twenty-First-Century Struggle against Resegregation and 2013’s New York Principal of the Year, South Side High School principal Carol Burris, Green Party candidate for lieutenant governor Brian Jones, and community activist Jitu Brown, among others.
LikeLike
I just don’t know why it’s considered a conspiracy or “fringe” to believe that incredibly wealthy people have outsized influence on public policy and politicians.
It isn’t considered a conspiracy EXCEPT in ed reform circles. It’s a huge problem in the US. It’s covered extensively. The concerns are completely reasonable and valid. The fear is that extremely wealthy people either do not know what is in the best interest of the public (well-intended but wrong) or will not act in the best interest of the public (self-serving).
This is in no way at all controversial OUTSIDE ed reform circles. Why is this ONE area an exception?
Is it smart to turn public schools over to 11 billionaires? This is a damn good question, and ed reformers won’t even allow discussion on it. They dismiss this concern OUT OF HAND.
The rest of the country is debating it in all other areas of policy! It’s mainstream! Teachout got 30% of the vote in a NY primary talking about capture and corruption. It’s real.
LikeLike
There is a telling paragraph in that New York Times article that you mentioned that hints at why the corporatocracy looks at education as “the last honeypot”
With the advent of Citizens United, any players with the wherewithal, and there are surprisingly many of them, can start what are in essence their own political parties, built around pet causes or industries and backing politicians uniquely answerable to them. No longer do they have to buy into the system. Instead, they buy their own pieces of it outright, to use as they see fit. “Suddenly, we privatized politics,” says Trevor Potter, an election lawyer who helped draft the McCain-Feingold law.
If the oligarchs have managed to “privatize” politics, education should be an tempting and easy opportunity – even “tantalizing”!
For the reference to “the last honeypot”, see Lee Fang’s “Venture Capitalists Are Poised to ‘Disrupt’ Everything About the Education Market” that Dr. Ravitch had referenced in an this post.
“The tantalizing prospect of tapping into the K-12 market has drummed up new level of zeal from education reformers”.
http://www.thenation.com/article/181762/venture-capitalists-are-poised-disrupt-everything-about-education-market
LikeLike
Reblogged this on logging entries in my life.
LikeLike
We have a Right-leaning Democrat in Ohio running specifically AGAINST public school privatization. I went to hear him speak. It’s central to his candidacy. This is no longer fringe at the state level if it’s playing in rural Ohio. He says ed reformers are harming existing public schools. At some point Republicans at the state level in Ohio are going to have to address this issue, instead of running as public supporters and then governing against public schools. Republicans need rural counties in this state. It’s unsustainable for them to continue this assault on public schools, politically. It’s why Kasich and Snyder in Michigan are denying gutting public school funding. They can’t win without public school parents.
http://www.voteforlymanstall.com/
LikeLike
It’s as if the mainstream media has a gag order, not to report on the corruption surrounding the privatization of public education. What is happening is outrageous; yet we rarely see or hear coverage, other than Steven Colbert or Jon Stewart. There are many stories here that only the bloggers dare to touch. America needs to wake up before we lose what is left of our democracy to the oligarchs.
LikeLike
I am responding to a post by Harlan Underhil and i can’t find where it was so I’m putting my response here; please indulge me. Harlan Underhill I think the model came out of the defense industry where you can keep repeating the industrial quality design over and over as you build new bombs. You are aiming at “perfection” in the absolute. Teaching is a different field; “The Black Swan” says we need to throw out the bell curve; Neil Wilson (Australia — thanks Duane Swacker) says we have only “psychometric fudge” when we apply these to actual people…. Totally different paradigms. Now I am going out on a limb here and revealing my own fallibility: (a) my first husband was a quality control engineer for Raytheon that built defense shields used in the Middle East to protect against incoming rocket attacks — he and I had many discussions and before we divorced (b) my second husband worked at MIT on the Apollo in the late 60s (the one that almost didn’t make it back)…. when they talk about “perfection” in their industry they aim for 100% but I would tell them this is not how we work in schools when working with human nature. I hope some people can get a laugh from this open, personal dialogue but it is true. For years in special education we would follow trajectories of individual children ; the most recent Stanford Binet claims to have “change sensitive scores” (built on Rasch models) that will help to do that. In the testing industry now, the PARCC and SBAC tests have not proven that they are instructionally sensitive…. even given the very best teachers in the world, would those tests pick up any changes in the student’s trajectory? It is still research and has yet to be proven. So I envision one huge law suit — however, all these kids are being harmed in the meantime and that is moral /ethical failure.
LikeLike
Jean,
Sometimes we don’t recognize the insidious nature of the language we use:
“. . . even given the very best teachers in the world, would those tests pick up any changes in the student’s trajectory?”
Perhaps the usage of “trajectory” is due to your prior life experience, but the usage implies a certain ability to control where a projectile will land. Do we really want to imply that a child and the myriad life factors can be “controlled” for such as is done for artillery and rocketry? I doubt so.
LikeLike
Thanks, Duane, you’ve got me there…. and I just hate the war metaphors…. would path be more accurate? for years we have been pushed into the accountability mode and when we follow a student it can be encouraging to have a measure of progress in vocabulary growth, or concept formation. That is different from trying to say in 4th grade that I can predict the child is “career or college ready” which of course we can’t…. I will do my best to think about the journey instead of using the “trajectory” term …. would the tests pick up a change over a two year span? over a six year span? are the tests change sensitive or “instructionally” sensitive?
LikeLike
Teachers have to speak truth to power. Without there voices, parents are dismissed as frantic and misinformed. In Chicago, teachers and parents have united to fight back. It has been a successful model for action. We need to replicate that across the country. Is it risky for teachers and educators to speak up? Yes. Is it our professional and ethical obligation? Yes. I am a NYC principal and I have been speaking up for a few years. In my experience, as long as we keep the “best interest” of students at the forefront, it is difficult to criticize our position.
LikeLike
Typo alert above. THEIR
LikeLike
Reblogged this on carolbach and commented:
Worthy reading; we are sinking into the soup with Common Core and its insidious move to corporate takeover of our kids’ educations.
LikeLike