In writing the state budget, New York legislators totally capitulated to the billionaire-funded charter industry. Of course, they were egged on by Governor Cuomo, who now sees himself as a national leader of the school privatization movement. (He is even leading a retreat with other prominent figures of the movement to turn public schools over to private management. Please note that the “philosophers” who wrote the invitation to the retreat couldn’t manage to spell the name of James Russell Lowell correctly.)
The budget deal includes these terms:
The private corporations that manage charter schools in New York City will never have to pay for using public space.
The de Blasio administration must offer space to all charters approved in the dying days of the Bloomberg administration. De Blasio had previously approved 14 of 17; now he must approve all 17. Whatever Eva Moskowitz wants, Eva gets.
The charters located inside public school buildings may expand as much as they wish, and the mayor can’t stop them. If this means pushing out children with severe disabilities, so be it. If it means taking control of the entire building and pushing all of the students out of their public school, so be it.
If a charter chooses to rent private space, the New York City public schools must pay their rent. Where will the money come from? Well, the public schools can always increase class size, or they can lay off social workers and counselors and psychologists. Or they could cut back on the arts. That’s their problem.
In addition, the budget deal includes a provision to authorize merit bonuses of $20,000 for “highly effective” teachers based on the state’s highly ineffective educator evaluation system. No one bothered to tell our legislators that merit pay failed in Nashville, where the bonus was $15,000, failed in New York City, where the bonus went to the whole school, failed in Chicago, and has consistently failed for neatly 100 years.
The bottom line is that when billionaires talk, the New York legislature and Governor Cuomo listen. Actually, they sit up, bark, and roll over.
You see, the charter schools say they get higher test scores (they don’t; on the 2013 state tests, the charter schools had the same scores as the public schools). The billionaires believe that students with high test scores deserve more privileges than students with low scores. Sort of like their own world, where those with the most money get to live in bigger houses, drive nicer cars, and have multiple privileges.
How did the Legislature capitulate to the billionaires? Ask Paul,Tudor Jones, who manages $13 billion and has decided that it is up to him to “save” American education. Ask Dan Loeb, hedge fund manager. Ask Democrats for Education Reform, which is the organization of hedge fund managers that is politically active in many states to promote privatization. Maybe they can explain why a child with high test scores is more deserving than a child with disabilities.

Who decides what children go to the charter schools?
LikeLike
Peg Buzako, students apply to attend a charter school. If there are more applicants than places, there is a lottery. Some charters, like Success Academy, spend hundreds of thousands of dollar to market the schools and the lottery to create the impression of scarcity. Once the lottery winners are announced, they enroll, but within a few weeks, months, or years, half will leave. Guess why?
LikeLike
Actually Diane, the lottery winners DONT just enroll. They have to be offered admission by Success, and not all are. How many aren’t? We’re trying to find out and have FOILED for the info but gotten no reponse. Either way, the lottery is opaque and guarantees nothing. Those not offered admission via lottery, or don’t accept admission (whom could they be?) are then replaced by applicants from the screened waiting list, where again selection critera are shady. What we do know is that Eva screens her wait list by interviewing parents 5 and 6 times. Even after this, and her claimed huge waiting lists, Success recruits outside of public schools clear into the Autumn, stopping only when the money is fixed on 10/31. Quite a sham.
LikeLike
And who decides who stays in charter schools? At many of them, students with disabilities or even just challenges are told “this probably isn’t the best school for you.” At one charter school, I heard a mother complaining that the high cost of special needs children was putting the school in the red.
LikeLike
New York Gov. Cuomo is the nation’s first Tea Party Democrat member. I am surprised he wasn’t asked to keynote at CPAC.
Diane, you hit the nail on the head this weekend, when you said that several cities will lose their public education system.
Cuomo, Silver, and Skelos will go down in history as puppets of the hedge fund moguls. It’s time to occupy our local elected leaders time with faxes, calls, and e-mails. When they return to their home districts, we must be at every appearance. We must put up challengers to each and everyone of them.
LikeLike
Where is the UFT in all of this. The UFT/AFT & the NEA should call for a national one day strike to protest the privatization and endless testing. That would get the public’s attention and possibly be the beginning of the end of control by the billionaire boys club. Maybe this blog should also concentrate on the failures of the unions to participate in this struggle.
LikeLike
Michael Brocoum, Good question. AFT & NEA have the numbers to primary challenge anyone in the lege who votes for this mess. Their leverage is critical inan election year.
Check out the tactics the Progressive Change Campaign Committee used when Obama included Social Security cuts (for the 3rd time) in his budget. They made it VERY clear that they would primary challenge anyone & everyone who voted for his budget. CHeck out this video on how they confronted the Third Way think tank & their corporate backers:
http://boldprogressives.org/2013/12/top-ten-bold-progressive-highlights-of-2013/
LikeLike
Traipsing through New Zealand & Ukraine. What NYC charter takeover? Can’t see that far! Suffer from Gates’ tunnel vision…can only see poverty across the Pond, not even stumbling over it in the US. Where are the Unions??????
Yes, where are The Unions? It is way past the time to have a National Sick Day(s), especially during Spring Testing. Don’t we feel the creeping crud oozing across America and infecting every teacher?
Let others hold down the schools for a couple of days. Amazing, what other people learn in a couple of days with children in HUGE classes.
We must demand more!
LikeLike
Well guess what else they’re doing? Plotting to turn charter teachers into union members. Sorry to criticize, but it’s true. As long as the unions see this as a boon to their membership, they will not fight it.
LikeLike
Karen, I think there may be some flaws in your logic. In Chicago, 100s of teachers have lost their positions as public schools have been closed. It is generally recognized that Rahm father is attempting to break the union by closing the schools. Unionizing in charter schools is not the easy task you appear to think it is. Go back and check the figures on unionized charter teachers.
LikeLike
It’s just more legislation that is exclusively focused on the needs, wants and desires of charter schools.
It’s all they do. One would think public schools were already gone, looking at the laser-like focus on privately-run, publicly-funded schools.
They can’t get anything done at the federal level, nothing, but they took care of charter schools!
“H.R. 2218, the “Empowering Parents through Quality Charter Schools Act,” streamlines the administration of the Charter School Program (CSP) and expands its scope. The bill restructures the current program so that grants are delivered by and operated by a state level entity. State educational agencies (SEAs), state charter school boards and governors are eligible to apply for five year grants. While continuing to support the planning, development, and initial implementation of charter schools, H.R. 2218 also make funds available for the expansion and replication of high-quality charter schools.”
That is some clout, I’ll tell you. I’ve never seen anything like it.
http://democrats.edworkforce.house.gov/bill/hr-2218-empowering-parents-through-quality-charter-schools-act
LikeLike
By highlighting these details of the budget deal, it is clear that this was a major capitulation. Thank you for doing this. I am going to contact my state legislators.
LikeLike
“However, the budget agreement announced Saturday also threatens to chip away at the mayor’s ability to control city schools. Having the mayor fully in charge of public education in the city has mostly worked over the last dozen years. This is no time to start diluting that authority and responsibility over the largest system in the country.”
They do this all over the country. They push charter authorization and regulation up to the state level, but it’s impossible to regulate thousands of schools at the state level.
Which they have to know, because it hasn’t worked anywhere else they’ve done it; OH, FL, MI and AZ.
Yet the deregulatory push continues, nationally. This model fails in state after state after state, yet they keep expanding it.
Which obviously contradicts the charter operator claim that they desire accountability, transparency and regulation. That will never happen at the state level, which they know.
LikeLike
I do not understand how the legislature can take control of NYC’s budget and put in an unfunded mandate with no cap to the amount, and puts it on the mayor to find the funding to pay for whatever space a charter deems is necessary if the mayor can’t find space inside a public school serving whatever population the charter is targeting, or to find space for a public school if they’re pushed out by a charter.
This goes way beyond Bloomberg in scope – Charters now have the authority to close public schools from within (all they have to say is “we’re expanding our rolls – leave now”), and to stick huge NYC rents on the mayor to pay private properties – what if the charter OWNS the property and dictates to the mayor that they need THIS space and that they will charge whatever they want for it?
Don’t think this stuff will happen? We shall see I suppose….there aren’t any caps that I see on city costs or any backdoor if the city can’t afford to purchase/build a new school – or even a timeline in which they can try to meet the demand.
NYC is now charter heaven. How the hell can a private entity that makes a profit have the legal right to close NYC Public Schools with no democratic process whatsoever?
LikeLike
“I do not understand how the legislature can take control of NYC’s budget and put in an unfunded mandate with no cap to the amount”
There may be a cap to the amount. The reports of the budget I saw over the weekend were saying that NYC would be on the hook for the first $40 million, although it wasn’t clear to me whether NYC and NY State would share costs beyond the $40 million threshold, or whether NY State would pick up all the costs beyond $40 million.
LikeLike
Elite greed at the White Face Lodge @ $3k per night plus. Dinner wil probably help fill his coffers and belly @ what $$$ per plate?
I’m sure Eva will be there roaming the tunnels to the indoor/outdoor pool.
We would all like to see who is footing the bill for this? Oh that’s right….we are! Philosophy my butt …. Disgusting!!!
LikeLike
You bet your sweet bippy other school systems across the US are taking copious notes as NY demonstrates a Putin Takeover. Invading an existing school, squat in the building, have every Right to do so, and kill off the Host School…chewed up from the inside.
This is Madness!
In their eyes, this is a dream. They can select the children ‘fit’ for the Charters. If children do not live up to the ‘Rigor’ those poor kids will be kicked back over to the other part of the building. Everyone will know the ‘Rejected Kids’.
This is Sickening!
Of course, Cuomo would only get away with this in the City.
Dare him to try this with the #whitesuburbanmoms in Long Island.
Chicago Mayor is planning as we tweet, for sure.
America, you have lost your Mind!
LikeLike
“This is Sickening!” No, this is capitalism. This is how the billionaires came to be to their station in life, by tossing the rest of us aside. Shame on us for voting these clowns in office again and again. We are getting exactly what we deserve.
LikeLike
So, does that mean capitalism is sickening? How would YOU organize production? You really have a duty to say.
LikeLike
I wonder what would happen if someone wanted to open a charter in Stuyvesant HS or Bklyn. Tech. The could blackmail the schools by “requesting” as much space as they want (the legislation does not say that the schools have to be under-utilized) or they can get free, very expensive space in the school district’s area! Up to now, most nyc charters have been opened in economically deprived areas. Now they will invade middle class areas, like the Village, park Slope, Forest Hills, etc. Let’s see what happens when the shit hits the fan!!!
LikeLike
One of the three charters originally denied co-location by de Blasio (because it was in a high school) is in downtown Manhattan, a very wealthy neighborhood with regular public schools that have long waiting lists. The downtown parents have been fighting with the DOE for years to get more seats, and we have won some of those battles.
Last year he DOE promised a certain number of seats would be added and then went back on their promise by 1/2 later. In a meeting to quell the outrage they did quietly suggest the new Success Academy opening in Murray Bertram would provide parents with “other options,” They even had a satisfied white/white collar Success Academy parent to reassure us that Success was working for his family (this might be the same person as MS who posts here but I’d have to go back through local paper archives for the man’s name to check that.) I don’t think he convinced anyone, however.
LikeLike
Should be “Murray Bergtraum High School”
LikeLike
this sucks , so now we fight they keep screwing us over we did’t sign on for this crap these apartheid dems, need to be voted out ,look if we voted to stop public education that would be different BUT WE DID’NT SO WE FIGHT
LikeLike
Good to know that Education Sage-On-Call M. Night Shyamalan is still trending, contributing as only he can to the current horrors in education.
LikeLike
Is there any real possibility of changing the pander-to-charters status quo unless we get some hedge fund millionaires on our side?
It seems to me that advocates of public education have exhausted the citizen’s democratic toolkit.
We’ve attempted to disseminate information about the very real flaws of charter schools. It is ignored and drowned out by “OMG charter schools under attack” histrionics of the pro-charter media.
We’ve organized rallies and protests. Eva organizes bigger rallies and protests, courtesy of her kids and employees, who are forced to attend. Guess who gets the attention?
We elected by a wide margin a so-called “progressive” mayor who promised to challenge charter school favoritism. Only months later, charging charter schools rent and stopping co-location is off the table. I don’t know if he’s sold out or been outmaneuvered, but it almost doesn’t matter – the results are the same.
How much longer are we supposed to sit here and watch the charter crowd destroy public education in NYC, bemoaning every defeat with angry comments and blog posts that seem to do nothing to prevent the next defeat and the one after that? When do we get to amass resources that can match and beat Eva’s, our own press and our own influential donors and our own state legislators? When can we fight back for real?
LikeLike
Yes when? Why are the public school advocates losing the fight so far? Are they doing something wrong? Or are the just being outspent?
LikeLike
The latter. Clearly. it’s all about The Money. The Money to buy off elected officials. The money to pay for massive advertising campaigns to push their propaganda and punish those who they do not like. The money to start and operate phony Astroturf groups with ersatz titles making them sound like real citizen otganizations.The Money to set up a handful of “Charter Potemkin Villages” to sucker the NY and national media. And The Money to Hire an Army of Bloggers to post propaganda everywhere on the Web while posing as “just average citizens”.
Of course it’s all about the money. Politicians don’t jump through these hoops for just anyone. Get real.
It’s 100% about the money.
Any moron can see that.
Can you, Harlan Underhill?
LikeLike
“How did the Legislature capitulate to the billionaires?”
“Democratic societies make terrible mistakes, especially when elected officials are bought off with big money.”
LikeLike
Looking to the future of NYC’s rent obligations for charters denied co-locations — one very important detail is whether the $40 million figure that’s been reported over the weekend is a hard cap, beyond which NY State is responsible for all the rent contributions, or a threshold that triggers NY State’s obligation to contribute a portion of rent. And if it’s the latter, how will the costs be divided between NYC and NY State?
If the $40 million is a hard cap for NYC, that may be a good thing (relatively speaking) for the city, and depending on how the actual costs play out in the real world, it may make sense for NYC to deny *all* future co-locations and treat the $40 million as a highly visible, transparent cost of doing business with the charter sector.
LikeLike
The only rental cap I saw in the legislation is 20% of the “basic tuition-$13527” per pupil or the rental costs-whichever is lesser. That does not suggest any kind of cap.
LikeLike
I haven’t seen the legislation, but this is what the Times has been reporting, and it’s typical of what the other news organizations have said:
“Under the deal, the city would be required to find space in public buildings for charter schools, which operate independently of the school district but receive public funds. If the city could not, it would have to cover the cost of renting private space, up to $40 million. Charter schools could challenge the city’s selection of space through an arbitration process.”
LikeLike
FLERP, where will the $40 million for charter rent come from? Why don’t the billionaires pay the rent?
LikeLike
Diane, I wish we could have heard our Mayor publicly raising questions like that at some point in the last week.
LikeLike
Perhaps the State’s plan is for the $40 million will come from the $300 million allocated for universal Pre-K
LikeLike
If it is a $40 million hard cap, that is a borderline miniscule amount that can be offset by stopping all the waste on ARIS, Skedula, Tweed lawyers, and all those other wasteful Bloomberg practices that de Blasio is going to put a stop to.
LikeLike
Whoa, I forgot about that. I remember hearing that there are BILLIONS of dollars that can be saved that way. Why are we even worrying about paying for charter school rent?
LikeLike
Please look at the legislation 1 (A-5): With regard to gaining space in a district school or getting rental space: “The City School District shall pay the charter school an amount attributable to the grade level expansion or the formation of the new charter school that is equal to the lesser of:
A-the actual rental cost of an alternative privately owned site selected by the charter or
B- twenty percent of the product of the charter school’s basic tuition for the current school year…..
Did I miss something? Where is the $40 million cap in the legislation???
LikeLike
Once again we have the right to the oligarch’s opinion. They know what is good for us. They clearly do not know the dangerous path they are on. The problem is it will ruin all of us.
LikeLike
Diane,
Among several items,
“The charters located inside public school buildings may expand as much as they wish, and the mayor can’t stop them.” Deception. Charter schools are public schools, serving the same children. And why would charter schools expand? Because parents want their children in them. Ah, but a cadre of We Know Best experts has no intention of letting parents decide for themselves and their own children. “But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?”
Next, “If this means pushing out children with severe disabilities, so be it. If it means taking control of the entire building and pushing all of the students out of their public school, so be it.” Well, does it mean that? When it becomes fact and not hypothetical sophistry, then report it to your readership.
Further, “If a charter chooses to rent private space, the New York City public schools must pay their rent. Where will the money come from?” Again, charter schools are public schools. The money will come from the same source: taxation. And it will be spent on the same clientele: NYC children.
Yet again, “The billionaires believe that students with high test scores deserve more privileges than students with low scores. Sort of like their own world, where those with the most money get to live in bigger houses, drive nicer cars, and have multiple privileges.” Yours seems to be a zero-sum world, wherein the privileges of some are attained only at the cost of privileges to others, and where the possession by some of money, cars, and houses means a corresponding loss or lack of money, cars, and houses by others. That is not a real world.
Finally, “the billionaire-funded charter industry,” “when billionaires talk,” “The billionaires believe,” “capitulate to the billionaires” and “Paul, [sic] Tudor Jones, who manages $13 billion.” You sound much like Mr Obama during his last campaign, when the phrase “millionaires and billionaires” was packed into every paragraph, apropos of nothing except to incite class hatred and envy. The NEA is also a billion-dollar industry. When it talks, legislators capitulate. No objection?
LikeLike
Since charter schools are public schools as you claim, Peter, should they not also be required to open their books for audits? Not a lot of that going on around the country. What ‘s going on with charters in Ohio?
http://www.nbc4i.com/story/24778722/nbc4-investigates-taxpayers-left-holding-bill-for-charter-schools
Yeah, public schools, alright.
And you are correct: this is class warfare. And to paraphrase Warren Buffet, the billionaires are winning the war. Now the rest of us are fighting back.
LikeLike
If charter schools, and public schools are one and the same, why did charter schools need this special law to tell them to be public schools and open their books to financial audits. Why do they not have elected school boards if you even can find out who their board is? The only thing that’s public about them is their financing.
As for pushing out children with severe disabilities. It is harder to prove this point as charter advocates would say SWD children are less likely to apply to a charter and may be more likely to be declassified if they are. Aside from the nonsensical argument about declassification since special education students take in a lot of funding, and since when are businesses loathe to take money especially since if they can meet the child’s needs with the classification, they win 2 ways.
We can see that charters typically do have far less SWD children than neighboring public non-charter schools and that they graduate far fewer such children too. We have numerous anecdotes of people who have tried to get their SWD child into charters and either failed or been punished so badly by the charter that they needed to withdraw their child.
As for the funding pot, if these schools are all one and the same, then why are they delineated separately in state law. Further, it will not all be spent on NYC children, at least part of it will go to enrich the charter operators further – and in the case of non-profits, those the charter contracts with for all of its services (excluding of course those massive non-profit salaries). And seeing as the city is having the onus on it of finding space or paying up, it is being taken right out of the mouths of those who CHOOSE public schools.
Small tangent – this dichotomous argument of children being split into those in charters and those stuck in failing public schools is atrocious – public schools have plenty of support.
As for Diane’s “zero sum world” – we can see in terms of income inequality that indeed the privileges of the “1%” do come at a cost to the rest of society. They control the hegemony of law and politics. They control the media. They try to control politicians. And as most economists would say, this is “them” taking a larger bite of the pie rather than enlarging the existing pie – the difference is that rather than creating more that feeds everyone, they’re leaving us crumbs and saving as much of the economy for themselves as possible. Indeed, today wealth in many cases does have a cost to everyone else attributed to it. See teachers in Detroit fighting for their pensions compared to the bank deals struck by Detroit that were attempts to secure better repayment terms for the banks.
As for the “NEA” being a billion dollar industry we should object to, the NEA is a conglomerate of professionals seeking equitable working conditions for all of its members who are in the working class. The voices of thousands of teachers is far more democratic than 1 multibillionaire staking out what he believes is right for society’s children. The teachers have bet their lives on helping children and educated themselves as such – what has that billionaire done?
It’s not about class envy and hatred, it’s about equitable circumstances in society for both children and adults to succeed and build meaningful lives and families. As opportunities both in education and in the workforce have been siphoned away over the last 30 years and the mean wage has stagnated, we look to those who have reaped the gains of what are inarguably huge gains in human productivity that have resulted in 0 net gain to those who produced it. There is a class of society that is far enriched above society’s workers, and there’s no sign they’re interested in sharing that wealth built on the backs of workers – indeed they seem more intent on destroying people’s voices and making people fearful for their jobs so they will be compliant. If there’s hatred, it comes from feelings of repression, fear, and inevitable servitude.
LikeLike
I am also waiting for my law to expand a public school within a charter school and/or for a charter to make room for a public school
LikeLike
This guy, Peter Cohee, Is a paid right-wing shill and propagandist for such extremist, anti-public education groups like the vile and deceptively labeled “National Association of Scholars.”
He is used by the billionaire class as a paid attack dog. He makes things up. He distorts. He’s deliberately deceptive. He’s not to be trusted.
Mr. Cohee was dismissed from his job at Boston Latin School in 2011 for poor job performance. I believe that Ihe anger and the bitterness you see in his writing is directly related to his failure In education.
It is not surprising that he would come here to try and derail and distort this discussion as well.
LikeLike
“The bottom line is that when billionaires talk, the New York legislature and Governor Cuomo listen. Actually, they sit up, bark, and roll over.”
GREAT line.
LikeLike
As they do indeed sit up, bark, and roll over, I would like to take them to the vet and neuter each and every one of them . . . . . Snip, snap, slice, sew, heal . . . . sit boy, sit! Down, boy, down! . . . .
LikeLike
This is the systematic dismantling of public schools from the inside out. For shame on Cuomo and the legislature!
LikeLike
“Best government money can buy”.
LikeLike
This is packed with great information–including the comments. But I’m still cracking up over the title of this post! “Dumb state budget deal” it’s pretty simple, isn’t it? I’ve started calling the district’s dumb plans in my community “cockamamie.” It’s become a signature of sorts. My school board member’s staff told me I should stop, but I’m not going to.
LikeLike
[…] particularly in New York City, where Mayor Bill de Blasio had threatened to modestly rein them in. Diane Ravitch sums it up: The private corporations that manage charter schools in New York City will never have to pay for […]
LikeLike
I have a question about the $40 million “cap” on NYC payments for charters that rent space because they cannot get space in a traditional school. Does the jargon embedded in the law provide that NYS will provide money to cover costs above $40 million. I wonder how this ruling will be implemented. For example, if many charters want space in schools and don’t get it and then they all find rental space that will cost more than $40 million, which schools will get money for their space? Or-Will NYS make up the difference for all of them? There is something in the law about an apportionment (P. 74, line 18) and later on line 29 a multiplier of 6/10. Can anyone shed light on this item???
LikeLike
My reading of that is that the state will kick in 60 cents on every dollar above $40 million. So it’s not a hard cap, just a threshold that triggers cost apportionment between the state and the city
LikeLike
Cuomo practically BRIBED the legislators by offering to kill the ethics commission looking into legislators’ abuse of office and criminal dealings. Of course they JUMPED at this deal!
LikeLike
How is any of this working to improve public schools? Let’s stop worrying about charter schools and improve public schools so no parent even considers the charter option. Attacking charter schools won’t solve our education problems.
LikeLike
Grunt92, charter schools drain away dollars from public schools and skim their best students. The costs don’t go down. The costs rise as public schools get the kids rejected by the charters. How do public schools improve when the charters can kick out the kids they don’t want? If deregulation is good, deregulate all schools.
LikeLike
While I don’t disagree with your argument regarding the draining of dollars from public schools, we have to face the fact that in NYC public education was failing before charter schools were introduced by Mayor Bloomberg. So now if we argue to immediately eliminate charter schools that work and have students and parents that like them (there have been actual parents and students protesting to keep the schools, not just commercials paid by big money), what about that will improve public schools? The policies that have been followed here haven’t improved public education. DeBlasio doesn’t seem to be presenting any new ideas on how to improve education beyond universal Pre-K. why not use his suggested tax on the ultra-rich to fund a new public school initiative?
LikeLike
Rgrunderstudios, NYC schools were NOT failing pre-Bloomberg.
By the way, on the 2013 state tests, the charters got exactly the same scores as public schools. Poof! No miracle.
LikeLike
And I suppose that this $40 million + unlimited amounts of NYS apportionment (60% of costs above the $40 million) will continue every year for the first group of charters getting rental space? What happens in 2015 when more charters request rental space? NYC will have already been committed to paying rent for the 2014 charters. Will NYC then have to offer an additional $40 million dollars to these new charters, in addition to the $40 million for the 2014 charters who are still in their rental spaces? Or, will the charters just go to Albany and amend the law and increase the cap to $80 million???
LikeLike
Dear Diane,
It seems to me that the civil rights of public school students are being violated; certainly, the ones of special needs students are! Are any of these issues actionable in court? I do believe that these provisions are sounding the death knell of public school in New York City! The charter schools, like snake fish, will eat up everything in sight and will be all that remains!
Sincerely,
Shelley, a public school teacher
LikeLike
It seems very interesting that you refer to “charters” all as one entity even though they have multiple different management organizations. It’s an effective method for avoiding stating the facts – that Success Academy scholars do achieve higher test scores than most of the students that are being educated in the same building as they are.
There was a really great Op-Ed from a Success Academy teacher in the Wall Street Journal that opened my eyes quite a bit. I’m including part of it here:
Success Academy critics, however, have a hard time accepting our students’ academic achievements, even after a five-year track record ranking among the state’s top-performing schools. Critics, among them the teachers union, claim we “counsel out” special needs or low-performing students to keep scores high. Success Academy loses fewer of its students (10%, including special needs students) each year than our peer co-located public schools do (21%). Despite evidence to the contrary, this myth is frequently cited as fact in print and online. Last year, 1,538 Success Academy students took the state exams; 13% of them were special-needs kids. Of that group alone, 56% of them passed math. An average of 7% of New York City district special-needs students passed math.
The newest theory regarding our test scores is the most outlandish. Jonathan Westin, executive director of New York Communities for Change, a union-funded nonprofit, was quoted in Bloomberg News saying that Success Academy is “trying to find ways to increase test scores; that’s why they go into the wealthier neighborhoods.”
Really? Is it just me—or does anyone else hear the prejudicial undertone in that statement? Is it really impossible for Mr. Westin to believe that Success Academy’s poor black and Latino children can achieve at extraordinarily high levels? That with hard work and dedication, significant numbers of children in Harlem and the South Bronx and Bed-Stuy can be proficient at math and reading? That Success Academy might want all children—black and white, poor and middle class—to have access to great schools in various New York City neighborhoods?
Critics fail to understand how insulting and hurtful their remarks are to students and their parents. One of my students recently asked me, “Why are so many people mad at us if we are doing so well?” These children work incredibly hard, and they’re proud of their success. No one, especially without knowledge of their situation or home life or personal effort, has the right to undermine their remarkable achievements.
There’s an excellent reason why Success Academy scholars do extraordinarily well on the state exams: We believe they can. We believe all children can succeed, no matter their socioeconomic circumstances.
Our critics do not share that belief. To them, the achievement gap—with only 11% of African-American children and 12% of Latino students prepared for college—is a given, an unfortunate, but unavoidable fact of New York City’s public schools.
Our students have flipped that “fact” on its head. Now it’s time for educators to start believing that with the right changes, we can achieve these results for all New York City students.
LikeLike
Amanda, you know that what you wrote is not true. Success Academy does not accept students with high special-needs, the students who are in self-contained classrooms because of their IEP. The neighboring public schools have 14% such students. The students with special-needs in SA are those with the mildest disabilities. SA has half as many ELL students as the neighboring schools. SA manages to disappear nearly half of its students. Those are facts, straight from the Department of Education as reported by SA. Your claim that “belief” is all it takes to pass the state exams is not grounded in fact or reality.
LikeLike
When test scores and outcomes are unusually high or unexpected, investigations begin. We saw widespread cheating in Atlanta and D.C. a few years ago and the cheating was discovered when their unusually high test results were reviewed. I doubt that S.A. has a miracle method for teaching reading and math. None of the other charter schools in NYC scored as high as SA., so it is natural to question the validity of SA test results. Let there be a fair and unbiased investigation of SA’s testing procedures, so we can put this matter to rest, one way or the other.
LikeLike
one more thing-The NYC Charter Center August 2013 Data brief mentioned SA’s unusually high test scores and indicated that they “would doubtlessly draw scrutiny [but] a great deal [but not all, I presume] of that attention should be directed to the network’s instructional practices and literacy curriculum.” I go for the scrutiny option!!!
LikeLike