Paul Horton, who teaches history at the University of Chicago Lab School, here ponders a famous remark by David Coleman, architect of the Common Core standards. Coleman said, while giving a speech in New York that was taped, that students need to learn that no one gives a s— about what you think or feel, which was his way of saying that your opinions and feelings matter little in the world, as compared to the ability to write or read a memo or informational text.
He writes:
Perhaps more studies are needed to determine whether there is a similar bundled connection between exposure to narrative stories and creative writing and the development of social and emotional intelligence, empathy, tolerance, and sensitivity to the needs of others. To take things a step further, our codes of ethics, morality, and connection to the spiritual dimensions of experience have always been intertwined with our reading and writing about sacred texts, great poetry, and great literature.
When we marginalize storytelling, literary fiction, and creative writing within K-12 language curricula in favor of nonfiction documents and the construction of analytical memos that might please Pearson Education, McKinsey consulting, and Bill Gates; we risk losing something more important than the ability to construct analytical memos.
To do so would be to risk severing our connection to the rest of humanity, to fall away into the cold, endless, zero gravitational space: the existential reality of the jackhammering of human connection that is the object of uninhibited capitalism.

Why must we need additional study to prove what we know to be true?!?! When story–whether told through word, song, dance, instrument, drama, painting, weaving, sculpture…are stolen from us, we cease to be human. Even scientists look for the story to tell, to describe the unveiling of their research. It is in the telling and hearing of stories that we recognize similarity, difference, strength, vulnerability, uniqueness…and hopefully develop respect for all creatures with whom we share this planet.
LikeLike
Storytelling is one of the core aspects of our sense of self – the story we tell ourselves and the world about who we are and how we relate to others. It’s tightly connected to memory. identity, social functioning, etc. One of the hallmarks of traumatic injury (whether actual brain injury or “merely” psychological injury) is the inability to integrate a coherent narrative of an event with the emotional and physical reactions thereof. Conversely, denying someone the ability to tell her/his story is a way to inflict trauma – it turns the person’s reality upside down. It’s no accident that conquerors almost always deny their conquered people the right to use their own language, make their own artwork, tell their own stories. I recomment Judith Herman’s TRAUMA AND RECOVERY for much more on the emotional violence and denial of self involved with trauma.
I guess I sound like some conspiracy nutjob, but I’ve become convinced that the elite have come to see the middle class and the poor in our own country as people to be conquered rather than fellow citizens of a democracy.
LikeLike
Dienne: I do not think that you are a “conspiracy nutjob” to point to an important aspect of the emerging—and increasingly publicly acknowledged—two-tiered education system that the owner of this blog has warned against.
Two small additions to what you wrote.
First, Chiara Duggan below [9:54 AM] points to David Coleman’s revealing remark, accessed by clicking on the link provided in the posting, to wit:
“Forgive me for saying it so bluntly, the only problem with …that [creative] writing is that as you grow up in this world you realize people don’t really give a [expletive] about what you think and feel.”
As always with the self-styled “education reformers,” it is helpful to filter their remarks through an English-to-English translator. He is simply repeating a commonplace among his peers, the sort of thing that speaks his heart but hurts the rheephorm brand when made public. A fuller and more accurate rendering would be: “Those of us who are and will be the owners, leaders and managers of this country don’t really give a [expletive] about what the vast majority of the people of this country, unworthy and shiftless and petulant and feeling so entitled as you are, think and feel.”
Which leads directly to the second point. The sort of docility/obedience training and low-level skills the leading charterites/privatizers are increasingly mandating FOR OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN is in stark contrast to what they provide for THEIR OWN CHILDREN.
From the Cranbrook [think Mitt Romney, among others] website an extremely brief excerpt from one of many many wonderful offerings in academics, arts and sports:
[start quote]
Cranbrook Theatre School
The Summer Theatre School, our oldest summer program, presents classic theater skills like character acting, lighting, dance, voice, costuming, set design and other stage crafts. The Theatre School operates from Cranbrook’s beautiful Greek Theater grove, an outstanding full sized stone replica of a classic outdoor Greek theater setting nestled in a mature pine forest. Evening outdoor theater productions attract ample crowds from neighboring communities.
[end quote]
Link: http://schools.cranbrook.edu/programs/theatre
One of the most terrifying aspects of the alleged “new civil rights movement” is that it has met with some success in convincing part of the public that separate but unequal & unfair in education is not just a good thing but highly desirable.
Thank you for your comments.
😎
LikeLike
I have to know: are you Crazy Crawfish and if so, is it CRAY-fish or CRAW-fish in Louisiana?
LikeLike
Chiara Duggan: alas, I am neither one nor the other. If only!
😉
Just a most insanely KrazyTA.
CrazyCrawfish is, well, a link to his own unmasking party:
Link: http://crazycrawfish.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/anti-ed-reform-history-from-my-perspective-part-i/
His blog is well worth visiting.
Please keep posting. I’ll keep reading.
😎
LikeLike
Weirdly (and not surprisingly), students applying to colleges must write an essay about some aspect of themselves and their lives, as a written audition piece for Admissions. This piece of writing ideally has provided more clues as to who the student really is – in and around the SAT and ACT scores, along with grade transcripts. Any chance that younger students had to practice the art of the personal narrative has now been shelved.
This makes no sense.
LikeLike
To clarify: Under the Common Core, in elementary, middle and high schools, Coleman and Co. are removing a writing genre that would help younger students to become “college ready”. Our media is soaked with personal narratives. Are these people that divorced from reality????
LikeLike
They’re in love with themselves. Of course they are that divorced from reality.
LikeLike
They sure are in love with themselves…and definitely divorced from reality. They are the entitled.
LikeLike
“Coleman said, while giving a speech in New York that was taped, that students need to learn that no one gives a s— about what you think or feel”
Wherein Coleman contradicts the entire history of the human race, with all the fairy tales and literary characters and stories humans create and repeat and always have created, and the ed reform community swallows his ridiculous premise, whole.
Not only are stories “important” to people, you can’t stop them from telling them!
Also, why do ed reformers believe one doesn’t need a “human connection” for college and career readiness? That’s not true. It’s not even true in their narrow “business” or “marketability” context. A “human connection” is absolutely essential in any but the most entry-level or rote job, even most of those require the ability to connect with other people. His pronouncement fails even as “college and career ready” advice. It’s simply false.
LikeLike
Coleman is nuts.
LikeLike
And yet he now holds the educational lives of millions in his hands. I keep wondering who died and made David Coleman the educational god?
LikeLike
“Pearson Education, McKinsey consulting, and Bill Gates”
Honestly, the vo-tech aspects of ed reform worry me a little too. My 20 year old son works for a Honda supplier and they’re training him in manufacturing quality control.
I suppose they could have demanded that the public cover the cost of a Honda-specific training program, but instead they’re covering the cost.
Scott Walker claims manufacturers in Wisconsin can’t find welders. I think it’s nonsense, I think companies in Wisconsin can’t find welders who will work for 9 dollars an hour, but I’m old enough to remember when there were three ways to become a skilled welder; labor unions apprentice program, company-trained or a public high school training program.
If Microsoft is worried about “creating skilled employees” why don’t they invest in training? Honda seems to be doing it, here in Ohio. Maybe we’re “falling behind” because US companies don’t invest in workers, but instead are looking to pass the cost of training their workers off on the public.
I’d like to hear Arne Duncan address that. Fat chance, right? 🙂
He’s only brave when he’s lecturing public schools and parents.
LikeLike
Below is why David Coleman doesn’t want public school students to think critically or creatively. It was written by an 8th grade student at Welsh Valley Middle School in the high achieving Lower Merion School District, which still provides opportunities for students to think for themselves and develop their own opinions:
Multiple Choice Futures
By Jamie Bregman
Difference.
It’s what makes us unique,
Different qualities,
And different physiques.
So now we come to the fact,
The fact about our tests,
The fact that they test us,
Like were all on the same track.
The very thought, that our futures
Come down to a single sheet of answers,
Is killing our education,
Like a slow moving cancer.
Some think,
That standardized testing
Points in the right direction.
But in truth,
the topic is so controversial
That it comes down to an election.
The pressure builds,
the anxiety doubles,
All for what?
A page of bubbles?
We are all different,
So why are we tested the same?
When we don’t do well,
Why are we to blame?
When it comes down to it,
Everybody is a genius,
So to test everyone alike,
Is an inaccurate inconvenience.
Our answers shouldn’t be based
On A, B, C, or D,
Because in real life,
It’s not going to be that easy.
The answer to a problem,
always has multiple solutions,
So these multiple choice, single answer, standardized tests,
Are nothing but pollution.
LikeLike
Danielle: thank you so much for the poem by Jamie Bregman.
Another POV:
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.” [Albert Einstein]
Choose between the two? Rank them? Rate them? Absolutely not. I like them both!
😎
LikeLike
KrazyTA, the Einstein quote is exactly where he got that line! He will be excited for your feedback. Thanks for the comment!
LikeLike
TY…perfect.
LikeLike
Thanks for the shout out to Jamie, Yvonne. He will be happy to see it!
He wants to share his point of view & give public school kids a voice.
LikeLike
And what a wonderful way to do it! Thanks, Jamie.
LikeLike
Awesome poem!
LikeLike
Dear Jamie Bregman:
You. Are. Awesome.
Jamie Bregman for Secretary of Education!
LikeLike
Here’s an interesting link about a study that links reading novels with an increase in the neural wiring of the brain in the areas associated with social interactions. Perhaps the goal is to have students stunted in these areas so that they won’t reach out to others as they accept their role as emotionless cogs in the machine.
LikeLike
My brother in law was raised in an atmosphere that put performance on standardized tests above all, check the box on upward mobility and churn out qualifying scores. He’s in his late forties and he makes a lot of money in finance.
When he had children, his wife read them fairy tales. He called me and my husband absolutely outraged. He said “why don’t I know any of these stories! Everyone else knows them!”
It was both funny and sad, because he’s real rigid, real “data” oriented, he’s middle aged and he still talks about his SAT score.
That was a box he missed checking 🙂
LikeLike
Part of the problem with putting 32 year olds in leadership positions in education as principals, deputy superintendents, decision makers, etc. is that they not only have limited exposure to educational practice, they also have limited life experience. This is one of the reasons experience matters in public education: teachers acquire life experiences and share them while they spend time in the classroom with their students. Here is Mercedes Schneider, in her column from today:
“However, the reality is that they ask for assistance from me, their teacher, because I am 46 and they are 15, and they learn by interacting with me as I broaden their exposure to the world via my own.”
David Coleman’s allergy to story-telling limits human interaction. It’s part of a world view of education that is antiseptic, devoid of the emotion and passion teachers strive to create each day in effective classrooms. We’re always baiting the hook to bring in our students. Stories do that.
It’s why the “standards” fail the teacher test. It’s why they ought not to reflect the perspective of just one architect.
LikeLike
My kids (my students are all my kids–I tell them that) LOVE to hear stories about me and I LOVE to hear stories about them. These are 8th and 9th graders and sometimes I still have storytime with them. We cannot be human without tapping into each others’ stories. It’s why I love teaching.
LikeLike
Ah. but that is not “teaching to the standard”! L.A.Superintendent Deasy would have you removed. For your sanity, stay out of L.A.
LikeLike
Here’s Arne Duncan’s favorite pundit blaming income inequality on public schools.
Does it occur to anyone else that blaming income inequality on public schools is incredibly convenient for US business and political leaders?
Wow. They’ve managed to completely insulate themselves from any responsibility or role in what has happened over the last thirty years. It’s the fault of public schools! It’s not privatization or the demise of labor unions or the idiotic and narrow focus on making a quick buck in the next quarter rather than investing in employees or captured politicians who serve monied interests. It’s second grade teachers! They’re the culprits!
What a sad joke. Does anyone besides pundits and politicians buy this?
LikeLike
Duncan’s favorite dopey pundit:
“Are we falling behind as a country in education not just because we fail to recruit the smartest college students to become teachers or reform-resistant teachers’ unions, but because of our culture today: too many parents and too many kids just don’t take education seriously enough and don’t want to put in the work needed today to really excel?”
Teachers are dumb, unions suck, and parents and students are lazy.
Not a word about wages, business, or political leaders. This is a great message for President Obama. Absolutely. He should blame ordinary middle class people for the fact that wages are stagnant. Obviously, they’re all dumb, coddled and lazy according to the millionaire pundit at the NYTimes.
Glad we solved income inequality! Thank God no one who is at all powerful or wealthy was implicated in this “solution” 🙂
LikeLike
This is merely “culture of poverty” dogma repackaged for education. These pundits really need to get some new ideas. And they really need to read some social science other than The Bell Curve with a side of Malcolm Gladwell.
While at a very high level I agree that American education could be more rigorous, I think this for very different reasons. Rather than spending any time on pedagogy, Friedman goes straight to this: “To really help our kids, we have to do so much more as parents. We have to change expectations about how hard kids should work. And we have to work with teachers and leaders to create schools that demand more from our kids.”
We’lldemand more. You’llwork harder.
That is not pedagogy. It’s a statement of role expectations. As motivation, it really only works for students who have a reason to believe that by playing by these rules their own goals will be met. Its darkly humorous that some students, already in junior high, have caught on to the absurdity of this game and have realized that they actually have the power to dissent – to basically say as we did in the 90s – “homie don’t play that.” Now, opting-out at such a young age will virtually guarantee more hardship so it is a short-sighted approach. And that is why our educational system shouldn’t put students in that position in the first place. The answer isn’t to say “We’ll demand more. You’ll work harder” even louder (as if they never heard you in the first place). The answer is to offer real intrinsic and extrinsic rewards to working harder. A rigorous and engaging pedagogy that is both developmentally appropriate and culturally relevant can build intrinsic motivation over time. A realistic prospect of full participation in the economic and cultural life of our democracy is the extrinsic reward.
These pundits should know that even a factory boss can only go around waving their arms and shouting “I’m demanding more! You’ll have to work harder!” for only so long before everything comes to a grinding halt.
LikeLike
Thanks. That’s interesting, the genesis of this.
For me it’s fairly simple. I won’t accept a lecture on high standards from a pundit who basically recycles the same column week after week after week, and I won’t accept a lecture on high standards from Mr. Duncan, because I am not impressed with his work.
Duncan’s speech to parents was awful. He read one book, the fad book, the Amanda Ripley book, and quoted it extensively. The speech was patronizing and shallow, chock full of slogans and marketing.
They should hold themselves to higher standards.
LikeLike
Chiara Duggan and Emmy: the mindset you two are describing so well is summed up in the old workplace slogan—
“The beatings will continue until morale improves.”
I used to think it was perceptive and humorous. Then I thought it was perceptive and humorous and painful. Given the fury with which the self-styled “education reformers” follow it in their zeal to rake in ever greater $tudent $ucce$$, I am feeling less and less of the “messy middle” and just the first and last parts of that triad.
Thank y’all for your comments.
😎
LikeLike
The Storyteller’s Creed is taken from the beginning of Robert Fulghum’s book All I Really Need To Know I Learned In Kindergarten.
I believe that imagination is stronger than knowldege,
That myth is more potent than history,
That dreams are more powerful than facts,
That hope always triumphs over experience,
That laughter is the ony cure for grief,
And I believe that love is stronger than death.
LikeLike
I think it’s important to note that Coleman provided evidence for the Math standards but, while claiming there was evidence for the ELA standards and that he would cite it, too, he actually provided none in this discussion –where he also admitted that he was unqualified to write the standards:
http://truthinamericaneducation.com/common-core-state-standards/david-coleman-2-years-ago-we-were-a-collection-of-unqualified-people/ The transcript can be read here: http://truthinamericaneducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/What_must_be_done.pdf
Had Coleman been a trained, experienced educator, he would have known that it’s not enough for students to provide “evidence,” which he emphasized in the Common Core as if that expectation didn’t already exist. That is part and parcel to being able to write in an accepted writing style, such as MLA and APA Style –which has been a standard for middle school students in my district for decades.
I’m going to address Coleman’s focus on evidence and informational texts, since he claims to be preparing students for college, beginning in Kindergarten, and so many college level textbooks and assigned readings in peer-reviewed scholarly journals are indeed non-fiction.
In college, when writing in APA Style, which is the accepted writing style by many experts in the Social Sciences, including Education, students are to delay providing their opinions. After they cite evidence, such as from peer-reviewed scholarly sources like professional journals and college textbooks, students are to compare, contrast and analyze the evidence. In conclusion, they are to synthesize the evidence, evaluate it and provide their opinions.
Analysis, synthesis and evaluation are higher order thinking skills, according to Bloom’s Taxonomy (Huitt, 2011), which encourage critical thinking and help students to develop *educated* opinions –which do matter tremendously in the real world. Thus, teachers at virtually all levels of education value and promote the development of both lower order and higher order thinking skills, as developmentally appropriate, across the curriculum. Coleman does not know how teachers help students to develop *educated* opinions, based on his unsubstantiated claims about teachers and his ELA prescriptions. Thus, America has good reasons to not give a s*it about what Coleman thinks, as those are merely his personal opinions, not *educated* opinions.
References
Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.’s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved January 19, 2014, from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/bloom.html
LikeLike
“as if the expectation didn’t already exists”
One of the distinguishing characteristics of work by the deformers is their breathtaking lack of familiarity with actual practice in classrooms. They continually say the most obvious crap as though it were some revelation they’ve just brought down from the mountain top. And they are made grotesque by their adherence to a few truths through which all is seen, as through a distorting lens.
I listen to Coleman and the other deformers, and I am often reminded of this passage from Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio:
“[I]n the beginning when the world was young there were a great many thoughts but no such thing as a truth. Man made the truths himself and each truth was a composite of a great many vague thoughts. All about in the world were the truths and they were all beautiful.
“The old man had listed hundreds of the truths in his book. I will not try to tell you of all of them. There was the truth of virginity and the truth of passion, the truth of wealth and of poverty, of thrift and of profligacy, of carelessness and abandon. Hundreds and hundreds were the truths and they were all beautiful.
“And then the people came along. Each as he appeared snatched up one of the truths and some who were quite strong snatched up a dozen of them.
” It was the truths that made the people grotesques. The old man had quite an elaborate theory concerning the matter. It was his notion that the moment one of the people took one of the truths to himself, called it his truth, and tried to live his life by it, he became a grotesque and the truth he embraced became a falsehood.”
LikeLike
Spot on, Robert!
To clarify, in my district, and from what I understand, in other districts across the country, too, students have long been expected to write in an accepted writing style, providing evidence, citations, etc., beginning in middle school. They are expected to continue to hone such writing skills across the curriculum in high school as well.
That was even an expectation of students beginning in middle school when I was a student here in the 60s, so COLEMAN IS AT LEAST A HALF CENTURY BEHIND on the learning curve for ELA standards in this country. It baffles the mind that this guy was tasked with being the “architect” of NATIONAL standards for ELA, when he is so out of the loop on education matters. This is absolutely appalling.
LikeLike
A number of years ago, I had a dream in which I was on a small airplane, flying into Cuba. I could see the island, below. It was a white wedding cake floating in an emerald sea. Next to me in the plane was an orangutan smoking a cigar.
In the preceding week, I had been on a puddle jumper prop airplane. I had attended a wedding where there was a large white sheet cake. I had been to a zoo with my grandson and seen an orangutan. And I had smoked cigars with friends on a golf course. And I had read a bunch of stories in newspapers about Fidel’s brother taking over in Cuba.
And all these events fired in my head, and a part of me that tells stories wove these random firings of recent events into a coherent narrative.
Narrative is one of our PRIMARY means for making sense of the world.
Change people’s narratives, and you change EVERYTHING.
What drives education deform? A narrative: Our schools have failed. We are waiting for Superman. We need these tests and national standards. If we adopt those, we’ll knock the socks off Finland and Singapore.
What are we but our narratives? Erase your stories, but leave only your world knowledge and skills, and guess what happens? YOU are GONE. Pfft! No YOU.
There’s a school of clinical psychology and psychiatry called Cognitive Narrative Therapy. It’s all about teaching people how to tell themselves more life-enhancing stories about themselves and others. It works because people are the stories they tell themselves.
And history is the stories that we tell about our past. And science is storytelling about how the world works. And even that quintessentially “informative” scientific paper has its section that tells the story of the history of the problem and its methodology section that tells the story of how the research was done and its conclusion that plants the authors’ hopeful story about how their research will change things.
Where did we learn to be human? Gathered around the fire with other humans, at night, telling stories.
What are our deepest ideals? Stories we tell ourselves about what who we think we should be.
What are our strongest aspirations? Stories we tell ourselves about what we want to be, what we will be.
And what is “understanding” an event, a bit of history, except imposing a narrative frame on it?
And, of course, you can’t be a GREAT teacher without being a GREAT storyteller.
We would do well to attend to storytelling, to make sure that we and our students have a clue what it’s all about.
Even seeing, which people often naively think of as unmediated access to the world as it is, is storytelling. See the website of the great cognitive psychologist and expert on visual perception, David Hoffman, for brilliant, philosophically profound, essays on this.
Someone sign David Coleman up for a remedial course on storytelling, please.
LikeLike
Coleman’s comment made me sick this summer when I first read it. I let my first graders write lots of narratives, regardless. They need to write about things like loosing a tooth, going trick or treating, etc. Besides which, this is the form of writing that gets them interested in writing period. Do we really want to live in a world where no one cares? Who will our story tellers be if we limit our students writing?
LikeLike
I urge all readers of this blog to read Paul Horton’s superb piece in its entirety. It’s beautifully written and argued, and it may well be the most profound piece you’ve read all year. Thanks, Diane, for posting this. And Paul, well done!
LikeLike
It’s a great article. Coleman is just plain wrong. And it’s amazing how many different things he’s wrong about. Just for the record, he wasn’t talking about “creative writing.” He was talking about “personal writing,” Here’s my transcript of the excerpt I was able to find on YouTube.
“The fifth point is about writing. Do people know the two most popular forms of writing in the American high school today? [Audience comment.] Sorry? ‘Texting,’ someone says. I don’t think that’s for credit, though, yeah. But I would say that, as someone said, it is personal writing. It is either the exposition of a personal opinion, or it is the presentation of a personal narrative. The only problem—forgive me for saying this so bluntly—the only problem with those two forms of writing is as you grow up in this world people really don’t give a s___ about what you feel or what you think.”
He then conjures up a specious anecdote intended to ridicule the idea that personal narrative could ever be useful on the job. Even without the casual fascism of his infamous sound bite, the joke is on him. There’s now a whole library of books explaining the importance of narrative in the workplace (and life in general). But apparently Mr. Coleman hasn’t gotten the news.
There’s another interesting Coleman speech in which he talks about the new “fifty-fifty split” between “literary reading and informational reading” in the elementary grades. He calls this a “radical” shift. Here, as elsewhere, he reduces the building of knowledge to what can be transferred via a formal course of study, which to me is a fundamental flaw in the application to the classroom of E. D. Hirsch’s cultural literacy ideas. In downplaying the knowledge-building potential of literature, he ignores the work of researchers like Stephen Krashen, who is not a fan of the Common Core.
Here’s my transcription of an excerpt from that speech:
“In K-5 education, typically state standards and state assessments, focus 80% on literature, even though the evidence from Don Hirsch and others is that building knowledge and building informational understanding in early grades in particular is essential for later disciplinary knowledge and for general knowledge required for later reading. So the core standards require a fifty-fifty split, in which kindergarten through fifth grade now measures equally literary reading and informational reading, including science and history reading. They are quite radical in that shift, except I have learned, as reporters may be in the room, I’m speaking background because radical does not play well for the public. We’re building incrementally on what people are doing, in a very productive way. [Audience laughter]”
I hope more teachers will see this man and his ideas for what they are.
LikeLike
“Not everyone wants light. Not everyone wants clarity.”
–David Coleman, describing himself as the bringer of light and clarity, as the way, the truth, and the light.
LikeLike