Archives for the month of: June, 2013

Harvey Scribner is a teacher in Philadelphia. He got his pink slip over the weekend. He was broken-hearted.

He knows that no one cares.

But he needed to say what he did in his four years as a teacher and why his school should not be destroyed:

“Since coming to the District I found equipment when there was none, I created curriculum when there was nothing, I did without when we needed supplies, I broke up fights, I sent kids to class when they wandered the halls, I worked two summer programs and took the extra step to complete training when the District did not think it was needed. For the last four years I have struggled, alongside the most courageous and honorable people I have ever worked with, to teach the students, feed the students, clothe the students, protect the students, and lead the students. For this dedication, and for the dedication of my brothers and sisters in education, we are now rewarded with this?

A District that lets us go, a union that shrugs its shoulders, a city that sleeps, a state that remains deaf, a federal system that demands more and offers less. The real crime is to the neighborhood’s and blocks in Philadelphia that cry out for something better, to anyone that would hear and that sound is lost in the overwhelming symphony of thundering apathy on all sides.

I realize that there are always forces beyond my control, but know that if you break up our team at Crossroads, you will damage one of the few systems in the School District of Philadelphia that is actually working. We are strong because of the integration of our curriculum, the dedication of our small but determined band of educators, and because we have the proper leadership to carry us through. I understand that every school and employee will claim the same, but we are truly different. If you break us up now, you will lose one small program that is making a profound impact on the fabric of our city.”

A diverse group of individuals have joined to sign an Education Declaration to Rebuild America. Please read the statement and if you agree, send it to your friends, tweet it, add it to your Facebook page.

Please sign here.
·

An Education Declaration to Rebuild America

Americans have long looked to our public schools to provide opportunities for individual advancement, promote social mobility, and share democratic values. We have built great universities, helped bring children out of factories and into classrooms, held open the college door for returning veterans, fought racial segregation, and struggled to support and empower students with special needs. We believe good schools are essential to democracy and prosperity — and that it is our collective responsibility to educate all children, not just a fortunate few.

Over the past three decades, however, we have witnessed a betrayal of those ideals. Following the 1983 report A Nation at Risk, policymakers on all sides have pursued an education agenda that imposes top-down standards and punitive high-stakes testing while ignoring the supports students need to thrive and achieve. This approach – along with years of drastic financial cutbacks — are turning public schools into uncreative, joyless institutions. Educators are being stripped of their dignity and autonomy, leading many to leave the profession. Neighborhood schools are being closed for arbitrary reasons. Parent and community voices are being shut out of the debate. And children, most importantly, are being systemically deprived of opportunities to learn.

As a nation we have failed to rectify glaring inequities in access to educational opportunities and resources. By focusing solely on the achievement gap, we have neglected the opportunity gap that creates it, and have allowed the re-segregation of our schools and communities by class and race. The inevitable result, highlighted in the Federal Equity and Excellence Commission’s recent report For Each and Every Child, is an inequitable system that hits disadvantaged students, families, and communities the hardest.

A new approach is needed to improve our nation’s economic trajectory, strengthen our democracy, and avoid an even more stratified and segregated society. To rebuild America, we need a vision for 21st Century education based on seven principles:

· All students have a right to learn. Opportunities to learn should not depend on zip code or a parent’s abilities to work the system. Our education system must address the needs of all children, regardless of how badly they are damaged by poverty and neglect in their early years. We must invest in research-proven interventions and supports that start before kindergarten and support every child’s aspirations for college or career.

· Public education is a public good. Public education should never be undermined by private control, deregulation, and profiteering. Keeping our schools public is the only way we can ensure that each and every student receives a quality education. School systems must function as democratic institutions responsive to students, teachers, parents, and communities.

· Investments in education must be equitable and sufficient. Funding is necessary for all the things associated with an excellent education: safe buildings, quality teachers, reasonable class sizes, and early learning opportunities. Yet, as we’ve “raised the bar” for achievement, we’ve cut the resources children and schools need to reach it. We must reverse this trend and spend more money on education and distribute those funds more equitably.

· Learning must be engaging and relevant. Learning should be a dynamic experience through connections to real world problems and to students’ own life experiences and cultural backgrounds. High-stakes testing narrows the curriculum and hinders creativity.

· Teachers are professionals. The working conditions of teachers are the learning conditions of students. When we judge teachers solely on a barrage of high-stakes standardized tests, we limit their ability to reach and connect with their students. We must elevate educators’ autonomy and support their efforts to reach every student.

· Discipline policies should keep students in schools. Students need to be in school in order to learn. We must cease ineffective and discriminatory discipline practices that push children down the school-to-prison pipeline. Schools must use fair discipline policies that keep classrooms safe and all students learning.

· National responsibility should complement local control. Education is largely the domain of states and school districts, but in far too many states there are gross inequities in how funding is distributed to schools that serve low income and minority students. In these cases, the federal government has a responsibility to ensure there is equitable funding and enforce the civil right to a quality education for all students.

Principles are only as good as the policies that put them into action. The current policy agenda dominated by standards-based, test-driven reform is clearly insufficient. What’s needed is a supports-based reformagenda that provides every student with the opportunities and resources needed to achieve high standards and succeed, focused on these seven areas:
1. Early Education and Grade Level Reading: Guaranteed access to high quality early education for all, including full-day kindergarten and universal access to pre-K services, to help ensure students can read at grade level.

2. Equitable Funding and Resources: Fair and sufficient school funding freed from over-reliance on locally targeted property taxes, so those who face the toughest hurdles receive the greatest resources. Investments are also needed in out-of-school factors affecting students, such as supports for nutrition and health services, public libraries, after school and summer programs, and adult remedial education — along with better data systems and technology.

3. Student-Centered Supports: Personalized plans or approaches that provide students with the academic, social, and health supports they need for expanded and deeper learning time.

4. Teaching Quality: Recruitment, training, and retention of well-prepared, well-resourced, and effective educators and school leaders, who can provide extended learning time and deeper learning approaches, and are empowered to collaborate with and learn from their colleagues.

5. Better Assessments: High quality diagnostic assessments that go beyond test-driven mandates and help teachers strengthen the classroom experience for each student.

6. Effective Discipline: An end to ineffective and discriminatory discipline practices including inappropriate out-of-school suspensions, replaced with policies and supports that keep all students in quality educational settings.

7. Meaningful Engagement: Parent and community engagement in determining the policies of schools and the delivery of education services to students.

As a nation, we’re failing to provide the basics our children need for an opportunity to learn. Instead, we have substituted a punitive high-stakes testing regime that seeks to force progress on the cheap. But there is no shortcut to success. We must change course before we further undermine schools and drive away the teachers our children need.

All who envision a more just, progressive, and fair society cannot ignore the battle for our nation’s educational future. Principals fighting for better schools, teachers fighting for better classrooms, students fighting for greater opportunities, parents fighting for a future worthy of their child’s promise: their fight is our fight. We must all join in.

Signatories
· Greg Anrig
The Century Foundation

· Kenneth J. Bernstein
National Board Certified Social Studies Teacher

· Martin J. Blank
Director, Coalition for Community Schools

· Jeff Bryant
Education Opportunity Network

· Dr. Nancy Carlsson-Paige
Co Founder, Defending Early Years Foundation

· Anthony Cody
Teachers’ Letters to Obama, Network for Public Education

· Linda Darling-Hammond
Professor of Education, Stanford University

· Larry Deutsch, MD, MPH
Minority Leader (Working Families Party), Hartford City Council

· Bertis Downs
Parent, Lawyer and Advocate

· Dave Eggers
Writer

· Matt Farmer
Chicago Public Schools parent

· Dr. Rosa Castro Feinberg, Ph.D.
LULAC Florida State Education Commissioner;
Associate Professor (Retired), Florida International University

· Nancy Flanagan
Senior Fellow, Institute for Democratic Education in America (IDEA);
Blogger, Education Week; Teacher

· Andrew Gillum
City Commissioner of Tallahassee, Florida
National Director of the Young Elected Officials Network

· Larry Groce
Host and Artistic Director, Mountain Stage, Charleston, West Virginia

· William R. Hanauer
Mayor, Village of Ossining;
President, Westchester Municipal Officials Association

· Julian Vasquez Heilig
The University of Texas at Austin

· Roger Hickey
Institute for America’s Future

· John Jackson
Opportunity To Learn Campaign

· Jonathan Kozol
Educator & Author

· John Kuhn
Superintendent, Perrin-Whitt School District (Texas)

· Kevin Kumashiro, Ph.D.
Incoming Dean, University of San Francisco School of Education;
President, National Association for Multicultural Education

· Rev. Peter Laarman
Progressive Christians Uniting

· Chuck Lesnick
Yonkers City Council President

· Rev. Tim McDonald
Co-Chair, African American Ministers In Action

· Lawrence Mischel
Economic Policy Institute

· Kathleen Oropeza
Co-Founder, Fund Education Now

· State Senator Nan Grogan Orrock
Georgia Senate District 36

· Charles Payne
University of Chicago

· Diane Ravitch
New York University, Network for Public Education

· Robert B. Reich
Chancellor’s Professor, University of California at Berkeley;
Former U.S. Secretary of Labor

· Jan Resseger
United Church of Christ, Justice & Witness Ministries

· Nan Rich
Florida State Senator

· Hans Riemer
Montgomery County Council Member; Montgomery County, MD

· Maya Rockeymoore, Ph.D.
Center for Global Policy Solutions

· David Sciarra
Education Law Center

· Rinku Sen
President and Executive Director, Applied Research Center

· Theda Skocpol
Harvard University
Director, Scholars Strategy Network

· Rita M. Solnet
Co Founder, Parents Across America

· John Stocks
Executive Director, National Education Association

· Steve Suitts
Vice President, Southern Education Foundation

· Paul Thomas, EdD
Furman University

· Dennis Van Roekel
President, National Education Association

· Dr. Jerry D. Weast
Former Superintendent, Montgomery County (MD) Public Schools;
Founder and CEO, Partnership for Deliberate Excellence

· Randi Weingarten
President, American Federation of Teachers

· Kevin Welner
Professor, University of Colorado Boulder School of Education;
Director, National Education Policy Center

Roger Hickey
Campaign for America’s Future
office: (202) 587-1604 cell: (202) 270-0300

Columnist David Safier of Tucson keeps close watch on the corporatization of education in Arizona.

He recently reported that the Tucson school district is outsourcing student data to a Murdoch owned site called mCLASS. This is different from the Murdoch data storage program called inBloom.

Safier is concerned about the security of student data, as we should all be. Why can’t schools respect student privacy?

Newark, New Jersey, has been under state control for 18 years, and many residents have sought a return of local control. Their demands have grown louder since the district became a playground for reformers after Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg gave the city $100 million for reform and the state appointed Broad-trained superintendent Cami Anderson.

In a surprise move, State Commissioner Chris Cerf gave the district’s powerless elected board “fiscal control” but no one knows what that means. Can they cut the budget proposed by Anderson? Can they change it? Can they raise or lower her salary? No one knows.

The most important responsibility of a school board is to hire and fire the superintendent, and this power they definitely do not have.

Logan T. Carlson, an investigative journalist for the Gannett News Service, noticed that the School Choice Demonstration Project at the University of Arkansas is funded by pro-voucher foundations, including the Walton Family Foundation and the Bradley Foundation. A group of researchers at the Project have been responsible for the five-year evaluation of Milwaukee’s voucher program. They found that the voucher schools did not affect students’ test scores, but led to a high graduation rate. Critics point out that 56% of the students who enrolled in the voucher program left before graduating.

Even more worrisome is the connection between the research project and campaign donors.

Carlson writes:

“The research conducted by the School Choice Demonstration Project at the University of Arkansas is paid for primarily by special interest groups that also donate to politicians pushing for the voucher expansion.

“A Wisconsin Democracy Campaign report on school choice special interest money shows that individuals with ties to foundations that have funded the School Choice Demonstration Project have donated more than $630,000 to Wisconsin politicians, most of them Republicans, during the past decade.”

Patrick Wolf, the lead researcher from the University of Arkansas, said his research was unaffected by the source of the funding. However, in an opinion piece he wrote recently, Wolf strongly endorsed school choice in Minnesota and warned Minnesotans that they had fallen behind in adopting school choice programs, such as vouchers and charters.

The reporter noted that the Walton Family Foundation had spent over $500 million in the past three years to support school reforms, especially vouchers and charters. In 2002, the foundation gave $300 million to the University of Arkansas, which the article calls Walmart University.

When the University established its Department of Education Reform, funded in part by Walton, it invited Jay Greene to chair the department. Greene is known as a strong advocate of vouchers. Patrick Wolf holds the endowed chair of school choice in the department.

A teacher read the discussion about the “parent trigger,” which assumes that schools improve when parents have the power to fire some or all of the staff, or to turn the school over to a private charter operator.

This teacher disagrees, based on direct experience:

I can add to this discussion. I am a teacher in a “failing” inner city school that was closed down and had its leadership and faculty changed. I came in a year after the new principal and have been there for several years now.

What happened is that changing the leadership, the staff and structure of the school, the supervisory network, the uniform requirements all has not changed the school’s low performance. The reasons are clear, it’s because it’s the kids are all the same, the families are all the same, the neighborhood is the same and all of the same community-wide problems are the same.

Changing principals, APs, teachers, or even the name on the school does not address the underlying troubles in our school – poverty, drugs, crime, violence and teen pregnancy.

But education-related factors can be just as damaging, from the regimen of standardized tests that makes school mind-numbingly boring to the cherrypicking of “desirable” students by nearby charter schools. These are the fault of politicians and corporations, not local school staff, but cut into valuable learning time and waste tax dollars just the same.

Paul Thomas has a surprising and unusual habit of thinking. He doesn’t follow the crowd or the latest fashion. In this post, he notices how organizations are falling into line on the Common Core, even though they know that schools and teachers and children are not ready. Thomas taught English in high school for nearly twenty years; he now is a professor at Furman University. In his post cited here, he examines the issue of choice and inevitability.

Come to think of it, it’s interesting that the same people who insist that everyone needs to have a choice of schools (like Jeb Bush and Joel Klein), also insist that when it comes to Common Core, there should be no choice at all. Just fall in line. It is inevitable. Everyone must comply. If, as Jeb Bush puts it, choosing a school should be like choosing what kind of milk you want (1%, 2%, skim, chocolate, whole, buttermilk?), why only one curriculum for the whole nation? Why not choice there too?

A few weeks ago, Randi Weingarten called for a moratorium on Common Core assessments and on the accountability attached to them (aka, punishments). Randi pointed out that it made no sense to hold students and teachers accountable when there has been little or no curriculum, professional development or other preparation for the new standards and tests.

Aside from widespread predictions that the proficiency rates will drop by 30% or more, no one knows how the standards and tests will work because they are new and have never gotten a real trial. They may or may not lead to higher achievement. They may widen the achievement gaps, or not. No one knows.

However, Alice Johnson Cain, Vice President of the Gates-funded AstroTurf group Teach Plus, opposes a moratorium. Cain previously worked as an aide for many years for California Congressman George Miller, the senior Democrat on the House education committee. Miller was one of the authors of No Child Left Behind and is a favorite of Democrats for Education Reform (DFER), the Wall Street hedge fund managers’ group that supports high-stakes testing and charters. DFER has raised large sums for Miller, who seldom has any opposition in his safe district.

Randi was right in this respect. If the Common Core is imposed without any adjustments and tested without preparation, it will fail. It will be a footnote in educational history. It will be studied in the future along with Life Adjustment education and other “movements” that had their day and disappeared.

Somehow the word has gotten through to the Gates Foundation that many teachers don’t like their agenda.

Teachers know that Bill Gates has told governors and the media that American public education is broken and obsolete. Teachers know he created the “blame-the-teacher” narrative. Teachers know he pushed the flawed idea that test scores of students should be used to judge teacher quality. Teachers know that Gates pumped $2 million into the anti-public school agitprop film “Waiting for Superman.”

Teachers are not dumb.

But now the Gates Foundation has launched a campaign to persuade teachers that the foundation cares.

Actions speak louder than words.

Teachers in many states are being evaluated by whether student scores rise or fall. Third graders will be surveyed to see what they think of their teachers. All bad ideas from Gates.

The public school bloggers in Seattle see this effort as a Trojan horse.

It is good Gates is listening. Now teachers must speak truth to power. Let him hear what you think.

Robert Shepherd, author, textbook writer, curriculum designer, writes:

“How many different forms might the education of the young take? One of the problems with issuing a single set of standards for all is that those standards are INTENDED to reduce the amount of variation (synonym: innovativeness) in the system. But variation, innovation, competitive models, models with many, many different tracks is precisely what a complex, pluralistic society needs.

“The notion of a single set of standards for all appeals to authoritarian types with a rage for order, uniformity, predictability that is, at its core, inhumane.”

Will Bunch, Philadelphia journalist, reports rumors that state officials may be planning to privatize all of Philadelphia.

Philadelphia schools tried privatization a decade ago and it didn’t work. But this seems to be the cheapest way to get rid of the Philly problem instead of giving the kids and schools what they need.