I read this article “by Bill Gates” with a growing sense of incredulity.
I kept hearing echoes of many things I and others have written since Gates decided to make teacher evaluation the biggest crisis in American education. In 2008, he dropped the small schools movement and determined that teachers are our biggest problem. If we had a better way to evaluate them, schools could fire the bad ones and have only good ones.
No one did more to push the idea that teachers should be judged by the test scores of their students. No one had more influence on Race to the Top.
Now he says that test scores are not the only way to identify great teachers. They might not even be the best way.
Now he is worried that there is a growing backlash against standardized testing and he says he gets it.
He even concedes that tying pay to test scores is offensive.
Let us take him at his word. Let us take yes for an answer.
Please, Fairtest, invite him to speak at your next event.
Now if the day comes that he admits that the search for the right metric to measure teacher quality was a waste of time; and if the day comes that he realizes that many great teachers work selflessly in schools with low test scores; if he can begin to focus on the conditions that affect both teaching and learning rather than the fruitless search for the perfect evaluation system; when that day comes, we will all celebrate the painful metamorphosis of Bill Gates.
From my limited unerstanding his foundation is doing wonderful work in bringing healthcare to developing nations. Nowhere do I hear him criticizing health workers for the conditions of their patients. I’d love to see him take a similar, cooperative, all-hands-on-deck approach to the improvement of (especially urban) public education.
In his international work, too, Gates has been accused of using his immense wealth to impose his ideology and trampling policies taht are better for the localities in which his policies are being imposed. http://newint.org/features/2012/04/01/bill-gates-charitable-giving-ethics/, http://seattletimes.com/html/opinion/2017612869_guest28ashton.html
This is why I don’t trust Gates no matter how he sometimes appears.
http://whatiscommoncore.wordpress.com/2013/03/28/top-ten-scariest-people-in-education-reform-5-bill-gates/
Sorry, but your understanding is indeed limited, for now. Do look into what Bill Gates is doing by bringing innovations like genetically-modified monoculture to third world countries who were doing much better without it, thankyouverymuch. There have also been rumblings that he insert himself into research that he is sponsoring, to the point where he disrupts the very research he’s supposedly supporting.
There was some talk about how he effectively cornered the research on malaria, which made it difficult to sustain an independent peer review process. Progress in science really depends on the independence of researchers. Gates seems to decide what the answer is and try to get all efforts focused on his agenda. We want guys trying to poke holes in a theory preferably BEFORE mass experimentation with one approach.
Sorry Diane, I have to disagree with you on this one. Reading Gate’s article,he still is hold hard and fast to tests being part of a teacher’s evaluations. Here in NYSE tests make up 40% of our evaluations.
You’ve always said tests should be designed for only 1 purpose. Assess students for what they need to know, not to evaluate teacher too.
Saying test fixation is wrong is not changing a position, it’s trying to sell his idea. Let’s not forget he made his billions in sales.
It’s a trap ❢
Yes, a wire neck snare!! (Billy the Goates’ philosophy is to directly slit the throat).
Don’t believe it.
Maybe if he talked to professionals for advice…
How much was wasted on “small high schools” that were to be the next silver bullet? He could have fed poor nations, given tablets (ok, laptops back then) to millions of kids. Instead – he spent millions moving the deck chairs.
Too soon to tell on revelation #2
c’mon. the kind of people he’s hired live in a bubble of The Best Schools, The Best Degrees, The Best Jobs, The Best Zip Codes, The Best Paychecks – they really really think their arrogant elitist poo doesn’t stink
My draftee high school drop out step father had many poo based philosophies – money talks, and poo walks. WHEN / IF Gate$-ILL-Vain-IA ever stops funding the above it all elitists, THEN I will believe him.
BTW – I have a metric to evaluate them by – how many adults kid helpers did your idea put into how many classrooms for how much time? Period.
But then I sigh; and, with a piece of scripture,
Tell them that God bids us do good for evil:
And thus I clothe my naked villany
With old odd ends stolen out of holy writ;
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil.
rmm.
Ironic that the following came out on the same day as this info.–read Fred Klonsky’s Blog–today’s post–“Study the Faces of the New Tyrants.”
I will believe when he does the complete 180 degree turn that you took, Diane, and goes on tour with you to speak against that which he has been touting, gives $$$ to pro-public schools school board candidates–the whole nine yards, as it were.
What a brilliant idea: Bill Gates getting in touch with his inner Diane Ravitch, and then touring with the First Lady of Education Truth.
SIgn me up! Is there ANYTHING I can do to facilitate this?
I think it would be a powerful move in all seriousness.
Ms. Ravitch’s views have evolved over time; I think Mr. Gates’s could, too. Indeed, they have in the past. The thing he needs to grasp is that there is no simple way to quantify how much education a student got. You could have two third-grade teachers, a mediocre one and a great one, whose students show exactly the same test score growth — but the great teacher’s students also show curiosity, excitement about school and learning, an awareness of their own strengths and challenges as learners, and an understanding of how to revise and reflect on their work in school. A well-informed principal’s judgement should trump test scores in these teachers’ evaluations. And (as Gates himself seems now to realize), the great teacher’s skills should be put to use in developing other teachers’ capacities, not competing against them.
Bill Gates would be an extraordinarily powerful ally for teachers if he expanded his understanding of education beyond metrics. Let’s prepare for the worst, but hope for the best.
You also find that the teacher who is great for one child is “mediocre” for another. So-o-o many variables to consider…
Gloria–like your last sentence! Always prepare! Never thought I’d quote Sarah Palin, but I’m a little sour on that “hope-y” thing. And just LOOK at how that “hope-y, change-y thing” is going!
And, Robert–thank you for calling my idea “brilliant.” I also like your title for Diane–“First Lady of Education Truth.”
As to your “facilitation” of this, I would think that that would be up to Bill & Diane!
Maybe he is trying to slow down the train because the MS tablet isn’t winning the ed tech wars? Could it be because MS doesn’t have enough ed apps? Apple is making more sales despite a higher price, and now Murdoch has a product bundled with curriculum.
Just a guess.
BINGO!
If he really is moving away from high stakes testing, that’s great. But the fixation on “great teachers” seems to still be there. In Gates’ view, that means finding small numbers of superstars instead of providing support and training to all.
I’ll believe it the day that the Gates Foundation stops funding the many groups and initiatives based exactly on the opposite philosophy.
He could be talking out of both sides of his mouth, an increasingly popular PR
strategy.
…and I’ll believe it the day he compensates all of the teachers who lost their jobs because he put his hat in the reform ring.
Gate’s words….”What the country needs are thoughtfully developed teacher evaluation systems that include multiple measures of performance, such as student surveys, classroom observations by experienced colleagues and student test results.”
We can clearly see he is still in favor of high stakes tests.
Right on. I don’t trust Gates. Why do people think that Gates can change his spots to stripes?
He still wants to weed the bad ones out. His mindset has not changed.
Bill and Melinda Gates have caused great harm to the teaching profession. First it was an uninformed research base promoting small schools. Recently, with the MET studies that set out to prove and assumption, rather than “do” research.
One of the most difficult mental obstacles to overcome is the “sunk cost bias”.
The Gates foundation needs more than a mild, opinion piece to be believed. Bill and Melinda need to sto the harm.
I’m still trying to figure out why Bill Gates is an expert on k-12 education.
This was my thought as well. Of course we all know the real answer.
MONEY, pure and simple. He pays off people to get his way. And the weasels take the money and do his bidding. SIC.
He praises Conn, Del and Ky. Diane or anybody else know what their systems are like, and what it says if these are the examples of what he wants?
Connecticut is a mess, having rushed through legislation mandating teacher evaluations (thanks to the waiver) only to find through pilots that they are much more costly and problematic than the ill-informed legislators bargained for. Now, they are trying desperately to slow down (but unfortunately not stop) the train wreck and save face. Gates is likely referring to New Haven, where a large component of the teacher eval system is test scores and where (lord knows why) the teachers’ union agreed to it. It was completely untested before implemented and still remains unproven. The corporate ed cheerleaders like to praise it saying that teachers have been dismissed under this system, but they can’t show that those teachers who were dismissed were not good teachers.
I think this is characteristic of Gates’ approach to education. First, he is certain he has the “magic bullet” to “fix” public schools. Initially this was charters, then small schools, now “effective teachers” as measured by test scores. All of his approaches are colored by an ideological assumption that “market based” solutions will ultimately provide the best outcomes. But he is at least intellectually honest enough to look at the results of his efforts and recognize that they have all failed to a greater or less extent. Unfortunately, this doesn’t reduce his hubristic assumption that his next “great idea” will be the real “magic bullet” or cause him to question his underlying assumption about the value of market based approaches.
Meanwhile, many of us have suffered, both teachers and students..
Don’t hold your breathe! Tigers (jackals) don’t change their spots, and when someone like Gates is appearing to, it’s probably because he can dupe teachers to think he’s really fair-minded, just needs to “grow” and he’ll become our advocate. Ain’t gonna happen! Here in Denver, a yearly recipient of his multimillion dollar gifts, come with ropes you could tie up one of his luxury floating palaces with! I’d bet that he can tell the public is getting a little wise that all his non-factual ideas about education, result in deterioration of the public schools at large. So, to save his position as a guru, he’s just paying lip service to a program that really isn’t much different than before, its just got better PR attached to it. Interestingly, his evolution is announced at the same time that one of his battering rams, Michele Rhee, is on the ropes…Hmm, could it be his way to appear non-connected to her vicious and very possibly illegal ways?
There needs to be a law that when the billionaire who instigated “reforms” that he/she later decides was wrong-headed, the laws and regs put into effect due to such whims are automatically rescinded. Undoing the damage form this nonsense will take years, but good to know “it’s all about the kids.” Arrrggghhh! See, e.g., our just-enacted GA law (SB 244) that makes “not less than 50%” of every GA teacher’s evaluation to be based on student test scores. Hey Bill, can you get the Governor to veto that one!? You’ll be in our state next week, right!? Seriously we are losing GREAT teachers every year– and it is getting worse. Nice of you to notice.
Bertis, I agree. I think we will all see the day when those who have done large-scale damage to public education will feel the sting of justice.
Even if Gates is having a change of heart (and I share the majority of commenters’ skepticism on that), he will never renounce his previously held position, any more than he ever did with his small schools notion. The damage will remain done.
While Gates’ article may give the appearance that he has loosened his grip around the neck of public education I will not rest easy until he has no influence whatsoever on students, teachers, school boards, superintendents, etc. anywhere In this universe. He is first and foremost a businessman not an educator. Period.
Right. He ain’t no educator. He is a MARKETER, pure and simple. Marketers manipulate.
“We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it.”
― George Orwell, 1984
Great quote.
OMG, the worm turns? Probably too good to be true!
Diane, have you read the MET reports? In none of the reports does he see state test scores should be the only measures used. I still don’t agree with the findings of the MET reports because I believe the proportion of the variance explained by teacher performance in test scores isn’t high enough to use them. Still, I’ve never read a MET report that’s advocated for the exclusive use of state tests.
Bill Gates: “In top-performing education systems in other parts of the world, such as Singapore and Shanghai, accomplished teachers earn more by taking on additional responsibilities such as coaching and mentoring other teachers and helping to capture and spread effective teaching techniques. Such systems are a way to attract, retain and reward the best teachers; make great use of their skills; and honor the collaborative nature of work in schools.”
Guess what Bill, we have that here in the good ol’ USA too. In our school district, coaches get paid more (not enough, but they do get paid more). In our district, mentoring teachers get paid more on our pay scale. So why do you have to mention Singapore and Shaghai?
It sounds like you’ve been learning more about public school teachers, but you’ve still got a long way to go Mr. Gates.
Mentoring? That’s something good teachers do for new teachers normally. I have mentored several newbies. Nobody paid me for it, nor did I expect it. I benefited too.
That’s funny…in MY district, coaches get paid on the top tier for after-school programs, but arts teachers get middling pay at the middle school level and bottom pay at the elementary level. They justify this by calling it an “honoraria” meaning you get paid so little for that extra hour of teaching that you are doing so because you are “honorable” enough to work more, despite an exhausting full daily schedule, to “honorably” accept the pittance you receive.
Coaches generally work as a staff, but arts teachers are expected to supervise, organize and teach groups that are double the size of a regular class and do so all by themselves. The assistant coaches make more than the arts teachers who have no assistants on staff. Today, I found out that the intramurals coaches had scheduled half the meetings they were contracted to coach–all for full pay. My principal isn’t saying a word. I think next year, I’m going to take a cue from them and stop killing myself and ruining my health by working all those extra days for peanuts.
This was posted April 3rd … Did he just miss April Fool’s Day cos this ain’t the Bill Gates that I have been reading and hearing for the last few years … he used public school so many times … he lauded teachers, and says he is hearing them … this has to be a joke
…. would be nice if true … but actions speak louder than words … how can/will he make amends for all the teachers who have been run out of teaching with his financial and verbal backing ….
I am in wait/see mode … and can not wait to see what Michelle, John White, Huffman etc have to say about his latest turn around …..
You are delusional if you think Gates is going to change. When, after 10 years and more than $1 billion, small schools was a joke and did not work he switched overnight without even considering his previous failure and no time to look at the teacher thing he immediately went to attacking teachers and hired John Deasy one week after he quit his Prince Georges County Superintendents job when the stories on his phony PHD came out. Real ethical and thoughtful guy, right?
Will Bill replace the billions of dollars lost to public schools by his championship of everything set to destroy American public education?!?! I, and my colleagues, learned a long time ago that education dollars and contract give-backs lost are rarely regained. Thanks a lot, Bill…
Great, Bil!
Now can you please acknowledge that there is an achievement gap in ALL countries between lower and higher income children? The problem is not teaching in every nation, it’s poverty: http://www.epi.org/blog/international-tests-achiev…
Please, move on now and address poverty. Your dollars could do so much more if they were invested in helping people obtain jobs with livable wages, instead of continuing to contribute to the testing obsession.
Do you realize that a bill has moved to committee in Tennessee which would permit families on TANF to be penalized by 30% of their welfare benefits if their children’s test scores don’t show improvement? This is abhorrent. (Families on TANF there can already lose 20% of their benefits if their kids don’t show up to school.)
This craziness has got to stop!! Please stand up for families and children who are in poverty and help stop the testing mania!
Sorry, the above link got cut off. It’s for the following article from Economic Policy Institute website, by Martin Carnoy and Richard Rothstein,
International Tests Show Achievement Gaps in All Countries, with Big Gains for U.S. Disadvantaged Students
http://www.epi.org/blog/international-tests-achievement-gaps-gains-american-students/
I would like to hope that Bill and Melinda Gates hearts are in the right place. They are systems people, and maybe learning and teaching is more of a relationship process so it does not lend itself to as much improvement by a systems approach.
Bill Gates Sr. tried to fix the regressive tax structure of WA. The voters said no, keep heavily taxing the poor. I have a lot of respect for Bill Gates Sr. Unfortunately over half the citizenry thinks they are about to win the lottery.
can we all just get together and tell this man to stick to his damn computers and leave education to the teachers’ pupils and parents thank you very much!
There are many indications that Bill Gates “learns.” As soon as the Atlanta cheating indictments came out, I thought he might write an op ed on problems with making high stakes tests a part of teachers’ evaluations. And he did. Actually, he said quite a bit MORE than I thought he would.
By cautioning against the “urgency for change” it seems that Bill Gates is telling corporate reformers that the no-excuses management style doesn’t work. And further, that in the work of teaching, collaboration makes more sense than competition.
Remember when he wrote an op ed about teacher VAM scores, saying they should not be published? The LA Times had already done so, and the NY Times was planning to do the same. But after Gates’ op ed, that fight vanished.
Maybe he understands that his teacher evaluation system is like a poorly designed video game. Besides being full of bugs, it’s no fun, and it won’t sell.
AA, you are very kind to Bill Gates. I want to believe the best. I hope he can change. I hope he renounces the many mistakes of hog-stakes testing.
But I disagree with you about his decision to oppose the publication of teacher ratings. He waited to announce his imperial view until the very day before the ratings were released. If he had spoken a week sooner, maybe Mayor Bloomberg would have listened, although I doubt it.
The names and ratings were released, to no purpose other than humiliating teachers. Thanks to Bill for speaking out, but too late to matter.
Thanks, Diane, for taking the time to tell me the facts on the NY scores being published. I haven’t seen much on that issue since Gates’ op-ed.
I’m not sure I’m kind to Bill Gates when I say he learns; I just notice that his thinking iterates, as they say in software development. In the case of education I would say he’s a slow learner. (Not a kind thing to say.)
Gates is simply trying to head off the anti-testing backlash by seeming to agree with those who disagree with this testing mania. Why, because there’s too much money at stake. The investment in hardware,software, and the tests themselves will be useless if we succeed in stopping the testing madness. Then how will their billions invested in testing be recouped. Gates is protecting billionaire edupreneurial establishment.
Billy the Goates only cares about one thing and one thing only, his own a$$. Hey, Billy, get the duck out of Fodge and go enjoy your billion$$$$ and fut the shuck up
This comment made me lose brain cells.
This comment killed some of my brain cells.
made me giggle… and agree 🙂
I may very well be naive, but I have to think at this point that Bill Gates has no personal monetary interest. He is so far beyond what almost any human being has ever possessed, that I cannot believe he is strategizing in order to possess even more.
On the other hand, I can see him pursuing goals as a part of self-validation and refusing to embrace others as a way of not admitting the harm he has done over the years.
Why should we care about Bill? It’s just a self-esteem issue. He did everything in education reform is to cover up his own foolishness of dropping out from the higher education, that most people thought that it was boring for him. Perhaps, we should take another look is that he was unable to face the reality of the workload in college. Don’t you think so?
In addition, I really feel shame on our government, who didn’t look at the bottom of educational issues, such as poverty and family issue. Uncle Sam just wants to look at $$$ that Mr. Gates can offer, and agree with him in every single manner.
I cringe that we have come to the point where we feel the need to beg FairTest or any other organization to ask Bill Gates to speak on his alleged evolving view of high stakes testing. Although a brilliant computer scientist, Mr. Gates is not an educator. He never was an educator, and shame on our government for allowing him to speak for educators, children, and families on matters of public school teaching and learning. If he wants to put his money to good use, he should use it where it can do the most help for education – helping to study and remedy the issues surrounding child poverty in this country. Then I’d be happy to sit down and have a discussion about what’s in the best interest of our children.
I see an error in your post. Bill Gates was never a “brilliant computer scientist.” At best he was adequate, akin to Steve Jobs. What he was “brilliant” at was marketing and creating illegal contracts that stopped competitors from having access to the marketplace.
Perhaps Bill Gates attitude towards American education can be derived from his own personal experiences, and his reasons for dropping out of school. It is very interesting that a dropout from higher education should want to become an educational leader.
I agree…inviting him to speak gives him too much power…but then again he and his $ is power…imthinkmhe is beginning to feel the rising heat of the backlash
i’m with you in sentiment, merrywether, but i also think that the UNbelievable amount of authority afforded this incompetent non-educator is a powerful thing. i mean, the whole country moves in whatever direction he says we should in regard to education. that is crazy. so, while i don’t have respect for his views, i do know that if he somehow grows more “progressive” (or just publicly pretends to be..), there could very well be lots to gain. think about how funder priorities dictate work that gets done. if he just switches up to be even the slightest bit anti-high-stakes testing, the impact could potentially be felt far and wide…
Good for Bill Gates! I had a feeling that Bill Gates was fair minded. He is not part of the Republican let’s destroy public education group. I am glad that he is changing his mind. I have written him many letters. I haven’t got a reply back, but I think that he must read some of these teacher letters. He is a logical thinker, so if something doesn’t work, then he is willing to change course. Good for Bill Gates! We need his help for real reform. We need a billionaire who is willing to think logically and clearly.
Please post a good address where one can write Bill Gates– I would like to and I imagine others would as well. Every little bit helps, right?
I find it sad that Gates makes a pseudo-teacher friendly remark, and some are given to throw roses at him, as though his intended nefarious plans for public schools were just a product of his honest innocence! His record and his beliefs to a supra national goal are not merely playful ventures. His plans go far beyond merely US pubic education, as his philosophy is clear to state. I fear we are too simplistic in our assessments of self-appointed leaders aims, and can be neuratlized in addressing steps that ultimately will end far from the veneer of “progress” false claims. Trojan horses are renown and used
since that first, wooden creature caused the demise of an acient city and are working similar destruction in our world today…from “W’s, T.H. of weapons of mass destruction” right on to the promoters of improving education through charters, the name of the game is the same: hide the real purpose and sell the plan through chicanery..
Re writing a tycoon: don’t worry, I ain’t planning to go easy on the guy, and I certainly won’t throw roses his way. My remarks will be firm and cogent– and I don’t for a minute think he’s pivoted in any meaningful way. My theory is that if enough people who know the harmful effects of the bad medicine he and others are peddling, if enough of us write to him, to Arne Obama, to our Senators, state officials, et al, maybe just maybe, someday, hopefully someday soon, it will dawn on some of those who make and influence policy to stop damaging and deriding our schools and start building them up and investing in the communities and people that make them work. Today is a good one to quote King and the fact that “darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that.” The alternative, giving up, isn’t in the cards or playbook, IMHO.
I am hardly “giving up” but at the same time, I am very aware of the circuitous tricks
that the jackals like Gates can do when it behooves them to appear to be giving ground to reality…really just another way to fool the foolish who have too deep an attachment to the basic good intentions of everyone in power. He’s no newcomer to this whole educational destruction. AND, he’s hardly coming to his senses by seeing the damage he has so greatly profited by. MLK was right in his thoughts, but I would venture to say if Governor Wallace would have kissed a black child, he would not have thought that racist had become a humanitarian. Acknowledging such a crumb of honesty should be assessed as just that…ONLY a crumb, not a conversion!
Mary– we agree. Bertis
Bertis (@3:40),
Yes many people have drunk the kool-aid of “hope” only to find themselves six feet under.
Duane
Bill Gates has a face book page — you could post on that.
But getting the attention of any person with his immense wealth is not going to be easy.
Billy the Goates has no clue how to be fair minded. That’s like asking a starving pike to not eat the perch. He really doesn’t have a clue as per the following: “Even in subjects where the assessments have been validated, such as literacy and math, test scores don’t show a teacher areas in which they need to improve.”
If he knew anything about “assessments:” he would have written: “{Even} In subjects where the assessments have been NEVER BEEN validated, such as literacy and math, test scores CAN NEVER show a teacher areas in which they need to improve.” ({} = delete) Wilson has proven the invalidity of educational standards, standardized testing and even the “grading” of students in his “Educational Standards and the Problem of Error” found at:
http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/577/700
We should hold Gates to the same Common Core Standards our students are subjected to, where is the evidence or as per Coleman, no body gives a shit what you think Bill!
Bill Gates is little more than an edupreneur-edupredator, and we and our elected officials have, worse, enables him and his wife to believe that having wealth is synonymous with having wisdom.
Like the edupredator turn!!
The more I read about Bill Gates, the more convinced I am that he is not against public education… he just wants it to change a LOT faster than it is capable of doing because unlike a business, it operates democratically… and democracy is slow but, to paraphrase Churchill, far better than any alternative
Shall we all wait to see what he wants us to do next?
He never went to public school, never taught anywhere, how did he become an expert on school reform?
He purchased his role as an expert. He paid cash, didn’t he?
Gates is attempting to distance himself from his cake, and eat it, too. Far from abandoning his demand for test-based teacher accountability, he embeds it in his mealy-mouthed demand for yet more control. Listen to him:
“What the country needs are thoughtfully developed teacher evaluation systems that include multiple measures of performance, such as student surveys, classroom observations by experienced colleagues AND STUDENT TEST RESULTS.”
Emphasis mine.
“Of particular concern is the possibility that test results ALONE will be used to determine a large part of how much teachers get paid.”
To avoid the appearance of over-reliance on test scores, Gates sits now atop a shambles of prescribed “indicators”, requiring me to upload evidence of the kitchen sink into a proprietary data management program, so he can take those things into account, too, when he and his minions determine my pay rate with their data-driven junk science.
Who asked him?
Well said, chemtchr! Who asked him, indeed?
We would all be a whole lot better off if he went back to his philanthropy (helping the impoverished in other countries) rather than perpetrate his villainthropy here (helping to make more people impoverished in America).
Liking “villainthropy”!!
I think your interpretation is likely to be the right one — softening the message while still pursuing the same goal.
Bill Gates has not changed his mind about anything regarding teacher evaluations. He is merely trying to make the case for the kind of evaluation plan –– based predominantly n student test scores –– that his foundation funded. Gates has spent a TON of cash poking and prying into every educational nook and cranny trying to force his view of education “reform” onto public schools. But there’s just no there there.
In a recent letter on the “findings” from the Gates-funded MET (Measures of Effective Teaching) “study,” Gates says “how important it is to set clear goals and measure progress in order to accomplish the foundation’s priorities.” He lauds “the power of measurement,” and he claims –– incorrectly –– that “our schools have lacked the kinds of measurement tools that can drive meaningful change.”
Perhaps Gates has never heard of the Eight Year Study. Or the Sandia Report. The Eight Year Study made clear what “meaningful change” looks like. And the Sandia Report undermined virtually all the wildly speculative claims in A Nation at Risk about a “rising tide of mediocrity” in American public education that “threatened” the nation’s security.
Nevertheless, the Gates foundation has not provided any “meaningful” measures. Gates says that ” a strong” teacher evaluation system would only cost about 2 percent (surely a lowball estimate) of a total compensation budget, which is the most significant part of any school system’s spending. In a small, suburban school district that easily translates into an extra $2-3 million a year –– additional cost at a time when funding is more than tight. In a school district the size of Fairfax County, VA, or New York City, the costs would be significantly higher. And what does that extra cost actually bring?
Here’s the crux of Gates “strong” teacher evaluation plan, described in the MET project’s Feedback for BetterTeaching (Nine Principles for Using Measures of Effective Teaching):
“MET project teachers’ classroom observation scores were bunched at the center of the distribution, where 50 percent of the teachers scored within 0.4 points of each other (on a four-point scale) using Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. Teachers at the 25th and 75th percentiles scored less than one-quarter point different from the average. Only 7.5 percent of teachers scored below a two, and only 4.2 percent of teachers scored above a three. This would suggest a large middle category of effectiveness with two smaller ones at each end. Rather than trying to make fine distinctions among teachers in this vast middle, efforts would be better spent working to improve their practice.” Say what?
In other words, this is much ado about not very much. Most teachers and administrators already know where the stronger and weaker links are in any school faculty. And there are plenty of ways to create a high-performing school culture without resorting to the complex and costly evaluation and “reform” plans envisioned by Bill Gates and his corporate allies.
By the way, while Gates is touting “multiple measures” “such as student surveys, classroom observations,” his own foundation-funded “study” found that these measures add absolutely nothing to effective teaching data. Nothing. But Gates knows that he cannot simply rely on student test scores alone, so he’s trying to sell his clunker of a value-added model with fins and a cool-sounding horn. But it’s still one heck of a clunker. The Gates-VAM is so erratic as to be virtually useless, so Gates is plying lipstick to the pig.
In his Washington Post piece, Gates writes that “as states and districts rush to implement new teacher development and evaluation systems, there is a risk they’ll use hastily contrived, unproven measures.” On, the irony!
First, why is there a “rush” to new evaluations? Isn’t Gates one of those who is pushing the “rush?” And funding it?
Second, the “research” that comes from Gates-funded “studies” indicate that the teacher evaluation system he supports is, in fact, contrived and unproven.
No, Bill Gates has not changed his mind on anything. He’s simply rearranging the words to try and sell a bad idea to the public.
Why we, as a country, would allow a retired billionaire computer wizard to enter into the realm of education as an expert, I will never know.
He is now a philanthropist and his generosity is much appreciated. However, as a business man, he should be “investing” his money more wisely. Maybe I am naive, but I don’t believe that Gates’ intentions are malicious. I feel that he truly believes that he is trying to help, although highly misguided. If he thinks that you can create a measurement tool that will be a panacea for education, he is mistaken. He has clearly not even diagnosed the problem accurately. This is not and never has been a “teacher effectiveness” problem; it is and always has been a POVERTY problem. Fixing poverty is difficult and doesn’t make a profit. Gates needs to apologize and exit gracefully from this endeavor.
Allow me to correct your statement: “He is now a philanthroVULTURE AND/OR VILLAINTHROPIST and his SELF CENTERED POMPOSITY is NEVER much appreciated.”
Obviously this like the previous article from “Gates” and Randi it’s another version of a very bad attempt to spin this issue. The sheep’s clothing is not working her for either of them although Randi may have pulled the wool over a few people’s eyes—many who should really know better!!!
Good news that he is rethinking this.