Chancellor Carmen Farina has taken on a massive challenge by stepping into a central office shaped by people who were mostly non-educators, who had a faith-based reliance on test scores, and who believed that the way to “reform” schools was to close them. This strategy didn’t work, by any measure. By the end of Bloomberg’s term, the overwhelming majority of parents were opposed to his “reforms,” and wanted smaller classes and better education, not just more testing. I wrote this report with the research assistance of Avi Blaustein, an independent researcher.
Here are some ideas for Chancellor Farina.
Next Steps in Reforming the New York City Public Schools
The media, politicians, and corporate sponsored think tanks will go on a no-holds-barred offensive against anyone who dares to challenge the sacred-cows of corporate education reform. We saw this response when Mayor de Blasio decided to preventing a charter school chain from evicting students with special needs from their public school. Evidence is irrelevant when special interests are at stake. It therefore behooves us to pre-emptively get the true numbers and accurate facts out there along with some ideas for fixing the damage done over the past dozen years in New York City.
Reform the district governance structures with an eye to creating community ownership. It is time to restore community school districts. These districts were dis-empowered and replaced by non-geographic networks as the organizing framework for management of schools. Although this was portrayed as an attempt to support schools, it actually centralized power at Tweed (the New York City Department of Education’s headquarters building) and silenced community voice. It has also proved to be an ineffectual way to support schools. 33% of the 55 Networks received ineffective or developing quality ratings. An audit by the NYC Comptroller’s Office found that “it is difficult to determine whether or not that support increased the efficiency of the school’s day-to-day operations.”
Disband the Networks and empower local instructional superintendents to oversee and support a group of 15 schools in the same neighborhood. This will re-build relationships and trust with the community, allow the development of deep school/community organization partnerships, and spread best practices throughout the schools serving the community. Back office functions should be run out of borough-based offices.
Reform and downsize the bloated central bureaucracy at Tweed. Over the past years central office headcount increased by 70% and the salaries by 79%. The number of non-pedagogues employed by the DOE increased to the highest levels since 1980. According to the Independent Budget Office, an ever increasing share of money budgeted to “total classroom instruction” actually went to central offices. In 2007 about $550,000,000 went to central offices and in 2012 about $793,000,000 went to central offices, approximately a 45% increase in total classroom instruction dollars going to central offices. This is an outrage, and it should end.
Cut the size of the staff at Tweed and return those funds to schools to reduce class sizes. Bring in pedagogical experts who can design and implement progressive education policy, which the current large crop of executive directors, CEOs, COOs, deputy executive directors, deputy CEOs, deputy COOs populating the cubicles at Tweed are both unable and unwilling to do.
Revise the “Blue Book” that determines how much space is every school so that every school has enough classrooms for its students’ needs. Once the Blue Book is revised, there will be fewer co-locations, and schools would have art rooms, dance rooms, rooms for special education classes, and other programs.
Prioritize class size reduction. New York City’s class sizes are at their highest point in at least a dozen years. Just as the research on preschool education is strong, so is the research on class size reduction, especially in schools that serve the poorest and neediest students.
Hold community hearings and listen to parents and the local community before agreeing to any future co-locations. This was a campaign promise that the Mayor made, yet he recently approved 36 new requests for co-location without any community. participation.
Reform the accountability process to create valid and reliable mechanisms for providing parents with information and providing schools with feedback. The Progress Reports that schools have been subject to over the past years give lower grades to schools serving higher proportions of Black and Latino students, English Language Learners, and students with disabilities. Progress Report scores remain correlated with many pre-existing risk factors, including poverty, 8th grade achievement, the percent of students who are ELLs, and the school’s admissions method.
Stop penalizing schools that educate the neediest students. Stop rewarding schools that get rid of challenging students. Develop clear, succinct, and accurate reports of each school’s program describing the academics, the extracurriculars, and the culture at each school.
Reform how students are matched to schools to increase equity. The data on all schools closed since 2003 shows that they had more special education students, more English Language Learners, a higher poverty rate, and 4x more students entering overage than the citywide average. Another report found that new schools accepted 9-10% more students proficient in reading and math, with 4% average higher prior attendance who were 15% less likely to enter overage, 6% less likely to be ELLS, 5% less likely to be students with disabilities, and 7% fewer males. The closing and opening of schools has done nothing to reduce the segregation of students by academic need. The DOE has deliberately sent the highest-need, “over the counter” students to a specific group of schools that then struggled and failed. Most small schools were not sent such students. De facto education redlining continues to exist in NYC with extreme inequities in educational opportunity across districts.
Establish a school matching process that ensures diversity and equity within and between every school.
Reform school funding to increase fairness in the distribution of resources. Although it is claimed that schools are funded based on student need, the dollars say otherwise. Schools are actually provided with different proportions of the funds they are entitled to by the funding formula. This results in schools in the same building being funded at rates that diverge by over 20%.
Give every single school the funds to which they are entitled by the funding formula so that they can educate their students.
Reform how principals are trained with an eye to improving the quality of leadership. Bloomberg’s Leadership Academy was a failure. It was created at great expense ($10 million per year) to fast-track people, often with limited teaching experience, into principal positions. According to the latest data, 32% of the 2011-12 cohort of Leadership Academy graduates did not find principal positions. Over 40% of Leadership Academy graduates from earlier cohorts are no longer principals in their original school after a mere 4 years. The market has spoken and these principals are not wanted, even with the pressure exerted to encourage their hiring.
The Leadership Academy should be closed and replaced by a career ladder of teacher leader to assistant principal to principal with on-the-job mentoring and training. Only the most successful educators at each level should have the privilege of leadership.
It is time for New York City to join districts such as Union City and San Diego, in implementing true education reform, built on the principles of professionalism and genuine community engagement. The evidence shows that this requires a coherent, cohesive strategy that involves collaboration, a focus on teaching and learning, development of engaging curriculum, and a quality pre-K program.

Reblogged this on McBlog.
LikeLike
“According to the Independent Budget Office, an ever increasing share of money budgeted to “total classroom instruction” actually went to central offices. In 2007 about $550,000,000 went to central offices and in 2012 about $793,000,000 went to central offices, approximately a 45% increase in total classroom instruction dollars going to central offices. This is an outrage, and it should end.”
Just to be clear, this figure from the IBO does *not* describe how much the DOE is spending on useless non-pedagogues. It’s just the difference between total amount of “General Classroom Instruction and School Leadership” the amount that’s allocated directly to school budgets. It includes $250 million for “school programs and CBOs” (and boy, that CBO number is going to explode next year with pre-K), $150 million for ATR and excessed staff, $40 million for sabbaticals, another $40 million for “extended use of school buildings,” and $30 million for payroll tax.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I’m with you, FLERP. May I assume (from the dates) that this is about bean-counting successful vs failing schools?
LikeLike
Wonderful suggestions. The fly in the ointment is Farina. She was a principal and part of the malignant power structure that consistently removed the veteran teachers, offering them no opportunity for due process, so that the slanderous allegations thrown at them would have no venue for due process. I remember her.
What is needed at the top of the NYC Public schools is a TEACHER. A teacher who consistently fights for the rights of the students to learn, and the rights of the professionals to speak to their needs and to the policies that enable learning.
As long as the people chosen to run the show are the ones who were part of the power structure responsible for the debacle then nothing will change. Klein and Rhee have a voice because they were chancellors… who resided over utter failure and were responsible for the evaluation narrative that blamed teachers even as they undermined education with their ‘reign of error.”
I vote for Leonie Haimison to be chancellor, because she represents the teachers, the students and the parents, whereas Farina is the same old….
but what do I know… I was merely a teacher, and my voice has no resonance.
LikeLike
Another suggestion for the new Chancellor is to refrain from “selling” – her term, not mine – Common Core to parents and teachers.
She must also put the brakes on the Stasi from the Networks who are barging into classes and imperiously walking around the class room, poking into students’ notebooks and disrupting the class. This is straight-out intimidation masquerading as “accountability.”
LikeLike
Could you expound on “the Stasi from the Networks” ???
Thanks
Sounds Orwellian.
LikeLike
Well, Stasi is my term for it, since I believe these people are there to maintain a repressive order and see to it that everyone, teachers and administrators alike, is kept in line. They have complained to the administration about teachers who did not show proper deference to the new and punitive evaluation procedures during the professional development sessions that are wasted on this nonsense. Our PD is now nothing but Common Core and Danielson, over and over, to the exclusion of everything else.
Groups of people from the Networks – essentially parasites, since they threaten and intimidate, but provide no real support – along with other admin types come in to classes unannounced. Instead of quietly heading to the back of the room to observe, they strut around the room, ostentatiously examining student work on the walls, poking into students’ notebooks, conferring among themselves during the lesson.
Earlier this week, these rude and arrogant know-nothings came into a class while a school alumnus was giving an oral presentation to the students about her job lobbying for immigration reform. They actually had the nerve to call the teacher to the back of the room – during the presentation! – and start grilling her. Once done, they strutted out, without so much as an acknowledgement, let alone a thank you. Their rudeness and lack of professionalism was off the charts, demonstrating the arrogance of unchecked power.
The students from my school are all recent immigrants, in this country for three years or less. Many of them are undocumented. For all they know, these people could be from Immigration, and the kids are extremely unnerved by it.
Needless to say, the teachers are unnerved and intimidated (at first, then they are angry), which seems to be the purpose. Our school administrators are also cowed, since the intimidation is directed at them, as well. As soon as these “observations” are concluded, back to the Principal’s office they go, where the Principal and APs are interrogated on how they should evaluate the lesson, based on the Danielson checklist.
You couldn’t write a better prescription for how to demoralize a faculty, and this is happening in a highly successful school where the administrators are not your typical DOE sociopaths, but whose impulses are to be supportive. Yet they too are subjected to this rite of collective misery and institutional sadism.
Bloomberg spent twelve years doing his utmost to destroy the NYC public schools, and many changes that people want Mayor De Blasio and Chancellor Farina to make will, under the best of circumstances, take time. We have also seen in recent weeks that De Blasio faces opposition from very powerful interests that want to maintain their stranglehold over the school system. However, what I’m describing is something that could be ended immediately with a strongly-worded memo from the Chancellor.
Unlike his predecessor, Bill De Blasio is not a vicious bastard who takes pleasure in keeping his foot on people’s throats, but in the coming months we’ll see if we get a change in substance, or just a change in tone.
Either way, teachers need to get loud, take chances, get in the faces of these people, and forcefully show them that they will not allow themselves to be meekly led to their professional slaughter.
LikeLike
Great suggestion that could also apply to our other large school districts. It’s good that New York has a leader who is for public education. In Los Angeles we are not that fortunate. We have a privateer, hell bent on draining public education of every dollar he can. I like the idea of returning schools to local control and getting parents involved. In Chicago, the opt out movement has validity and I hope Los Angeles follows in that direction, politically, the present administration in Washington does not support public education and that’s so sad. Public education arose from the neglect and unconcern of private interests in educating the public. We should already know where this corporate reform movement is going.
LikeLike
As a former Assistant Principal of ten years and a teacher of thirteen years, I applaud all your recommendations. there is just one more I would suggest. Bring back the funding where schools fund all teachers at a set rate for the entire system. this way, schools will have no incentive to get rid of experienced teachers.
LikeLike
I totally agree with that! Good suggestion.
LikeLike
Reform special education so that the focus is on the whole child. Spend money on giving the most vulnerable children the services they need rather than on pushing back against parents who are trying to get those services for their children.
LikeLike
One more reform idea. (I just LOVE reinventing the wheel!). Go back to funding and supporting curriculum writing in New York City. Actually HIRE people who are top flight teachers and administrators in their chosen license/field to write scope and sequence curriculum as was done years ago. Then distribute this curriculum to schools who can actually use it. No one has done this for YEARS. When I first started with the DOE(then BOE) I had a set of curriculum guides for EVERY grade in EVERY subject(elementary school). I then chose my materials/books to implement the curriculum expectations. What a concept!
LikeLike
Except for the vague recommendation about school matching, a sensible list. What would a revised school matching plan involve? Does your grandson’s school need to rematched? Would he be sent downtown?
LikeLike
Pay attention to segregation issues, as noted in the UCLA report. Districts 2 and 26 have boundary lines and policies that exclude nearby, lower income kids from their schools. Start with a increasing the percentage of students from outside the district, and increase every year. Kids from Harlem live closer to Eleanor Roosevelt than eligible (and likely richer) kids from Tribeca, but can not attend there.
LikeLike