Appalled by Trump’s erratic behavior and his threats to commit war crimes in Iran–as he said in a news conference, to destroy every bridge and every power plant in Iran–many political commentators are calling for the implementation of the 25th Amendment to remove him from office.
Last night, Laurence O’Donnell devoted most of his news program on MS NOW to the claim that Trump is insane, and it is time to activate the 25th Amendment.
Trump’s vulgar message to Iranian leaders, posted on Easter Sunday morning, set off a new round of demands to get this unhinged man out of the Oval Office, far away from the power to start a nuclear war on a whim.
After reading Trump’s message, even former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, once close to Trump, wrote in a tweet:
Everyone in his administration that claims to be a Christian needs to fall on their knees and beg forgiveness from God and stop worshipping the President and intervene in Trump’s madness.
I know all of you and him and he has gone insane, and all of you are complicit.
Certainly Democrats and most independents would like to see this menace to world peace, the global economy, democratic institutions, and national security removed from office. No doubt JD Vance, despite his sycophancy, quietly would love to be catapulted into the presidency.
BUT…..it’s not going to happen.
To remove a President from office, the Vice President and a majority of his Cabinet must agree that the President is incapable of fulfilling the duties of his office.
Trump’s Cabinet would never agree to remove him from office unless he did something unthinkable. They were chosen not for their competence, but for their personal loyalty to him. Can you imagine Pete Hegseth or wrestling queen Linda McMahon voting to remove Trump? The unthinkable that might change even their minds might be…Trump running around the White House grounds stark naked; Trump ordering the military to drop a nuclear bomb on some country, friend or foe, because they disrespected him; Trump ordering ICE or the FBI to murder his political enemies; Trump engaging contractors to demolish the entire White House so he can erect a high-rise replacement, with his name at the bottom and the top in flashing lights ….The possibilities are limited.
But let’s imagine that Trump does something beyond my poor imagination, something so awful that a majority of his lackeys and sycophants vote to remove him.
That’s not enough. Their recommendation goes to the Congress, where two-thirds of both Houses must approve his removal.
How likely is that?
I say zilch, unless a black swan happens to build a nest on his bleached blonde tresses. A black swan, you may recall, is a metaphor for a totally unprecedented event, one that almost no one anticipates.
The 25th Amendment is not going to remove Trump, because those around him and Republicans in Congress are afraid of him or idolize him. There is only one way to curb Trump’s rage, incompetence, and boundless narcissism: Turn out the vote in November 2026. Sweep every Trump enabler out of office. Restore checks and balances. Elect a Congress that will investigate corruption, grifting, and profiteering. Elect a Congress that will stop his demolition of federal agencies and departments. Elect a Congress prepared to fight his attacks on enforcement of civil rights laws. Elect a Congress that will encourage and protect the votes of every citizen, not seek to suppress them.
The 25th Amendment will not save us. But a Congress devoted to the Constitution and to democracy can limit the damage that Trump has imposed on our government and on our relations with the rest of the world.
A historical note:
The National Constitution Center summarized the 25th Amendment, passed by Congress after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
AMENDMENT XXV. Passed by Congress July 6, 1965. Ratified February 10, 1967. Note: Article II, section 1, of the Constitution was affected by the 25th amendment.
The relevant content–removing a President who is unfit but unwilling to resign–is Section Four.
Section 4 addresses the dramatic case of a President who may be unable to fulfill his constitutional role but who cannot or will not step aside. It provides both a decision-maker and a procedure. The initial deciding group is the Vice President and a majority of either the Cabinet or some other body that Congress may designate (though Congress has never done so). If this group declares a President “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office,” the Vice President immediately becomes Acting President. If and when the President pronounces himself able, the deciding group has four days to disagree. If it does not, the President retakes his powers. But if it does, the Vice President keeps control while Congress quickly meets and makes a decision. The voting rule in these contested cases favors the President; the Vice President continues acting as President only if two-thirds majorities of both chambers agree that the President is unable to serve.

It may take a medical event. (I’m withholding more comment so as not to be callous.)
LikeLike
Good you didn’t say more.
The FBI is watching.
LikeLike
In Rome, in its decline, there was lots of corruption, there were emperors who were clearly insane, and there were Senators who tolerated the insanity because they benefitted from the grift. This is not a new phenomenon.
The United States is no longer a democracy.
LikeLike
AGREED — forget about the 25th Amendment…ALL FOCUS must be on accomplishing THE FIRST STEP, which is for Democrats to win control of at least one of the Houses of Congress.
If that can’t be accomplished, then we have at least two more years of Trumpism…and maybe more.
So, all focus, all energy, must be on winning control of one or both Houses of Congress.
Unfortunately, I don’t think that the dithering, divided Democrats are capable of doing that because the Democratic Party is little more than a loose coalition of bickering special interest groups, each with its own pet objectives and who are unwilling and incapable of setting those objectives aside and subjugating them to a single, unified Party purpose.
I hope they can prove me wrong…but history says otherwise because idealistic progressives literally don’t have the neurological brain wiring to grasp the fact that if the Democratic Party isn’t in control, no progressive goals will ever be met.
LikeLike
Quikwrit,
I hope for more: Democratic victories in both Houses of Congress. The House, for sure, but also the Senate, where many Republican seats are in peril: North Carolina, Maine, Ohio, Texas, and more.
LikeLike
…and…even if Trump were removed, that would give us the phony hillbilly, Vance. Vance is actually smart and articulate. He might be more dangerous than Trump. The removal might be worth it for the precedent. But maybe not. I’d say, we have a better chance of focusing efforts on a few “swing” Republicans to reign him in. But I worry most about how many people he will kill–he might even go to nuclear war to bring the world down with him.
LikeLike