Heather Cox Richardson brings us back to that terrible day two years ago when Vladimir Putin sent Russian troops into Ukraine. He expected the government to collapse within a matter of days or weeks. Yet Ukraine stands. Entire cities, such as Mariupol, have been obliterated. The inhabitants of towns such as Bucha were subjected to murders, rapes, and torture. Yet Ukraine stands. Europe supports Ukraine because they fear what Putin will do next. Will he storm Poland or Lithuania? The extreme right wing of the GOP has turned against funding Ukraine because Trump, their cult leader, is opposed. As usual, he will do thing to offend his very good friend Putin.
Richardson wrote:
Two years ago today, Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky made a passionate plea to the people of Russia, begging them to avoid war. He gave the speech in Russian, his own primary language, and, reminding Russians of their shared border and history, told them to “listen to the voice of reason”: Ukrainians want peace.
“You’ve been told I’m going to bomb Donbass,” he said. “Bomb what? The Donetsk stadium where the locals and I cheered for our team at Euro 2012? The bar where we drank when they lost? Luhansk, where my best friend’s mom lives?” Zelensky tried to make the human cost of this conflict clear. Observers lauded the speech and contrasted its statesmanship with the ramblings in which Putin had recently engaged.
And yet Zelensky’s speech stood only as a marker. Early the next day, Russian president Vladimir Putin launched a “special military operation” involving dozens of missile strikes on Ukrainian cities before dawn. He claimed in a statement that was transparently false that he needed to defend the people in the “new republics” within Ukraine that he had recognized two days before from “persecution and genocide by the Kyiv regime.” He called for “demilitarization” of Ukraine, demanding that soldiers lay down their weapons and saying that any bloodshed would be on their hands.
Putin called for the murder of Ukrainian leaders in the executive branch and parliament and intended to seize or kill those involved in the 2014 Maidan Revolution, which sought to turn the country away from Russia and toward a democratic government within Europe, and which itself prompted a Russian invasion. He planned for his troops to seize Ukraine’s electric, heating, and financial systems so the people would have to do as he wished. The operation was intended to be lightning fast.
But rather than collapsing, Ukrainians held firm. The day after Russia invaded, Zelensky and his cabinet recorded a video in Kyiv. “We are all here,” he said. “Our soldiers are here. The citizens are here, and we are here. We will defend our independence…. Glory to Ukraine!” When the United States offered the next day to transport Zelensky outside the country, where he could lead a government in exile, he responded:
“The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.”
That statement echoes powerfully two years later as Ukraine continues to stand against Russia’s invasion but now quite literally needs ammunition, as MAGA Republicans in Congress are refusing to take up a $95 billion national security supplemental measure that would provide aid to Ukraine.
Instead, Republicans spent the day insisting that they do not oppose in vitro fertilization, the popular reproductive healthcare measure that the Alabama Supreme Court last Friday endangered by deciding that a fertilized human egg was a child—what they called an “extrauterine” child—and that people can be held legally responsible for destroying them. Since the decision, Alabama healthcare centers have halted their IVF programs out of fear of prosecution for their handling of embryos.
Republicans who oppose abortion have embraced the idea that life begins at conception, an argument that leads naturally to the definition of IVF embryos as children. But this presents an enormous problem for Republicans, whose antiabortion stance is already creating warning signs for 2024. Today a memo from the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) noted that 86% of the people they polled support increased, not reduced, access to IVF procedures.
The good news for the Republicans is that their frantic defense of IVF means that the media has largely stopped talking about the news of just two days ago, the fact that the man whose testimony congressional Republicans relied on to launch an impeachment process against President Joe Biden turned out to be working with Russian operatives. House leaders have quietly deleted from their House Impeachment website the Russian disinformation that previously was central to their case against Biden.
But today, as Republican House members remain on vacation, President Biden announced new sanctions against Russia, and Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) was in Ukraine, where he challenged House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) to pass the national security supplemental bill. “The weight of history is on his shoulders,” Schumer told reporters in Lviv. “If he turns his back on history, he will regret it in future years.”
“Two years,” Ukraine president Zelensky wrote today. “We are all here…. Together with representatives of Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Egypt, Estonia, the EU, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, the Holy See, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, the Republic of Korea, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Montenegro, the Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Pakistan, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Thailand, Türkiye, the UAE, the United Kingdom, the USA, Viet Nam, as well as international organisations….”
Slava Ukraini.

Cox is right.
LikeLike
Cox is wrong. (Nice bookends, eh?)
Putin definitely had a reason, not just the reasons he offered (Nazi cabals, etc.). Putin wants to reestablish a Russian Empire at least as great as the USSR. After Ukraine, next up would be the Baltic nations, then maybe Poland.
LikeLike
Steve,
I agree. Easy for Putin to pick off the Baltic nations unless NATO defends them. During his interview with Tucker Carlson, Putin seemed obsessed with Poland. But I have thought from the beginning that he wanted to reassemble the USSR. He called its dissolution the greatest geopolitical tragedy of the 20th century.
I wish the Russian Revolution had been strangled at birth. Millions of lives would have been saved. And Hitler should have died in his crib.
LikeLike
Putin is not a Communist. He is an authoritarian megalomaniac kleptocrat who profits very handsomely from the crime family he heads in a Capitalist system. . He arose like Hitler out of a Democracy. Are we supposed to wish that Democracy had been strangled at birth.
His appeal is a twisted religious message appealing to a sense of victim-hood borne by the Russian People and backed by the Russian Orthodox church. Appealing to a sense of greatness and restoring greater Russia. As Idol Worship of Trump has replaced actual religion in much of the American Evangelical movement and Christian Nationalists threaten Democracy. Putin has done the same in Russia.
As detailed much better by Tim Alberta in his new book. “The Kingdom the Power and the Glory”. A book that perhaps Linda should should read to understand the difference between Catholics and Evangelicals.
Preaching Trump and grievance has replaced preaching the scriptures in much of the SBC. Or to rephrase that twisting the scriptures to preach Trumpism. Sometimes right from the Pulpit. More often at Church sponsored events. Mega events with Nation Wide Tours,featuring Right Wing Pastors.
I do not think we see that in the Catholic Church even if White believers vote in similar manners.
LikeLike
Putin is believed to be the world’s first TRillionaire. Navalny was right about his boundless greed.
ERROR: Auto-correct changed “trillionaire” to “billionaire.” I have never typed TRillionaire before. Putin is the world’s first TRillionaire.
LikeLike
Sláva Ukrayíni
Вічна ганьба тим, хто не підтримає нашого союзника! І смерть Путіну.
vichnaya ganba tim, khto ne podtrimaje nashogo soyuznika! i smert putin.
LikeLike
Easy for you to say.
LikeLike
Let me put it this way. Eternal shame on Mike Johnson, that twisted creep.
And death to Putin and the marauders.
LikeLike
NATO operates as a classic protection racket, hitting up constituent countries for “fees” based on each country’s GDP. The attitude of the U.S.-led western empire was perhaps best voiced by George W. Bush when he said, “”Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.”
LikeLike
James,
NATO does not receive fees from member states. There is a suggested 2% of GDP expenditure on defense in each NATO nation. Some exceed that number, some don’t. NATO is not “paid off.” NATO is a mutual defense treaty. Article 5 says that all NATO countries will respond to the invasion of any NATO country. That provision has been activated only once since NATO was formed in 1949: on 9/11/2001.
The existence of NATO kept the peace in Europe from 1949 until 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine. Ukraine is not a member of NATO.
Nations like Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, and Poland joined NATO because they don’t want the Russians to invade.
When GW Bush referred to “every nation, in every region,” he was not referring to NATO. Joining NATO requires unanimous consent of the other members and it’s a lengthy process. Until two years ago, Europe was peaceful. The members of NATO enjoyed astonishing peace and prosperity after NATO was created to deter Soviet aggression. After the collapse of the Soviet regime, the newly freed satellites joined in the peace and prosperity.
NATO has been a successful guarantor of peace. Until two years ago. Putin has never dared invade a NATO country.
Finland and Sweden asked to join NATO after Putin invaded Ukraine. So if Putin intended to prevent the expansion of NATO, he failed.
LikeLike
Thanks for the history lesson. NATO was created to expand the U.S. “sphere of influence” during the Cold War. The U.S.S.R. actually tried to join NATO but was rejected. Ironically, NATO military operations didn’t happen until after the collapse of the U.S.S.R. and the U.S. focus on acquiring new resources and markets. U.S.-based weapons manufacturers are quite happy to supply NATO members with products they sell. (BTW, Afghanistan and Libya aren’t considered countries in the “North Atlantic” but they sure felt the brunt of U.S./NATO aggression!)
LikeLike
The USSR was controlled by a brutal dictator-Joseph Stalin—until his death in 1953. The USSR continued to be a dictatorship after Stalin’s death. Molotov proposed that the USSR join NATO in 1954. Since the democratic nations of Europe formed NATO as a defensive alliance to protect against Soviet militarism, its members saw no point to admitting their chief adversary into NATO. The USSR continued to be a Communist dictatorship—no free press, no free elections, no free speech, long prison terms for dissidents—until it collapsed.
LikeLike
NATO is a defensive alliance. The NECESSITY of strong NATO defenses has been proved again and again and again by the propensity of that criminal state, the USSR, and its successor, that criminal state, Russia, to invade its neighbors and either take them over or install puppet authoritarian regimes. Thanks be to all the gods that we have a robust defense industry in the US employing patriotic Americans and paying them handsomely to make weapons to provide a deterrent to authoritarian regimes like Russia under would-be Tsar, Vladimir the Mobster Murderer Kakistocrat and Defenestrater.
Si ce n’est pas pour nous, le déluge.
LikeLike
During the twenty-first century, the U.S. has killed more human beings and displaced more human beings than any other country on the planet. The U.S. has invaded countries, dropped thousands of bombs, tortured and murdered many, many human beings. Right now the U.S. government abets campaigns of ethnic cleansing and genocide in the Middle East. I suppose it’s easier to complain about the faults of a country on the other side of the planet than criticize the “leadership” of one’s own country. Alas, Americans have no moral authority while crying crocodile tears about crimes committed by other countries. Don’t look now but there’s a plank in your eye!
LikeLike
To James Eales:
All of us have the moral authority to condemn nations that slaughter their own citizens, as Russia, China, and Cambodia did. We all have the moral authority to condemn nations that suppress independent journalism and freedom of speech and religion. You surely have no problem exercising your moral authority to condemn your own country. Aren’t you glad you live in a country where you are free to criticize your own leaders? If you lived in Russia and dared to say the same things about your leader, you would be jailed for years.
LikeLike
James, obviously the United States has acted the aggressor in the past especially in Central and South America—sins of the past. People are quick to point out the atrocities committed by those crafting laws to further oppress minority groups even among American citizens. The point here is not that he who is without sin can be the only one to defend democracy. Oversimplifying every issue seeks to weaken us. Case in point, the war in the Middle East has been characterized as one horrible side against one innocent one, and it depends on who you ask which side is which. It’s complicated in that it involves a vast history of oppression of the people on all sides with the exception of a terrorist group whose main job is to oppress.
Diplomacy isn’t about only being friends with those you like. That’s what personal relationships are for. Diplomacy requires negotiation for the sake of peace. Yes, the United States should atone for past sins, no question. However, it does not mean that, as a world power, it cannot come to the defense of other democracies.
Nuance is lost in modern politics—this is one of the reasons I feel Biden is the best choice for us. He understands foreign relations better than most
in government today.
LikeLike
“America First” Cost American Lives
The original “America First” movement in the 1930’s led to World War II and cost more than 1,000,000 million American casualties.
Today’s “America’s First” movement is leading toward World War III and who knows how many casualties because World War III will be fought with nuclear missiles from which no one is safe.
In the years before World War II, the most famous spokesman for the 1930’s “America First” movement was American aviation hero Charles Lindbergh who crisscrossed America, giving speeches about why American should look to its own concerns and not get involved in what was going on in Europe where Hitler was on the rise, taking over the Sudetenland.
On September 11, 1941, Lindbergh gave a fiery speech to a cheering crowd that included leaders of the national “America First Committee”. He was wildly cheered when he declared: “We have weakened ourselves for many months, and still worse, we have divided our own people by this dabbling in Europe’s wars!”
Hitler heard this speech and decided that America was too weak and divided to challenge him, so a few weeks later he brutally invaded Poland and started World War II in Europe.
Even after that, Lindbergh and the American First movement declared that the United States should let Europe fight its own wars.
But the Japanese had also listened to the cheers of the America First crowd to Lindbergh’s speech, and Japan’s military leaders decided that by taking swift military action against America, such a show of power coupled with the anti-foreign war “America First” movement would prevent the United States from taking retaliatory action and allow Japan to overrun all the Asian nations. So, just 90 days after the America First crowds cheered Lindbergh, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.
The lesson is: The only way to prevent the next world war that will engulf the United States is to take decisive action now to stop aggression like that which is happening in Ukraine. Putin won’t stop until he is stopped…and China is watching, just as Japan did.
U.S. Army General Patraeus, who also served as the Director of the CIA and knows what’s really going on in this world, points out that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is “as right versus wrong as it gets in this world. Here we have a brutal, unprovoked invasion at the orders of a kleptocratic leader who denies Ukraine’s right to exist. And keep in mind that Putin won’t stop there. [Driving Russia out of Ukraine] is in our cold, hard national interest.”
And yet, Putin’s Pals in the House of Representatives would rather play politics instead of pay attention to our nation’s interest.
They are traitors to America’s national interest.
LikeLike