Mike Miles was imposed on the Houston Independent School District by State Commissioner Mike Morath. Neither Miles nor Morath was ever a teacher. HISD was graded a B district before the state takeover. The takeover was based on spite, on Governor Greg Abbott’s hatred for a district that opposes him.
Miles thinks he is an innovator, but none of his authoritarian mandates has ever succeeded anywhere else. They won’t succeed in Houston because he lacks the single most essential ingredient of leadership: Trust.
He rules by fiat. That may work in dictatorships but not in schools. Fear is not a good long-term motivator. If Miles know anything about research on motivation, he would know that the greatest motivators are intrinsic, such as a sense of mastery and autonomy.
This post was written and published on a teacher website. It reports what’s happening in Houston’s classrooms, through the eyes of teachers.
The post begins:
The largest school district in Texas has been in the news a lot lately. You may know the district was issued a state takeover and its superintendent was replaced by Mike Miles, who, notably, has never taught.
You may know that as a part of his “wholescale, systemic reform” he identified 28 underperforming schools and identified them as NES Schools—which stands for New Education System.
You may know a few headlines—the most bizarre being that Miles starred in a musical skit for convocation that’s been scrubbed from the Internet.
Often, the real story isn’t as bad as newspaper headlines make them out to be. That’s not the case with what’s happening in H.I.S.D.
The experiences teachers are sharing are a different story entirely.
Here is what this reform looks like on a classroom level, from teachers currently in H.I.S.D.
Teachers read from a script the first two days of school.
Read right off the page. No get-to-know-yous, no surveys, no relationship-building, no games, nothing. Right into curriculum.
Teachers must keep classroom doors propped open.
However, teachers and parents argue this violates past safety mandates to leave classroom doors shut and locked.
Teachers cannot dim lights.
Even if they leave the windows open, have lamps, etc., the lights must be at full power.
Teachers have constant interruptions from administrators and district “minders.”
APs have to submit a minimum of five teacher observations per day, so this means near-constant interruption.
Administrators evaluate teachers on a checklist that has very little to do with pedagogy.
Teachers don’t know how school leaders will use these observations. This is the actual form (big thanks to Janice Stokes).
[Open the link to see the form.]
My first three reactions:
If teachers are reading from a script created by the district, why are we evaluating them on their instruction being relevant and engaging? Isn’t that on your people, Mike?
MRS stands for Multiple Response Strategies. Pair and share, whip around, etc. These are acceptable checks for understanding, but every four minutes is formulaic and prevents any kind of extended focus or stamina.
I haven’t heard “DOL” since 1992.
Classroom monitors can coach teachers on instruction at any time.
Even with students present. Not insulting at all!
No “weak readers” can read aloud because it models disfluency.
Huh. OK.
At NES schools, libraries have been replaced with detention centers.
A district employee I spoke to insists it is a “flex space that can have other uses besides discipline.” I said, “Oh, like a library?” She did not respond.
Students may not free-write.
Also, they may not work independently for more than four minutes.
Every four minutes, teachers are required to hold an all-class response to check for understanding. Which is great, until you actually have to read a book, take a standardized test, or focus for more than four minutes.
Every classroom activity must tie directly to instruction.
No classroom celebrations, relationship-building activities, brain breaks, or routines/procedures instruction are permitted.
Teachers received extremely limited training on this model.
The location chosen for training left people sitting on floors and stuck in parking lots for over 45 minutes.
There is no information tying any of these strategies to best practice or research on what’s best for kids.
This authoritarian approach to education is taking a huge toll on school climate and morale. A friend of mine said teachers at her school are breaking down on a daily basis. Even the strongest, most experienced educators—department chairs and leaders with stellar records—feel demoralized and unnerved (and that’s saying a lot after the past few years).
And no, the answer isn’t to “just move,” or switch districts, or quit teaching altogether. First, that response is lazy and reductive, but more importantly doesn’t account for the hundreds of thousands of kids in H.I.S.D. schools forced to learn in environments counterproductive to their wellness and development.
Public school teachers in Texas have known for years that it’s in the best interest of the state to destroy public education and reallocate funding to religious and private schools. Years of slashing budgets, demonizing teachers, lowering standards, letting chaplains offer mental health counseling—don’t tell me that’s a state that holds any kind of value for public education. That’s a state that wants to “prove” public education doesn’t work so it can privatize.
It’s just wild to me that they’re not even hiding it anymore.

“MRS [Multiple response strategies] is [sic] used every four minutes throughout the entire lesson.” How would that be humanly possible?
LikeLike
If anyone can read this list and come to a conclusion other than mine, let me know.
I can conclude from this list that it was designed to fail miserably. When the Memphis ASD failed, did the perpetrators of it suffer? No. When New Orleans tried this version of reform and got poor results, did the leaders suffer consequences? Hardly. The only reason anyone would try to do these things is to destroy public education.
LikeLike
@Roy — That’s what I concluded. The real goal is not this NES stuff, but a completely different system. I always thought if they wanted to save tons of money, hire paraeducators (hand out papers, room monitor, and whatnot) to be in the classroom and simply do distance learning where one teacher could do and say the same thing to thousands. And now with AI — no benefits, no opinions, no sick days…Make something so bad that no one can possibly do, say it they are no good, and here’s what we have to do with “BESTEDUCATION CO” and say “this is the way.” Sad.
LikeLike
It isn’t. The one that really floored me was “no ‘weak readers’ can read aloud because it models disfluency”. I can’t imagine being in classroom where this level of cruelty and dystopia is forced upon the teachers and the students, particularly those with IEPs. Then, I read the FB comments section. Many of the teachers believed that these new draconian rules were a practice run for AI. That’s exactly what that program sounds like. Heartless. Robotic. That giant sucking sound? Teachers leaving the district in droves. Just in time to put the kids in front of machines with a “facilitator”.
LikeLike
When Miles was superintendent in Dallas, teachers left in droves.
LikeLike
Maybe it’s time for Houston teachers to do more than just leave. There must be contract provisions with the HFT that are being violated by these dictates from Miles and the district. It might be time for them to consider a strike and court action to oppose this insanity.
I will say that, as a classroom teacher myself, I can’t imagine how they could possibly follow these dictates and get actual lessons taught. This is either pure idiocy from the non-educators around Miles (and definitely including the man himself) or it’s a calculated attempt to get teachers to quit in droves so that the schools can be essentially privatized and turned over to charter operators. Either way, it’s time for collective action to stop this and show Miles that he can’t just roll over teachers, students, schools, and parents.
LikeLike
As strategies go…
Is there a missing “know-that”
tid-bit, that would disempower
the head of a top-down regime?
IOW, is it the unknown, about the
“heads”, that empowers them?
LikeLike
I hope you’ll be posting something on Petrilli’s piece in the Times.
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
LikeLike
It pays really, really well to spout the bullshit that Petrilli does.
LikeLike
Petrilli is a think tank ho.
LikeLike
President of the Fordham Foundation for Securing from Oligarchs Big Paychecks for the Officers of the Fordham Foundation, a think tank where thinking tanks. If Petrilli were able to connect enough synapses to do even Trump-level “thinking,” he would understand that his championing of E.D. Hirsch, Jr., and knowledge-based education is in direct contradiction to his championing of the puerile list of breathtakingly vague and almost entirely content free “standards” hacked together by an unqualified doofus appointed by Master of the Universe Bill Gates to be the decider for the rest of us. Yes, Hirsh briefly got on board with the Common [sic] Core [sic] because he was promised that it would mean a great return to substantive texts. But he soon repented when he saw that what the CC$$ actually encouraged was everything that he argued against throughout his career as an education pundit–the dumbing down of curricula to random exercises on content-free “skills.” Petrilli draws big checks for promulgating the views of a few oligarchs. If Bill Gates suddenly developed a rabid belief in dropping rocks on the heads of third graders to jolt their cognitive abilities, you could count on a slew of white papers from Petrilli and Fordham about what a great, research-based idea that is.
Disgusting.
LikeLike
Too stupid to be an academic so he writes idiotic “white papers”
LikeLike
For years I was amused that his official bio pasted on the Fordham site described him as an education “thought leader.” I would practically roll on the floor laughing every time I read that.
LikeLike
Well, it is perfectly possible for a leader to lead in the wrong direction.
Jim Jones was a leader and he led his followers off a cliff.
LikeLike
Robert McNamara was also a “thought leader” on Vietnam and he led tens of thousands of American troops to their deaths and lard only knows how many Vietnamese.
Ditto for Henry the Hut and for Paul Woefulwits,
Ivy League “Thought leaders” all.
LikeLike
McNamara. And LeMay. A couple pieces of work, there.
And don’t get me started on Henry and Paul, those war criminals.
LikeLike
Unqualified doofus is a great term for most of the deformers.
LikeLike
Thanks, RT. I agree.
LikeLike
Reminds me of Charles Dickens’ novel Hard Times, where children are empty “vessels” which need to be “filled to the brim” with “facts.” No art, no stories, no creativity— just joyless soul-crushing facts.
LikeLike
Love that allusion. I still remember Mr Gradgrind demanding the definition of a horse. How often I have thought of that book during inservice.
LikeLike
Simply terrifying in its details.
Okay, Houston teachers, for how long are you going to take it? How many buckets of nervous vomit are you going to let burn your trachea getting ready for your workdays before you ban together and go on wildcat strike against your enemy?
Houston high school students, for how long are you going to take it? How much boredom and tedium can you stand before you stand up for your rights and your teachers? When are you walking out together? It’s called a boycott.
It’s called solidarity. It’s your greatest strength. Support your team. Don’t let Miles mess with Texas.
LikeLike
Typo. Oops! Please imagine that my finger didn’t miss the letter ‘d’ in band together, and if you’re in Houston, don’t let a typo distract you from what you must do.
LikeLike
Well said, LCT!!!
LikeLike
This will not go over well with everyone here.
Here goes.
I observed hundreds of classrooms a year until retirement 🙂 a couple of years ago. I didn’t get to hundreds during covid, but observed a lot.
In far too many, the constant factor was the teachers were doing all the work. Kids were passive. One student responds and the teacher moves on. Kids hear a term or reference they don’t know so they’re lost (opportunity gap). Some kids sit the entire period without talking – or reading or writing, maybe “solving” a couple problems. And no checks.
Regardless of the lesson plan and observation forms, I looked for four things:
1. Are kids working? Reading? Discussing? Responding with short answers so teachers can see them responding? The infamous “turn and talk.” Choral responses? Writing? Are they THINKING?
2. Are teachers checking for understanding during a mini-lesson, an explanation, when explaining directions, and reviewing work?
3. Are teachers asking questions that cause thinking, not basic recall?
4. WAIT TIME.
All the Houston reform horrors and others aside – the form is not horrible. Unlike most forms* the observation form includes items like yes – Multiple Response Strategies. Consistent checking for understanding (if done well) (It is possible in large classes with creative methods). Engaging students. Multiple activities.
It appears to check if teachers are activating kids to work.
*most forms: is the objective and a “do now” or “bell ringer” on the board, do kids know what standard they’re working on, did teacher use a formative and post-assessment daily) are the blinds the right height).
The Deming-lens review is accurate; however it seems that someone bucked the system to cause observers to: 1) actually observe and 2) concentrate on whether or not kids are doing something other than sitting and lost
LikeLike
@Wait, What? — From my experiences, I have witnessed the same. In fact, when I taught art lessons a physical therapist told me young boys paper cutting skills are slowed due to many (not all) teachers not having the patience, taking the paper from the child and saying, “Here, let me do it. This will speed things up.” As for me (and I can speak from what happened with the students I taught), I REALLY had to stop myself from “speeding things up” to give students “think time.” For example, when I asked a question, I would bounce around the room (I mean I wasn’t always in one place physically), but made it a habit of counting to ten before moving to, “Okay, Jimmy. Nothing coming to mind? Do you want some help? Can someone help Jimmy?” The best thing I did for my students is teach them to take ownership of their education. I never wanted to be the only one participating. And when I taught art, I often would say, “Is that what you want to do? Because if I tell you what I would do, then the work is a “teacher thing.” I will help you with all the technical aspects and “things to think about,” but in the end, I want you to own it.” And, once again, it worked for me and I am sure other teachers have excellent strategies to engage their students so it is more student driven. In the end, the teacher is the driving force navigating where they are heading, but they all can take turns driving, eh? And even stopping to share the view! Thank you for “my three cents worth.”
LikeLike
But, in the “Miles Maestrom” teachers don’t have an opportunity to even “rethink” anything (after an observation –more of catching them doing the wrong thing than the right) because the “Alpha and Omega” has happened. Sad.
LikeLike
I don’t see why you thought your comment wouldn’t go over well. Teachers should keep students involved and thinking all the time. That’s entirely right. The sage on a stage method has its benefits, but they are outweighed by the benefits of a generally interactive classroom environment. That said, however, there are times when direct instruction is necessary. Administrators should be experienced enough teachers to understand that and be able to use their heads more than their checklists, but checklists help those who are not.
LikeLike
Amen!
LikeLike
Miles must be following in Putin’s footsteps to remove democratic thinking (professors, teachers and students) from the state’s public schools and implement authoritarian programming.
LikeLike
Mike Miles is s loser.
These deformer types are all losers.
They have failed at every endeavor they have ever tried.
LikeLike
That’s assuming they were trying to reform instead of destroy. Toward the end of maiming public schools, they have been a $ucce$$.
LikeLike
It is possible to be a failure at destroying.
Deformers have tried to destroy public education for the past two decades but so far have failed.
Some people are just incompetent at everything they do.
LikeLike
True.
LikeLike
In the old days, the football coaches went off and took a degree in administration and then became high-school principals, even though they knew next to nothing–even though they were typically, arguably, the least-well-educated adults in their buildings. Why were these people chosen for the role? Because idiots thought that they were commanding, being big, tough manly men. These days, it seems that we are doing this same kind of thing at the administrative level.
LikeLike
cx: at the district administrative level
ofc
LikeLike
The best principal I ever had was a coach. He told me he was the least educated person in the building, and that he liked to hire good, smart people and let them be. He created a school with such a reputation that real estate agents still lie about the house they are selling being zoned for that school. And he left there thirty years ago.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hiring people who are smarter and more capable than you are is an excellent policy.
Unfortunately, the deformers do just the opposite, which leads to an inevitable spiral to the bottom.
LikeLike