The New York Times reported that rail workers’ unions felt betrayed by President Biden’s support of legislation that imposed a settlement and averted a national strike.
This is the same president that Trumpers call a “radical,” a “socialist,” and a”communist.”
The agreement Mr. Biden asked Congress to impose would raise pay nearly 25 percent between 2020, when the last contract expired, and 2024, and allow employees to miss work for routine medical appointments three times per year without risking disciplinary action. It would also grant them one additional day of paid personal leave.
It would not provide paid sick leave, however, a provision that many workers argue is the bare minimum they can accept given their grueling work schedules, which often leave them on the road or on call for long stretches of time. Rail carriers say workers can attend to illnesses or medical appointments using paid vacation.
Four of the 12 unions that would be covered by the agreement voted it down, and several others approved it only narrowly.
Tony Cardwell, the president of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division — International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which voted down the agreement Mr. Biden has asked Congress to impose, said that simply asking Congress to include paid sick days in the agreement would have gone a long way toward satisfying his members.
“If he would have said, ‘I want this one thing,’ it would have changed the whole narrative,” Mr. Cardwell said in an interview on Wednesday.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told members on Tuesday night that she would hold a vote on a separate bill that included seven paid sick days, but it was unclear whether it could pass both houses of Congress.

Why does Biden get all the blame when it is both Houses of Congress that pass the laws?
Why not ask, “Why did Biden make that suggestion to Congress?” A suggestion that Congress could ignore.
Is it possible, that Biden had his administration staff find out what would stand the best chance to be accepted by Congress and that’s what he went with, or did Biden meet with leaders from both parties to find out from them what would have the best chance of garnering enough votes through Congress so this issue would not paralyze the nation with a national rail strike?
“Rail moves roughly two-fifths of long-distance American freight and one-third of exports, making the stakes enormous. What’s more, rail is a central component of a complex global supply chain that depends on the coordinated movements of cargo ships, trains and trucks. Sep 14, 2022 – NY Times”
How many employees work for the railroads?
“In 2020, approximately 135,000 people were employed by Class I railroads in the United States.”
So, do we let 135,000 people hold 330 million Americans hostage because of the health benefits they want/need, or find some middle ground to give them something even if it wasn’t everything they wanted?
As long as there are elected members in both Houses of Congress that are owned and controlled by labor union hating corporations and billiaonres, a cup with some water in it is better than an empty cup.
The only way to change that is if voters vote out all elected representatives with a clear voting history that shows they vote yes or no for whatever their powerful and wealthy masters want them to do. As long as that doesn’t happen, the corporations and billionaires rule this country not the majority of voters.
And that brings me back to Biden being a dealmaker. If you have the time and are willing to read this piece from Politico, you may understand what I’m talking about. Getting something is better than nothing and keeping the supply lines open is better than having them crash and burn.
“President Barack Obama was elected during an economic cataclysm, and his first major task was passing an economic stimulus bill. But Republican leaders were determined to stop him, and he needed to persuade three GOP senators to support his bill and break the filibuster. He assigned the job to his Senate whisperer, his chief dealmaker, his aide with the best bipartisan relationships: Vice President Joe Biden.
“To nail down those Republican votes, Biden went into legislative stalker mode, schmoozing his old Senate colleagues into submission. …”
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/30/biden-bipartisan-dealmaking-backfire-226758/
LikeLike
Well, he said that he is pro-union at the campaign a couple of years ago. He chose exactly the opposite to what he initially promised. He sided with railroad executives— not workers. It’s more than a slap in the face. They felt like they were betrayed.
LikeLike
Huh. How interesting. On September 15 you lauded Biden for “brokering a deal to avoid railroad strike” (https://dianeravitch.net/2022/09/15/biden-administration-brokers-deal-to-avoid-railroad-strike/#comments). I said that the union brass had sold out the union membership and that the union membership would reject the agreement. You dismissed me saying “You want Biden to fail.” Now here we are with Union Man Scranton Joe begging Congress to do some union busting on the scale worthy of Ronald Reagan, all to side with railroad bosses instead of simply giving the railroad workers a measly few days of sick time, which would cost less total than Warren Buffett makes in a day. Most progressive president since FDR!
Turns out I was right about this one. Maybe I’m right about other things too. Nah, couldn’t be.
LikeLike
You want Biden to fail. You hate him as you hated Hillary.
Do I give you credit for defending Putin’s brutal war? No.
You are wrong.
You are defending mass murder.
You are defending war crimes.
You are defending Putin’s disgusting effort to eliminate Ukraine’s identity and subjugate its people to his tyranny.
Are you ok with one-man rule for36 years?
Why do you defend elimination of an almost free press?
Why do you defend one of the world’s worst tyrants?
LikeLike
Hello?? She writes:
“I said that the union brass had sold out the union membership and that the union membership would reject the agreement.”
The union membership did NOT reject the agreement. SOME of the union membership rejected the agreement and some didn’t.
The NYT puts the worst spin on it: “Four of the 12 unions that would be covered by the agreement voted it down, and several others approved it only narrowly.”
In other words, 8 out of the 12 unions voted to approve it!
More than 2/3 of the unions voted to approve this contract because they got OTHER things from it.
Calling this “union-busting” is kind of ridiculous. If Republicans were in charge, they would see what “union busting” really is. Or look at what Jimmy Carter did to destroy unions if you want evidence of how much better Biden is towards unions than the supposedly evil Democrats under Jimmy Carter.
I admit I sounded as rabid and totally deluded as dienne77 does when I was bashing Jimmy Carter and the Democrats of the 1970s as destroying unions.
And I was just as deluded as she was when I insisted that defeating Jimmy Carter in 1980 would usher in a wonderful era for unions, because I just knew that electing Reagan would be no worse for unions than re-electing the evil, anti-union anti-worker Jimmy Carter.
At least I was a dumb teenager and not a grown person when I decided defeating Carter would be great because Jimmy Carter was so anti-union. And I saw the reality of what the Republicans did and learned.
It’s shocking to keep reading the juvenile rantings of a grown person shouting “I told you so” sounding so much like the teenage me ranting about how evil Jimmy Carter was.
Biden isn’t trying to bust any unions. The Democratic House just passed an even more union-friendly bill, but once the Republicans take over, the railroad workers will be unlikely to get ANYTHING.
LikeLike
I said union membership would reject the agreement, and yet 2/3 of the unions voted for the agreement, but I told you so, I told you so, I told you so. Just like I told you that Putin was fighting the Nazis in Ukraine and his bombing of Ukraine civilians was justified. Just like I told you Trump was no worse than the evil Democrat.
LikeLike
Biden is a conservative. One day in the not too distant future, a new generation will rise up and strike down the conservative Democrats as almost happened in 2016 and 2020. In the meantime, mediocrity will fuel the progressive fire among the young. In the meantime,
Say to them,
say to the down-keepers,
the sun-slappers,
the self-soilers,
the harmony-hushers,
“Even if you are not ready for day
it cannot always be night.”
You will be right.
For that is the hard home-run.
Live not for battles won.
Live not for the-end-of-the-song.
Live in the along
LikeLike
Is Jimmy Carter a “conservative”? Because it seems to me that he was more “anti-union” than Biden.
LikeLike
Biden is in no way a conservative. He is an American institutionalist. There’s a chasm wider than the Grand Canyon between the two.
LikeLike
LikeLike
I would have hoped everyone who reads this blog would have known this by now: the assault against public education does not break on “liberal/conservative” lines. It’s been the one consistent issue on which bipartisanship has happened in the past two decades. Has anyone actually read Diane’s books around here?
LikeLike
Yes,, thank you. Republicans and Democrats have agreed for the last few decades, with a great deal of bipartisanship, about conservative policies. Both parties have agreed to be anti-union, pro-business and deregulation,
LikeLike
Your certainty constantly exposes your shallow idiocy. You mistake the urge to scream “I told you so” well before the evidence is complete. But then, evidence is a malleable commodity to you, much like all fellow travelers of authoritarianism. If you would actually follow the facts of the actual news, you would see that it is likely the House will restore sick leave provisions into the deal and then both sides would be obligated to accept. Premature crowing is definitely your most practiced talent.
Why are we subjected to this crap all the time? Isn’t there a neo-Nazi website for deluded people who are sure they are far-left geniuses she would be more comfortable with?
LikeLike
The railroads are an incredibly profitable mature industry that essentially, with government help, jettisoned they unprofitable passenger operations well before many of the people reading this were born and were allowed to restructure with enormous support from the Federally administered Conrail. They also benefit from hidden subsidies as well as the simple fact that their right of ways were also a gift from the government. They are also essentially a public utility. The simple fact that workers had to even make paid sick days a contract demand is absolutely disgusting. That should have been the status quo since the Pullman Strike, not something on the table now. I commend the President for doing what he did to keep the freight running but the companies never were negotiating in good faith. That just has to be said.
LikeLike
The railroads are a bully industry and have been since the 1970’s when they were given subsidies from the gov’t when the rail industry was floundering financially. A union rail job was a good paying job with many perks and benefits, but the big people at the top have gotten greedy. Yes, union workers still make a decent wage, but over the years they have slowly had their perks and benefits (including sick/vacation time) downgraded in contract negotiations. A group of elite lawmakers who get a ton of “off” time just made a really poor decision against union workers…..looks pretty bad IMHO.
LikeLike
Agreed. How do these employees NOT have sick time in this age of Covid? Infuriating.
LikeLike
I have long thought of Biden as the moderate MLK speaks of in his letter from Birmingham Jail. Biden has a long history from Anita Hill to his present abandonment of railway workers.
“I MUST make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizens Councillor or the Ku Klux Klanner but the white moderate who is more devoted to order than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says, “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can’t agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically feels that he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by the myth of time; and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”
LikeLike
And in today’s news of the absurd, Lady G. voted against the gay marriage bill.
LikeLike
I’m sickened by this. The democratic party should support unions, not bust them. Joe felt the same way in 92. “In 1992, Senator Joe Biden voted AGAINST ending a major rail strike. He argued that by intervening, Congress would be “rewarding” the railroad companies for years of bad faith negotiation.”
LikeLike
Really sad. And opposed to Medicare 4 All and allowing Merrick Garland to play Sleeping Beauty with regard to prosecution of Trump.
Status Quo Joe. Better than Trump. But what isn’t? Colon cancer?
LikeLike
Agreed. Much happier with Joe than Trump.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Garland might be sleeping, but he sure as hell ain’t no beauty.
I’d sooner French kiss a frog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bob,
Many unions were opposed to Medicare for All, too.
LikeLike
Diane does not allow on her blog the language that occurs to me in response to that reality. Infuriating.
LikeLike
Bob,
I have some sympathy for union workers who feel as if they have fought hard and given up a lot for good health insurance and are reluctant to just give that up. Not that it wouldn’t be better ultimately, but I can empathize with their concern that it won’t be.
That’s why I thought “Medicare for All who want it” might be a better transition to eventually become Medicare for All. Or even a policy where the age where Americans are eligible for Medicare would keep dropping every year so that in 5 years it covered everyone over 40, and then it might be easier to just make it Medicare for All.
LikeLike
I do love the Right wingers and Left wing Nihilists with their sudden appreciation for workers. There are two issues here. One is that the Rail Roads have cut 30% of the workforce over the last few years and not replaced many who were laid off due to Covid. This has left the remaining workforce to be saddled with unreasonable demands for overtime and on call status. The demand being made by the workers is for sick days to restore some sense of normalcy to their lives.
Which sounds reasonable
Of course there was another option available to those Union workers they could have demanded that the workforce be restored to more normal levels .
I have had this discussion all day with several Union workers and as I pointed out to a friend now working as a worker for the company I was a Union foreman for, “you are in a position similar to those rail workers ” if you don’t come in Saturday or Sunday or as a supervisor Saturday and Sunday . Then don’t bother coming in Monday “.Luckily for those lucky enough to be steadily employed in an industry with 15% unemployment a work share furlough plan ensures plenty of time off during the year( if not by choice.) And of course there is a lot of bitching about the grueling work schedule . But there are not a hell of a lot of men who turn down the overtime on weekends.. Today he sent me a copy of a letter from the Unions Business manager that all overtime be approved by the Union. In my / his case it would have been as Subway Signal rehabilitation demands off hour construction.
To some degree the rail workers want the best of both choices. They want the overtime but also want to chose the days off . or they would have demanded plan B rehire sufficient workers to make the schedule more acceptable.
The House just voted to include 7 sick days to the contract 218 democrats and 3 Republicans. My guess is the Senate will see 48 Democrats vote to include those sick days and possibly 2 Republicans . The filibusterer rules again, sing it till the rafters ring “both parties are the same”.
The rest I will save some typing and copy and paste a previous comment on a Union facebook page. There is a reason the Union Leadership including my international approved the deal back in September . Unlike many members they know what is at stake.
“If they were to strike this would not only be a disaster for the country throwing 7 million out of work rapidly and tanking the economy instantly at the same time as spiking inflation . It would be a disaster for Biden and Democrats, as the fascist anti labor Republicans cheered it on .
It would also be a disaster for the entire Union movement or what is left of it .With all the BS about Americans now supporting Unions . That will turn on a dime as soon as it cost Americans the slightest inconvenience. No less a red nickle.
1) In 1947 a wave of strikes enabled the passage of Taft Hartley over a Truman Veto. Rewriting the NLRA screwing labor Unions for the next 75 years .
2) In spite of Reagan firing the Air Traffic Controllers and an orgy of union busting that followed . Of note most Americans did not fly and certainly not for business in 1980 . Every American will be impacted severely by a rail strike . Yet the Nation re-elected the senile union busting s——– in a landslide over Mondale with a 100 % approval rating with the AFL CIO.
As for morning in America inflation was 5% and unemployment 7.2% in 1984. Can’t fix stupid .
Yup Government was the problem especially the NLRA and Republicans have done their best to gut it through their appointments every time.
3) Lastly this case stands a good chance of being the next devastating decision out of the Republican Taliban 6 on the Supreme Court.
A National Rail Strike would insure their decision goes against Organized Labor and have the vast Majority of American cheering them on.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/…/union-strike-power…
LikeLike
Second try for link “Union Strike Power Under Threat as Supreme Court Mulls Labor Law”
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/union-strike-power-under-threat-as-supreme-court-mulls-labor-law?fbclid=IwAR1FmMG5h1_PcJ_rE0fZAKKCIgkjfp02J2FGk1OQpZqNR5XIBhnGyK7BIgw
LikeLike
Joel,
Quit trying to post intelligent responses when you are supposed to say that Biden “sold out” the union and that the Democrats are anti-union.
I noticed that 8 out of 12 unions supported this deal, but our resident Putin-defender claimed that “the union membership rejected it”.
It seems to me that Jimmy Carter was a lot more anti-union than Biden. I have no doubt that there are things to criticize in this deal, but there are also good reasons to support it, which is probably why the membership of 8 out of the 12 unions did vote for it.
LikeLike
It is odd that The NY Times reported that 4 of 12 unions rejected the settlement, instead of writing that 8 of 12 accepted it. Unless some accepted it and some didn’t vote. This is just not good reporting.
LikeLike
The Corporate Media is going to spend a few days trying to make the narrative Biden’s betrayal of Unions stick, they same way they crafted a lie about Afghanistan being a colossal disaster and thus sticking years of neglect at Joe’s feet. The Corporate Media is in no way left. Fortunately, (or sadly) once these bills get through the Senate no one will care anymore since Americans don’t give a shit about unions or railroads.
LikeLike
Also anyone here saying Biden is a conservative or anti-unions or anything bullshit about Putin fighting Nazis in Ukraine can be summarily ignored. They are, most likely, rightwing ratfvckers pretending to be leftists.
LikeLike
yep. But it is certainly revealing – and very disappointing – to read some of the comments from educators here who completely embraced the NYT’s anti-Biden narrative on the union deal, just like I read similar comments embracing the NYT’s anti-Biden narrative about the so-called “fiasco” during the Afghanistan withdrawal.
Those narratives need to be legitimized by having lots of non-right wingers embracing them as true. Just like we see here.
At least on a blog for educators I would hope that there was a little more thoughtfulness. After all, the NYT also pushes the same narratives about how charter schools are a great success in helping hundreds of thousands of students who would otherwise be stuck in failing public schools, and if it wasn’t for the politicians who are owned by the teachers’ union and their huge donations, there would be tens of thousands more charters to help millions more of those students that the anti-charter school politicians have sold out to serve their teachers’ union masters.
When I read those narratives in the NYT about “failing” public schools and wildly successful charters, I know they aren’t true. So do most teachers here. So I wonder why they believe it is true that Biden is siding with railroad executives.
Thank you to Joel for posting an informative reply. I wonder if the ranting folks here who “know” Biden sells out workers will even bother to read it.
LikeLike
But all is well after the devastating headlines. Neal Irwin or Krugman or perhaps Leonhardt will write an opinion piece on the issue that gets me to keep my on line subscription.
LikeLike
Exactly. And no the types who rant about ‘Joe selling out the workers’ are not here to read responses but to Troll and to push rightwing agitprop.
LikeLike
The vote by the House of Representatives Wednesday morning to ban a nationwide rail strike and impose a White House-backed settlement on approx 120,000 rail workers is an historic political event. The Democratic Party, which controls the House and drove the vote, has openly displayed its class role as the instrument of corporate America against the working class.
Biden’s admin watched in horror as rail workers voted to reject the settlement it had devised in collaboration with Wall Street, the rail corporations and their union servants. Now this government, which prattles endlessly about “freedom” and “democracy” around the world, is moving to ruthlessly suppress the democratic rights of the rail workers. According to the White House and Congress, workers do not have the right to vote on the terms of their employment, or the right to strike if the corporate bosses refuse to make an acceptable offer.
The mantra repeated by the Democratic and Republican politicians and the corporate media is that a rail strike must be prevented because it will damage “the economy.” No such argument has been made to stop profit-gouging by the oil companies, or factory shutdowns, or the slashing of wages and benefits by corporate employers, all of which certainly damage the economic interests of working people.
By “economy,” the representatives of big business mean “profits.” Wall Street signaled its approval by rising sharply following the House vote.
The rail bosses claim they cannot afford to meet the demands of workers, even elementary necessities like paid sick leave, available to 78 percent of all US workers according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. These claims of poverty are ludicrous, coming from the most profitable industry in America, controlled by the banks and billionaires like Warren Buffett. The rail bosses can pay, but they do not want to.
That is because the issue is not just the immediate interests of the rail companies, but the entire class strategy of the American criminal class. This strategy has been based on continuing the inflation of asset values—stocks, bonds and other paper holdings—while suppressing any wages movement in the working class.
The monetary policy of the Federal Reserve, the US central bank, clearly expresses this class strategy. The Fed has systematically raised interest rates this year, citing as its main concern the tightness of the labor market, which would ordinarily find expression in a rise in wages. The Fed is using higher rates to promote a recession, increase unemployment, and thus counteract any wages movement in the working class.
A breakthrough by an important section of workers, such as in rail, would threaten to trigger a far wider offensive by the working class, whose rising militancy has been revealed in contract rejections and in strikes by university workers, health workers, transport workers and sections of industrial workers.
This class necessity explains the remarkable speed of passage of this anti-worker legislation, which was publicly proposed by Biden on Monday evening, passed by the House on Wednesday morning, and set to be discussed by the Senate Democrats at a Thursday lunch. The ban on a rail strike is likely to become law by the weekend.
Only two other pieces of legislation have achieved such rapid passage in recent years: the rescue plan for the banks and corporations, enacted in March 2020 at the onset of the coronavirus pandemic by congressional Democrats and Republicans working together and signed into law by Donald Trump; and the emergency military and financial aid to Ukraine, rushed through this year to bolster the US-NATO war against Russia.
LikeLike
This is sheer nonsense and despicable lies. The best part is your long winded lies about the Democratic Party and Russias War Crimes in invading Ukraine are tl:dr have a terrible holiday.
LikeLike
Paragraph 3, read it again because I don’t think you did. Not with an open mind [in my opinion].
I’m not framing my “long winded lies” [as you say] to encourage any type of identity politics. I’ll leave that to you [as you’ve so eloquently done]. My point is that the move by Congress to impose a contract on railroaders [WHICH THEY COMPLETELY REJECTED, btw] should be viewed by the majority of us as completely illegitimate–political affiliation aside. This should be viewed as an attack on the democratic and Constitutional rights, including the right to strike and the right to participate in a meaningful contract vote, not only of railroaders, but of the entire working class. Because if it succeeds, it will set a precedent that will be used against other sections of workers in the future. Including you.
Now, I hope that you have a happy holiday season… genuinely.
LikeLike
Eight of 12 rail unions approved the contract.
A national rail strike three weeks before Xmas would have devastating consequences for the economy and for public opinion about unions.
LikeLike
Yes,, thank you. Republicans and Democrats have agreed for the last few decades, with a great deal of bipartisanship, about conservative policies. Both parties have agreed to be anti-union, pro-business and deregulation, etc.
LikeLike
I meant this as a reply to Greg up there, so let me copy and paste.
LikeLike
But without highlight at all is what the opinion of the ‘dues paying worker’ is in relationship to their [local, regional, national] ‘Union Rep’. I do believe that if one looked [objectively] at the voting results of the 12 then one would see that the genuine “will of the worker” isn’t being represented.
Scores of American labor historians last week signed an open letter to President Biden imploring him not to impose a contract on railroad workers against their will, and thereby outlaw the right to strike.
Biden called for congressional intervention last week after several unions voted down the contract worked up by his Presidential Emergency Board (PEB) in collusion with the rail corporations and unions, whose membership had overwhelmingly authorized a strike in the summer. Biden turned to Congress imposing the deal only after the rail unions’ bureaucracies proved incapable of forcing the rotten deal on the rank and file.
By Thursday, both houses of Congress had passed Biden’s proposed injunction, with near unanimous support from the Democratic Party delegation. The vote was a stark lesson in class politics. While Congress regularly stalls, indefinitely, any legislation that might in any modest way help working class people, when called on by Biden to strip workers of their democratic and human right to withhold their labor, Democrats and Republicans saluted, clicked heels, “reached across the aisle,” and made illegal the rail strike in near record time. So fast, indeed, that the vote was complete even as historians were still affixing their names on the open letter to Biden.
Though their letter is titled “Historians in Support of Railway Workers,” it is written from the standpoint of offering friendly advice to the Biden administration, to whom it is addressed. The letter expresses “alarm” at Biden’s “decision to ask Congress to impose an unfair and unpopular settlement,” which, it correctly notes, “constitutes a negation of the democratic will of tens of thousands of workers.”
Yet in spite of acknowledging Biden’s machinations, the letter portrays the White House as a neutral, and even friendly, arbiter in the struggle. Referring to anti-labor laws put in place long ago to curb the immense industrial power of workers in critical transportation industries such as rail, the historians write that “History shows … that the special legal treatment of rail and other transportation strikes offers the federal government—and the executive branch in particular—a rare opportunity to directly shape the outcome of collective bargaining, for good or for ill.” The letter goes on to cite one example each of “ill”—the federal government using the military to attack rail workers in the Gilded Age—and one of supposed “good,” when Woodrow Wilson acceded to the eight-hour day demand among rail workers during World War I.
The signatories hope that Biden might yet follow Wilson onto the “good” side of history’s ledger.
They write,
“President Biden, you have vowed to become the ‘most pro-union president’ in American history. You have said that ‘No one should have to choose between their job and their health – or the health of their children…’ What do these commitments mean if the women and men who work in an essential industry like rail cannot count on your support in their fight for basic protections?
The letter, also addressed to Labor Secretary Marty Walsh, asks Biden to “put the full force of your Administration behind the eminently just demands of the railway workers.” It then calls upon “progressives in Congress to reject any imposed settlement that shortchanges workers and undermines collective bargaining and the right to strike.”
The historians’ plea fell on deaf ears. Only eight House Democrats voted against it. As for the “progressives” in Congress, including Democratic Socialist of America (DSA) Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, they too voted for the injunction. Bernie Sanders, the self-styled socialist from Vermont, ensured the bill’s passage in the Senate.
Anyone remotely familiar with American labor history—or, for that matter the half-century long right-wing career of Joe Biden—should not have been surprised. It consists of an unbroken chain of such federal interventions against workers stretching back to the late 1870s. In this long and often bloody history it has mattered not one iota if the occupant of the White House has been a Democrat or Republican.
LikeLike