Steven Singer wrote this last year, but it remains pertinent and on the money. He says that there is a narrative spun by Disrupters that American schools are in “crisis” and are “failing.” He says this is baloney, or bologna, whichever spelling you prefer.
Singer says that American public schools are among the best in the world.
He writes:
Critics argue that our scores on international tests don’t justify such a claim. But they’re wrong before you even look at the numbers. They’re comparing apples to pears. You simply can’t compare the United States to countries that leave hundreds of thousands of rural and poor children without any education whatsoever. The Bates Motel may have the softest pillows in town, but it’s immediately disqualified because of the high chance of being murdered in the shower.
No school system of this size anywhere in the world exceeds the United States in providing free access to education for everyone. And that, alone, makes us one of the best.
It doesn’t mean our system is problem free. There are plenty of ways we could improve. We’re still incredibly segregated by race and class. Our funding formulas are often regressive and inadequate. Schools serving mostly poor students don’t have nearly the resources of those serving rich students. But at least at the very outset what we’re trying to do is better than what most of the world takes on. You can’t achieve equity if it isn’t even on the menu.
The important thing to know about the international test scores is that we were never #1. Never. When the first international test of mathematics was offered in the mid-1960s, we came in last.
What holds us back is our high rates of child poverty. If we reduced poverty, we would improve our schools because children would arrive in school ready to learn, and would not lose days of instruction due to illness and lack of medical attention.
The biggest problem in American education, aside from our national indifference to the well-being of students, is that we have a crazy federal law that makes test scores the goal of education. That’s backwards. Test scores are supposed to be a measure, not a goal.
We should aim to be more like Finland, which not only has high test scores without test prep, but has been rated the happiest country in the world. Less testing, more time for the arts and more attention to creativity and divergent thinking. Teachers with autonomy and a love of teaching. Students encouraged to do their best but not measured by standardized tests. You know where Finland got these ideas? They borrowed them from the U.S., and we forgot them and went for standardization. As Albert Einstein said many decades ago, standardization is for automobiles, not for people.
Go Finland, the HAPPIEST country.
Private schools in Finland:
“Are private schools banned in Finland?
There are few private schools. … However, even in private schools, the use of tuition fees is strictly prohibited, and selective admission is prohibited, as well: private schools must admit all its pupils on the same basis as the corresponding municipal school.”
From what I read, Finland Schools are not divided into the “haves” and the “have nots.”
An Open Letter to Randi Weingarten and the American Federation of Teachers Regarding the Humanitarian Crisis at the Border | Common Dreams Views
https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/07/04/open-letter-randi-weingarten-and-american-federation-teachers-regarding
This is a great post for the 4th of July. It reminds us to dismiss the propaganda campaign against our public schools. No schools can accomplish as much as our public schools have. We have helped build our nation and have served it well. No schools are as inclusive and efficient as authentic public education. Our public schools are anchors of many communities, and they are founded on principles of inclusion, diversity and democratic governance.
It’s up at OEN: https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Steven-Singer-American-Pu-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Diane-Ravitch_Education_Education-For-All_Education-Laws-190704-635.html#comment738309
with my comment which has embedded links taking you back to Diane’s post here.
My comment.
In this post, https://dianeravitch.net/2019/06/25/chester-e-finn-jr-the-persistent-failure-of-big-shiny-ideas-to-reinvent-schools/. Diane offers a look at her road to knowing what she does about our public education system, and she offers a fascinating article recently by Checker Finn that captured her skepticism about the Big Ideas imposed on schools and teachers. https://www.educationnext.org/new-american-schools-short-opinionated-history/
Dr Ravitch’s reaction to Checker’s article was this: “Twenty or thirty years from now, someone will write a similar article about charter schools and ask, “How could people have been so dumb as to believe that you could ‘reform’ American education by letting anyone get public money to open any kind of school? Why did they think it was a good idea to let entrepreneurs and for-profit entities open schools? Why did they allow corporate chains to take over community public schools? Why did they allow religious zealots to get public money intended for public schools? They must have lost all common sense or any sense of history!”
I agree that the international comparisons are baloney. It should give people pause that ed reformers rely on them so much- they know better.
The international comparisons on cost are also baloney- you can discover reading the work OF ED REFORMERS. Arne Duncan likes to compare the scores of some Asian countries to US scores but in that comparison he talks about the PRIVATE cost borne by families of the elaborate test prep they do. This is a COST. It doesn’t matter if the state pays it or the families pay it- it’s a cost and an honest accounting INCLUDES it on the cost side of the ledger.
How did this fake comparison become so pervasive in a “movement” that crows about how much they rely on data? Why did they all swallow it and parrot it? Because they have an ideological agenda. How do the ed reform think tanks at universities justify using bogus numbers to “prove” things? They KNOW better.
The biggest damage ed reformers did in Ohio with their 20 year capture of our state government was NOT charters and private school vouchers.
It was the 20 year utter neglect and abandonment of public schools.
They still don’t see it. Read any ed reform pundit or platform and look for something, anything, that actually adds value to any public school or public school student. It doesn’t exist.
“Read any Ed reform..” You got that right.
I am to the point that I would make a deal with the anti-public school ed reform movement. They can have charters and vouchers if they agree to stay out of policy that affects public schools.
They must do NO HARM. They can pursue their ideological mission. Just leave our kids and our schools out of it. I don’t want their high school graduation schemes or their garbage ed tech or their unregulated vocational programs that will screw students. I want public school policy set by people who value public schools and public school students. No more gimmicks and fads.
I have to agree with half your thoughts. They can have their Charter schools but I draw the line with vouchers. I pay for my 2nd child to attend a private religious HS because he needs to be away from CC curriculum, the testing madness, SEL, ed tech, data collection etc. When private schools start accepting tax dollars from the state, the state will always want something in return…….CC, testing, data, ed tech, SEL. There has to be some refuge from the madness.
Let’s not forget the chronic drip, drip of funding that vandalizes public education. The privatizers will not “leave our schools out of it.” They want to dismantle them.
I agree that our public schools could and should be a LOT better. Changing the school-funding formula that links funding to property taxes would help. Stop using standardized testing as a goal and a barrier. Also there needs to be a reform of curriculum. One of the reasons why we’re so ignorant in this country is because things like geography are not taught, history teaching is a joke and the arts have been relegated to second and third class status. Witness the results: Politicians playing on people’s ignorance to achieve their goals. Now public education that’s been purposefully underfunded for 2 and 3 generations is now seen as not up to the challenge by people who profit off of its demise – and short term profit at that.
“Test scores are supposed to be a measure, not a goal.”
At the risk of sounding like Duane, test score cannot measure. Once we decide that test scores do anything but hint at the truth, they become a goal. That is what happened after the test comparison stuff that produced tha Nation at Risk thing. People who were otherwise level-headed became insane followers of data, data generated by faulty questions which obfuscated rather than revealed the truth.
Perphas we need tests to give us information we did not have, but until we quite worshipping at the altar of data, I am against them.
Deformers like Bill Gates and Raj Chetty (picker) actually worship at the “Alter of Data”
See Moshe Adler’s critique of Chetty et all, wherein he points out how they Chetty picked their data and simply disregarded data that did not support their thesis.
http://vamboozled.com/moshe-adler-on-chetty-et-al/
The Alter of Data”
They worship at the Alter
Of Data in their chapels
Deformers never falter
To Chetty pick their apples