Fred Smith and Robin Jacobowitz published a paper analyzing the tests that students in New York are required to take. Their conclusion is devastating.
They examine the quality of the tests, not just the scores of the students. And they conclude that the tests are inaccurate, unintelligible, and indechipherable.
Taxpayers are spending millions of dollars for flawed instruments that harm students and corrupt education.
Questions are not only flawed but developmentally inappropriate for the children to whom they are administered.
Expanding the testing time did not fix the inherent problems.
Smith and Jacobowitz conclude:
Our boldest conclusions tie together important aspects of the testing story: children upset and dumbstruck
by the exams, especially the youngest ones; unhappy parents whose views were disparaged; SED’s suppression of data needed by the public, especially parents to stay informed and make intelligent decisions about their children’s education; the surge in zero scores and omissions that this study uncovered; ill-conceived tests and their perpetuation; the strong case parents have for opting out; the overriding need for transparency, timely data and unfettered review by analysts. These rest most solidly on findings for grades 3 and 4, and for ELLs, students with disabilities, and minority students.
In the final analysis, we are dealing with children here at a formative time in their lives, when education matters most. For every discussion and news story about the increase or decrease in test scores, we must remember that behind each statistic is a child—a young child— who lives each day with the decisions that we make about testing. The 3rd graders who took the first CCLS-linked test in 2013 are taking the 8th grade test this spring. Everything that has been wrong with the core-aligned tests has framed the education of these young people.
It’s time to create a legitimate assessment process, unified with standards and curricula that work in harmony to foster the development of every child’s intellect, abilities, and dreams. Federal education law, the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), dictates that we test our young students in math and ELA each year.
We must determine how to do that in a way that serves children and the educational goals we value.
Message to parents:
The testing corporations have never been held accountable.
The New York State Education Department has never been held accountable.
Nothing has been fixed.
Opt out.
Do not allow your children to take these tests.
They harm your child and corrupt what we value most in education.

All true.
And the politicians have never been held accountable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So clear! It is true – See Short Documentary More . . . than a score! https://vimeo.com/203722082 in support of the thesis presented.
“In Kindergarten” children are feeling that “School is NOT FOR ME!” Quote from Dean of Elementary Education and Director of Community Based Schools.
LikeLike
Thank you for this video! I plan to share with my school district parent group.
LikeLike
Kids’ hatred for school is growing under the Common Core/NGSS regime. School is now about performing onerous mental chores rather than actually learning anything. The old fashioned model of schooling, for all its flaws, was far better than this new mutant version of education. While it promises to make them smarter, it only makes them ignorant and stultified.
LikeLike
As a retired NYS ESL teacher, I know that ELLs have been over tested for years. Giving the CCSS tests to beginning and intermediate students and expecting them to meet “proficiency” is absurd. From my reading certification courses I know that testing students on a frustration level yields no useful information that can help students. It is an exercise in futility. The only “accomplishment” that this educational malpractice does is undermine students’ self confidence and make them feel like failures. According to the post, the NYSED has applied for a waiver so ELLs can take the test according to language level rather than grade level. Frankly, this does not make much sense either as ELLs already take the NYSESLAT which is intended for ELLs, but it is still not a useful diagnostic tool.
What the article does not address is the impact of all the “zeros” on school closings. Proficiency is a subjective, artificial construct, not a statistical one. When “zeros” are averaged in for schools, it will impact the overall average scores of a building making it more likely for closure. Consequently, schools with high numbers of ELLs would be unfairly targeted because high numbers of ELLs will bring down the average of the school. The current testing regimen is designed to make schools vulnerable for closure or takeover, not to help students. There are far too many ways that privatizers have unfairly rigged the testing against poor and language minority students.
LikeLiked by 1 person
SADLY and devastatingly, the fact that “The only “accomplishment” that this educational malpractice does is undermine students’ self confidence and make them feel like failures…” has been a resounding success for elitism/cultural segregation in its own roundabout way.
LikeLike
In the immortal words of Rod Stewart,
“Every picture tells a story”
Turn this data into a bar graph and you get a picture of
Common Core testing “inequity” in New York State
WARNING: If you are subject to cognitive dissonance anxiety, STOP reading now.
Data taken from NYSED school report card for 2016 – 2017
ALL> all students tested SWD> Students with disabilities
Here is the link and see for yourself.
https://data.nysed.gov/lists.php?type=district
If you are an elementary or middle school ELA or math teacher don’t you wish that your high school teacher would share their “secret sauce” with you. If you want evidence of of child abuse, look no further than this testing data.
ALBANY CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
COMMON CORE PASS RATES
2016 – 2017
ELA
Grade 3: ALL (20%) SWD(1%)
Grade 4: ALL (20%) SWD(2%)
Grade 5: ALL (17%) SWD(2%)
Grade 6: ALL (15%) SWD(3%)
Grade 7: ALL (16%) SWD(0%)
Grade 8: ALL (28%) SWD(4%)
HS Regents ELA (Common Core)
Grade 11: ALL (78%) SWD(45%)
MATH
Grade 3: ALL (24%) SWD(4%)
Grade 4: ALL (14%) SWD(1%)
Grade 5: ALL (15%) SWD(2%)
Grade 6: ALL (13%) SWD(3%)
Grade 7: ALL (14%) SWD(0%)
Grade 8: ALL (0%) SWD(0%)
HS Regents Algebra 1 (Common Core)
Grade 9: ALL (60%) SWD(45%)
ADIRONDACK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
COMMON CORE PASS RATES
2016 – 2017
ELA
Grade 3: ALL (23%) SWD(0%)
Grade 4: ALL (23%) SWD(0%)
Grade 5: ALL (32%) SWD(0%)
Grade 6: ALL (29%) SWD(0%)
Grade 7: ALL (29%) SWD(0%)
Grade 8: ALL (44%) SWD(4%)
HS Regents ELA (Common Core)
Grade 11: ALL (90%) SWD(54%)
MATH
Grade 3: ALL (17%) SWD(0%)
Grade 4: ALL (45%) SWD(11%)
Grade 5: ALL (28%) SWD(0%)
Grade 6: ALL (25%) SWD(0%)
Grade 7: ALL (36%) SWD(0%)
Grade 8: ALL (5%) SWD(0%)
HS Regents Algebra 1 (Common Core)
Grade 9: ALL (91%) SWD(57%)
LikeLike
Any such research studies on similarly-flawed CC-aligned SBAC test?
LikeLike
You would have to find school district report card from your state ed department.. This data is from NYSED.
LikeLike
I’d love to hear from any teacher who thinks Common Core is making our kids better at reading, math or anything else. If this describes you, please speak up. I’m sincerely curious.
LikeLike
That is the $64K question.
crickets?
Institutional hyper-failure rates rarely encourage marginal or struggling students to like school or persevere in their efforts.
Lack of basic knowledge is glaring. Units in local and state history, geography, and ecosystems seem to have fallen by the wayside in favor of empty skill sets and Chromebooks.
Ignorance compounded by disinterest, apathy, and social distraction are now the official legacy of 21st century, standards-based, test-and punish school reform.
LikeLike
I’m a history teacher, but I occasionally have students do some simple math. Many cannot do subtraction without a calculator, much less division or multiplication. Some don’t even know how to use a calculator. But they think about math at a deeper level now, right? Oh, I’m sure. What a fiasco.
LikeLike
This is the end result of professional educators cow-towing to the reform crowd’s constant disparagement of “rote” memorization, facts, and core knowledge. The misguided attempt to teach deep understandings, higher order thinking, problem solving, and 21st century skills to young children has left kids with long term memory banks with nothing to work with. The students who struggle the most are those who know the least. It is almost impossible to learn, much less solve problems, without a strong foundation of knowledge. Why more teachers are not recognizing this problem is mystifying and frustrating.
LikeLike
No thank you for this mess, big $$$$$$ and politicians, who don’t give a hoot about anything except their pocketbooks and bank accounts.
And children are STILL SEPARATED from their families and housed in detention centers at $450/day….child trafficking is going on in more than one way.
LikeLike