The One Wisconsin Institute compiled a list of the organizations that have been funded by the far-right Bradley Foundation of Milwaukee. It is a remarkable documentation of the largesse that is showered on advocates for privatization of public schools.
You will notice the relationship with Betsy DeVos’ American Federation for Children, adding more shekels to the school choice honey pot. DeVos’ AFC has pumped millions of dollars into Wisconsin legislative races to assure that its privatization agenda is protected by the legislature. We are reminded again that our Secretary of Education is an extremist who opposes public schools.
Bradley-funded activities work to prevent any accountability or audits for private schools that receive public funds. And they seek every opportunity to siphon money away from public schools to benefit voucher schools.
Among the notable recipients of Bradley funding:
*American Enterprise Institute (where EdWeek blogger Rick Hess is education director) received $4.3 million from their Bradley paymasters.
*Black Alliance for Educational Options (founded by Howard Fuller) got $1,475,000. BAEO sends speakers to black communities to try to persuade them that charters and vouchers are best for black children. You can be sure that BAEO does not tell its audiences that its activities are funded by a rightwing foundation run by reactionary white men.
*Center for Education Reform, run by former Heritage Foundation aide Jeanne Allen, which exists to smear public schools and promote privatization. 620,000.
*Center for Union Facts, led by PR man Rick Berman, whose goal is to defame teachers’ unions: $1,550,000. About 10 years ago, I attended a meeting of the rightwing Philanthropy Roundtable, where Berman gave a pitch for funding, based on his campaign to demonized the New Jersey Educational Association. When I asked him to explain why the top-performing states are unionized, and the lowest are not, he answered: I am a PR man, not an educator.
*Charter Growth Fund: $28 million. Not familiar with this one, but it serves to remind us that charter schools are high priority for the extremists of the right.
*Donors Trust, $3.1 million. An organization assembled by the Koch brothers and Dezvos family to funnel money to pet causes while hiding the donors’ identity. Dark money.
*Foundation for Excellence in Education, $435,000. Jeb Bush’s pastime.
*Heartland Institute, $647,500. Rightwing think tank.
*Heritage Foundation, $623,500. The senior citizen of far-right think tanks.
*Hoover Institution, $1.6 million. Sponsor of Education Next and other school choice initiatives.
*Marquette University, $1.7 million. This may be another subsidy for Howard Fuller and the Black Alliance for Educational Options, since Fuller is based at Marquette.
*National Council on Teacher Quality, $445,000. This organization was founded by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute with the explicit purpose of harassing traditional teacher education programs. Started as a maverick, this rightwing group now grades teacher education institutions for US News & World Report and is quoted by the mainstream media as if it were a credible source.
*Partnership for Educational Justice, $200,000. This is Campbell Brown’s organization, whose goal is to eliminate teachers’ rights and unions.
*Rocketship Education, $375,000. The charter chain that piputs poor kids on computers.
*Thomas B. Fordham Institute, $522,000. One rightwing foundation funding another.
*University of Washington, $500,000. This would be a subsidy for Paul Hill’s Center on Reinventing Public Education, which promotes portfolio districts. You know, like stock portfolios.
That’s a sampling.
Think about this list of handouts the next time some rightwingers complains about unions subsidizing civil rights groups. No equivalency.
The report can be found here.

Websites that offer suggestions in choosing elder care facilities, recommend the selection of a non-profit. The people getting paychecks from weaponized philanthropy, like those at the organizations listed above, should be placed in for-profit nursing homes by their children, who “choose” a place based on the lowest cost provider.
Politicians like Corey Booker and Ohio’s Senate Education Committee Chair, Peggy Lehner, who founded Conservative Leaders for Education deserve the same fate.
LikeLike
The policies that the Hoover Institute advocates led to concentrated wealth. The Institute disingenuously trots out Larry Diamond, as their talking head to spin the loss of democracy so that it is divorced entirely from any economic cause. Diamond sees “corrupted semi-democracy” in other countries but, he has no near vision for it in this country.
Justice Brandeis, “We must make a choice. We may have democracy or we can have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.”
Six Walton heirs have wealth equivalent to 40% of Americans combined.
LikeLike
Fordham, “one right wing foundation funding another”, which explains the money transfer with Center For American Progress reported on Fordham’s posted 2013 tax return.
LikeLike
Where the current legislation stands:
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2017/09/school_choice_bill_stand_in_congress_restarts.html?cmp=eml-enl-eu-news2-rm&M=58181125&U=2306083
LikeLike
Ed reformers are all pushing this new book – the “new idea” is to turn all schools into charter schools.
In this piece, the author of the book uses Massachusetts as the model. But nothing he says about charter schools is true in the following states:
IN, OH, MI, PA or FL.
People who live in these states are VERY familiar with charter schools- we’ve had them FOR YEARS. We know better.
Why pretend all charter schools are nonprofits and all charter schools outperform public schools? That simply isn’t true in vast swathes of the country. To cherry pick “high performing” charters and use that selective information to promote privatizing all schools is really misleading.
There was just a long piece out yesterday on how Michigan “gambled on charters and lost”. They’re planning on ignoring the results in Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida? The states where ed reform has been a disaster are just omitted?
This isn’t “science”. It’s ideology.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2017/09/04/new-paradigm-public-education/EbSImQ8YEuPl67TuTOeBYM/story.html?event=event25
LikeLike
It’s money.
LikeLike
“This isn’t “science”. It’s ideology.”
No, it’s not ideology. It’s idiology*!
*Idiology (n) Beliefs based on falsehood and error, The ideology of idiots.
LikeLike
The richest 0.1% aren’t idiots. In the U.S., they’ve proven to be valueless predators and leeches, costing the nation its democracy and potential economic growth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The richest .1% may or may not be idiots (depending upon how much they inherited) but those who believe that becoming a member of and/or kowtowing to that .1% are idiologists.
LikeLike
On the same day that ed reformers are all promoting a new book that advises turning all schools into charter schools, the NYTimes published this piece on Michigan:
“The crisis at Carver Academy was not unfolding in isolation. Michigan’s aggressively free-market approach to schools has resulted in one of the most deregulated educational environments in the country, a laboratory in which consumer choice and a shifting landscape of supply and demand (and profit motive, in the case of many charters) were pitched as ways to improve life in the classroom for the state’s 1.5 million public-school students. But a Brookings Institution analysis done this year of national test scores ranked Michigan last among all states when it came to improvements in student proficiency. ”
It’s just amazing how they all ignore any evidence that goes against their crusade to get rid of public schools.
Thank God Michigan didn’t privatize the whole state. The experiment was a disaster. It’s harmed kids in BOTH public schools and charter schools. Michigan is now dead last in growth for public education. It’s a free for all. The public education system is collapsing in that state thanks to “free market” ed reform.
LikeLike
Have we given up on publicly-operated schools? see
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/10/the-war-on-public-schools/537903/
LikeLike
Here’s Peter Cunningham from the Obama Administration promoting the idea that all schools should be charter schools:
Organize all schools like charters, with more autonomy/accountability. New book from David Osborne makes the case.
When they say “reinvent schools” they mean “contract with private entities to provide services”.
This isn’t a new idea. It’s an old idea. It’s called “government contracting”.
How are public schools going to fare when we have government packed with people who want to eradicate public schools? Not well. And they haven’t fared well under ed reform leadership- public schools have either been denigrated or ignored.
These people oppose the existence of public schools. They should admit that to the public. It’s deceptive to continue to insist they “support” our schools. Of course they don’t. The plan is eradicate our schools.
LikeLike
Apparently David Osborne never looked at Michigan, where charter schools perform no better or worse than public schools.
LikeLike
Has Betsy DeVos met with a single public school family yet?
If she’s an “agnostic” why does she denigrate or ignore 90% of families with school children? We’re excluded from federal consideration because our children attend the schools DC disfavors?
If they’re doing 10% of their job can we pay them 10% of their salaries?
LikeLike
see
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-devos-weingarten-school-tour-20170420-story.html
Ms DeVos visited publicly-operated school in WashDC:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2017/02/18/devos-criticized-teachers-at-d-c-school-she-visited-and-they-are-not-having-it/?utm_term=.b90c4baac921
LikeLike
Gosh, Charles, you documented two occasions when she visited a public school in six months in office! Impressive!
LikeLike
It was all I could find on google. I think the SecEd should spend more time in the “trenches”, actually visiting publicly-operated schools, and in discussions with teachers/administrators/students/parents. On this point (and many others), we are in agreement.
LikeLike
When you are Secretary of Education, you should visit the public schools at least once a week and listen and learn.
Once every three months is an insult.
LikeLike
Like that last thought!
LikeLike
cross-posted at https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Follow-the-Money-A-Handy-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Accountability_Alec_Diane-Ravitch_Dollar-170906-911.html#comment672750
With these comments (WHICH HAVE EMBEDDED LINKS AT OPED.
There been NO DISCUSSION in the MEDIA, about the legislative take-over of the public school systems, and the ongoing destruction — the privatization of our public education by the state legislatures that Diane Ravitch covers at her site and by the NPE — and which my series here, re-posts with commentary that ties it all together.
https://www.opednews.com/Series/PRIVITIZATION-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-150925-546.html?f=PRIVITIZATION-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-150925-546.html
Read the TRUTH — at the RAVITCH BLOG or the NPE newsletter. https://networkforpubliceducation.org/newsletters/
Read her A Slick Campaign for Privatization https://dianeravitch.net/?s=PRIVITIZATION
Look at what the “California Billionaires are doing to privatize education” https://dianeravitch.net/2016/09/01/california-meet-the-billionaires-who-are-financing-the-spread-of-school-privatization/
and be aware that this is a worldwide takeover of education by the oligarchs who KNOW that getting people as kids, wins the battle to take over any nation. HERE IS ONE FROM WIRED ABOUT “Pearson’s Quest to Cover the Planet in Company-Run Schools”
https://www.wired.com/2016/04/apec-schools/
AND READ, FORMER UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE’, DIANE RAVITCH’S “How Not to Fix Our Public Schools” AND “Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools”
LikeLike
If the national ed reform “movement” prefers nonprofit charters, can they explain why MI, FL, PA and OH have for-profit charters and have had them for 20 years?
That’s a big chunk of the country to exclude from their “analysis”! I’d like to see this crazy map they’re using, where all states that have charters contrary to the company line simply disappear.
Where were these people when all these for-profit charter entities were growing? Lobbying for more charters and vouchers?
They haven’t even been able to regulate their OWN sector, let alone turn every public school into a charter school.
Why would a nation of charters look like Massachusetts? Isn’t it much more likely it will look like Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania, where ed reform is a disaster?
LikeLike
A new paradigm of public education:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2017/09/04/new-paradigm-public-education/EbSImQ8YEuPl67TuTOeBYM/story.html?event=event25
LikeLike
I would like to see educational researchers from other states conduct a similar study. Many of these same foundations are spreading similar propaganda in other states. It shows how vast the attack on public schools is despite the fact there is no legitimate evidence supporting privatization.
Taxpayers need to understand the implications of tax credit scholarships. With Trump and DeVos proposing a national tax credit “scholarship,” people need to understand this scheme is really a tax cut for the wealthy that will hurt public education and pass a greater tax burden on the working class. If taxes are not raised to make up the loss, Republicans will likely go after any social safety nets to make up the difference.
LikeLike
Propaganda example- Fordham attached a foreword to a paper they sponsored that produced results about Ohio vouchers that they didn’t like. The foreword’s claim about a finding that competition is beneficial was absent from the research paper. Media broadcast the finding as if it had a foundation in the research paper.
LikeLike
Lying liars lie, eh!
LikeLike
Sins of omission, commission, hype and spin are all in the deformer toolkit.
LikeLike
Notre Dame which takes big, strings-attached money from the Koch’s, not surprisingly, is linked to Gates-funded Pahara Aspen. A Senior Director of N.D.’s Alliance for Catholic Education is a Pahara Fellow. Public universities that give degrees to privatizers should force the return of the taxpayers’ money from those graduates, people like the ACE Senior Director.
LikeLike
The significance of the Bradley Foundation is it slithers alongside Koch operations.
Congress, U.S. Presidents, AFT and NEA leadership, and Dem. organizations like DFER, CAP and NAF white wash the plotting of Bill Gates. Similar to One Wisconsin’s ‘s revelations which expose the Kochtopus, the carefully crafted PR that hides Gates’ motives will be scratched away.
LikeLike
Bottom line, some people will do just about anything for money.
LikeLike
Diane: “About 10 years ago… When I asked him [Rick Berman] to explain why the top-performing states are unionized, and the lowest are not, he answered: I am a PR man, not an educator.”
Highest performing by what measure?
When I look at
1) NAEP scores as reflected here:
https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/profiles/stateprofile?chort=1&sub=MAT&sj=&sfj=NP&st=MN&year=2015R3
and
https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/profiles/stateprofile?chort=2&sub=MAT&sj=AL&sfj=NP&st=MN&year=2015R3
and also:
2) Fordham’s analysis “How Strong Are U.S. Teacher Unions? A State-By-State Comparison”
https://edexcellence.net/publications/how-strong-are-us-teacher-unions.html
and the material here:
and also:
3) Wikipedia’s list of states ranked by income levels
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_income
I find the picture rather more clouded than your question to Berman implied.
For example, of the 10 states that Fordham ranked as having the strongest unions, half of them ranked in the lowest 20 states in these NAEP scores:
https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/profiles/stateprofile?chort=1&sub=MAT&sj=&sfj=NP&st=MN&year=2015R3
all far below Virginia which, with teachers’ collective bargaining prohibited, came in tied for 5th.
At the same time, that approach could be misleading; I think you would agree that there are plenty of other factors such as levels of poverty, or prevalence of ELL, that should properly be considered.
When one factors in income levels, my impression is that states with teachers unions relatively weak or absent seem generally to outperform states with strong unions… in other words their NAEP rankings seem to further exceed their rankings by income. I can examine and relay that data more precisely, if that would be of interest.
LikeLike
Stephen,
The three top states on NAEP are
1) Massachusetts
2) tied: Connecticut and New Jersey
Which right to work state has higher NAEP scores?
LikeLike
I specifically referred to NAEP scores in my question to Berman.
LikeLike
Thanks. Where exactly would I find what you regard as the most reliable, cumulative, up-to-date ranking of states in respect to NAEP?
LikeLike
Google NAEP
LikeLike
Stephen
You should work for DeVos. You echo her.
LikeLike