A few years back, I went to Michigan to speak to a large group of superintendents, whose schools collectively enrolled half the students in the state. I learned from them about the pernicious effects of school choice. The state wiped out all district lines for purposes of enrollment. Students can enroll in any public school without regard to district lines, and schools are paid by the state based on numbers enrolled. Consequently, every district commits a portion of its budget to poaching students away from the neighboring districts. Each district spends about $100,000 each year on advertising, in hopes of getting more students and the money attached to them.
All this is background to Jennifer Berkshire’s incisive piece about how school choice promotes segregation. Jennifer recently visited Betsy DeVos’s hometown, Holland, Michigan, and was there to view the Tulip Time parade. As she watched the high school marching bands pass by, she saw a vivid portrait of segregation on display.
She writes:
“First, some background. During the endless runup to DeVos’ confirmation hearing last year, it was the Wild West-style school choice she’d pushed in Detroit that garnered most of the attention. But DeVos was also behind Michigan’s inter-district choice policies that, starting in 2000, *disrupted* neighborhood attendance zones, just as the proposed Trump/DeVos education budget seeks to do. In Michigan, school choice has become the new white flight as white families have fled their resident districts for schools and districts that are less diverse. The most dramatic example of this may be in DeVos’ own home town of Holland.
“The choice to segregate
“Since Michigan adopted the school choice policies DeVos is now pushing across the country, Holland’s white enrollment has dropped by more than 60%, as students decamped for public schools or charters in whiter communities nearby. The students who remain in the Holland Public Schools are now majority Hispanic and overwhelmingly poor—twice the schools’ poverty rate when Michigan’s school choice experiment began. Many of these students are the children of migrant farm workers who came to this part of the state to pick fruit; school choice enabled Holland’s white families to pick not to attend school with them. One in three students in Holland no longer attends school there, and since the money follows the child in the Mitten State, yet another DeVos priority, white flight has eaten the district’s finances too.
“In 2000, Holland had fifteen schools. Now it has just eight. Of nine Holland schools that once served elementary students, half have closed. By 2009, even the elementary school where DeVos’ mother once taught had been shuttered. As students flee for schools in communities like Zeeland, the future of Holland’s public schools looks increasingly dire. Already there are mutterings in this wealthy, Dutch-dominated community that the school population *doesn’t represent* Holland. And as DeVos well understands, a community that has little stake in its schools is unlikely to shell out money to pay for them…
“The Trump/DeVos education budget was made public on the 63rd anniversary of Brown vs. Board. DeVos’ vision isn’t just a retreat from Brown—it embodies the spirit that animated its opponents to set up segregation academies in Brown’s wake. The budget that bears her imprint would encourage and even incentivize white flight. We don’t have to speculate about where all this leads. The outcome of the kind of school choice policies that DeVos has pushed for decades in her home state and now wants every state to embrace has been starkly measurable segregation. And even that is an understatement. What I witnessed in DeVos’ hometown last week was extreme sorting on the basis of race and class. That the top education official in the country thinks this is a good thing is appalling.”
Folks, our Secretary of Education is encouraging racial and social segregation. She won’t stand in its way. She doesn’t care, she won’t act to stop it, she wants to subsidize it.
Were he alive, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would denounce her actions. How dare she and Trump claim they are advancing “the civil rights issue of out time!” They are reversing the progress made since 1954 with “all deliberate speed.”

It is so strange that DeVos played such a big role in Michigan ed reform but she doesn’t tout Michigan ed reform (because she can’t).
Instead she pushes Indiana and Florida ed reform. Her actual record on ed reform doesn’t matter at all.
It’s like Fordham in Ohio. Our lawmakers are still slavishly following directions from this think tank, utterly ignoring the “facts on the ground” IN OHIO.
It seems to be impossible for ed reformers to fail. If they fail in one state they just point to another state, even if their HOME STATE is a disaster.
We get national ed reformers in Ohio who have “reformed” NY or Massachusetts. Maybe it’s just me but I would insist they show something in the state they’re standing in. Massachusetts has about as much in common with Ohio ed reform as Finland does.
LikeLike
“As students flee for schools in communities like Zeeland, the future of Holland’s public schools looks increasingly dire. ”
When DeVos travels the country and paints this magical picture of parents choosing from a portfolio of super-duper schools where there is no risk and no sacrifice and everyone wins, she manages to completely ignore the real world effects of her own policies.
But no one should buy it. It’s ridiculous to say that “choice” has no effects on systems of schools, and it’s a lie to guarantee that there won’t be any downside.
This is used car salesman level deceit.
LikeLike
You’re giving used car salesmen a bad name with your last thought!
LikeLike
The biggest impact ed reform will have in the Great Lakes states is not charter schools and vouchers for private schools. The lasting impact will be the damage they have done to public schools by utterly ignoring children in public schools.
There’s a price for chasing charters and vouchers for the last 15 years, and the price in the Great Lakes will be paid by children in public schools. Their lawmakers and representatives followed ed reformers off a cliff like lemmings. They abandoned their own constituents in favor of lobbyists and think tanks.
We need to hire some public employees who are interested in public school students.
LikeLike
Here’s a typical ed reform victory lap:
http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-charters-after-lausd-board-elections-20170530-htmlstory.html
84% of Los Angeles school children attend public schools. Yet, the entire political and policy focus is charter schools. This is ludicrous. It’s practically the dictionary definition of “capture”.
Look at your state legislature some time. If it’s like mine they spend 90% of their time on “choice” schools and 10% on the schools 90% of children attend. This has been going on FOR YEARS and public school children are paying the price for having NO advocates in government. They deserve representation. It’s outrageous that all these public employees feel they can blithely abandon them to pursue whatever is fashionable.
LikeLike
I can’t print what’s going through my head. Hint “A b for b!”.
LikeLike
“Choice” is an insidious segregative tactic. Other states should take a good look at the failure of “choice” in Michigan and consider that it is a template for other school choice failure in other states. Nothing good will come from depleted public schools serving the neediest most vulnerable students in large classes with few resources. DeVos and Trump represent a total disinvestment in the common good. Michigan should be a cautionary tale about “choice” and racism. That is the authentic civil rights story.
LikeLike
How dare she and Trump claim they are advancing “the civil rights issue of our time!”
The civil rights claim is a perfected alt-claim. It is a great distractor from reality, facts.
The claim is intended to provide an ethical cover for the unparalleled corporate exploitation of poor students and those of color.
The pretense of having some moral purpose is central to the corporate demolition of public education, closing schools, firing and demeaning teachers, all the while claiming that standards must be higher and “rigor” must infused into every aspect of education to save poor children and children of color from failing schools and miserable teachers (and their unions).
Coincidently, addressing “civil rights” is also the reason for a surge of activity organized around financial products called social impact bonds or pay-for-success contracts marketed as “getting paid for doing good.”
There is also a huge flow of venture capital into start-ups that are intent on making public education obsolete except for the pot of gold money that follows all of those students. Investors see that as a huge and perpetual slush fund guaranteed by tax payments for compulsory education.
LikeLike
The new economic ventures are part of ESSA which promotes pay for play corporate welfare schemes. In fact, I see charters and vouchers as more corporate welfare. If public schools continue to lose ground, parents may have to step up and sue their state for the right of their children to attend a well resourced public school.
LikeLike
Laura,
It is strange to say that your administration is defending “the civil rights issue of our time” as it simultaneously guts the civil rights enforcement agencies within every Cabinet office.
LikeLike