The legislation passed by the House of Representatives aims to cut Medicaid by $880 billion over ten years, and a relatively small but significant chunk of that money pays for special education services in schools.
The new law would cut Medicaid by $880 billion, or 25 percent, over 10 years and impose a “per-capita cap” on funding for certain groups of people, such as children and the elderly — a dramatic change that would convert Medicaid from an entitlement designed to cover any costs incurred to a more limited program.
AASA, an advocacy association for school superintendents, estimates that school districts receive about $4 billion in Medicaid reimbursements annually. In a January survey of nearly 1,000 district officials in 42 states, nearly 70 percent of districts reported that they used the money to pay the salaries of health care professionals who serve special education students.
Republicans say federal health programs must be restructured to curb their soaring costs — the biggest driver of projected budget deficits — and force a smarter allocation of limited resources.
But in a letter sent to top lawmakers this week, a coalition of school educators and advocacy organizations said such efforts would force states to “ration health care for children.”
The advocates argued that under the House bill, the federal government would transfer the burden of health care to states, which would result in higher taxes, eligibility cuts or curtailed services for children. And they said that schools would have to compete for funding with other entities, like hospitals and clinics, that serve Medicaid-eligible children.
The ability of school systems to provide services mandated under the federal Individuals With Disabilities Education Act would be strained. The law is supposed to ensure that students with disabilities receive high-quality educational services, but it has historically been underfunded.
“School-based Medicaid programs serve as a lifeline to children who can’t access critical health care and health services outside of their school,” said the letter sent this week by the Save Medicaid in Schools Coalition, which consists of more than 50 organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union, the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, and the School Superintendents Association.
It is time for all concerned about children with special needs to contact their Senators and make sure that this cut to the most vulnerable children is eliminated. When Congress mandated that school districts include children with disabilities, it promised to pay 40% of the costs. It has never come close to fulfilling that promise. This cruel cut by the House of Representatives would shift even more of the burden for a Congressional mandate to the schools.

Everyday there is more about the horrors of the Trump administration. Who has the guts to pull something like this, while wanting money to build a wall and more money for a bloated military? Only someone with no compassion or understanding of how hard poverty is would think this is acceptable.
………….
Different topic:
What James Comey told his friend about President Trump..PBS NewsHour
Published on May 18, 2017
Benjamin Wittes, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institute, editor-in-chief of the Lawfare blog and a friend of Mr. Comey, spoke with PBS NewsHour’s William Brangham on May 17 about a series of conversations he had with Comey about the president.
………
Comey was trying to distance himself from Trump because he believed that there should be distance between the FBI and the WH. Trump was working to influence him. Comey thought it was inappropriate that tRump wanted to become ‘chummy’ with him and ‘bring him into the fold’.
Wittes comments about Trump asking Comey for ‘loyalty’ and ‘honesty’ and his saying that he could only give ‘honesty’.He wonders if Rosenstein was made to do a ‘loyalty’ oath to get the job.
Comey was concerned that he had been asked to make compromises and he had refused while possibly Rosenstein had been asked to make compromises as well.
Says Comey was fired by Trump because he wasn’t a person that he could control.
LikeLike
Aren’t these the same people who were outraged by physician assisted suicide in the case of terminal illness? So you can’t end your life with compassionate medical assistance, but if you have a medically fragile child….
LikeLike
This move is another ploy to topple public education. Trump and DeVos don’t care about medically fragile children. They’ll use them to attack school budgets.
LikeLike
Here we go again with the school superintendents making an appearance on the scene. If this passes, it will make their lives so much harder by having to deal with angry parents. They will have to start making some really hard decisions at the district level, like canceling edu-tech contracts, upper management salary decisions/raises….because they can’t cut out the teachers or paras anymore? Or maybe they will just opt to go ALL in on the ed-tech and really start slashing the working teachers. Any way you look at it, the Supers are running scared now. When it personally affects them, they join ranks and start to fight. Where have they been for the past 15-20 years?
LikeLike
Maybe it’s time for parents of handicapped students to file a lawsuit. What are they supposed to do with children whose only option is a depleted public school? They are naive if they believe that a computer will address all the needs of multiply handicapped students or anyone else for that matter. They just don’t care.
LikeLike
Do they do nothing else in Congress other than attack public schools?
I know very few of these people attended public schools and none of their children or grandchildren would be caught dead in one, but what did we do to deserve such lousy representation?
It’s bizarre to have an entire federal government composed of people who spend all day looking for ways to harm public schools. And we’re paying them for this, just to add insult to injury. It’s not like they do this on their own time.
LikeLike
I don’t know if I’ve mentioned this in the past, but I am a special education teacher.
And these people just depress the hell out of me….
LikeLike
I think this group of students has been targeted for a while. They are the most expensive to serve in special education. This will drastically impact their programs. Yet, with well-prepared teachers many students make great gains in independent living, academic, and social skills etc.
From link below, “For nearly 30 years, Medicaid has helped school systems cover costs for special education services and equipment, from physical therapists to feeding tubes. The money is also used to provide preventive care, such as vision and hearing screenings, for other Medicaid-eligible children.”
Can we expect to see for-profit institutional-like charters now that act like babysitters?
LikeLike
Pushing a “per-capita cap” on this program is a general tactic for the Republicans for all social programs. The language many be from the Heritage Foundation.
I recently encountered a discussion of a Heritage Foundation recommendation to Devos/Trump on the pending reauthorization of the Higher Education Opportunity Act. The Heritage Foundation praised DeVos suggestion that that whole act be dumped. The Heritage Foundation did not go that far, but it recommended a policy that would put a “per-capita cap” on the number of federal student loans for an individual and the duration of these.
LikeLike
The political reality has long been and remains that people vote their self-interest and their pocketbook, so the time is ripe right now to grab all 55,000,000 voters on Medicare, plus all those millions who hope to have Medicare, plus all those millions who have loved ones on Medicare and hold up in front of their noses the fact that their Medicare — MediCARE, not just Medicaid — premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket costs are all going to go up and their Medicare “doughnut hole” on prescription drugs is going to open wide again if the Republican health care scheme becomes law.
According to Congress’s own Congressional Budget Office, repealing the Affordable Care Act completely would add $802 billion to Medicare — MediCARE — spending from 2016 to 2025. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, in order to pay for this forced spending increase, Medicare will raise premiums, increase deductibles, and increase out-of-pocket cost sharing for beneficiaries. The Republican proposal will also close the “doughnut hole,” as the coverage gap in Medicare Part D drug plans is called. For 2017, the coverage gap begins once beneficiaries and their plan have together spent a combined $3,700 on covered drugs and ends when the beneficiary’s own spending reaches $4,950 and so-called catastrophic coverage kicks in. The doughnut hole will open wide again if Obamacare is repealed and will swallow more money from Medicare recipients’ pockets.
And the list of damage to Medicare goes on much longer than this, such as the loss of free annual physicals and other now-endangered Medicare features. Few people seem to be aware that the Affordable Care Act contains about 165 provisions affecting Medicare, according to Medicare’s trustees.
It’s time for Democrats to hold town hall meetings in their own and in Republican districts to explain to people just how the middle-class, not just poor people, will lose out if Trumpcare becomes law. It’s especially important to inform the 55,000,000 avid-voter senior citizens how Trumpcare will increase Medicare costs, including re-opening the prescription drug “doughnut hole” in Medicare Part D, and will bleed away Medicare’s funds with the aim of bankrupting Medicare. People might feed sorry for the poor people, but that is sadly not enough to bring people out to the polls. People come out when their self-interest is on the line, and everyone who has Medicare or plans to have Medicare or has a loved one on Medicare is in danger of losing Medicare because of the Republican “health care” scheme. Defeating the Republican scheme will preserve both Medicaid and Medicare, but it will require the millions of votes from Medicare recipients voting their self-interest to do that.
LikeLike
I agree. Democrats should be looking out for seniors. Once again, they have an opportunity to reach out to voters that would appreciate the information. Instead, they will probably squabble among themselves and miss the opportunity to reach out to a group that generally shows up to vote.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on BLOGGYWOCKY and commented:
And yet another example of the Republicans wanting to throw the vulnerable under the bus.
If you are poor, sick, a kid (especially a kid who needs special education), elderly, etc., too bad for you. They don’t want to help you.
They only want to help themselves and their wealthy donors.
LikeLike
To Chiara, 5/19 @ 12:43 PM: Yes, Chiara, that’s what ALEC-bought legislators do all day. Bought & paid for by the Waltons & their ilk on the American Legislative “exchange” Council (I put “Exchange” in quotes because that’s a euphemism for the money put forth to buy these legislators to make laws that will KILL “the great American” public education,
mu$cle in their charters & completely dumb-down, autocratize (e.g., Success Academy) education, test the kids almost to death (don’t want to kill them), & make “other people’s children” into obedient, below-minimum-wage-no-benefits-ever Walmart workers.
ALEC…going strong & killing our democracy since 1973.
On both sides of the aisle.
RESIST!
LikeLike