Alan Singer writes here about the resistance to the DeVos-Trump miseducation agenda, which has no core idea other than to replace public schools with charters and vouchers.
If you see the photograph that accompanies his article, you will recognize the DeVos smirk. It is the smirk of an entitled billionaire who knows what is best for you and everyone else, and who takes instruction from no one.
The article focuses on the Network for Public Education’s “Toolkit,” an assembly of brief answers to thorny questions like, “Are charter schools truly public schools?”
It also contains an interactive state-by-state map that will be updated to show which states support their public schools and which have succumbed to various privatization schemes.
Here is the answer to the question above:
Are charter schools truly public schools? Charter schools are contractors that receive taxpayer money to operate privately controlled schools that do not have the same rules and responsibilities as public schools. Investigations of charter school operations in Florida, Michigan, Ohio, North Carolina, and elsewhere have found numerous cases where charters used taxpayer money to procure school buildings, supplies, and equipment that they retained ownership of, even if the school closed. In most states, charter schools are exempt from most state and local laws, rules, regulations, and policies governing public and private schools, including those related to personnel and students. Calling charter schools “public schools” because they receive public tax dollars is like calling defense contractors public companies. There are so many substantive differences between charter schools and traditional public schools that charters can’t be defined as public schools. Our communities deserve a school system that is truly public and democratically governed by the community they serve.
The Toolkit has footnotes for each response.
To defend your public schools, you must be informed and active. The Toolkit is a great resource to help you.

Dear Diane Ravitch, I’ve read your ‘blog’ – almost daily- for 2 yrs. or more. I’m 86, with 2 grown sons… and no children in ‘public schools’ … My ‘mission’ in life (at this late stage) is to save our Public Schools. Public Education is the backbone of Democracy … and we are losing our democracy at a growing pace – while the corporations (charter schools) scoop up the school buildings and public money … to underpin their pursuit of total control…. (can it get worse? Ask A. Huxley?)
So, why write this letter? In all your blogs, I have never, NEVER read an account, a report or any comparison of the *curriculum of Charters to those of Public Schools.* How do your readers know if Charter Schools – teach: 2 yrs. of Algebra, 2 yrs. of Geometry and 1 yr. of Trigonometry… What about 2 yrs. of Latin or 2 yrs. of a foreign language (french or Spanish) How much grammar,composition, reading & writing is taught in ‘English’ Class? How about Shakespeare? in the past, no child graduated from High School without one or 2 plays (usually Macbeth or Julius Caesar, as well as an introduction to Biology and Physics …etc) Well, not a word about what they study and learn in school… Why is that so? Why is a comparison of curriculums left out?
From your comments and the reports you publish – it is clear that you are determined to save Public Education, and I thank Heaven for that. In fact, you are blessed with a mission – to save Democracy by saving public education…
I thank you for an explanation why the curriculum of public and charter schools never mentioned and comparisons are never made.
Jenefer Ellingston, Green Party 641 Md. Ave. NE Wash. DC 20002
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Diane Ravitch’s blog wrote:
> dianeravitch posted: “Alan Singer writes here about the resistance to the > DeVos-Trump miseducation agenda, which has no core idea other than to > replace public schools with charters and vouchers. If you see the > photograph that accompanies his article, you will recognize the ” >
LikeLike
To jellingston:
1) Should you have time to compare and contrast THE METHOD of how to build the foundation of your HOME (=national security, or the educational curriculum in your case) from:
a) The certified professional educator, or?
b) The corrupt hedge fund manager, PRIVATE, foreign corporate?
2)Should you educate and cultivate people/citizenry the danger of PRIVATIZATION that invades and steals tax payers’ fund?
IMHO, Dr. Ravitch has offered her wisdom and experiences to all educators, parents and students in America. I hope that you should look into what you are concerned about. Please inform us what you know about regarding the different of the curriculum between two best and two worst SPECIFIC private charter school and public school locations. Thank you for your contribution in advance. Back2basic.
LikeLike
Diane, I think I see an overlooked problem. If a school district gets rent from a charter school because they are on the district’s property, the district fights to help them keep their charter. If the school is separate and independent, they do everything in their power to stop a renewal of that charter. It makes it look like our public schools are involved just for the money. What to do about that?
LikeLike
In NYC, charters are co-located, meaning they get free public space, no rent.
Public schools should not defend or fund their competition.
LikeLike
Right on, Diane.
LikeLike