A few days ago, I posted about a proposal by powerful Republicans to “reform” public education with a grab-bag of failed policies that punish public schools and demoralize teachers while creating a flow of public dollars to the private sector.
In this article, the brilliant and persistent Sara Stevenson explains the details of the proposal. Stevenson, a member of the blog’s honor roll, is a librarian at O. Henry Middle School in Austin. She has had more letters published in the Wall Street Journal than anyone I know. She believes in setting the record straight, and she believes in public education. That’s why this destructive proposal made her blood boil.
The bill could well have been written in ALEC’s corporate offices. It has everything on the corporate free-market wish list.
Stevenson writes:
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and Senate Education Committee Chairman Larry
Taylor, R-Friendswood, delivered the terrible news last week: The
Senate education plan contains no financial help for school districts,
600 of which are already suing the state for inadequate and
inequitable funding. It offers no testing relief for students in
grades 3 through 8 who must sit for up to four hours at a stretch
taking multiple standardized tests.
Furthermore, their proposals are
merely warmed up, stale leftovers written by the American Legislative
Exchange Council, a corporation-funded group that emphasizes free
markets and limited government. Here’s a sample serving:
Giving letter grades (A-F) to individual public schools.
A “parent trigger” law, which allows the majority of parents at
individual failing schools to petition for new management.
Removing limits on full-time virtual schools and online courses.
Tying teacher performance to compensation.
Creating a “college and career readiness” course for Texas middle
school students.
Creation of a statewide district to manage failing schools.
The most dispiriting part of this education plan is that it proposes
absolutely nothing that will help educators with the serious charge of
preparing our young citizens for their adult lives. Our schools are
terribly underfunded. After the Texas Legislature cut $5.4 billion in
education dollars in 2011, Texas ranked 49th among the fifty states in
per pupil spending. Today we are spending less money per student than
we did ten years ago. How can the Legislature’s continued starving of
school districts help us with the very real challenges we face?
Less state funding for schools translates into larger class sizes,
fewer teaching assistants and painful cuts to electives, arts, PE,
libraries and clinics. Texas educators are willing to work hard in
daunting circumstances, but the more our legislators insult us with
unoriginal, ineffective schemes as they deprive us of necessary
resources, the more those of us with choices will flee our beloved
profession. The best teachers will refuse to work in an environment in
which they cannot be successful. I give this lazy, irresponsible
education plan a big, fat zero.”
Never mind that not one of these proposals is new or that not one of them has been successful anywhere.
Ideologues don’t care about evidence. The goal is to dismantle public education, a fundamental, essential institution of our democracy. In doing so, they override local control and funnel taxpayers’ dollars to entrepreneurs and religious institutions. There is not a shred of evidence that any of their proposals will improve education.
These men are not conservatives. Conservatives conserve. Conservatives don’t blow up community institutions. These men are radicals and anarchists, destroying heedlessly, mindlessly, zealously, without regard for the damage they do to the lives of children, families, educators, and communities.

The middle class has been hollowed out and struggling as it is. With a much greater percentage of the nation’s income and wealth concentrated in few hands there isn’t the broadband support to adequately raise taxes to fund public education properly. The wealthy understand that an increase in support will require higher taxation on them and they are using whatever distraction (“reform”) they can to prevent that. Same problem with infrastructure.
LikeLike
Those pushing these reforms are most definitely not ‘conservatives’. Rather, they’re neoliberals (or unwittingly following their playbook):
“Neoliberals, first, are not conservatives. They are not libertarians. And they don’t believe in laissez-faire. I can’t believe the amount of confusion that there is in the media—and among reasonably intelligent political people, too. They don’t understand this.
Neoliberals believe in a strong state. They need a strong state to impose the kind of market society that they think should exist. And their key doctrine—this is the part that I think is hardest to understand—is that the market mainly exists as an information processor more powerful than any human being. They mean it knows more than any human being ever could; they structure their politics around that.
That’s the first interesting thing about it. It’s really about knowledge. It’s not just about the economy in some narrow sense; it’s not just about power. It’s also about what we can know and can’t know…
Neoliberalism is not just a political philosophy, it’s also a philosophy of the self, and this is the part that percolates down to everyday life. Basically, since there’s no unique self, everything about me or my self can be outsourced or invested in. I have no class identity; everything is fair game to be erased, changed, and altered.
And by the way, that includes education. Education is not about finding ourselves, it’s not about becoming a solid citizen; it’s about investing in human capital for future payoff. One of the main figures of the neoclassical thought collective is Gary Becker, who invented a lot of this ‘human capital’ talk. And when it comes to failure, all failures are personal failures due to making bad choices or not undertaking risk.”
Mirowski’s analysis is certainly susceptible to criticism on the grounds that pure ideological unity is rare among the neoliberal elite, but the broader picture he paints above is largely accurate. They simply do not value community schools.
LikeLike
Neoliberalism cuts across the alleged conservative/liberal divide. Reagan and Thatcher, along with their godfather Milton Friedman, were among the earliest proponents of neoliberalism. Since then (and even before then, really), both parties have been active advocates of it. The Republicans’ job is to push the envelope and be the “extremists”. The Democrats’ job is to pretend to reel in the abuses while actually codifying the worst of it and setting precedents for what is considered “normal”. Then when people settle down and accept the new “normal”, it’s time for the Republicans to come back into office and push the envelope again.
LikeLike
I wrote this when mr. patrick proposed his A-F grading system.
https://davidrtayloreducation.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/the-scarlet-letter-again/
LikeLike
Let’s start calling the “reformers” by their true actions and motives: the Destroyers.
LikeLike
There is a clear need to reach voters who keep electing people who seek publicity as bashers of teachers, knowing that a majority of teachers are women, and that teachers worth their salt (and salary), and whether men or women, are called upon to protect children and teens from abuses of power.
“Bashers” is a term I picked up in Austrialia–billboards there called for wife and child bashers to be reported.
The press sleeps, allowing the teacher and child bashing to be part of a civil rights campaign. Bizarre, an ugly example of the double-speak of this era.
LikeLike
David,
I read your blog and tweeted it! Excellent! More Texans need to speak out! Thank you.
LikeLike
If this country is so darn wealthy, how come there seems to be less and less money available for the public good? Story after story talks about austerity budgets cutting public services. Sadly, it is true that the average taxpayer probably has less disposable income than he/she had twenty years ago. If we are so darn rich, where is it? If those greedy unions are responsible for all of society’s ills, are they sitting on billions in hidden assets? Are unions impoverishing the American public? It’s time for those who call themselves American to step up and act like it. Too many seem to have taken a belief in the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to be an individual entitlement independent of a commitment to the creation of a just society.
LikeLike
The article is behind a paywall. >
LikeLike
At least when I read this I know the Hoosier State is not the only one run by “the destroyers.” (We already have A-F grades)
LikeLike